logo
Economics or convenience: Debate simmers over opening day of Pa.'s rifle deer season

Economics or convenience: Debate simmers over opening day of Pa.'s rifle deer season

Yahoo24-02-2025
A white-tailed deer buck. (Pennsylvania Game Commission)
The first Monday after Thanksgiving for decades was treated as an unofficial holiday in Pennsylvania, as hunters took to the fields and woods for the first day of deer rifle season.
Schools would close and rural communities would see an influx of orange-clad men, women and children in their restaurants, convenience stores and other businesses in the weekend leading up to opening day.
But for the last six seasons, opening day has been held on a Saturday — a move that remains fiercely debated amongst the commonwealth's hunters.
'This is a decision that has undoubtedly sparked passionate debate, but it's also a decision that prioritizes participation, accessibility and the long term sustainability of hunting in the commonwealth,' said Steve Smith, executive director of the Pennsylvania Game Commission, during a meeting earlier this month of the House Game and Fisheries committee.
In 2019, the Pennsylvania Game Commission voted 5-3 to move the opening day to the first Saturday after Thanksgiving.
Smith said the tradition of the Monday opening day 'thrived' for years, but cited a decline in the number of hunters over decades as a reason to move the opening day. He said a 'lack of free time' was the biggest reason for the decline.
'In the years since then, younger hunters in particular have benefited from this change,' Smith said. He added that the move to a Saturday makes it easier for hunters to participate because they don't have to take paid leave for missing work on a Monday.
In 2021, a survey conducted on behalf of the Game Commission showed 60% of hunters supported starting the season on a Saturday, while 27% opposed, and 13% had no preference. Smith described the results as a significant shift compared to previous years' surveys, before the change was made.
'The Saturday opener is more than a scheduling change. It's a commitment to Pennsylvania's hunters, wildlife and the future of conservation,' he said.
But, not everyone on hand at the state House Game and Fisheries Committee hearing saw it that way. Some said they would like to return to a Monday start date.
Jim Daley, who served as a board member on the state Game Commission until 2019, said he suggested the change to Saturday, citing concerns about the decline in the number of hunters in Pennsylvania. But he noted that, during the 2019 public comment period, 82% of the 1,152 responses opposed the proposed change.
Following the move, Daley said there have been 'a lot of economic losses for rural and retail establishments,' citing the day being on the holiday weekend just after Thanksgiving. He said it disproportionately impacted older hunters and people who enjoy the Monday tradition.
Daley said the five commissioners who voted for the switch 'ignored' the concerns raised during the public comment period and it has had an 'adverse social and economic' impact. He also claimed the survey Smith cited disproportionately sampled hunters 45 and younger.
Randy Santucci, southwest regional director for the Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania, also told lawmakers he still doesn't like the move.
'How bad of an idea is it to put the most participated deer season opening day smack dab in the middle of the most traveled family holiday of the year?' Santucci asked.
Opponents, like Santucci, also read recent letters from members of chambers of commerce from across the state, highlighting claims that it has had a negative impact on rural businesses. According to one submitted by Julie Henry from the Wellsboro Area Chamber of Commerce, the change to a Saturday opening day has resulted in profits decreasing in excess of 65% for rural businesses.
Some lawmakers are moving to reinstate the traditional start date. House Bill 70, sponsored by state Rep. Brian Smith (R-Jefferson), would return the opening day to the Monday after Thanksgiving. State Sen. Lisa Boscola (D-Northampton) backs similar legislation in the Senate.
Rep. Smith said a majority of the fellow hunters he's come across want opening day to return to its traditional Monday slot, but added the impact goes deeper than just the sport.
'We're here to make decisions that affect everyone, and this decision affected everyone, not just hunters,' Rep. Smith said.
In his co-sponsorship memo, Rep. Smith said it 'is not an issue of wildlife management, it is purely cultural and economic, and thus the legislature must propose a permanent solution.'
The measure did not receive a vote in committee in the previous session and Rep. Smith said it's a matter of wait-and-see if it will receive a vote in the coming weeks and months.
State Rep. Eric Davanzo (R-Westmoreland) said he made peace with the Saturday move for the first two years, but noticed the woods were empty last year on opening day, while the community he was in held a parade.
'If we put this on a Saturday to prioritize participation, we picked the wrong Saturday,' Davanzo said. 'We picked the absolute worst day to do this.'
Davanzo also noted Penn State hosted a football game that day, which likely resulted in people choosing to attend the game instead of the start of the rifle deer season.
State Rep. Jim Haddock (D-Luzerne) described himself as a 'traditionalist,' who originally didn't like the move to Saturday, but said it has positively impacted hunting. He argues hunters were 'rejuvenated' as a result and thinks it works better for hunters who typically work on Mondays.
A spokesperson for the Game Commission told the Capital-Star a deer hunter survey is conducted once every three years to measure participation on opening day. In 2016, when it was on a Monday, 80% of all deer hunters reported hunting the opening day. Three years later, the first year opening day was held on a Saturday, 73% reported going out on the opening day. In 2022, that number jumped back up to 79%.
Mike Kriner, a lobbyist representing the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen and Conservationists, said his organization opposes the legislative effort to move opening day back to Monday. He said its members believe the Game Commission is best suited to make those decisions, not the General Assembly.
Kriner noted from 2013 through 2018, hunting license sales in Pennsylvania decreased by over 10%. Sales increased in the first year after the change to Saturday and remained flat afterwards. He noted that he was 'not directly attributing' the change alone to the issue.
In 2013-14, the Game Commission reported there were 953,027 general hunting licenses issued in the state. By 2018/19, that number dropped to 855,546 for that year. In 2023-24, the latest numbers available, the figure was at 853,440, per data submitted by the Game Commission.
The most recent annual financial report from the Game Commission shows revenues for the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2024 were $241,201,445, which was a 46.2% decrease from the prior year. Revenues from gas and oil lease royalties were down $220,949,115, which correlates with the worldwide decrease per unit of energy prices. Sales of adult nonresident hunting licenses were up $187,464 from the previous year, however revenue from adult resident hunting licenses fell $249,295 this year.
Every type of hunting licenses, contributed roughly 17% of the revenue in the fiscal year ending in June 30, 2024.
At the most recent Game Commission meeting, they voted to keep Saturday as the opening day of deer hunting season in Pennsylvania. They will meet in April for final approval.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House Backs Off 'Hostile Takeover' of D.C. Police
White House Backs Off 'Hostile Takeover' of D.C. Police

