Next generation of industry talent 'won't put up with inaction on DEI'
Speaking at the ITT conference on Tuesday (3 June), easyJet holidays chief executive Garry Wilson and Tui marketing and sales director Bart Quinton Smith agreed travel's talent pipeline was dependent on firms embedding DEI, sustainability and other responsible tourism practices in their operations.
Conference moderator Ayesha Hazarika asked Wilson if it was something potential employees were bringing up, whereby he revealed all easyJet holidays employees have their own sustainability objectives. "They just wouldn't join otherwise," he told delegates. "It's no longer an aside. It has to be in everyone's DNA – it's integral to how we operate."
Wilson said "the big kicker" for new entrants was understanding the social impact travel can have on people and communities. "That's really important to the people we've got coming through," he explained. "They want to know what they're doing is for good, that what they're doing is creating a legacy."
Hazarika said besides transforming geopolitics, Donald Trump was shaping business culture with his pushback against ESG and DEI, and asked Wilson for his outlook. "We actually talked about this last week," he said. "And with the DEI agenda, we will absolutely be doubling down on it. We will ensure we don't take our foot off the pedal."
Wilson warned prospective employees wouldn't tolerate inaction or tokenism. "The new generation that's coming through, they just will not put up with it," he said. "And that's something I get value and strength from in easyJet holidays. It gives me a lot of hope that we will go in the right direction."
Aviation, he added, also has work to do to remedy the gender and social splits within the sector, which will require "a lot of investment right down to grassroots level. "It's extraordinarily important. And it's not something we'll address in the next two or three years. It's a generational thing."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Prada acquires 10% stake in Italian leather group Rino Mastrotto
MILAN, June 5 (Reuters) - Prada (1913.F), opens new tab said on Thursday it acquired a 10% stake in Italian leather group Rino Mastrotto, as the luxury group aims to tighten its grip over the production process. Under the deal, Prada will confer to Rino Mastrotto two tanneries - Italy's Conceria Superior and France's Tannerie Limoges - and said it will make a cash investment, without specifying the figure. "Investing in Rino Mastrotto allows our group to strengthen its control over a highly strategic phase of the production process", Prada's Chairman Patrizio Bertelli said in a statement. Rino Mastrotto, backed by private equity firm Renaissance Partners, produces leather for the luxury, automotive and interior design sectors.
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
I live in a UK beauty spot threatened by Labour's planning bill. It could become a disaster zone
The UK needs houses. The UK needs open spaces, and wilderness. The Labour government's Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which cleared its second reading in the House of Commons with a majority of 256 votes, is only interested in the former. At the end of 2024, Keir Starmer declared that homes must have a higher priority than nature and the environment, as ministers outlined reforms that could allow more building on England's green belt. Housing minister Angela Rayner backed him, asserting that 'we can't have a situation where a newt is more protected than people who desperately need housing'. The populist punditry that would once have been anathema to leaders and politicians in general is designed to detract from the dire consequences if the bill is passed. Lawyers, environmental charities – including the RSPB and Wildlife Trusts – and activists have assessed that more than 5,000 of England's most vulnerable protected natural habitats are at risk of being destroyed by development thanks to Labour's new planning bill, which has been dubbed a 'licence to kill'. These would include many of the UK's favourite holiday destinations, such as areas that fall under designations like Sites of Special Scientific Interest, the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, Special Protection Areas, Special Areas of Conservation, and much-loved nature-rich parts of National Parks and National Landscapes (formerly AONBs), like the New Forest and the Forest of Bowland. As I live in the Forest of Bowland, I have a stake in this debate. I live in a ribbon of farmland that lies between the Forest of Bowland proper and Pendle Hill, which is part of the same protected National Landscape. South of here is East Lancashire, one of the most densely populated parts of the UK. For residents of Burnley, Blackburn and Accrington, Bowland is the second nearest large green space, after the West Pennine Moors. But Bowland is different. As the 'Forest' in its name suggests it is a former hunting chase, and while there are some pockets of grouse moor management that still rile most ordinary residents and visitors, swathes of the park are open country, ideal for hiking, cycling and family picnics. For decades, access was complicated here, with grouse butts and private lands blocking walkers. Just two decades ago, much of Bowland was opened up to walkers for the first time when the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 gave general right of access to the public to 'access