
‘Worse than Greece': The debt crisis threatening to blow up the global economy
Shigeru Ishiba, Japan's Prime Minister, warned the country's Parliament on Monday that his debt-strapped government's position was 'worse than Greece', signalling just how vulnerable the world's third-largest economy could be to a meltdown if markets lost confidence.
The wider fear is that Japan is a canary in the coal mine. In a world of Donald Trump-induced volatility and uncertainty, bond market investors could quickly lose faith in any one of the debt-dependent governments of the West.
'The pressure on both Japanese and US bonds this week is a sign bond traders are willing to punish high-debt nations with large deficits,' says Kathleen Brooks, an analyst at XTB.
'This is an issue that has hurt the UK in the past, it is weighing on the US right now, and Japan is also coming under the spotlight.'
Jittery investors are demanding more reward for the growing risk of holding long-term government debt by marking down the price of bonds and driving up their yields.
If the yields rise consistently, governments in countries such as Britain will have to spend even more taxpayer money on interest payments.
Since the post-pandemic inflation crisis sent interest rates surging around the world, the door has been slammed on a decade of cheap money that encouraged governments to rack up borrowing rather than cut spending or raise taxes. It has also left finance ministers such as Rachel Reeves in a painful political bind.
A shaky economy
The Tokyo tremor began on Tuesday, when the government tried to sell 1 trillion yen ($12 billion) of March 2045 bonds and encountered lacklustre demand.
The average bid-to-cover ratio, which measures investor appetite, dropped to 2.5 – the lowest since 2012. The 1.14-point gap between the average and lowest-accepted prices, known as the 'tail', was the longest since 1987.
Investors responded by pushing the Japanese government 20-year yield to the highest this century, and the 30-year yield to a record. The benchmark 10-year yield also surged.
The ever-increasing cost of borrowing will make life difficult for Ishiba, whose minority Government faces an upper house election in July – and with it, the temptation to promise tax cuts or spending largesse.
He tried to temper those expectations on Monday, reminding MPs that Japan's long era of anti-deflationary zero interest rates was over.
'The government is not in a position to comment on interest rates, but the reality is we are facing a world with them. Our country's fiscal situation is undoubtedly extremely poor, worse than Greece's,' he said.
International Monetary Fund data puts Japan's debt-to-GDP ratio at 235%, well above the 142% rate in Greece, the epicentre of the 2009 eurozone crisis.
Katsunobu Kato, Japan's Finance Minister, was even more stark, warning of the damage that could flow from the market ructions. 'A loss of market trust in our finances could lead to sharp rises in interest rates, a weak yen and excessive inflation that would have a severe impact on the economy,' he said.
Japan's economy already looks shaky, having contracted 0.2% in the first three months of this year from the previous quarter, as timid consumers kept their wallets shut.
Inflation is running at 3.6%, pushing the Bank of Japan (BoJ) to last year impose a positive interest rate for the first time since 2008.
Bonds struggle for buyers
For decades Japan's bond market has seemed relatively relaxed about the country's economy and public finances. But this was because the BoJ was buying up bonds to help boost the economy, owning about half the outstanding stock of bonds and creating a balance sheet bigger than Japan's GDP.
Now the BoJ is trying to unwind this untenable position: it is spending ¥400 billion less on bonds per quarter as part of its fight against inflation.
But the bonds are struggling to find alternative buyers, even among other traditional stalwarts like the big Japanese life insurers and managed funds.
The BoJ will next month decide whether to stay the course on this sell-down from next year, which would still leave it buying ¥2.9 trillion every month.
On Tuesday the bank released a summary of the views it has collected from economists and traders, which varied from one extreme to the other: some urged the central bank to keep buying anything from ¥1 trillion to ¥3 trillion a month; others said it was time to stop buying altogether.
Some market participants hope the BoJ's gradual withdrawal will help the Japanese bond market function more normally, even if the process of resetting prices is painful.
'Japan is not alone'
But even if this normalisation process is necessary or desirable, it is being side-swiped by the broader ructions in the global economy.
Trump's tariff tirade has clouded every crystal ball, putting markets on a hair trigger. Behind that, there are mounting worries about the sustainability of the American and other Western governments' fiscal positions.
With few exceptions, these are mired deep in deficit and debt. The US Government is heavily funded by the BoJ, owner of more than US$1 trillion ($1700b) of US Treasury bonds, adding to the uncertainty.
Fred Neumann, the chief Asia economist at HSBC in Hong Kong, said: 'Rising debt levels in developed markets have become a growing concern in recent years, and the seeming lack of urgency about fiscal consolidation is leaving government bond investors increasingly jittery.