Time​ Magazine

time21 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

White House Backs Off 'Hostile Takeover' of D.C. Police

The White House has backed off plans for a full takeover of the D.C. police force and will allow for the city's police chief to remain in charge after a judge indicated they would block the move. President Donald Trump this week invoked emergency powers to take control of the D.C. police department and call in the National Guard to a city that he claimed is overrun by "bloodshed, bedlam and squalor"—a claim that is disputed by experts. Read More: Trump Paints a Picture of D.C. as a Crime-Ridden Hell-Hole. Here Are the Facts As part of the federal takeover, Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Drug and Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance C. Cole as 'Emergency Police Commissioner,' a move that would have given the White House extraordinary powers over policing. The city's Attorney General Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit calling for an emergency restraining order to block the move, accusing the Trump Administration of implementing a 'hostile takeover' of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) that would lead to 'imminent, irreparable harm'. 'In my nearly three decades in law enforcement, I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive,' Smith wrote in the lawsuit Judge Ana Reyes said in a Friday hearing that, according to the Home Rule Act, the Department of Justice needed to rewrite the section of the executive order that placed Cole in charge, and that he needed to go through the city's mayor. Reyes stopped short of issuing a restraining order, but indicated that if the DOJ did not rewrite the section, she would. Read More: Trump Took Over the D.C. Police. He Can't Do It In Other Cities, Legal Experts Say 'The statute [The Home Rule Act] would have no meaning at all if the president could just say 'we're taking over your police department,'' Reyes said. In a press conference after the hearing, Schwalb touted the result as a 'very important win for Home Rule today.' A new directive by Bondi following the lawsuit allowed for Chief Pamela Smith to remain in charge of the force, though the city will still be under the Administration's control, and orders will be sent through the city's Mayor Muriel Bowser. The Trump Administration will still essentially have control over the city, but Smith will maintain control of the day-to-day operations of the MPD. In Bondi's new directive, though, she also required MPD to comply with the Trump Administration's aggressive immigration tactics, rescinding two police practices that limited MPD's immigration enforcement—also known as 'sanctuary policies.' D.C's At-Large Councilmember Christina Henderson reacted on X that, 'Respectfully, the Attorney General does not have the authority to revoke laws.' In the first week alone of the Trump Administration's federal takeover, nearly 200 arrests have been reported in the city, including many undocumented immigrants, which has alarmed civil rights groups.

Elon Musk's DOGE threw government contracts into chaos. This startup is cashing in.
Elon Musk's DOGE threw government contracts into chaos. This startup is cashing in.

Business Insider

time2 days ago

  • Business Insider

Elon Musk's DOGE threw government contracts into chaos. This startup is cashing in.

