Visitors shocked to discover the horrifying source of litter in famous birdwatching area: 'We saw hundreds of them'
A conservation reserve in India is being polluted by an unexpected source, which could have dire consequences for the entire food chain.
The Jorbeer Conservation Reserve in northern India is widely regarded as a birdwatcher's paradise. It is home to many vulnerable avian species, particularly vultures and raptors.
"In the space of an hour, we saw hundreds of them, including white-headed Egyptian vultures, glistening black cinereous vultures, Eurasian griffons, Himalayan griffons and more," wrote the Indian Express about a recent visit.
Sadly, the article's author also saw massive amounts of plastic waste within the reserve. But the source of the plastic was equally shocking.
The plastic came from the stomachs of decomposing animals.
The reason for the Jorbeer Conservation Reserve's ecological importance may sound strange: For more than 100 years, it has served as a dumping ground for animal carcasses.
Over time, this rare site has become a critical conservation area for endangered vultures and other scavenger birds who flock there in enormous numbers. Their presence attracts a diverse array of species, creating a rich ecosystem.
This unique site has collided with a growing problem — plastic pollution.
Grazing animals and cattle are ingesting our plastic waste, causing them harm and distress. According to the Indian Express, a cow can have 30 kilograms of plastic in its stomach. That plastic then reenters the environment once the animal decomposes.
Do you think America has a plastic waste problem?
Definitely
Only in some areas
Not really
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Vultures are a critical part of our ecosystem. Nicknamed nature's cleanup crew, they consume animal carcasses, which helps prevent the spread of infectious diseases.
Worldwide vulture populations are in steep decline, largely due to an anti-inflammatory veterinary drug used in cattle that's lethal to vultures that consume treated livestock.
India's vulture population has collapsed by more than 99%, which has been linked to 500,000 human deaths, according to the publication Science — proof of the importance of species conservation.
Plastic pollution is further imperiling this vulnerable species.
When plastic decomposes, it leaches toxic chemicals and breaks down into microplastics — tiny fragments that cause damage to human cells and stunt animal reproduction. Even plastic we intend to recycle often winds up in landfills and waterways, where it works its way through the food chain, causing residual harm.
According to the Indian Express, many organizations in India, like Waste Warriors and Clean Coonoor, are working to improve solid-waste management.
Bans and recycling help, but by using less plastic, we can ensure these pollutants never enter the environment in the first place. Our individual consumption habits can have the biggest impact on the larger ecosystem.
The switch to a biodegradable or reusable alternative protects species up and down the food chain.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
4 hours ago
Transport of mercury through rivers has risen threefold since Industrial Revolution, new study finds
Human activity has caused the amount of mercury being transported through rivers all over the world to increase up to threefold since the Industrial Revolution, making regulations to prevent toxic metals from entering waterways even more necessary, according to environmental policy experts. Industrial practices such as coal combustion, mining and manufacturing have increased mercury pollution and changed the way it moves through rivers, causing a sharp rise in mercury concentrations around the world since the 1850s, according to a paper published Wednesday in the journal Science. Scientists pay especially close attention to neurotoxins like mercury due to its ability to accumulate in fish and rivers, Yanxu Zhang, an associate professor at Tulane University's School of Science and Engineering and co-author of the study, told ABC News. Researchers used process-based models to reconstruct the amount of mercury emissions that would have existed in waterways naturally from events such as volcanic activity or wildfires, Zhang said. They found that between 1845 and 1859, the average baseline river cycle was roughly 390 megagrams of mercury per year. Today, rivers carry about 1,000 megagrams per year -- equating in about a 585 megagram per year increase in the last two centuries. The researchers also corroborated this finding with global historic sediment cores, according to the study. The findings of the report are "not at all surprising," John Holdren, a professor of environmental science and policy and former science adviser to President Barack Obama, told ABC News. "It just adds one more data point to the clear evidence that many human environmental impacts far exceed the scale of natural influences," Holdren said. The presence of mercury then poses a health risk to people living nearby -- especially in developing regions in South America, Southeast Asia and Africa, Zhang said. But proposed rollbacks on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations that tightened emissions standards for toxic metals like mercury could soon put Americans at risk of increased mercury levels in U.S. waterways, according to environmental policy experts. Earlier this year, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a massive deregulation campaign, rolling out more than two dozen policy announcements to propose changes on several emissions regulations. The actions included revisions to the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), which set limits on mercury and arsenic pollution from coal and oil power plants -- rules the EPA described in a press release in March as "overreaching." During a press conference on Wednesday, Zeldin said that if the proposed changes to MATS are finalized, "no power plant will be allowed to emit more than they do today -- or as much as they did one or two years ago." "These decisions allow more mercury into the air and water, even though mercury is known to harm children's brain development, and arsenic is linked to cancer and birth defects," James Pew, director of federal clean air practice at Earthjustice, told