logo
Full story of Rohan Dennis and Melissa Hoskins court case

Full story of Rohan Dennis and Melissa Hoskins court case

Sky News AU17-05-2025

It's a tragedy that shocked Australian sport and has left families shattered by grief.
On a Saturday night in the leafy Adelaide suburb of Medindie, Olympic cyclist Melissa Hoskins lay on a street with critical injuries, as neighbours and her husband Rohan Dennis desperately called for help.
The beloved mother-of-two had tripped and fallen under the family's Volkswagen Amarok, as fellow Olympian Dennis was behind the wheel and driving away.
Ms Hoskins suffered critical injuries and later died at Royal Adelaide Hospital.
This week, Dennis received a suspended jail sentence for his actions leading up to that tragic moment, bringing to a close a dramatic 18-month court case.
This is the full story from the beginning to the end.
December 30, 2023 – 7.45pm
A trivial domestic dispute about kitchen renovations was the catalyst for the tragedy.
The final blow-up happened about 7.45pm as Dennis was washing the dishes after dinner.
'We were having an argument about, it was quite early on today, about the renovation that we've had in our house,' Dennis told police in the hours immediately after Ms Hoskins' death.
'It's three years ago now, and we're not really happy with some of the stuff and I couldn't quite let it go.
'And then once the kids were down, had dinner, so the tensions boiled over again and we were yelling at each other, and I was like, 'I'm out', as in like, I'm just gonna leave the house.'
There was no physical violence in the argument.
'I thought it's just easier, I'll grab the car and … f--king just go,' Mr Dennis said.
'(For) 10, 20 minutes. Come back.'
Dennis left to try and get away from the exchange, taking the family's Volkswagen Amarok from the garage and driving off into the night.
Mere seconds to tragedy
But Ms Hoskins did not want him to leave and jumped onto the bonnet of the car as Dennis drove down Medindie Lane, behind their home, going at about 20km/h.
When Dennis pulled into Avenel Gardens Road, Ms Hoskins dismounted the bonnet and grabbed at the driver's side door.
As Dennis accelerated away from the intersection, Ms Hoskins held onto the driver's side door handle, the prosecution's factual summary – tendered to the court and seen by NewsWire – states.
She tripped and was dragged under the vehicle as Dennis drove off.
When Dennis heard a 'thump', he stopped the car and ran to help her.
The incident happened within seconds.
CCTV footage recorded Ms Hoskins on the bonnet of the car for about six seconds.
The time between Ms Hoskins dismounting the vehicle and Dennis closing the driver's side door and accelerating away from her was three seconds, the factual summary states, and the time between Dennis closing the door and Ms Hoskins falling under the wheel only two seconds.
Nightmare unfolds on quiet street
Dennis said his wife was still alive and struggling to breathe in the aftermath of the accident.
'I rolled her onto her side 'cos she seemed to be choking on something and I thought it might have been blood, and it was,' Dennis said.
'And then they gave – the neighbours they just gave me sort of a, a rug to sort of hold her head.
'I was holding that to try and stop any sort of bleeding. And just talking to her the whole time to try keep her awake.'
Dennis told investigators Ms Hoskins was unable to speak and could only nod.
'She was just moaning, like grunting with the pain, and I was saying, 'Can you feel your legs, are you OK' and just make sure she's … like 'just nod', you know,' he said.
'And she was nodding as a yes … so I was thinking … like I knew she'd hit her head but she's probably, really when I pulled her it felt like she potentially broke some ribs or something, and like … this was bloody hoping it's the worst thing.
'And that's why the blood was coming up but … that's why I was thinking maybe that's why she was struggling to talk.'
South Australian Police arrested Dennis that weekend and charged him with causing death by dangerous driving.
Tale of two champions
Dennis is a three-time Olympian and a Commonwealth Games gold medallist.
He first achieved fame at the 2012 London Olympics, nabbing a silver medal in the 4000m team pursuit on the cycling track.
At the Rio Games in 2016, he finished in fifth place in the individual time trial, but perhaps his crowning achievement is his bronze medal at the Tokyo Olympics on July 28, 2021.
In memorable scenes at the Fuji International Speedway, he clinched the medal with a time of 56:08.09.
In 2017, he became engaged to Ms Hoskins, a fellow Olympian.
Ms Hoskins competed in the London and Rio Olympics in track cycling.
She only just missed out on a medal in London, finishing in fourth spot for the 3000m Team Pursuit category.
In Rio, she finished in fifth position for the 4000m Team Pursuit.
In 2018, the pair married, and would settle into an elegant home in the inner-north Medindie suburb with their two children.
February 24, 2024 – Remembering Melissa
Hundreds of mourners gathered to farewell Ms Hoskins at a public service in Adelaide on February 24.
The memorial was held on what would have been her 33rd birthday.
Dennis attended the memorial with his children, but did not speak during the service.
He was photographed hugging guests before the ceremony started.
March 13, 2024 – First court appearance
Dennis fronted court for the first time on March 13 last year.
Dressed in a dark navy blue suit, he was met by a scrum of reporters outside Adelaide Magistrates Court.
He declined to say anything as he entered and left the court, standing silently in the dock throughout proceedings before Magistrate Simon Smart.
The prosecution asked for seven months to determine the final charges against the Olympian, arguing they needed six months for the major crash reconstruction report to be completed and then another four weeks for the Director of Public Prosecutions to determine charges.
Leaving the court, Dennis moved quickly through the scrum and into a black car.
August 6, 2024 – Charge determination
At a charge determination hearing later that year, prosecutors confirmed the police would proceed with charges of causing death by dangerous driving and driving without due care.
