Iran leader Khamenei sees his inner circle hollowed out by Israel
FILE PHOTO: Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during the 36th anniversary of the death of the leader of Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, at Khomeini's shrine in southern Tehran, Iran June 4, 2025. Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS/File photo
DUBAI/LONDON - Iran's 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei cuts an increasingly lonely figure.
Khamenei has seen his main military and security advisers killed by Israeli air strikes, leaving major holes in his inner circle and raising the risk of strategic errors, according to five people familiar with his decision-making process.
One of those sources, who regularly attends meetings with Khamenei, described the risk of miscalculation to Iran on issues of defence and internal stability as "extremely dangerous".
Several senior military commanders have been killed since Friday including Khamenei's main advisers from the Revolutionary Guards, Iran's elite military force: the Guards' overall commander Hossein Salami, its aerospace chief Amir Ali Hajizadeh who headed Iran's ballistic missile program and spymaster Mohammad Kazemi.
These men were part of the supreme leader's inner circle of roughly 15-20 advisers comprising Guards commanders, clerics, and politicians, according to the sources who including three people who attend or have attended meetings with the leader on major issues and two close to officials who regularly attend.
The loose group meets on an ad-hoc basis, when Khamenei's office reaches out to relevant advisers to gather at his compound in Tehran to discuss an important decision, all the people said. Members are characterised by unwavering loyalty to him and the ideology of the Islamic Republic, they added.
Khamenei, who was imprisoned before the 1979 revolution and maimed by a bomb attack before becoming leader in 1989, is profoundly committed to maintaining Iran's Islamic system of government and deeply mistrustful of the West.
Under Iran's system of government he has supreme command of the armed forces, the power to declare war, and can appoint or dismiss senior figures including military commanders and judges.
Khamenei makes the final decision on important matters, though he values advice, listens attentively to diverse viewpoints, and often seeks additional information from his counsellors, according to one source who attends meetings.
"Two things you can say about Khamenei: he is extremely stubborn but also extremely cautious. He is very cautious. That is why he has been in power for as long as he has," said Alex Vatanka, director of the Iran Program at the Middle East Institute think-tank in Washington.
"Khamenei is pretty well placed to do the basic cost-benefit analysis which really fundamentally gets to one issue more important than anything else: regime survival."
KHAMENEI'S SON AT THE FORE
The focus on survival has repeatedly been put to the test. Khamenei has deployed the Revolutionary Guards and its affiliated Basij militia to quell national protests in 1999, 2009 and 2022.
However, while the security forces have always been able to outlast demonstrators and restore state rule, years of Western sanctions have caused widespread economic misery that analysts say could ultimately threaten internal unrest.
The stakes could barely be higher for Khamenei who faces an escalating war with Israel, which has targeted nuclear and military sites and personnel with air attacks, drawing retaliatory Iranian missile fire, insiders and analysts said.
The five people familiar with Khamenei's decision-making process stressed that other insiders who have not been targeted by Israel's strikes remain important and influential, including top advisers on political, economic and diplomatic issues.
Khamenei designates such advisers to handle issues as they arise, extending his reach directly into a wide array of institutions spanning military, security, cultural, political and economic domains, two of the sources said.
Operating this way, including in bodies nominally under the elected president, means Khamenei's office is often involved not only in the biggest questions of state but in executing even minor initiatives, the sources said.
His son Mojtaba has over the past 20 years grown ever more central to this process, the sources said, building a role that cuts between the personalities, factions and organisations involved to coordinate on specific issues, the sources said.
A mid-ranking cleric seen by some insiders as a potential successor to his ageing father, Mojtaba has built close ties with the Guards giving him added leverage within across Iran's political and security apparatus, the sources said.
Ali Asghar Hejazi, the deputy of political security affairs at Khamenei's office, has been involved in sensitive security decisions and is often described as the most powerful intelligence official in Iran, the sources said.
Meanwhile, the head of Khamenei's office, Mohammad Golpayegani, as well as former Iranian foreign ministers Ali Akbar Velayati and Kamal Kharazi, and ex-parliament speaker Ali Larijani, remain trusted confidants on diplomatic and domestic policies issues such as the nuclear dispute, the sources said.
The loss of the Revolutionary Guards commanders nonetheless decimates the top ranks of a military organisation that he has put at the centre of power since becoming supreme leader in 1989, relying on it for both internal security and Iran's regional strategy.
While the regular army chain of command runs through the defence ministry under the elected president, the Guards answer personally to Khamenei, securing the best military equipment for their land, air and sea branches and giving their commanders a major state role.