ABC News. In March, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a requirement from the Clean Water Act that forced polluters to comply with water quality standards as a condition of their permits. Last month, the House of Representatives voted to allow about 1,800 facilities -- including chemical plants, refineries and pesticide manufacturers -- to "reclassify" themselves as minor polluters and stop controlling, monitoring or reporting toxic emissions under the Congressional Review Act. The vote passed 216 to 212, with all Democrats and one Republican opposing it. The Senate had approved the resolution weeks earlier. "All of Donald Trump's actions since taking office are taking us backwards on mercury pollution and threatening our health," Sierra Club Climate Policy Director Patrick Drupp told ABC News. Mercury -- along with other heavy metals, such as lead -- is one of the "clearest" cases of public health knowledge that has been translated into environmental standards in the U.S. over the last 50 years, Dan Esty, a professor of environmental law and policy at Yale University and former commissioner of Connecticut's Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, told ABC News. The report is "another reminder of the massive irresponsibility of the EPA's headlong retreat, under President Trump and EPA Administrator Zeldin, from science-based approaches to protecting public health from environmental harms of all kinds," Holdren -- the environmental science professor -- said. Mercury is toxic to both animals and people in a number of ways, necessitating effective controls to keep people from being harmed, Paul Anastas, director of the Center for Green Chemistry and Green Engineering at Yale University and former assistant administrator for the EPA, told ABC News. "It's always foolish to ignore mercury," Anastas said. "...If you're not afraid of mercury, you're not paying attention." Exposure to mercury typically occurs from eating fish and can cause a host of symptoms, such as loss of peripheral vision, the feeling of "pins and needles" in hands and feet and impairment of speech, hearing and walking, according to the EPA. Mercury exposure to infants in the womb can have a severe impact on brain and nervous system development, the EPA noted. The rollbacks will likely trigger more child deaths and increase the number of cases of cancer, lung disease and heart attacks, Ryan Maher, an environmental health attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, told ABC News. The eastern U.S., which contains many industrial sites that could potential have mercury in waste discharges, could especially be impacted, study co-author Zhang said. Mercury contamination is already happening in Minnesota, where residents have been advised by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to restrict eating fish from rivers, lakes and other bodies of water that have excess mercury to once per week. If mercury levels increase, humans may have to balance fish consumption to avoid exposure, Zhang said.
Gizmodo
7 hours ago
- Gizmodo
RIP to These NASA X Accounts, as U.S. Science Falls Off a Cliff
NASA is axing at least 23 X accounts run by the agency's Science Mission Directorate (SMD), citing a need to 'strategically reduce' its digital footprint. The move comes in the wake of President Donald Trump's proposed funding cuts that could kill numerous research programs. NASA operates more than 400 social media accounts, 300 of which belong to SMD. It's fair to say that's a bit excessive. The agency believes its effort to consolidate these accounts—which began in 2018—will improve its social media impact through more cohesive messaging. Some followers, such as spaceflight photographer John Kraus, are welcoming the change. Kraus described the consolidation as 'long overdue.' But others disagree, arguing that shuttering these accounts will further limit public access and attention to research in Trump's America. 'In my view the core strength of social media is letting individual voices and their quirks find their individual audiences,' Harvard University astronomer Jonathan McDowell tweeted Tuesday, June 10. 'Making a bland uniform corporate account to replace individual [NASA] voices is a mistake.' The agency says the public won't lose access to social media updates about all the affected SMD programs, but their accounts will either be archived, merged into larger, thematic accounts or NASA's flagship channels, or rebranded to 'better align with strategic framework.' The NASA X accounts (formerly Twitter) that have been or are soon to be archived serve as critical outreach platforms for specific research programs, spacecraft, rovers, satellites, and other scientific initiatives. These are just some of the ones being nixed: Perseverance Mars rover: @NASAPersevere Curiosity Mars rover: @MarsCuriosity Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft: @NASAVoyager Commercial crew program: @Commercial_Crew Exploration ground systems: @NASAGroundSys International Space Station research: @ISS_Research Space Launch System (SLS): @NASA_SLS Orion spacecraft: @NASA_Orion Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS): @NASA_TESS Goddard Institute for Space Studies: @NASAGISS A few of these accounts, such as the Curiosity Mars rover's X page, have millions of followers. 'Don't worry, my mission isn't going anywhere,' Curiosity's account assured fans on Monday, but the same can't be said for all of these programs. Trump's 2026 fiscal budget request proposes to cut NASA's funding by nearly 25% in one year—one of the largest percentage cuts proposed in the agency's history. This includes a 47% cut to the agency's science program, a move that would 'decimate' NASA, according to the Planetary Society. If approved by Congress, the budget would kill at least 41 active and planned space missions. Voyager's funding, for example, would shrink from $7.8 million to $5 million in 2026, then drop to zero in 2029, the Washington Post reported. The Mars Sample Return (MRS) mission, which intends to return samples of the Red Planet's surface dutifully collected by NASA's Perseverance rover over the last few years, is also on the chopping block. The funding cuts would ultimately retire the Orion capsule and Space Launch System (SLS) megarocket, too, according to Ars Technica. The International Space Station (ISS) is already feeling the funding squeeze. The Center for Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS)—which operates the ISS National Lab—recently canceled an upcoming space station research conference due to 'the current regulatory and budgetary environment.' The proposal also includes sweeping staff cuts that would reduce NASA's workforce by roughly one-third. 