The charges hold a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.
December 10, 2024 – Shock guilty plea
In a shock development, the original charges are dropped and replaced with a single new charge of an aggravated act creating the likelihood of harm.
Dennis pleads guilty to the new charge.
He admits to driving a motor vehicle without lawful excuse when Ms Hoskins was on or in close proximity to the vehicle, knowing that act was likely to cause harm to another and being recklessly indifferent to whether such harm was caused.
The clean-cut medallist, dressed in a sharp suit, stood quietly in the dock before magistrate Justin Wickens and said 'guilty' as the charge was read out to him.
The maximum penalty for the offence is seven years in jail.
Jane Abbey KC, appearing for Dennis, told the court her client was not being held responsible for Ms Hoskins' death.
'There was no intention of Dennis to harm his wife and this charge does not charge him with responsibility for her death,' she said.
His case is referred to the higher District Court for sentencing.
April 14, 2025 – A Family's Anguish
Ms Hoskins' parents Peter and Amanda and her sister Jessica confronted Dennis with their pain and grief in an emotional court hearing more than a year after her death.
Peter broke down when he spoke about the impact the event would have on his grandchildren, who he called the family's 'silent grievers'.
'The silent grievers are too young to realise the present and future impact of their mother's loss on their lives,' he said.
He said when the police delivered the news of his daughter's death, he was unable to process the devastating development and was overwhelmed with 'disbelief, anger and confusion'.
Jessica said she continued to have nightmares about the event and would sometimes wake up in the night and see the faces of the policemen who had broken the terrible news to her.
'It's not something that will ever pass,' she said.
'I will live with this every single day while I'm alive.'
She also said the family had not received an apology from Dennis for his actions.
'No remorse has been shown,' she said.
Peter said an 'apology and some sort of explanation' from Dennis would help his family with their grieving process.
Ms Hoskins' mother Amanda said she believed the event was a 'tragic accident'.
'I know that you would never intentionally hurt her,' she said.
'Emotions would run hot'
Ms Abbey, speaking for Dennis, said the argument that sparked the collapse was the 'sort of thing that husbands and wives disagree about all the time'.
She said 'emotions would run hot' between the pair a couple of times a year and that they had an agreed strategy in place, in which Dennis would leave the home and spend some time alone to allow both of them to calm down before returning to settle the dispute.
She added Dennis was in love with Ms Hoskins at the time of her death.
'He loved her as his best friend, as his partner and as the mother to his children,' she said.
May 14, 2025 – The Sentence
Dennis avoided jail for his actions.
Judge Ian Press sentenced Dennis to 16 months' jail, but suspended the sentence, and placed him on a two-year good behaviour bond.
The Olympian's licence was also disqualified for five years.
Judge Press stressed Dennis was not being held responsible for Ms Hoskins' death, but for his actions leading up to the tragic event.
'To describe the consequences of the events of December 30, 2023, as tragic, really does not do justice to the grief, the anguish and the turmoil those events have brought into the lives of those who knew and loved your wife Melissa,' he said.
'I accept you have a sense of responsibility for all that occurred. I accept you have anguished over what could have been different if you had acted in some other way … you are not charged with being criminally responsible for all of the events of that night and in particular you are not charged with causing the death of your wife.'
Dennis was punished for continuing to drive while Ms Hoskins was on the bonnet, which Judge Press slammed as 'an inherently risky and dangerous act', and for the act of accelerating at the intersection to get away from Ms Hoskins.
Judge Press said he suspended the sentence due to Dennis' guilty plea, his remorse, his personal circumstances and the circumstances of the offending, and his role as the sole carer of his children.
What happens now?
It is unclear what Dennis intends to do now. He has never spoken publicly about the case and has not indicated any wish to do so.
But he is prohibited from driving, which means he will need help from close friends and family to help him move his children around Adelaide as they go to school and grow up.
Ms Hoskins' family, meanwhile, have indicated a clear wish to be present in Dennis' life and to love and support their grandchildren in any way they can.
In a courageous and stoic statement outside court after the sentence, Peter and Amanda said their family would now try to 'move on' from the horrific incident.
'It's now time for us to move on, which would be Melissa's expectations of us,' Peter said.
'Clearly we want to continue to be an integral part of their children's lives and their future.
'How we do this in a meaningful way and relevant way will take time.
'With respect to Rohan, as hard as it is going to be, it is important that we also have a well-mannered relationship with him.
'(Our grandchildren) deserve this, they have done nothing wrong. We would like to thank everybody for their support of us.'
Peter said the family had not sought prison time for Dennis.
'We've got to remember there are two people caught up in this tragedy, and there are young children caught up in this tragedy, who have lost their mum,' he said.
'For them to go and lose their dad, albeit a temporary loss, I don't think that would be ideal at all.
'From the outset, it wasn't something that we were pursuing. The health and wellbeing of (our grandchildren) have been front of mind for us right from the word go. That remains the case.'
The heart-wrenching grief the tragedy has opened up will stay in place.
'We miss Melissa terribly,' Peter said, his voice breaking.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mushroom cook denies ‘wild goose chase' claim
Mushroom cook denies ‘wild goose chase' claim