As he faces one of the most dangerous moments in the Islamic Republic's history, Khamenei finds himself further isolated by the recent losses other key advisers in the region as Iran's "Axis of Resistance" coalition has been hammered by Israel.
Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, who was personally close to the Iranian leader, was killed by an Israeli airstrike in September last year and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was overthrown by rebels in December. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
14 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Will Trump join in Israel's crusade for Iran's total surrender? Is US intervention imminent?
Protesters demonstrating in Los Angeles on June 18. The chances of a US intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict remain very high. PHOTO: AFP News analysis Will Trump join in Israel's crusade for Iran's total surrender? Is US intervention imminent? – A week since Israel launched its strikes on Iran, all eyes are now focused on whether the United States will join the war by administering the decisive blow to Iran's nuclear capabilities. President Donald Trump is enjoying the suspense he has created around his future actions. 'I may do it. I may not do it. Nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Mr Trump told journalists on June 18, as he supervised the planting of a massive flagpole on the lawn of the White House in Washington. And at least in theory, there is still some scope for diplomacy to bring the current fighting to a halt. Iranian officials are darting in and out of Oman, the neighbouring Gulf state most involved in mediating between Iran and the US. Yet it is clear that all the key protagonists in this conflict – Israel, Iran and the US – are now facing significant time constraints that require their far-reaching decisions. It is equally clear that the Americans and Israelis are no longer aiming just to reduce Iran's nuclear and broader military capabilities; they seek Iran's total surrender. The chances of a US intervention in the conflict remain very high. As he ordered his first strikes on Iran on June 13, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was still unsure of the extent and duration of the US support for Israel's operations. For although the Israeli leader gained Washington's tacit approval for the action, Mr Trump still appeared to believe that a limited Israeli attack would be followed by Iran's swift return to the diplomatic negotiations with the US, which have been held on and off since April 2025. That's why officials in Washington were initially at pains to describe Israel's offensive as 'unilateral action', in which the US wasn't and supposedly won't ever be involved. And that's also why Israeli military commanders were under orders to inflict as much damage as possible on Iran and as quickly as possible before the US President made any calls for a ceasefire. The US position appears to have changed radically on June 16, as Mr Trump faced the handful of leaders of the G-7, the world's most industrialised nations, at a summit in Canada. The US President startled his summit counterparts by refusing to apply any breaks on Israel. French President Emmanuel Macron, who claimed that the US was still looking for a ceasefire, was promptly dismissed by Mr Trump as just a 'publicity-seeking' politician. 'Whether purposely or not, Emmanuel always gets it wrong,' Mr Trump wrote on June 17 in his Truth Social post, published while the American President was still in the air on his way back to Washington. Since then, US officials have increasingly given the impression that only the manner and timing of American intervention in the war are now in question. It is unclear what caused the shift in Mr Trump's position. Still, the most plausible explanation is that the US leader is impressed by the early success of the Israeli operation and wants to portray himself as the real architect of a new Middle East. Mr Trump presents himself as part of the Israeli operation: 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' he claimed in one of his social media postings. The White House has released an extensive list of quotes from Mr Trump going back more than a decade, documenting his opposition to Iran's nuclear programme. This is designed to present the war as an example of what happens to those who defy the American leader's wishes. Mr Trump is keen to maintain strategic ambiguity about his next moves. However, everything points to an imminent US military intervention. First, there is the massive US military buildup. An aircraft carrier strike group led by the USS Nimitz has departed the South China Sea and is en route to the Middle East, where it will meet with the USS Carl Vinson strike group, which is already in the Gulf region. Tellingly, other ships belonging to the US Navy's Fifth Fleet stationed in the Gulf have left their port in Bahrain and dispersed throughout Gulf waters, a move intended both to reduce Iran's ability to hit back at the US fleet but also offer the US the ability to escort oil tankers through the Gulf, should the war expand. Meanwhile, scores of US Air Force mid-air refuelling tankers have arrived in Britain and several other US bases in Europe. These tankers will be crucial for extending the reach of America's B-2 stealth bombers equipped to carry the 13,600 kg-heavy GBU-57, the 'bunker buster' bomb allegedly capable of penetrating Iran's critical nuclear site at Fordow, dug deep inside a mountain. Although there is plenty of talk about an impending Israeli commando operation on Fordow, and Israel's air force has repeatedly bombed the entrances of this Iranian nuclear installation, the consensus remains that only the Americans are capable of destroying it. Equally telling is Mr Trump's determination to silence critics within his Make America Great Again (Maga) movement, who are unhappy with the prospect of a new US military entanglement. Mr Tucker Carlson, the influential political commentator, was dismissed by Mr Trump as 