From the moment he became de facto head of the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk seemed intent on carving up the federal bureaucracy like a Thanksgiving turkey. Thousands of federal employees were laid off, entire departments folded, and contracts worth billions of dollars were scrapped. That mayhem created a lucrative opening for one startup. In the first half of this year, Legalist, a San Francisco lender founded by one of tech billionaire Peter Thiel's fellows, extended more than $100 million to dozens of government contractors scrambling for cash. Founder Eva Shang says that's about twice what it deployed in the three years since launching its government business. The company has doubled its origination team to meet demand, Shang said, and closed $40 million from new investors in June to expand the strategy. Legalist is best known as a litigation funder. It uses algorithms to scan court dockets, backs cases it thinks are likely to win, and takes a cut of any settlement. In 2022, at the urging of an investor tied to a university endowment, it branched into "government receivables," providing upfront cash to contractors for goods or services they've already delivered but haven't yet been paid for. Legalist takes its cut when the government eventually settles up. That sideline became a profit center under the Trump administration, as contract terminations, stop-work orders, and spending freezes choked off cash for contractors. DOGE says it's canceled about $58 billion in contracts, while a recent Politico analysis said that number was inflated by "accounting tricks" and claims that couldn't be verified. The White House defended DOGE's math, but Politico said it could identify $1.4 billion in money that was actually clawed back from contractors through July. The White House did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Federal rules let contractors recover money when policy shifts derail their work — either by adjusting the contract if the pause drove up costs, or by settling up if the job is canceled. But in the meantime, those contractors have bills to pay, creating a billion-dollar opportunity for private credit lenders like Legalist and its largely regional competitors. (Shang says the company targets an interest rate of at least 12%, above the cost of capital at traditional banks.) Legalist now has over 50 borrowers. One is a privately held international developer that incurred nearly $200 million in debt for services already rendered after Trump's sweeping freeze on foreign aid payments. Another is a manufacturer of aerospace engine parts that contracts with both the Department of Defense and private-sector clients. In March, the Pentagon moved to slash over $580 million in programs, grants, and contracts. Where Musk's cost-cutting frenzy whipped the contracting world into a maelstrom, Legalist has ridden the wave to new heights. Call it a DOGE bump. Earlier this year, a group of foreign aid groups sued the Trump administration for refusing to spend billions of dollars that Congress had budgeted for federal grants and other programs. Federal judges then ruled to block parts of the funding freeze from taking effect. An appeals court has now allowed the freeze on foreign aid payments to stand, not because the withholding is lawful, but because the plaintiffs did not have the legal standing to sue. (The decision doesn't alter federal rules letting contractors recover their costs, says Brian Rice, general counsel of Legalist.) Shang says the ruling is unlikely to affect Legalist's pipeline. That's because the lawsuit pertains to federal grants and other programs, not the contracts that Legalist funds against. "Some of the grants that Trump canceled, he's well within his right to cancel," she said. The decision does, however, seep uncertainty into Legalist's world — a dynamic that could keep up demand for its advances, even as it makes collecting on them murkier.

DC police chief calls Trump move to install DEA head ‘threat to law and order'
DC police chief calls Trump move to install DEA head ‘threat to law and order'

The Hill

time2 days ago

  • The Hill

DC police chief calls Trump move to install DEA head ‘threat to law and order'

Washington, D.C., Police Chief Pamela Smith pushed back Friday morning on Attorney General Pam Bondi's move to install the Drug Enforcement Agency chief at the head of the district's police, warning that the directive could upend the department's operations. District officials are suing the Trump administration to block the action, arguing it goes beyond the emergency authorities in the D.C. Home Rule Act that President Trump invoked to surge law enforcement resources in the city. On Thursday night, Bondi installed DEA administrator Terrance Cole as D.C.'s 'emergency police commissioner,' assuming Smith's duties as part of Trump's takeover of the district's police. 'If effectuated, the Bondi Order would upend the command structure of MPD, endangering the safety of the public and law enforcement officers alike,' Smith wrote Friday morning in a court filing accompanying the district's lawsuit. 'In my nearly three decades in law enforcement, I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive.' Smith said that Bondi's directive would only 'create confusion' for officers. 'Imposing a new command structure 'effective immediately' will wreak operational havoc within MPD and create tremendous risk for the public,' she wrote. 'The new command structure will create confusion for MPD personnel, who are required under District law to respect and obey the Chief of Police as the head and chief of the police force. 'There is no greater risk to public safety in a paramilitary organization than to not know who is in command,' she added. Trump's police takeover is in effect for 30 days. His administration has said it will seek congressional approval to extend past that window.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store