Perth Now

time3 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Mushroom cook denies ‘wild goose chase' claim

Alleged triple-murderer Erin Patterson has denied she led health authorities on a 'wild goose chase' as they probed the mushroom poisoning of her four lunch guests. Ms Patterson returned to the witness box at her Supreme Court trial in Morwell this week for her second week of giving evidence. The 50-year-old is facing trial after pleading not guilty to the murder of three of her husband's family members and the attempted murder of a fourth. Simon Patterson's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and aunt, Heather Wilkinson, died after eating a meal at Ms Patterson's home on July 29, 2023, in the country Victorian town of Leongatha. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty, telling the jury she did not intend to harm anyone. Brooke Grebert-Craig. Credit: Supplied Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson survived after spending about a month and a half in hospital. Prosecutors allege Ms Patterson deliberately poisoned the guests with death cap mushrooms while her defence argues it was a tragic accident. Giving evidence last week, Ms Patterson maintained she used dried mushrooms in the deadly lunch which she had bought from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's east in about April 2023. She told the court she initially planned to use them in a pasta dish, but decided they would be too overpowering and stored them in a Tupperware container in her pantry. She said she now believes she may have added foraged wild mushrooms to that container. Ms Patterson's estranged husband Simon Patterson. NewsWire / David Geraghty Credit: News Corp Australia Facing questions from Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC on Wednesday, Ms Patterson was asked if she was worried about them being too strong for the beef Wellington. 'No, I didn't think that. I thought it was the perfect dish for them,' she responded. Dr Rogers went on to probe the exchange Ms Patterson had with Department of Health officer Sally Ann Atkinson about the Asian grocer. Dr Nanette Rogers is leading the prosecution for the Crown. NewsWire/Ian Currie Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Atkinson gave evidence she communicated with Ms Patterson over several days in earlier August amid a public health probe into the poisoning. Text messages and calls between the pair showed the public health officer attempting to narrow down the location of the store. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was 'very familiar' with the area, owning a home in Mount Waverley and having previously worked for Monash City Council. The accused woman disputed this, but did say she was familiar with the adjoining areas of Glen Waverley, Oakleigh and Clayton. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was 'deliberately vague' about the location of the Asian grocer because it was a lie. 'Incorrect,' Ms Patterson responded. 'I was doing my best to remember when it happened, but I think I was clear at all times that I didn't have a memory of the actual purchase.' The trial, now in its seventh week, continues.