'That would represent the smallest NASA workforce since mid-1960, before the first American had launched into space,' Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society, recently told 'This is the extinction-level event we were warning people about,' Dreier added. With NASA's scientific future thrown into question, it's easy to see why the outreach rollback has struck a nerve with some, but this isn't the only federal science agency facing big changes to its online presence. the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) website for its Climate Program Office, is expected to shut down after most of its staff were laid off on May 31, The Guardian reports. Affected staff told the publication that they believe the cuts were aimed at restructuring public-facing climate information. While NOAA and NASA face distinct challenges, both agencies are undergoing major changes that signal a shifting landscape for publicly available science—just when we need it most.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers Found Unnatural Patterns Beneath an Ancient Forest
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Researchers surveying Michigan's Sixty Islands archaeological site have found ancient evidence of farming by the Indigenous Menominee people in the form of ridges in the earth. The farming capability of the Menominee—who were previously assumed to be mostly hunter-gatherers—had been far underestimated until this recent evidence. As more of the site is surveyed with LiDAR, it is possible that signs of even more extensive Menominee farming will surface. At a glance, the Sixty Islands archaeological site—which reaches both sides of the Menominee River at the border of Michigan and Wisconsin—appears like any other patch of woods. But a closer look reveals ridges in the grass that nature could not have possibly made on its own. This is the ancestral land of the Menominee people—an Indigenous tribe who had been farming the area since the 10th century. While the Menominee actually call themselves Mamaceqtaw (which translates to 'the people'), surrounding tribes called them Menominee as a reference to the Algonquin word for wild rice, manomin. This is because they heavily relied on wild rice as food source. The land containing the ridges is part of a region known as Anaem Omot, or 'Dog's Belly,' which is known for Indigenous settlements that date to as far back as 10,000 years ago. And recently, as a team of researchers were studying the site using LiDAR, they realized that the ridges were part of an agricultural system involving raised ridge fields. This indicates that the Menominee had engaged in much more extensive farming than previously assumed. Sometimes the lack of evidence for what ancient people accomplished robs us of an accurate understanding of what they actually managed to do. There had been previous evidence of ancient Menominee farming in the area, but it was thought that they farmed on a much smaller scale than the newly discovered buried farmland would imply. The Menominee eventually began the transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture. Despite the foreboding cold of Michigan winters, they were still able to cultivate maize, squash, beans, and other crops, as Madeleine McLeester (an anthropologist from Dartmouth) found out when she and her research team surveyed around 330 acres of land. The raised fields that had been reinforced over thousands of years are still remarkably intact, and indicate a scale of farming that is ten times greater than what was previously accounted for. This new evidence is now disproving theories that the Menominee were mostly hunter-gatherers who may have done some farming for sustenance. 'Our results demonstrate a rich anthropogenic landscape created by small-scale ancestral Menominee communities, located near the northern limits of maize agriculture,' McLeester said in a study recently published in the journal Science. Evidently, Menominee farming was carried out at a scale that would require sophisticated labor organization—something predominantly seen in larger hierarchical societies. It was Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) that made it possible to see just how advanced Menominee agriculture was. Topographic LiDAR carried out by drone (like the one that was used to survey Anaem Omot) uses near-infrared laser light pulses to measure topographical features of the land below. When all of the the data collected by these drones is analyzed, it can create hyperreal 3D images of Earth's surface. Without grasses or trees in they way, the LiDAR map of Sixty Islands revealed the extent to which the agricultural ridges sprawled across the site. Among the revelations provided by the LiDAR mapping was the fact that the ridges had been dug in different directions—something that could mean individual farmers determined which way to plant their crops without relying on outside influences (such as the direction of the Sun). Many ancient peoples who farmed allowed signs in nature (such as star alignment or where the wind was blowing from) to guide them. The farmers at this site might have relied on unknown signs or none at all. Additionally, through their survey of the area, the Dartmouth team observed burial mounds, a dance ring, and the remnants of logging camps from the 19th century. Excavations also unearthed artifacts such as ceramic fragments and charcoal, which McLeester thinks could mean that the Menominee made compost out of the dregs of firesand other household waste. Only 40% of the site has been surveyed so far, so the extensive agricultural system may still be even larger than we know. 'The excellent preservation of this site is exceptional in eastern North America,' McLeester said, 'and suggests that the precolonial landscape was more anthropogenically influenced than currently recognized.' You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
