logo
Silence in Brussels after Poland says implementing migration pact 'not possible'

Silence in Brussels after Poland says implementing migration pact 'not possible'

Saudi Gazette07-03-2025

BRUSSELS — The European Commission remained conspicuously silent after Poland doubled down on its refusal to implement the Pact on Migration and Asylum, which was once described as a "historical" legislative achievement to allow member states to manage the arrival of asylum seekers in collaboration with each other.
The scene played out in plain view on Wednesday evening, after a meeting of home affairs ministers chaired by the Polish presidency of the European Council.
Tomasz Siemoniak, Poland's Minister of Interior, was asked point blank if his country would comply with the Migration Pact, which consists of five separate but interlinked laws that were painstakingly negotiated in the previous mandate.
Siemoniak, speaking next to Magnus Brunner, European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, said implementing the legislative overhaul "was not possible," citing the previous arguments voiced by Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
In early February, Tusk told Ursula von der Leyen, the pact's main proponent, that Poland was in a "particular position" due to the migration flows instrumentalised by Belarus at the Eastern border and the mass arrival of Ukrainians who fled Russia's war.
"Poland will not accept any burdens related to the relocation mechanism. This is not an ideological debate," Tusk said, referring to "huge" migratory pressure."If somebody says that Poland is expected to shoulder an additional burden, irrespective of who says that, my response is Poland will not accept an additional burden. Full stop."The Pact's central pillar is a novel mechanism of "mandatory solidarity" that will give governments three different options: relocate a certain number of asylum seekers, pay a financial contribution or provide operational support, such as personnel and equipment. The relocations need to reach 30,000 per year, and the financial contributions €600 million.From the start till the end of the negotiations, Poland, together with Hungary, firmly opposed the solidarity mechanism, claiming it would force them to take in migrants against their will.That claim, however, is incorrect given the pact provides two additional options. It also offers partial or total exemptions for countries deemed to be under migratory pressure.On Wednesday, Siemoniak said that Poland's position was "quite clear" and that "nothing has changed" since Tusk's remarks in February."We have presented the reasons why the implementation of the pact is not possible," he said, speaking Polish. "In particular, as Prime Minister Tusk has mentioned, when it comes to Poland's security."Siemoniak noted his country remained open to other initiatives related to speeding up deportations or combatting instrumentalised migration, but not the aforementioned pact.Standing by his side, Brunner did not push back.Asked by Euronews if the Commission, which is tasked with ensuring the correct application of EU law, would launch legal action against Poland over its refusal, Brunner avoided the question and instead praised the country's actions."Poland is very active in its presidency on these topics when it comes to returns, when it comes to other topics (like) weaponisation," Brunner said."I think Poland is such an important partner on that (front) and is doing a very active job as the presidency. And the rest has been said."During his confirmation hearing in November, Brunner had committed to launching legal action against countries that rebuffed the legislation.On Wednesday, however, he did not voice such commitment.The Pact is legally binding for all 27 member states and is expected to enter into force in 2026. Before then, the Commission has asked member states to submit national implementation plans, indicating their preparedness to apply the comprehensive set of rules and the extra resources they need to make the Pact a reality on the ground.As of today, Poland has not submitted its plan. — Euronews

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alarmed European leaders urge immediate de-escalation between Israel and Iran
Alarmed European leaders urge immediate de-escalation between Israel and Iran

Saudi Gazette

time5 hours ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Alarmed European leaders urge immediate de-escalation between Israel and Iran