'After years of generous spending and tax cuts, fiscal constraints are starting to bite. Japan is not alone in facing the need for budget consolidation, but volatility in other developed economies' bond markets adds an extra layer of urgency to put the fiscal house in order.'
British and Japanese bond yields are related because the two are substitutes for each other, according to Paul Dales, chief UK economist at Capital Economics. But he says the big risk to the UK comes from the US.
He said 'uncertainty and tighter monetary policy in the US can be imported into the UK'.
The US, which suffered a downgrade from credit agency Moody's last week, has a government debt-to-GDP ratio of 123% and is rated by BNP Paribas as the most fiscally vulnerable developed economy.
An American 'Liz Truss moment' is 'a non-trivial possibility in current conditions', the bank said on Tuesday. BNP Paribas expects Congress to tap the brake on the US deficit, but 'perception can be reality in markets'.
Avoiding the tripwires
The ray of hope in Japan is that the markets will calm down and volatility will ease, even if yields never return to the level of previous decades.
Some investors, such as Vanguard and RBC BlueBay Asset Management, are doing some contrarian buying of 30-year Japanese bonds according to Bloomberg.
But that might not be enough to ease the squeeze, unless big Japanese money also starts to crowd in.
The next test of the Japanese litmus paper is barely a week away, when the Government will hold an auction of 40-year bonds. Investors are already nervous: the 40-year yield was up more than 10 basis points on Tuesday.
Will Japan blow up the world economy, including Britain's public finances?
There are so many tripwires: the risk appetite of Japanese investment managers; the deliberations of the Bank of Japan; the election promises of Japanese political parties; and the continuing emanations on tariffs and tax cuts from the White House and Capitol Hill.
And those are only the biggest threads.
It's a hard knot to unpick. Reeves will just have to soak up BNP Paribas' pithy observation: 'In the short term, concerns about debt sustainability provide just one more reason to predict unpredictability.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Trump and Xi hold long-awaited trade call
By Kevin Liptak and Simone McCarthy , CNN Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and US President Donald Trump. Photo: Evgenia Novozhenina and SAUL LOEB / AFP President Donald Trump emerged from a long-awaited 90-minute telephone call with President Xi Jinping of China encouraged that ongoing trade tensions could soon be resolved. Calling the conversation "very good," Trump said in a social media post after the call that follow-up talks would soon be arranged with his economic team, and that he and Xi had invited each other to visit each other's respective nations. Trump said the call focused almost entirely on trade, without touching on other geopolitical issues like Iran and Ukraine. The call "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries," Trump wrote on Truth Social. It comes after a long period of silence between the leaders, and the discrepancy in how each side was talking - or not talking - about the call ahead of time only underscored a widening gulf between the world's two largest economies. Tensions have been rising between the two sides in the weeks after they agreed to a 90-day trade truce last month, which hit pause on their tit-for-tat escalation of tariffs. Trump accused China last week of "violating" the agreement - a charge Beijing has denied, while it accused the US of taking steps to "seriously undermine" that consensus. In his readout of the Thursday call, Trump singled out the issue of rare earth minerals - which China had placed restrictions on - as an area where he made progress with his counterpart. "There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products," Trump wrote. He said a meeting between the economic teams would occur "shortly" in a location to be determined. And he said the leaders look forward to visiting each other. "During the conversation, President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and me to visit China, and I reciprocated. As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing," Trump wrote. US officials had signaled in recent days that a call between the two leaders could help jump-start progress in expected upcoming trade talks, which had appeared to stall following the initial truce reached in Geneva. As CNN reported ahead of Thursday's call, Chinese officials - who were deeply wary of Trump's unpredictability and track record of putting foreign leaders in awkward or embarrassing situations - had put off a phone call, according to people familiar, even as Trump stated on multiple occasions this spring that he expected to speak with Xi soon. The president's Oval Office ambushes of Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa caught the attention of officials in China, those people added, and officials wanted to avoid anything similar, even in a private conversation. But Trump regards securing a new agreement with Beijing both as a critical component of his broader trade agenda and as a necessary follow-up from his first term, when trade deals with China got derailed during the Covid-19 pandemic. The two leaders are known to have last spoken on 17 January, days before Trump's inauguration. They are navigating a fractious relationship, with recent points of contention stretching beyond their gaping trade imbalance. Following the Geneva talks last month, US officials had expected China to ease export restrictions on rare earth minerals, which had been imposed in April in retaliation against Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs on Chinese goods. The minerals are an essential part of everything from iPhones and electric vehicles to big-ticket weapons like F-35 fighter jets and missile systems. But the restrictions haven't been lifted, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a recent series of measures imposed on China, three administration officials told CNN last week. Beijing, meanwhile, has bristled as Washington warned companies against using AI chips made by China's national tech champion Huawei, moved to limit critical technology sales to China and announced that the US would "aggressively revoke visas" for Chinese students in the US with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields. - CNN


Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Te Pāti Māori stand down confirmed
Parliament has confirmed the unprecedented punishments proposed for Te Pāti Māori MPs who performed a haka in protest against the Treaty Principles Bill. Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi will be suspended for 21 days, and MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for seven days, taking effect immediately. Opposition parties tried to reject the recommendation, but did not have the numbers to vote it down. The heated debate to consider the proposed punishment came to an end just before Parliament was due to rise. Waititi moved to close the debate and no party disagreed, ending the possibility of it carrying on in the next sitting week. Leader of the House Chris Bishop - the only National MP who spoke - kicked off the debate earlier in the afternoon saying it was "regrettable" some MPs did not vote on the Budget two weeks ago. Bishop had called a vote ahead of Budget Day to suspend the privileges report debate to ensure the Te Pāti Māori MPs could take part in the Budget, but not all of them turned up. The debate was robust and rowdy with both the deputy speaker Barbara Kuriger and temporary speaker Tangi Utikare repeatedly having to ask MPs to quieten down. Tākuta Ferris spoke first for Te Pāti Māori saying the haka was a "signal of humanity" and a "raw human connection". He said Māori had faced acts of violence for too long and would not be silenced by "ignorance or bigotry". "Is this really us in 2025, Aotearoa New Zealand?" he asked the House. "Everyone can see the racism." He said the Privileges Committee's recommendations were not without precedent, noting the fact Labour MP Peeni Henare, who also participated in the haka, didn't face suspension. Henare attended the committee and apologised, which contributed to his lesser sanction. MP Parmjeet Parmar - a member of the Committee - was first to speak on behalf of ACT, and referenced the hand gesture - or "finger gun" - that Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer made in the direction of ACT MPs during the haka. Parmar told the House debate could be used to disagree on ideas and issues, and there wasn't a place for intimidating physical gestures. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson said New Zealand's Parliament could lead the world in terms of involving the indigenous people. She said the Green Party strongly rejected the committee's recommendations and proposed their amendment of removing suspensions, and asked the Te Pāti Māori MPs be censured instead. Davidson said The House had evolved in the past - such as the inclusion of sign language and breast-feeding in The House. She said the Greens were challenging the rules, and did not need an apology from Te Pāti Māori. NZ First leader Winston Peters said Te Pāti Māori and the Green Party speeches so far showed "no sincerity, saying countless haka had taken place in Parliament but only after first consulting the Speaker. "They told the media they were going to do it, but they didn't tell the Speaker did they? "The Māori party are a bunch of extremists," Peters said, "New Zealand has had enough of them". Peters was made to apologise after taking aim at Waititi, calling him "the one in the cowboy hat" with "scribbles on his face". He continued afterward, describing Waititi as possessing "anti western values". Labour's Willie Jackson congratulated Te Pāti Māori for the "greatest exhibition of our culture in The House in my lifetime". Jackson said the Treaty bill was a great threat, and was met by a great haka performance. He was glad the ACT Party was intimidated, saying that was the whole point of doing the haka. He also called for a bit of compromise from Te Pāti Māori - encouraging them to say sorry - but reiterated Labour's view the sanctions were out of proportion with past indiscretions in the House. Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said the debate "would be a joke if it wasn't so serious". "Get an absolute grip", she said to the House, arguing the prime minister "is personally responsible" if The House proceeds with the committee's proposed sanctions. She accused National's James Meager of "pointing a finger gun" at her - the same gesture coalition MPs had criticised Ngarewa-Packer for during her haka - the Speaker accepted he had not intended to, Swarbrick said it was an example where the interpretation can be in the eye of the beholder. She said if the government could "pick a punishment out of thin air" that was "not a democracy", putting New Zealand in very dangerous territory. An emotional Maipi-Clarke said she had been silent on the issue for a long time, the party's voices in haka having sent shockwaves around the world. She questioned whether that was why the MPs were being punished. "Since when did being proud of your culture make you racist?" "We will never be silenced, and we will never be lost," she said, calling the Treaty Principles bill was a "dishonourable vote". She had apologised to the Speaker and accepted the consequence laid down on the day, but refused to apologise. She listed other incidents in Parliament that resulted in no punishment. Maipi-Clarke called for the Treaty of Waitangi to be recognised in the Constitution Act, and for