Guernsey deputies use wheelchairs as part of accessibility event
He said "Every time somebody talks about a policy, a practice or a procedure, a light will go on and they'll say... 'where does this policy, practice or procedure sit within the new disability ordinance?'."Bury, president of the Committee for Employment and Social Security, said the challenge highlighted how each "tiny dip and incline" became a "massive" hurdle while using a wheelchair."This has been really valuable to everyone," she added.Deputy Gary Collins, vice-president of the Transport Licensing Authority, wore a blindfold and used a cane as part of the event.
He said: "You felt totally out of your comfort zone."Being totally blind was a very new experience and a real challenge."Things like this highlight what we need to do, we know we've got an ordinance in place about accessibility for certain things."He said the experience would "remain with him" and added "it's something to really take forward".
Deputy Adrian Gabriel, president of the Committee for the Environment and Infrastructure, said the experience was "hard physically" and "you don't appreciate what your legs do"."You take them away and you appreciate how everything else works harder," he added."My arms are buzzing from getting up and down ramps over uneven surfaces."The deputy said some disabled people were unable to visit Castle Cornet due to accessibility, which he said was a "real sad state of affairs I'm afraid".Gabriel said measures needed to be put in place in order to make sure it was "accessible to all".
'Real, everyday problems'
Chantelle Tucker, vision support services officer at Guernsey Blind Association (GBA), said: "It was an eye-opener for them to see the difficulties that people locally faced on a day-to-day basis."It was a really positive experience."A lot of them [deputies] made comments about their depth perception, about the distance, disorientation and it's trying to explain that these are the difficulties and challenges that people face on a day-to-day basis."These are real everyday problems that most people face."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Couple in Winnersh 'angry' as council halts tree removal plans
A woman with a rare degenerative disease has said she is angry a council halted the removal of a tree stopping her from making her home fully and John Garcia hoped to build a ramp and flat space outside their bungalow in Winnersh, Berkshire, to accommodate an electric said they needed to remove an oak tree at the end of their drive, but Wokingham Borough Council halted their plans by making a Tree Protection Order (TPO).The council has declined to comment on the case. The couple said when they initially enquired about removing the tree they were given the green light by the they said work on felling it was halted half-way through and the local authority said it must stay, applying a TPO to what was pair said they challenged the order, but it was refused by the council."It looks ridiculous, there is no public amenity value there," Ms Garcia said. "I can't walk, I've got limited standing, I'm hoisted and I'm cared for 24/7," Ms Garcia said."We have to use a manual ramp, which is shorter than what we need."Ms Garcia said she is forced to travel backwards down the ramp and there have been two occasions when she has "crashed off".She said it had taken some of her independence as she is unable to put the ramp out herself and always needs someone with her when leaving the house. The BBC has seen council emails that state that in May this year officers from the local authority were still trying to confirm whether the tree belonged to Garcia said: "It's very upsetting to be honest."He said they have sent reports and pictures to the council and explained why they needed the tree removed."They're just reluctant to help," he said. You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
BBC News
17 hours ago
- BBC News
Proposal for new homes in St Peter Port rejected
A proposal for seven new homes in St Peter Port has been rejected by application for four new flats and three houses on Mount Durand was turned down by the States of Guernsey Planning Service because it said the design did not fit with the authority referred to the impact it would have on neighbouring properties, in its report. "The site lies within a conservation area in which it is the duty of the Development and Planning Authority to pay special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing its character or appearance," it said. The developer SFD Limited has been approached for comment. The application proposed to demolish existing buildings and erect the new homes to the north of site which was adjacent to number 16 Mount Durand and three dwelling to east of the States said the proposed terrace of houses to the rear of the site with the associated retaining wall would be of a scale that was "substantially larger than other buildings in the locality and with blank gables which do not represent a high standard of design"."The proposed development, by reason of its design, mass and scale, would detract from the setting of the adjoining protected buildings and prove detrimental to the special interest of the protected buildings of architectural and historic interest contrary to Policy GP5 of the Island Development Plan (IDP)," added the States.
BBC News
20 hours ago
- BBC News
Mum raises road safety concerns over north Guernsey housing plans
A family in the north of Guernsey says safety is a "real issue" due to speeding motorists in the area and believes plans for more housing will only make it Reader, who has lived in Saltpans Road for four years, said she no longer walked her children up the road after a number of incidents involving said her seven-year-old son was nearly hit by a speeding car while walking and then he was verbally abused. She is concerned new infrastructure for housing will create added danger for active travel. The States of Guernsey said enabling housing was a top priority and part of the work was to create new infrastructure in the area to ease pressure on existing roads. However, Claire said residents who have lived in the area for 40 years have noticed a difference in the road, with more congestion and it was now far busier. "As it stands, it's not safe to walk or active travel. There are over 700 houses and some of the plans we are looking up to 1,200 houses being built a stone's throw from where we live."Residents are finding all the buildings seem to be in the north - and there are pockets in other parishes - but the distribution of properties on the island is not fair." 'Massive concern' She said the local community was not saying not to build but for the States to consider the current residents, conduct an accurate traffic report and reduce the number of houses being built in the added: "Build but consider how you are building and don't build it all in the north."Safety is a massive concern for lots of people."The States said the work to create new infrastructure in the area would ease pressure on its existing roads and give more people more options to get around. Claire's son Bertie said: "I don't feel that safe at all and I've nagged my mum to let me walk and cycle to school but I can't because it is way too dangerous." Her daughter, Grace, thinks the road near their house should be 15mph rather than 25mph. "Sometimes they go at a good speed but most of the time they are just speeding," she said."When I'm walking on my own it is a bit scary because I feel like cars are going to hit me." States Property Unit said the States' desire to deliver critical infrastructure to enable a homes-building programme as soon as possible had led to accelerated consideration of the wider requirements of the said: "This has ensured a solid foundation for this outline planning application for road infrastructure and also provides the springboard for the next stages, alongside the additional reports and engagement needed for broader planning applications following the completion of the IDP review."
