YouTube launches U.S. trial of AI system to detect underage users
The pilot, initially affecting only a small portion of U.S. users, could expand nationwide if the technology proves as accurate domestically as in other countries. The system will operate only for users signed into their accounts and will assess age regardless of the birth date entered during registration.
If flagged as under 18, a viewer will be subject to the same restrictions YouTube already applies to minors. These include content limitations, privacy warnings, reminders to take breaks, and limits on video recommendations. The platform also blocks personalized ads for users under 18.
Viewers incorrectly flagged as minors can verify their age by submitting a government-issued ID, a credit card, or a selfie.
"YouTube was one of the first platforms to offer experiences designed specifically for young people, and we're proud to again be at the forefront of introducing technology that allows us to deliver safety protections while preserving teen privacy," James Beser, YouTube's director of product management, wrote in a blog post.
Users can still watch videos without logging in, but some content will be automatically restricted unless they provide proof of age.
The move comes amid increased political pressure for online platforms to better protect children from inappropriate content. That pressure intensified in late June when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Texas law aimed at preventing minors from viewing pornography online.
While platforms like YouTube have begun tightening age checks, some companies argue that the responsibility should lie with major app store operators Apple and Google—an approach that both have resisted.
The new system also raises concerns among privacy and free speech advocates. Groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Center for Democracy & Technology warn that mandatory age verification could intrude on personal privacy and infringe on First Amendment rights.
YouTube, which Google has owned for nearly two decades, says the AI-based system is designed to balance youth safety with privacy protections while limiting the need for intrusive personal data collection.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
The dangers of Canada leaving its digital sovereignty in American hands
Canadians are waking up to just how much power American tech companies have over their digital life. In April, Microsoft confirmed that U.S. law can override foreign privacy protections, even for data stored on servers outside the United States. That means if Canadian data is hosted by Microsoft, Amazon or Google, it can be accessed by U.S. authorities. For Guillaume Beaumier, an assistant professor of political science and international studies at École nationale d'administration publique (ENAP) in Quebec City, it's a clear sign Canada needs to take digital sovereignty seriously. In a recent Policy Options article, he argues that Canada has grown too dependent on U.S. cloud providers and tech infrastructure, and risks losing control over its economy, governance and security in the digital era. National Post spoke to Beaumier about what digital sovereignty means and what steps Canada should be taking now. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and length. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. I think you can define digital sovereignty in multiple ways, and that's the issue with the concept. It can relate to the ability of the Canadian government to control its own digital ecosystem through regulation, and having the availability to force or influence companies to act in certain ways. It's also, to some extent, the ability to have the economic independence to be able to produce digital services for Canadian citizens, in ways that are not dependent on having access to services coming from other places in the world. It can also relate more broadly to the security of the nation. If you're depending on other countries for accessing specific digital services, in times of crisis, you can end up in a position where you don't have access to the services, and so the broader security of the country also depends on having the ability to produce the services on your own. For a very long time the United States has been using its control over the digital infrastructure around the world, so a lot of the digital services that we rely on are American companies and they also rely on physical infrastructures that are located in the United States. You can think of data centres in that regard. And so, for a very long time, we were fine with it, we forgot that other countries like Russia or China, might have used this control over this digital ecosystem to its advantage, to survey the world, to sometimes even impede other countries. You can see again what happened after the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, where Microsoft stopped offering some of its services in Russia. And so, like I said, for a while most countries around the world would have been fine with that, especially western countries because we were allied countries with the United States, even sometimes collaborating with them. But as the (Donald) Trump administration came in and took a more coercive approach towards its traditional allies, it's also making these countries more insecure about their dependence on the United States. I think that we do lack, to a large extent, sufficient capacity to operate on our own, to have a digital ecosystem that can function without American companies. And so, if you think about our digital ecosystem, most social media platforms, if not all, are American companies. If you think about data centres, the