BRUSSELS — European leaders are voicing alarm over the military attacks launched overnight between Israel and Iran and calling for immediate de-escalation to avoid an all-out war that could spiral across the Middle East and beyond. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was one of the first heads of government to react, urging "all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently". "Escalation serves no one in the region. Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate," Starmer said on social media. "Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy." His Dutch counterpart, Dick Schoof, issued a similar message. "Alarming attacks in the Middle East," Schoof said. "The Netherlands calls on all parties to remain calm and to refrain from further attacks and retaliation. In the interest of stability in the region, immediate de-escalation is necessary." German Chancellor Friedrich Merz convened his security cabinet after speaking by phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who informed him about the objectives behind the military operation. The Iranian nuclear program "violates the provisions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and poses a serious threat to the entire region, especially to the State of Israel," Merz said in a statement as he warned against regional instability. Merz cited the recent conclusion by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that found Iran was not complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years. Germany stands ready "to exert influence on the parties to the conflict using all diplomatic means at our disposal. The goal must remain to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons," the chancellor added. French President Emmanuel Macron also gathered his defense and security team to assess the escalation of hostilities and implement "all necessary steps" to protect French nationals, diplomats and military officials deployed across the region. In a post on X he condemned Iran's ongoing nuclear program and reaffirmed Israel's right to defend itself and ensure its security, while echoing political calls for "maximum restraint" and immediate de-escalation. "Peace and security for all in the region must remain our guiding principle," Macron said. As part of his diplomatic outreach, Macron spoke with US President Donald Trump, with whom he is believed to be in regular contact, as well as with Merz, Starmer and the leaders from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Jordan. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was highly critical of Israel, denouncing the military strikes as a "clear provocation that disregards international law". "The Netanyahu administration is trying to drag our region and the entire world into disaster with its reckless, aggressive and lawless actions," Erdoğan wrote in Turkish, also posted on X. "The international community must put an end to Israeli banditry that targets global and regional stability," he went on. "The attacks of Netanyahu and his massacre network, which are setting our entire region on fire, must be prevented." In Brussels, the leaders of the European Union institutions weighed in on the "deeply alarming" chain of events. "Europe urges all parties to exercise maximum restraint, de-escalate immediately and refrain from retaliation," Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said in a statement that did not mention Israel or Iran by name. "A diplomatic resolution is now more urgent than ever, for the sake of the region's stability and global security," von der Leyen added. High Representative Kaja Kallas described the situation as "dangerous" and said that "diplomacy remains the best path forward". Earlier on Friday, Kallas spoke with her Israeli counterpart, Gideon Sa'ar, and her team was in touch with Tehran. "We're speaking to both sides and channels are open," her spokesperson said. Asked if the Commission was ready to evacuate its diplomatic presence on the ground, which is considered to be limited in scope, the spokesperson said: "Appropriate measures have been taken to reinforce the security of our staff and to mitigate risks." Other capitals offered their initial reactions through their foreign affairs ministries. "The situation in the Middle East is deeply concerning, and the cycle of military escalation must be brought to an end," said Finland's Elina Valtonen, noting the staff of the Finnish embassy in Tehran was "safe" and continued to operate "normally". Austria's Beate Meinl-Reisinger said her country and its partners should prepare "for all possible scenarios," as Ireland's Simon Harris cautioned that "further escalation would bring a very real risk of regional spillover". "This would be disastrous for all the peoples in the region," Harris said. Meanwhile, the Kremlin's spokesperson said Vladimir Putin was receiving "real-time updates" on the "sharp escalation in tensions" adding that "Russia is concerned and condemns the sharp escalation in tensions between Israel and Iran." Russia is a close ally of Iran, which is under sanctions for providing military supplies to support the invasion of Ukraine. The renewed conflict between Israel and Iran comes two days before the leaders of the Group of Seven (G7) are set to meet for a two-day summit in Canada. The summit's agenda was intended to focus on Russia's war on Ukraine and the international trade system, but the latest developments are expected to alter that agenda. — Euronews

Iran threatens nuclear escalation after UN watchdog finds it in breach of obligations
Iran threatens nuclear escalation after UN watchdog finds it in breach of obligations

Saudi Gazette

timea day ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Iran threatens nuclear escalation after UN watchdog finds it in breach of obligations