'kooky' after he dared oppose the President and subsequently withdrew his criticism. And Vice President J.D. Vance, known as the leader of the non-interventionist camp, is also falling in line. The US President, Mr Vance, claimed, 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment'. Meanwhile, time is running short for everyone. Although Israeli defences continue to intercept the bulk of Iranian missiles fired at Israel's cities, the rate of such interceptions is declining. An estimated 30 per cent of Iran's missiles are now getting through, perhaps an indication that Israel may be running low on stocks of its Arrow-3 interceptors. A US entry into the war will provide Israel with a considerable boost. Meanwhile, Iran has no chance of regaining control of its airspace. It possesses a dwindling number of missiles, probably not more than a quarter of the 2,000 ballistic missiles it originally had. It also faces grim choices. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country's supreme leader, may be moving from bunker to bunker. Still, most of his military and intelligence advisers were killed in Israeli air strikes or targeted assassinations. The Iranians desperately need a ceasefire to save their regime, but dare not opt for the only diplomatic option now on offer: a humiliating and wholesale surrender of their nuclear capability. And although Mr Trump still enjoys keeping everyone guessing about what he may do, he also knows that keeping the US military on high alert for too long costs a great deal of money and brings diminishing political returns. Jonathan Eyal is based in London and Brussels and writes on global political and security matters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Finnish MPs agree more rights for indigenous Sami parliament
The parliament is the Sami people's main political body in Finland. PHOTO: REUTERS HELSINKI - Finnish lawmakers approved on June 19 a long-awaited legal reform of the Sami parliament that strengthens the rights of Europe's only recognised native people to decide how they are governed. The changes to the Sami Parliament Act aim to bring the law governing the assembly into line with Finland's human rights obligations. The parliament is the Sami people's main political body in the Nordic country. The new law modifies the Sami electoral system and the criteria for standing in these elections. It also clarifies the Finnish authorities' duty to consult the Sami on matters that concern them. The acting speaker of the Sami parliament told AFP the bill – which had stalled under three previous governments – included important elements which 'strengthen the Sami people's powers to decide how they are governed'. 'For more than 14 years now, we have had to fight to have a free voice,' said Mr Tuomas Aslak Juuso, who is Acting President of the Sami Parliamen t. The Sami are an indigenous Finno-Ugric people inhabiting the Arctic region of Sapmi, which encompasses parts of Norway, Sweden, Finland, and the Kola Peninsula of Russia. They are known for their unique culture, including their traditional reindeer herding practices, languages, and handicrafts. Some 10,500 indigenous Sami live in Finland, speaking three different Sami languages. Under the Finnish constitution, they have the right to keep their own languages and culture. And in their homeland in Finnish Lapland, Sapmi, they have the power to take political decisions on such matters. Their main decision-making body is the Sami parliament, which is based in the Arctic town of Inari and holds elections every four years for its 21 seats. Mother tongue United Nations human rights bodies criticised Finland several times over the Sami Parliament Act. They said the Act breached Finland's human rights obligations because it allowed people who the Sami parliament did not deem eligible to be included on the electoral roll. The new Act bases a person's eligibility to vote or stand in Sami parliamentary elections on language. This means they must have one of the Sami languages as their mother tongue, or have at least one parent, grandparent or great-grandparent who did so. MPs who opposed the reform said the new criteria exclude from the electoral roll people who should be included. But Mr Juuso said it allowed the parliament to finally 'focus more on other issues which are perhaps even more important for the future of the Sami language and culture'. In addition to northern Finland, the Sami homeland of Sapmi stretches over the northern parts of Norway, Russia and Sweden. There are an estimated 75,000 to 100,000 Sami in total, many of whom live outside Sapmi. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
30 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Iran foreign minister to attend OIC meet in Turkey on Saturday, source says
Iran foreign minister to attend OIC meet in Turkey on Saturday, source says ANKARA - Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi is expected to attend a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Istanbul on Saturday, a Turkish foreign ministry source said on Thursday, as war rages between Israel and Iran. The source said a special session of the 51st OIC Council of Foreign Ministers is expected to focus on Israel's recent strikes against Iran, including Thursday's attack on the Khondab nuclear site in Arak. The Israeli military said it targeted a partially built heavy-water reactor at the site, which experts say could produce weapons-grade plutonium. Turkey has sharply criticised Israel, called its actions illegal and said Iran was legitimately defending itself. Opening the two-day summit, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan is expected to call on Muslim countries to unite in the face of "destabilising actions" across the region, the ministry source said. President Tayyip Erdogan will also address the conference. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, which includes 57 member states, has long served as a political and diplomatic forum for Muslim countries. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