land' for the purposes of open-air recreation on foot. People can walk, run and – where permitted – ride bikes wherever there are paths. To be candid, Bowland doesn't have Instagram-friendly summits to bag or famous poets' houses to swoon over. It doesn't attract countless car-tourers or caravan-users. It is absolutely nothing like the Lake District or nearby Yorkshire Dales. Many of its upland areas are boggy and only the very well-acquainted would want to negotiate the steep-sided valleys or gully-riven, heather-clad slopes. But the relatively low visitor numbers are great for nature. A sizeable central section of the 300-square-mile National Landscape is designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest because of the habitats it helps to protect and its internationally important bird populations. One of these is the merlin, the UK's smallest bird of prey (it's only about the size of a thrush). On my last visit I saw one at a distance, seated – ironically – on a grouse butt. During the same half-day visit I also spotted meadow pipits, curlews, skylarks, a stonechat, a greylag goose, and nesting peregrines. The most surprising sighting was a couple of ring ouzels – a red-listed species (that is, 'of high conservation concern') and members of the thrush family that dwells on the uplands. The absolute high point was the bird for which Bowland had become famous: the hen harrier. At first I saw males and females skimming across the top of the heather. This was satisfying enough; hen harriers are among the most persecuted birds in the country. Then I was treated to a sky dance, which is when a male hen harrier performs extraordinary aerial stunts to show off to females, to warn off rival males, or – perhaps – just for fun. The one I saw did Red Arrows-style vertical leaps, back flips, twists and turns, against a clear blue sky. It was one of those moments in nature, all of five minutes, that felt life-enhancing and deeply moving. Does any of this matter as much as the desperate housing situation? Is wildlife really as important as new estates? Is it not time rural England accepted that cities can't accommodate all the new houses and flats? Would Bowland not in fact benefit from development? Am I trying to promote tourism and leisure – arguably luxuries for only some members of society – and ignoring the needs of millions of people? The honest answers to all these questions is clear to anyone who lives in places like the Forest of Bowland. The UK is one of the most nature-depleted nations on earth. How often do we hear now the distressing news that butterflies are disappearing, that once familiar birds have become near-extinct, that hedgehogs are on the same path already taken by red squirrels? Even my greenish patch within the greater Bowland area is, frankly, a classic farm-ageddon of dry-stone wall-to-wall sheep fields, with very limited birdlife and a worrying lack of insect life. The flora that lies outside the sheep-mowed areas is not particularly diverse. The trees are, as often as not, plantations of conifers. This is precisely why we need to protect, at all costs, those areas where species thrive or, at least, have a chance to revive. Bowland is the last place to reimagine how England should reside in the coming decades. As well as being an important, if imperfect, space for nature – as outlined above – it has risible road connections, no railways passing through it, and only a couple of bus services that run infrequently and never after dark. The whole area is poorly supplied with the essential, basic amenities communities need to thrive, from schools and hospitals to theatres and cinemas to local shops and places to eat and drink. Dropping blocks of beige housing – this area seems to specialise in hideous and overpriced executive homes – would at best attract some retirees. Alternatively, if truly affordable housing were built in any useful quantities, the Government would have to seriously consider a new town project of some kind. The nearest urban areas – Preston, Blackburn, Lancaster – currently have deep-set housing, social and transport problems of their own. They all take forever to reach on the winding country lanes that link, eventually, to the jammed and dangerous A59 – the one major trunk road that tears through the Ribble Valley in a blaze of boy-racers, trundling tractors and pelotons of unhappy cyclists. Try this experiment in any of the 5,000-plus precious areas and the results will be the same. The tourism and leisure, exercise and inspiration that ordinary people get from being close to birdsong and surrounded by unsullied, unpeopled emptiness will be sacrificed to cover up the deep tragedy of 40 years (and counting) or poor planning by all shades of government, national and local. Much of British wildlife is threatened. Nightingales, badgers, dormice, otters, butterflies, dragonflies, kingfishers, tufted ducks and egrets are just some of the beautiful creatures that the extant, already damaged natural areas help to conserve. If we wipe these out, and destroy the places they inhabit, what is there for people to do, to see, to admire? The wealthy will go overseas, adding air miles. The rest of us will have nowhere to stretch our legs or lungs. Bowland is no paradise, no idyll. But Labour's short-sighted and unscientific scheme to fill the hills and vales with houses, in the face of criticism from experts from many camps, will turn it into a disaster zone.
