logo
Three Belgian soldiers hurt in ‘shooting incident' near Scottish town

Three Belgian soldiers hurt in ‘shooting incident' near Scottish town

The National13-05-2025

THREE Belgian soldiers have been injured in a 'shooting incident' during a training exercise in Scotland, Belgium's defence ministry has said.
The ministry confirmed that two of the soldiers are in a stable condition, with one expected to undergo surgery in Scotland before returning to Belgium.
The third was taken to hospital with minor injuries and has been discharged.
READ MORE: Man arrested after alleged arson attack on Keir Starmer's home
About 'a dozen' soldiers also suffered hearing damage as a result of the incident.
We previously reported on how a convoy of Belgian army vehicles was spotted near the town of Moray.
A spokesperson for the defence ministry said: 'On May 12, during Exercise Red Condor currently taking place in Scotland, three Belgian soldiers were injured.
'They received first aid on site and were then transferred to a regional hospital. In addition, around a dozen soldiers suffered hearing damage.
'Defence authorities have confirmed that the two soldiers who were seriously injured are now in stable condition.
'They have already been able to speak with their families. One of them will undergo surgery in Scotland before being repatriated to Belgium.
'The third soldier sustained minor injuries and has since returned to the military camp.'
The spokesperson added: 'The families of the injured personnel have been informed.
'The incident took place during a planned training exercise. An investigation has been launched to determine the exact circumstances.'
Last week it was reported that around 600 Belgian military personnel were in Moray for exercise Red Condor.
In a post on X, Belgian prime minister Bart De Wever offered his condolences to the injured soldiers and their families.
'I have received the sad news that three soldiers from the Third Parachute Battalion were injured during an exercise in Scotland,' he wrote.
'I wish the injured a speedy recovery. My thoughts are with their loved ones.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thousands join anti-austerity march in London to protest against Labour's cuts
Thousands join anti-austerity march in London to protest against Labour's cuts

The Guardian

time35 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Thousands join anti-austerity march in London to protest against Labour's cuts

Thousands of people marched through central London on Saturday calling for an end to public service and welfare cuts, in the first big anti-austerity march under Keir Starmer's Labour government. The campaign group People's Assembly, which organised the demonstration, called on the government to 'tax the rich and their hidden wealth to fund public services'. The People's Assembly said it was bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No More Austerity 2.0. Writer Kate Hardie, 57, was among those marching to Whitehall. She had voted for Labour in every election since she was 18, including last year, but said she will no longer support the party under Starmer. 'I worry about the fact that this government is making cuts that are unnecessary. People are really suffering because of it,' she said. She has friends who are disabled, who were 'devastated' when cuts to personal independence payments (Pip) were announced. 'It isn't just about my friends, because if we only vote for the people that we know, we're in trouble,' she added. Hardie was also dismayed over the prime minister's widely criticised 'island of strangers' speech, which was likened to the rhetoric of Enoch Powell. 'There's the problem of cuts and a problem with rising hate in this country and around the world,' she said. 'It's not just financial, it's also ideological and about how we treat each other.' She thinks the government's current approach will bear little fruit electorally. 'Why would you go and see a tribute band if you can get the real thing? It's not gonna work, it's ridiculous.' Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, said: 'People are very disappointed in this government. Whether it has been cuts to winter fuel, the two-child benefit cap still being in place, we haven't seen enough investment. 'We appreciate that the government have a tight fiscal window to operate in, but we think they need to tax the wealthy more and start investing in communities.' He said the 'commitment to roll out free school meals to all families in receipt of universal credit' was welcome but called on the government to 'go much further much faster because the only person who is benefiting from cuts to communities is Nigel Farage'. Holding a sign calling for landlords to be taxed – including herself, Corinne Richeux, 57, who runs an NGO based in China, said: 'I'm really worried about the state of the country and I don't think British people can take austerity any more. We need a real radical change of direction and we need to tax the rich to make it happen. 'I think that many rich people would support more taxation. I think it's cowardly of the Labour government to pander to the rich when the people are really struggling.' She said she 'was shocked when the first thing they did was to start slashing benefits'. 'I kind of hoped that he was keeping his cards close his chest and that he was planning on taxing the rich when he got into office. I wasn't expecting it to be quite so bad.' Labour-run councils were also a target of criticism. Helen Davies, 59, a social worker, chanted in support of bin workers in Birmingham, who have been striking since January. On central government, she said: 'It's not what we expect from a Labour government. The social inequalities are being driven harder, there has to be a positive alternative to that.'

Starmer's immigration speech ‘fundamentally racist', says Diane Abbott
Starmer's immigration speech ‘fundamentally racist', says Diane Abbott

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer's immigration speech ‘fundamentally racist', says Diane Abbott