main ones that are operating right now and that we rely on, are either in the United States or are owned by American companies on Canadian soil. On the regulatory side, we have also seen the government struggling over the years, to enforce its own regulations, or to even want to regulate these platforms. So we threaten these companies, Google and Meta, to basically leave the country. More recently, the government decided to move back on this decision to impose digital services taxes, and it's an example of where the Canadian government seems to be struggling, because it relies primarily on American companies. So to summarize what I just said, I think just this lack of the ability to offer basic digital services by Canadian companies is one of the big gaps right now. In times of crisis, they can be used as leverage against the Canadian government, so like during this trade negotiation, they can threaten to stop offering some services to Canada. There's also the risk that when the government tries to regulate these companies, they can just threaten to exit the country. You can see in the example of Meta blocking news because of being asked to share the revenue with news organizations. This has left our media ecosystem in a worse-off position. And in times where there are forest fires or other emergencies, information can be more difficult to access by citizens. I think there should be a strategy to invest and develop more national digital ecosystems, to reduce the reliance on American companies. It also should not shy away from regulating these big tech companies and level the playing field for Canadian companies. Basically, making sure they are being taxed, and that they contribute to the national economy. Also, promoting the use of more open source software, in public administration and the digital ecosystem, could help reduce reliance on big tech companies, and prioritize the development of more digital expertise in Canada. When you're thinking of all the big projects the government wants to launch, like big national infrastructure projects, I think it would be a good moment to invest in having more data centres owned by Canadian companies, funded by the government. With the new investments coming in the defence sector, some money could go towards the development of artificial intelligence (AI). I think this broad national plan to invest in Canadian digital capacities would be an essential thing to do in the years to come. I think we just need to find a balance between still being open, we still want to rely on the valuable services that come from the United States, and elsewhere in the world, but to ensure our resilience in times of crisis, and have some basic capacities to function without the use of these services coming from the rest of the world. This is the latest in a National Post series on How Canada Wins. Read earlier instalments here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Edmonton Journal
2 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
The dangers of Canada leaving its digital sovereignty in American hands
Article content What are some of the biggest gaps in Canada's digital sovereignty? Article content I think that we do lack, to a large extent, sufficient capacity to operate on our own, to have a digital ecosystem that can function without American companies. And so, if you think about our digital ecosystem, most social media platforms, if not all, are American companies. If you think about data centres, the main ones that are operating right now and that we rely on, are either in the United States or are owned by American companies on Canadian soil. Article content On the regulatory side, we have also seen the government struggling over the years, to enforce its own regulations, or to even want to regulate these platforms. So we threaten these companies, Google and Meta, to basically leave the country. Article content More recently, the government decided to move back on this decision to impose digital services taxes, and it's an example of where the Canadian government seems to be struggling, because it relies primarily on American companies. Article content Article content So to summarize what I just said, I think just this lack of the ability to offer basic digital services by Canadian companies is one of the big gaps right now. Article content What risks could Canada face if it continues to rely heavily on U.S.-based cloud providers and tech companies? Article content In times of crisis, they can be used as leverage against the Canadian government, so like during this trade negotiation, they can threaten to stop offering some services to Canada. There's also the risk that when the government tries to regulate these companies, they can just threaten to exit the country. Article content Article content What do you suggest Canada should do? Article content I think there should be a strategy to invest and develop more national digital ecosystems, to reduce the reliance on American companies. It also should not shy away from regulating these big tech companies and level the playing field for Canadian companies. Basically, making sure they are being taxed, and that they contribute to the national economy. Article content Also, promoting the use of more open source software, in public administration and the digital ecosystem, could help reduce reliance on big tech companies, and prioritize the development of more digital expertise in Canada. Article content When you're thinking of all the big projects the government wants to launch, like big national infrastructure projects, I think it would be a good moment to invest in having more data centres owned by Canadian companies, funded by the government.