MPs to be required to honour it by law. "The pathway forward has never been so clear," she said. ACT's Nicole McKee said there were excuses being made for "bad behaviour", that The House was for making laws and having discussions, and "this is not about the haka, this is about process". She told The House she had heard no good ideas from the Te Pāti Māori, who she said resorted to intimidation when they did not get their way, but the MPs needed to "grow up" and learn to debate issues. She hoped 21 days would give them plenty of time to think about their behaviour. Labour MP and former Speaker Adrian Rurawhe started by saying there are "no winners in this debate", and it was clear to him it was the government, not the Parliament, handing out the punishments. He said the proposed sanctions set a precedent for future penalties, and governments may use it as a way to punish opposition, imploring National to think twice. He also said an apology from Te Pāti Māori would "go a long way", saying they had a "huge opportunity" to have a legacy in The House, but it was their choice - and while many would agree with the party there were rules and "you can't have it both ways". Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi said there had been many instances of misinterpretations of the haka in The House and said it was unclear why they were being punished, "is it about the haka... is about the gun gestures?" "Not one committee member has explained to us where 21 days came from," he said. Waititi took aim at Peters over his comments targeting his hat and "scribbles" on his face. He said the haka was an elevation of indigenous voice and the proposed punishment was a "warning shot from the colonial state that cannot stomach" defiance. Waititi said that throughout history when Māori did not play ball, the "coloniser government" reached for extreme sanctions, ending with a plea to voters: "make this a one-term government, enrol, vote". He brought out a noose to represent Māori wrongfully put to death in the past, saying "interpretation is a feeling, it is not a fact ... you've traded a noose for legislation".


Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Nauru, Metals Company Revise Deep Sea Mining Agreement
The updated 'sponsorship agreement' was announced in a press release from The Metals Company. Nauru has revised its commercial agreement with Canadian mining group The Metals Company for deep sea mining in international waters. The updated 'sponsorship agreement' was announced in a press release from The Metals Company. It comes at a time of increasing uncertainty in the deep sea mining industry with both the US and International Seabed Authority (ISA) respectively stating each offers a licencing pathway to mine the seabed in international waters. Nauru president David Adeang said in the press release that The Metals Company has been a 'trusted and respectful' partner to Nauru. 'We have worked to establish a responsible pathway for deep sea mineral development, one that can serve for a model for other developing states.' The area of international waters currently under the spotlight is the Clarion Clipperton Zone – a vast area of the Pacific Ocean that sits between Hawai'i, Kiribati and Mexico, and spans 4.5 million square kilometres. The zone is of high commercial interest because it has an abundance of polymetallic nodules that contain valuable metals like cobalt, nickel, manganese and copper, which are used to make products such as smartphones and electric batteries. The minerals are also used in weapons manufacturing. Nauru has special rights in the Clarion Clipperton Zone through the ISA, which under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) has jurisdiction over it. Since 2011, Nauru has partnered with The Metals Company to explore its area of the zone for minerals through that framework. At the same time, the ISA – which counts all Pacific nations among its 169-strong membership – has been developing a commercial mining code. The process, which began in 2014 and is ongoing, has been criticised by The Metals Company as effectively blocking it and Nauru's commercial mining interests. The company has also praised the US deepsea mining licencing pathway, which was effectively reactivated through an executive order President Donald Trump issued in April. That legislation, the Deep Sea Hard Mineral Resources Act, states the US can grant mining permits in international waters. At face value, it offers an alternative licencing route to commercial seabed activity in the high seas to the ISA. However, any cross-over between jurisdictions and authorities remains untested. In the press release from The Metals Company, its chief executive Gerard Barron made direct reference to Trump's order, titled 'Unleashing America's Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources'. He said he was heartened by its call 'for a joint assessment of a seabed benefit-sharing mechanism' and was certain that 'big ocean states' like Nauru would continue to play a leading role in the deep sea mining industry. The company confirmed two weeks ago it would not be applying for a commercial mining license through the ISA in June. Instead, it has said it would apply exclusively apply through US regulations. No mention of that decision was made in the press release. 'We remain unshakeable in our commitment to developing this project responsibly, transparently, and in a way that delivers real benefits to Nauruans,' Barron said. ISA secretary general Leticia Carvalho has previously said the US had no authority to offer permits in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone. 'Circumventing the regulatory authority of the ISA not only breaches international law, but also erodes trust,' Carvalho said. In addition to Nauru, Tonga, Kiribati and the Cook Islands have special rights in the Clarion Clipperton Zone through the ISA.