Schoolkids don't need smartphones: A Sydney mum's ban on her teenager having a phone should not baffle educators
Schoolkids don't need smartphones: A Sydney mum's ban on her teenager having a phone should not baffle educators

Sky News AU

time4 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Schoolkids don't need smartphones: A Sydney mum's ban on her teenager having a phone should not baffle educators

A 13-year-old boy is being teased by classmates. Not for his clothes, his grades, or his hairstyle - but because he doesn't have a smartphone. Sydney mother of three and primary school teacher, Monica Cura, made the decision years ago to hold off. No screen time before age five. An iPad at nine, purely for schoolwork. And phones? That's a firm not yet. 'It wasn't even something we discussed,' Ms Cura told me. 'It just didn't occur to us to give him one. He'll get one when he can afford to buy it himself. Until then, there's no need.' Her stance is clear, consistent, and deeply rational: her son doesn't need a phone, she can't adequately monitor one, and frankly, he's still a child. But apparently, that makes Ms Cura, and her son, a target. 'He does get comments from other kids' she said. 'His friends call him 'iPad boy' because that's what he uses at home to talk to them.' What's more disturbing is that the comments aren't just coming from other kids. 'Teachers have made comments to him suggesting it was odd that he didn't have a phone," she told me. 'His sporting coach pulled my husband aside to ask why he wasn't on the team group chat with the other children'. This is where the story stops being quirky and starts being concerning. Because when adults are reinforcing the idea that every child should have a smartphone, and subtly shaming those who don't, we've lost our way. As a child psychologist, I hear stories like hers far too often. What used to be a considered parenting decision - to delay giving a child a phone - has now become something a parent feels they must defend. Ms Cura's son isn't isolated or unsafe. He trains at an elite level in soccer, catches public transport independently, and communicates with friends at home via his iPad - with appropriate boundaries in place. And yet, he's being made to feel like an outsider, not just by his peers, but by the very adults meant to support his wellbeing. 'He doesn't even nag us about it,' Ms Cura said. 'He knows where we stand. He did try to make a case - he said he needs it for training updates or because he catches the bus. But we get the emails too. 'And he can actually walk to school if he wants. He just thought maybe that excuse would convince us.' But she and her husband held firm. 'We've had parents come up to us and say, 'Wow, that's amazing, I wish I'd done that.' Others have said they gave their kids phones and now regret it.' I see the clinical consequences of early, unrestricted smartphone access every week. Kids who are anxious, distracted, emotionally volatile. Children as young as 10 exposed to violent pornographic content. Pre-teens addicted to dopamine-driven social media feedback loops. And parents bewildered at how fast they lost control. As of 2023, 37 per cent of Australian children under the age of 12 own a smartphone, an increase from 22 per cent in 2018. According to a global OECD report, Australian teenagers average 49 hours a week on digital devices, placing them among the heaviest users worldwide. Notably, 12 per cent of Australian teenagers spend over 80 hours weekly on screens. That's the equivalent of a full-time job - plus overtime - spent staring at a screen. For a generation still forming its identity, attention span, and social skills, this level of exposure isn't just excessive; it's developmentally catastrophic. Smartphones aren't neutral tools. They're highly sophisticated devices designed to hold adult attention - let alone that of a still-developing brain. From a neurological standpoint, the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control, planning, and risk assessment, continues developing into the mid-20s. Children and early teens are simply not equipped to self-regulate their usage, navigate social comparison, or resist the pull of addictive algorithms. Giving them unfiltered access to that kind of power is, quite literally, developmentally mismatched. And yet culturally, we're doing exactly that - en masse. The problem isn't just that kids want phones. It's that adults have normalised this want as a need. Teachers ask why a child doesn't have a phone, instead of asking why so many do. Coaches expect group chats with 13-year-olds, instead of communicating with parents. We act like having a device is a developmental milestone, rather than a lifestyle choice. Ms Cura, to her credit, has stood her ground. 'We just don't see why he needs one,' she said. 'They're on screens all the time at school. Homework's online. That's already enough. Outside of that, they need to be looking around, being present. But instead you see kids and adults walking around with their heads down, staring at screens.' She's right. The presence of a phone changes the entire ecology of a child's world. It alters how they interact with peers, with parents, with boredom, with the physical world itself. And often, it robs them of things that are developmentally essential - creativity, stillness, resilience, even real friendship. Some parents justify early phone use for safety. Ms Cura doesn't buy it. 'People say, 'Oh, they need it to get picked up from school.' But there are phones that just receive calls,' she said. 'There are other ways to manage that. You don't need a smartphone with access to everything.' She's right again. The real reason most kids have phones isn't necessity. It's convenience. It's conformity. It's because the rest of us gave in. But Ms Cura's story shows something powerful: you cansay no. You can delay. And your child will not combust. They may, in fact, turn out better for it. We need more parents like her, not fewer. Parents who don't outsource boundaries to the crowd. Who understand that development doesn't speed up just because society has. And who are willing to put up with the teasing, the eye-rolls, and the awkward silences because they care more about raising a whole child than a popular one. And if you're a parent holding out, or wanting to, let this story be your reminder: you're not crazy. You're just ahead of the curve. Clare Rowe is a Sky News contributor.