Globe and Mail
14 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
GAMB Reports Earnings
Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) reported second quarter 2025 results on August 14, 2025, with revenue rising 30% year over year to $39.6 million and adjusted EBITDA increasing 22% year over year to $13.7 million, setting new Q2 records. The company updated full-year guidance to $171 million-$175 million in revenue and $62 million-$64 million in adjusted EBITDA, incorporating contributions from the pending acquisition and the scaling of sports data services for fiscal 2025 (period ending Dec. 31, 2025), while managing the impacts of recent Google search algorithm updates. Adjusted EBITDA climbs 22% as Group diversifies revenue Sports data services revenue quadrupled to $10 million, while high-margin subscription revenue accounted for 25% of total revenue, compared to a historical marketing focus on SEO-led affiliate traffic. Recurring revenue, including revenue share arrangements in the marketing business, reached 51% of total revenue, supported by recent acquisitions and broadening go-to-market channels. "We generated record second quarter revenue and adjusted EBITDA, with revenue rising 30% and adjusted EBITDA increasing 22% year over year. Our marketing business generated all-time highs for second quarter revenue, and the growth in our sports data business accelerated to where its highly visible and high-margin recurring subscription revenue accounted for 25% of total revenue despite the second quarter being the seasonally slowest quarter. These results provide clear evidence that even while we continue to deliver high growth, quarter after quarter, we are also rapidly diversifying our business to include a broader suite of products which serve a much larger addressable market." -- Charles Gillespie, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer Sports data segment accelerates, with Opticogs leading Group growth Opticogs grew 120% year over year, underpinning the sports data services business, which now delivers $10 million in revenue amid broader client demand than previously anticipated. Management noted strategy revisions in light of a larger-than-expected total addressable market (TAM), expanding beyond traditional operators to include platforms, professional bettors, and media companies. "Turning to another key component of our diversification, growth in our Sports Data Services business accelerated in Q2 with Opticogs leading the way with 120% year-on-year growth. Given the momentum this business is already achieving to date and our realization that the TAM for this business may be bigger than originally expected due to the wide variety of clients interested in the data, we continue to revise up our long-term growth expectations." -- Charles Gillespie, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer Opticogs' strong growth and the expansion of sports data services have resulted in substantial high-margin recurring subscription revenue and enable Group to leverage its intellectual property and content into repeatable, scalable enterprise revenues. Group pivots rapidly to omnichannel and non-SEO marketing Non-search channels such as apps, email, social media, and paid media are now growing by orders of magnitude, shifting the revenue mix and prompting acceleration of investment away from reliance on legacy search. Management emphasizes faster, shorter-cycle ROI from omnichannel marketing, and a proactive approach to adapting resource allocation. "While the development of these other marketing channels like apps, email, social media, and paid media is still relatively early, the contributions are growing rapidly, to the point that they are now more evident in our results. We are measuring the growth in these non-search channels in terms of orders of magnitude, not incremental percentages. Generally speaking, these channels have shorter investment cycles, while still offering attractive ROI. Having said all of this, the search marketing channel continues to drive significant revenue and cash flow for both Google and publishers. While we expect the channel's relative proportion to other digital channels to fall, we also expect it to intertwine with next-generation AI tools." -- Charles Gillespie, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer The company's rapid diversification of marketing channels and investment in non-search channels aims to support growth and reduce reliance on traditional search, while reducing dependence on external search ecosystem risks. Looking ahead Management guides to $171 million-$175 million in fiscal 2025 revenue (midpoint 36% year-over-year growth) and $62 million-$64 million adjusted EBITDA (midpoint 29% year-over-year growth), both on a non-IFRS basis, factoring in four months' contribution from and new sports betting legalization in Missouri for fiscal 2025, but with no expected adjusted EBITDA benefit from until 2026. For 2026, is expected to add at least $8 million net revenue and $1.4 million incremental adjusted EBITDA. The company reaffirms double-digit free cash flow yield expectations for the second half of 2025, and has expanded its share buyback authorization to $20 million as of August 14, 2025, with none utilized to date. Where to invest $1,000 right now When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025
