
Dundee issue update on new Camperdown Stadium project
The American revealed that the cost for the project stands at £3.5m, and is likely to rise.
His update reads: "We have had many enquiries from Dundee supporters concerned by the recent media reports regarding the Camperdown Stadium Development Project.
Camperdown Stadium Development Project Update - 15th August 2025
We have had many enquiries from Dundee supporters concerned by the recent media reports regarding the Camperdown Stadium Development Project.
As a result, an update on the project has been provided by the club's… pic.twitter.com/vbW4GM8dnc — Dundee Football Club (@DundeeFC) August 15, 2025
"Our Planning Application in Principle remains ongoing and we continue to adhere to a process which I know has been frustrating for many fans excited by our vision for a new home for our club. Rest assured it is just as frustrating for all of us at the club and our team of consultants as we navigate through the process at mounting cost – currently £3.5m and counting.
"Notwithstanding the regulatory boundaries of this planning process, it is incumbent upon us to communicate openly with the main beneficiaries of this project: you, the fans.
"Firstly, we remain absolutely committed to working with Dundee City Council and statutory consultees such as Transport Scotland to resolve technical points that ought not to be insurmountable for a project that will deliver £150m of economic benefit to the city, be a transformative pillar of this club's future and provide an ambitious asset to the Scottish football estate.
"It is curious that Transport Scotland uploaded a consultation response based on out-of-date information, whilst all parties remain in ongoing technical discussion on the primary issue relating to the junction. Yet we are informed that was requested of them by our Dundee City Council officers.
"Our planning consultant provided up-to-date context in a letter uploaded to the council's planning portal on the same day as the Transport Scotland submission. As of this morning, it remains unpublished. In the interests of accuracy and transparency, it is available here – Applicant Letter to DCC Planning
"This failure to present both sides of the correspondence in public has understandably contributed to a negative media narrative, which is unhelpful and harmful to the public perception of such a high profile and complex planning application.
"It is merely the latest in a series of inexplicable procedural anomalies, which are becoming increasingly commonplace.
"Among the concerns raised is the unexplained delay of vital responses from key consultees: The Draft Traffic Management Plan was submitted to DCC on 5 March 2025. The response from DCC [Roads], dated 4 April, was not sent to the applicant until 24 July, along with another response from Police Scotland, dated 30 May. Why the delay in reporting such vital information to us? Transport Scotland's response to the Draft Traffic Management Plan, dated 7 August, was provided to the applicant on 8 August.
"It is our dear hope that our misgivings prove to be unfounded. That our assigned senior council officers are shown to have acted with the utmost professionalism and good faith. That ultimately our supporters will be able to see our vision become their reality.
"Yet we are increasingly alarmed by unhelpful procedural developments that seem to obstruct rather than try to support – in principle, remember – an ambitious multi-use stadium and event campus.
"This, despite on-the-record quotes from council spokespeople stating they exist 'to work with developers to overcome obstacles', when the opposite has been our experience. This, also, despite the fact that in 2017 the Camperdown location was recommended to us by council figures as a preferred site among many under consideration. Ironically, the site since approved for the Eden Project was also under consideration but deemed unsuitable to meet the traffic demands.
"Having had no communication from the Executive Director of City Development since the application was submitted in February 2024 – a concern in itself given the obvious long-term benefits to a city facing financial pressures across its main institutions – I am encouraged that the Chief Executive, Greg Colgan, has today agreed to a meeting on the project, at which Robin Presswood will also attend.
"We will continue to respect the planning application process in spite of the challenges we have summarised for you illustratively but certainly not exhaustively. We will do so against an apparent indifference by certain council officers to the wider benefits of this project and to our city's regeneration, via the social and economic benefits we have outlined.
"In summary, we will continue the fight – though we had never intended or foreseen it being thus – to show our ambition for the City of Dundee and our commitment to a prosperous future for Dundee Football Club, its fans and, indeed, its rivals. The outcome of this process will, of course, have future ramifications for all fans, irrespective of the colour of their scarves.
"We now urge the most senior elected figures within Dundee City Council, together with Scottish Government and Holyrood parliamentarians to pay close attention as we approach a critical juncture of this long-running process."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
44 minutes ago
- The National
Innis & Gunn named Scotland's best at World Beer Awards
The World Beer Awards are an annual global competition judged by international beer experts to crown the best brews in each style and country. The win marks another award for The Original, which has been winning awards for the past 22 years, and this year secured gold in the Wood Aged category. Lager Beer also retained its crown as gold winner in the Classic Pilsener category. Both beers topped the Scottish charts as Country Winners in their category. Full list of the World Beer Awards 2025 winners below: Gold – Country Winners Innis & Gunn – The Original (6.6%) — Wood Aged. Innis & Gunn – Lager Beer (4.6%) — Classic Pilsener. Paolozzi – Helles Lager (5.2%) — Helles/Münchner. Anti Establishment – Double Hazy IPA (7.2%) — Imperial/Double/DIPA. Tennents – Extra (9.0%) — Bock. Jackstaff – IPA (0.5%) — NO & LOW: IPA. Tennents – Light (3.4%) — Gluten-free. Silver Arran – Milestone Special Reserve (6.0%) — Wood Aged. Harviestoun Brewery – Schiehallion (4.8%) — Classic Pilsener. Bronze Arran – Dark (4.3%) — English Style Brown Ale. Tennents – Lager (4.0%) — Classic Pilsener. Untitled – IPA (5.5%) — English Style IPA. Harviestoun Brewery – Ochil Lager (4.0%) — Czech Style Pale. Freedom – 4.8% Organic Helles Lager (4.8%) — Helles/Münchner. Tennents – Gluten Free (5.0%) — Hoppy Pilsener. Tennents – 1885 (5.0%) — International Lager. Lager Beer, brewed with naked golden oats and zesty aromatic hops for a crisp, refreshing taste, continues to outperform major international brands in blind tastings. The Original, launched in 2003 and matured using oak for a smooth, rich flavour, is the beer that first put Innis & Gunn on the map. Dougal Gunn Sharp, founder and master brewer, said: 'This is an immensely proud moment for the team, particularly seeing Lager Beer maintain back-to-back gold status. World leading beer that could only come from Scotland. unique, we've been making Original for over two decades and it continues to win awards and delight customers in Scotland and beyond. READ MORE: 'A lad o' pairts who revelled in being of use': An obituary of George Reid 'This is the global benchmark for brewing excellence, and a real testament to the hard work and craft of the team. Scotland's brewing scene is world-class and these wins put Scottish beer firmly on the global map.' The World Beer Awards celebrate the best beers from around the globe, with entries judged for outstanding flavour, quality and innovation. Breweries from across Scotland and beyond compete in style categories ranging from lagers to speciality and wood-aged beers.

Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Rail campaigners say potential 5.5% fares rise would be ‘ripping off' passengers
July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6% hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5%, which means fares could jump by 5.5%. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for pressure group Railfuture, told the PA news agency 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He said: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' Mr Williamson said he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71% of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. 'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise, so as the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways (GBR), it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.' GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation. About 45% of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Rail campaigners say potential 5.5% fares rise would be ‘ripping off' passengers
The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6% hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5%, which means fares could jump by 5.5%. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for pressure group Railfuture, told the PA news agency 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He said: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' Mr Williamson said he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71% of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. 'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise, so as the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways (GBR), it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.' GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation. About 45% of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'