Sydney man charged after allegedly stranding family overseas
Sydney man charged after allegedly stranding family overseas

Herald Sun

time11 hours ago

  • Herald Sun

Sydney man charged after allegedly stranding family overseas

Don't miss out on the headlines from National. Followed categories will be added to My News. A southwest Sydney man who allegedly stranded his wife and one-year-old child in Pakistan is facing human trafficking charges. The Australian Federal Police's Eastern Command Human Trafficking team launched an investigation in February 2025, after a woman reported her husband had left her in Pakistan without documentation after the family travelled overseas together from Australia. It will be alleged the man, 45, deceptively convinced his wife and child to travel with him to Pakistan in August 2024. On arrival, he allegedly took the child's passport and abandoned the pair at the airport. He returned to Australia by himself later that month. A Sydney man is facing human trafficking charges. Picture: AFP The man then allegedly fraudulently cancelled the Australian visa of his wife in November 2024, and retained possession of the child's passport. The wife reported the matter to the AFP when she was able to return to Australia in February this year. AFP investigators engaged with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to facilitate the child's return to Australia. The child was born in Australia and is an Australian citizen. AFP investigators executed a search warrant at an Austral home on Thursday and seized a number of electronic items and documents. The man was later charged with two counts of trafficking a person from Australia using deception. The offences carries a maximum 12 year prison sentence. The 45-year-old was arrested at Austral, Sydney. Picture: AFP He was also charged with one count of dealing with identification information involving the use of a carriage service. That charge carries a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment. AFP Detective Acting Superintendent Luke Needham said the allegations in this matter could be described as potential 'exit trafficking' offences. 'Carrying out actions to force or encourage someone to travel overseas and then impede their ability to return to Australia can be a serious criminal offence, and the AFP will not hesitate to act when we have evidence of criminal actions,' Detective Needham said. 'Exit trafficking offences quite often occur within family units or in situations where close relationships have disintegrated, and there is a concern these types of offences are under-reported in Australia. 'The AFP encourages anyone who suspects they, or someone they know, has been a victim of exit trafficking to come forward. All complaints will be taken seriously and appropriately assessed with dignity, and the AFP can help victims obtain the support and assistance they require.' Originally published as Sydney man charged after allegedly stranding family overseas

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store