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Merz plans to avoid an Oval Office pasting
No other European leader has criticised Donald Trump as fiercely as Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor. On Thursday, the two will come face to face in Washington in what is the biggest test of Mr Merz's tenure so far. It means entering the gladiatorial arena of the Oval Office and enduring the impromptu press conferences now dreaded by visiting leaders the world over. Mr Trump has already ambushed Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa and Jordan's King Abdullah II in front of the cameras. But Mr Merz is no pushover. 'When he comes into the room, everyone goes quiet, like when the schoolteacher comes in,' a source from his centre-Right Christian Democrats (CDU) said. 'And he can be really tough on people, to the point of being rude.' Leaders in Europe will be hoping that Mr Merz will be able to soften Mr Trump's stance on Ukraine and convince the president to drop 50 per cent tariffs on EU imports. And Mr Merz has been doing his homework before his daunting date at the White House. He has sought advice from Giorgia Meloni, Italy's prime minister who is admired by Mr Trump, and Alexander Stubb, Finland's president, who scored a diplomatic coup by playing an impromptu round of golf with the US leader. Mr Merz, a former BlackRock banking executive, will look to bond with Mr Trump, rather than directly confront him. He has been advised to let the president do most of the talking and if he must commit the sin of interrupting, to soften that with praise. But like Canada's Mark Carney, who survived his Oval Office visit unscathed, Mr Merz is not afraid of confronting the world's most powerful man. The bespectacled old school conservative rounded on Mr Trump on the night of his election victory in February. Mr Merz was incensed that JD Vance and Elon Musk had endorsed and promoted the far-Right Alternative For Germany (AfD) during the campaign. He declared that the Trump administration was meddling in Germany's democracy after the AfD came second in its best-ever election result. Mr Merz added that Berlin and Europe could no longer rely on the US for its security and warned that Nato could soon be 'dead'. It felt like the end of the international order created from the ruins of the Second World War. The two leaders have since spoken on the phone during which the chancellor told the president the US remained Germany's 'indispensable partner'. But the truce did not last long. Asked about the call at a conference later, Mr Merz mimicked Mr Trump's voice, to laughs from the audience, and said every second or third word the president said was 'great'. Days later, when Germany's domestic intelligence agency designated the AfD as a 'Right-wing extremist' group, Mr Vance, the Oval Office attack dog, went for the jugular. 'The West tore down the Berlin Wall together. And it has been rebuilt – not by the Soviets or the Russians, but by the German establishment,' the vice-president said. These were 'absurd accusations', replied Mr Merz. 'I did not interfere in the American election campaign,' the chancellor said before telling the US government to 'largely stay out' of German politics. The two leaders' differences over Ukraine have narrowed recently but Mr Trump has a problem with Germany. His dislike of Angela Merkel, the former chancellor, was evident and he had little to no time for Olaf Scholz, her successor. For the tariff-wielding president, Berlin has too long profited from a massive trade surplus with the US, spending the money on woolly social policies while freeloading on America's defence of Europe. To make matters worse, it is deeply committed to the EU, which the president says was set up just to 'screw' the US. Germany, a faltering exporting powerhouse, now faces the prospect of massive 50 per cent US tariffs on the EU imports. The AfD wants Germany to strike its own tariff deal with Washington, but Mr Merz has ruled out breaking ranks with the EU. 'Together, we are even bigger than the US,' he said in May. ' We are united, to a large extent anyway, and that will be my message to the American government.' CDU sources said Mr Merz was optimistic about the relationship, and that they did not need a 'reset' with the US. Mr Merz and Mr Trump share a background in the macho corporate world and are of a similar age. The chancellor has two private jets, while the president has his own Boeing 757, nicknamed Trump Force One. Mr Merz is a family man with two daughters: Constanze, a doctor, and Carola, a lawyer – more potential common ground with Mr Trump, who has five children. They also share a love of golf, although Mr Ramaphosa, the South African president, was not spared false accusations of white farmer genocide even though he brought golf legend Ernie Els with him to Washington. And King Abdullah II won't forget being told to take in displaced Gazans under Mr Trump's 'Middle East Riviera' plan. But Mr Merz shares a populist streak with Mr Trump. Soon after taking office, Mr Trump declared a national emergency over immigration. Mr Merz did exactly the same thing. Mr Merz is also no fan of Mrs Merkel, who sidelined him from the CDU during her 16 years in power. The chancellor's vow to make Germany's army Europe's strongest may convince the president the two can do business. Günter Krings, a senior CDU MP, said: 'Given his business background, his self-confident appearance and his focus on Germany's role in the world, there is a very good chance Trump will see him as his main European counterpart in the coming years.' German political analysts said Mr Merz would show 'respect' to Mr Trump, but expect the same in return. 'I suspect that Trump will give Merz a chance. He's got a decent story to tell on promised defence spending increases,' a European diplomatic source in Washington said. 'The real risk is Vance in the Oval Office on freedom of speech – particularly the new laws in Germany banning extremism which Vance has seen as an attack on the AfD and anti-democratic.' 'The Americans know that the fight for freedom of expression and sovereignty is being waged everywhere,' an AfD source told The Telegraph. 'That's why they cannot look away when democracy is simply abolished in their most populous ally.' The AfD is now the main opposition and just a whisker behind the CDU in the polls. It will be watching on intently from Berlin as Mr Merz and Mr Trump meet in Washington, as will the world.