Diane Abbott has said Keir Starmer's speech about Britain becoming an 'island of strangers' was 'fundamentally racist'. Ms Abbott, the UK's first black woman MP, said she was 'very disturbed' by the Prime Minister's recent speech in which he said that mass immigration had done 'incalculable damage' to Britain. Speaking at a thousands-strong anti-austerity march in London on Saturday, Ms Abbott said: 'I was very disturbed to hear Keir Starmer on the subject of immigration. 'He talked about closing the book on a squalid chapter for our politics – immigrants represent a squalid chapter. 'He talked about how he thought immigration has done incalculable damage to this green and pleasant land, which, of course, is nonsense – immigrants built this land. 'And finally, he said we risk becoming an island of strangers. I thought that was a fundamentally racist thing to say. It is contrary to Britain's history. 'My parents came to this country in the 50s. They were not strangers. They helped to build this country.' The Prime Minister faced outrage from Left-wing critics who claimed the reference to an 'island of strangers' had been deliberately lifted from Enoch Powell's incendiary 1968 speech on immigration, known as the 'Rivers of Blood' speech. Ms Abbott, who has served as a Labour MP since 1987, also accused Sir Keir of aping Nigel Farage in order to turn around Labour's dire poll rating. She said: 'I think Keir Starmer is quite wrong to say that the way that you beat Reform is to copy Reform.' The Prime Minister delivered the speech last month while announcing a new programme of immigration restrictions. He has castigated record-breaking net migration numbers under the Conservative governments of Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak as 'Britain's failed experiment in open borders'. The latest figures show that the net flow of people into Britain halved between 2023 and 2024. While Labour sought to take credit for the cut, former Conservative Home Secretary James Cleverly claimed his immigration rule changes were behind the sudden fall in numbers. Thousands of Left-wing demonstrators gathered in central London on Saturday to march against the Government's programme of spending cuts and welfare reform. The march was organised by The People's Assembly and featured representatives from the Green Party, the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union, the National Education Union (NEU) and the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) among other Left-wing groups. A spokesman for The People's Assembly slammed the Government's spending cuts and said: 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' The Prime Minister is facing increasing pressure from his Left flank to change direction. He has now announced a U-turn on a cut to winter fuel allowance, which removed the benefit payment from 10 million pensioners. A major change to the two-child benefit cap is also expected after concerns that it increases child poverty. But senior Left-wingers have urged Sir Keir to go further. Splits over economic policy A secret memo from Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, to Rachel Reeves, uncovered by The Telegraph, has also shown the splits over economic policy at the top of Government. In the memo, sent before the Spring Statement, Ms Rayner urged the Chancellor to raise taxes rather than cut spending to plug fiscal holes. Ms Abbott had the whip withdrawn in 2023 after sending a letter to the Observer, for which she later apologised, arguing Jews could suffer prejudice but not racism. In the run-up to the last general election, Ms Abbott was readmitted to the party, but there was rampant speculation that she would not be allowed to stand again as a Labour candidate in her Hackney North and Stoke Newington seat. After political pressure, Sir Keir said that she was 'free to stand' in the seat if she wished. She now sits as Mother of the House, the longest continuously serving woman MP in the House of Commons.

Government stalling in efforts to cut foreign aid spent on asylum seekers
Government stalling in efforts to cut foreign aid spent on asylum seekers

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Government stalling in efforts to cut foreign aid spent on asylum seekers

The government is struggling to cut the amount of money from the foreign aid budget it spends on asylum seekers in the UK, new figures show. Home Office figures show the department expects to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) this financial year, of which £2.1bn is expected to be spent on asylum support. The predictions for this year are only slightly less than the £2.4bn spent in 2024/25. Official development assistance (ODA) – which was slashed earlier this year to 0.3 per cent of GDP to pay for a boost to defence spending - is used to promote the economic development and welfare in developing countries around the world. A portion of this money is handed to the home office to support asylum seekers after they arrive in the UK, most of which goes towards their accommodation. But the government's failure to cut back on this spending has led aid organisations to accuse ministers of 'robbing Peter to pay Paul', claiming they are in danger of a 'reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government.' Figures published in March revealed that the number of asylum seekers housed in costly hotels has increased by more than 8,000 since the general election, with 38,079 migrants being housed in hotels at the end of December. It comes despite Sir Keir Starmer previously saying a Labour government wouldn't use the foreign aid budget to pay for asylum seekers' hotel costs – but admitted that the government would not be able to stop doing so immediately. 'I'm not going to pretend to you we can do that in the first 24 hours', he said in May 2024. Meanwhile, Labour's election manifesto vowed to 'end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds'. Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at the Bond network of development organisations, warned that 'cutting the UK aid budget while using it to prop up Home Office costs is a reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government.' "Diverting £2.2bn of UK aid to cover asylum accommodation in the UK is unsustainable, poor value for money, and comes at the expense of vital development and humanitarian programmes tackling the root causes of poverty, conflict and displacement. "It is essential that we support refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, but the government should not be robbing Peter to pay Paul', he told the BBC. Meanwhile, Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said: "Aid is meant to help the poorest and most vulnerable across the world: to alleviate poverty, improve life chances and reduce the risk of conflict. "Allowing the Home Office to spend it in the UK makes this task even harder." "The government must get a grip on spending aid in the UK. The Spending Review needs to finally draw a line under this perverse use of taxpayer money designed to keep everyone safe and prosperous in their own homes, not funding inappropriate, expensive accommodation here." The Home Office told the BBC it is committed to ending asylum hotels and is speeding up asylum decisions to save taxpayers' money. The department also said it had reduced overall asylum support costs by half a billion pounds in the last financial year, saving £200m in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. In April, The Independent revealed that the government had awarded a contract which allows for hotels and barges to house asylum seekers up until September 2027, despite Labour vowing to end the practice. The contract, advertised ahead of the election, was awarded by the Cabinet Office in October 2024 – just months after Labour won a historic landslide election victory - and runs up until September 2027. In June, the home secretary admitted she was "concerned about the level of money" being spent on asylum seekers' accommodation, adding: "We need to end asylum hotels altogether."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store