TEHRAN — Iran has warned it will ramp up its nuclear activities after the United Nations nuclear watchdog's 35-member board of governors adopted a resolution Thursday declaring it in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. Tehran retaliated by announcing the launch of a new uranium enrichment center and the installation of advanced centrifuges – an escalatory move likely to complicate nuclear talks with the United States set to resume this weekend. Nations attending the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board meeting in Vienna voted on the resolution, with 19 in favor, 3 against and 11 abstentions, Reuters reported. The IAEA has previously accused Iran of non-cooperation but Thursday's move marks an official finding of non-compliance and raises the prospect of escalating the issue to the UN Security Council. The resolution was tabled by European countries and the US after a May 31 IAEA report found Iran to be non-compliant in its nuclear duties, including failing to answer questions on uranium particles found in undeclared sites in the country, and its stockpiling of uranium enriched to nearly weapons grade. Iran says the IAEA report was politicized. Uranium is a nuclear fuel that, when highly enriched, can be used to make a bomb. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful condemned the US, the United Kingdom, France and Germany for tabling the resolution and said it has 'no option but to respond.'A day ahead of the vote, a senior Iranian official told CNN that 'Iran intends to launch a series of retaliatory nuclear measures as soon as the resolution is adopted at the IAEA.''These measures include scaling back cooperation with the agency and imposing certain restrictions, activating advanced and new-generation centrifuges, and removing monitoring cameras from the Isfahan facility,' the official Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X last week: 'Mark my words, as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights.'In 2022, the IAEA censured Iran over uranium particles found at the undeclared sites. Iran also dismissed that motion as 'politicized,' and responded by removing surveillance cameras from key sites – depriving negotiators of up-to-date information on its enrichment IAEA board resolution comes as Tehran and Washington are in the midst of complicated negotiations over Iran's nuclear two nations will hold indirect talks in the Omani capital, Muscat, on Sunday for the sixth time, Oman's Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi said on X Thursday. Despite multiple rounds of negotiations over a new nuclear deal, a major sticking point remains: Iran's insistence on its right to enrich has said he's grown less confident in being able to strike a deal with Iran, saying in a new interview that Tehran could be 'delaying' striking an agreement.'I'm getting more and more less confident about it. They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame, but I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,' Trump said in an interview with a New York Post podcast that was released on tensions have escalated significantly ahead of the next round of Wednesday night, the US State and Defense departments made efforts to arrange the departure of non-essential personnel from locations around the Middle East, according to US officials and sources familiar with the efforts. It's not clear what caused the change in posture, but a defense official said US Central Command is monitoring 'developing tension in the Middle East.'Trump said the personnel are being moved out 'because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens. But they have been or we've given notice to move out, and we'll see what happens.'On Thursday, the US embassy in Jerusalem also issued a security alert restricting US government staff and their families from traveling outside of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Be'er Sheva until further notice. — CNN

Slovakia cannot support new EU sanctions against Russia without energy solutions, PM says
Slovakia cannot support new EU sanctions against Russia without energy solutions, PM says

Al Arabiya

time2 days ago

  • Al Arabiya

Slovakia cannot support new EU sanctions against Russia without energy solutions, PM says

Slovakia will not back the EU's 18th package of sanctions against Russia unless the European Commission provides a solution to the situation the country faces if the bloc phases out Russian energy as planned, Prime Minister Robert Fico said. The Commission proposed on Tuesday a new round of sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago, targeting Moscow's energy revenues, its banks and its military industry. Fico has criticized separate European Union plans to phase out Russian gas and other energy imports in the coming years, which the EU executive announced last month, calling them 'economic suicide.' Hungary, which like Slovakia, continues to rely on Russian gas and oil supplies, and like Slovakia has maintained warm ties with Moscow, has also rejected the plans. EU countries will start debating the sanctions proposals this week, which require unanimity in the bloc for approval. 'Slovakia will not support the upcoming 18th sanctions package against Russia unless the European Commission provides it with a real solution to the crisis situation that Slovakia will find itself in after the complete cessation of gas, oil and nuclear fuel supplies from Russia,' Fico wrote in a Facebook post late on Tuesday. Slovakia has not blocked any previous sanctions packages. But Fico had said over the weekend Slovakia would block any sanctions that harmed its national interests. The Commission's new sanctions package proposes banning transactions with Russia's Nord Stream gas pipelines, as well as banks that engage in sanctions circumvention. The Commission has also proposed lowering the Group of Seven nations' price cap on Russian crude oil to $45 a barrel, from $60 a barrel, to cut Russia's energy revenues. Fico has long opposed sanctions against Russia, saying they harmed Slovakia and the EU more than Moscow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store