Criminals need just 20 images of one child to produce deep fake, cyber experts say
Parents who share pictures of their children online have been warned that these images could expose them to serious risks and long-term problems, such as identity theft and fraud.
Other risks include extortion or exploitation, allowing cyber criminals to create bank accounts and claim benefits in their name.
A new research of 2,000 parents with children under 16 in the UK, conducted by Perspectus Global and commissioned by Proton, showed that parents upload an average of 63 photos to social media every month.
The majority of these photos – 59pc – include family photos, with one in five parents – 21pc – uploading such pictures multiple times a week, while two in five – 38pc – several times a month.
Professor Carsten Maple from the University of Warwick in England and the Alan Turing Institute warned that parents are "unwittingly opening their children up to possible exploitation by criminals who want to use their data for their own purposes".
'It takes just 20 images for sophisticated AI tools to create a realistic profile of someone, or even a 30-second video," he said.
'But it's not just images that can be used, social media posts also reveal sensitive information such as location data and key life moments, that can effectively be used to create an online profile for children long before they're old enough to consent to it.
'Oversharing by parents can lead to numerous problems for the child in the future, including digital records that can be extremely difficult and painful to remove, leading to mental anguish, negative reputations and harm to others," he added.
Professor Maple also warned that 'it's not just criminal gangs who can use the data', as Big Tech companies also use images posted on their platforms for their own agendas.
It comes as only a few months ago, Instagram changed its user agreement to allow it to use people's images to train its AI.
ADVERTISEMENT
The professor added that many cloud storage services, such as Google Drive and Photos, use personal information in ways that many parents are unaware of.
More than half – 56pc – of respondents said their family photos are uploaded to cloud storage, with an estimated 185 photos of their children on their phone and cloud.
When asked what information they think tech companies can access, almost half – 48pc – did not know that data from pictures stored on a cloud can be accessed and used by the companies that hold them.
Parents have been advised to think about what they are sharing; ensure their personal moments are held using secure storage; read the small print and set their privacy and security settings; be aware of phishing scams; and be aware of free public wi-fi.
They have also been asked to set clear ground rules with their children; use parental controls, filters in search engines, antivirus software; and model healthy online habits.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
5 days ago
- RTÉ News
Is home gym equipment worth the price tag? I put two to the test
Journalist Glenn Kelly puts two pieces of home workout equipment to the test to see if they are worth the hefty price tags. The gym - it's a funny old place, and while it offers a "catch-all" of everything from running machines to weights, it is not for everybody. I used to be a regular gym user myself, but with the arrival of kids and an intensification of work commitments, I found it was getting less and less the place for me. In the age of working from home, and people's demands for specific training (and work) schedules, investing in some state-of-the-art equipment is proving to be a godsend for current generations of would-be gym rats. This gear doesn't come cheap, but rather than a one-off payment, many are viewing it as something akin to a gym membership. I was, of course, intrigued about what I could get out of today's premium offerings, and if they were really worth their executive price tags. Step forward, market leaders Wattbike and Echelon, who offered their respective bikes and rowing machines for testing. Needless to say, I was only too happy to give my independent verdict. Time to read on to see if these machines are really good enough to replace that gym membership... Wattbike Proton €1,899 (includes free delivery offer) Score: 8.5 out of 10 Pros Easy to assemble Huge sizing adjustability Can be used by a range of age groups Smooth operation Relatively compact Great challenges on app and compatible with some of the largest cycling apps Cons Quite noisy if used at night App controls take a bit of getting used to The saddle could be more comfortable Artificial feel to gear changes I would be the first to admit that I am not the king of DIY, so when Wattbike explained that the bike would come unassembled, I was struggling to clear half a day in my diary. However, I should not have worried. Upon delivery, the box simply gets pulled up and cleared to unveil the bike, almost fully assembled. Some simple attachment of the wheels and legs was all that was required, and within half an hour, I was ready to go. The Proton is aimed at cyclists of all abilities and sizes. The bike has height and reach adjustments coming out of its ears, which means it is suitable for users from 137-198cm. This means almost all the family can take part in activities on the bike, something that my young family found particularly fun. The adjustability is child's play and offers something very niche in this market. The bike itself is on the heavy side at almost 50kg, but it has a relatively small footprint, so it doesn't look too out of place within the house. When I was eventually ready to go, it did take me a little while to get the hang of the app. Some simple instructions, such as to end the workout, require an extra click on the screen that isn't very obvious when it really should just be a big red button. However, apart from this, the app was relatively straightforward and showed me the basics I needed. If you need more, it is compatible with, amongst others, the Zwift app, which will help you push yourself to your limits and race in real-time with fellow cyclists around the world. The actual mechanics of the bike were solid. The bike is well put together, and the operation is smooth, although there is a fair degree of whooshing during use. The noise travels through the house, which may be an issue when you want to keep the kids asleep, but this is not unexpected. During my cycling, it was possible to exert a high degree of force through the bike, and I don't think I was in any danger of overloading it! The gear changes are operated by buttons on the handles, and they seem a little artificial to use, but they do the trick. Overall, I found it very easy to jump on and off the bike during my lunch break and blast out 45 minutes to an hour while enjoying listening to my favourite podcast or watching a show on TV. Although my kids are just off the size chart for the bike, they couldn't wait until they could ride it for real, and I think that is the point of the Proton. It is not aimed only at the cycling supremo, but at the individual or family who are breaking into the cycling habit, and this can only be a good thing as we head towards a more sustainable future, where hopefully, kids will have better road infrastructure outside to test their cycling skills on. Fair play, Wattbike. Echelon Row-7s Smart Rowing Machine €2,380 Score: 9 out of 10 Pros Smooth and quiet operation Superb interface with endless interactive and live workouts 22-inch screen included Foldable Comfortable seat Instant resistance changes at the touch of a fingertip Full-length bench allows full rowing movement Cons Expensive Setting up the on-screen app was plagued by connectivity issues until updated Takes up quite a bit of room Having suffered from some Achilles issues over the past year, I was particularly intrigued about trying out the Row-7s due to rowing's low-impact nature as I seek ways to fill the intense cardio void of football, and I was not disappointed by the machine. Let's get the negatives out of the way first. Out of the box, it wasn't quite as easy as the Proton to put together, taking most of an afternoon, but there are more parts involved. Then, it was onto the setup. Despite trying for over an hour, the machine just would not connect to the internet. This was extremely frustrating until I eventually read that due to software issues, I had to connect to my phone's hotspot connection, which allowed it to update, which then cured the connection issues. Thankfully, this worked and, to be honest, was the last negative I had of my time with the machine. The equipment is not cheap, coming in at over €2,000, but it feels every bit the premium piece of gym equipment, with an option to pay about €75 a month. Operation of the pulley is smooth and eerily quiet. Unlike the bike, I could use the machine next door to where my kids sleep and knew I wouldn't wake them. The fittings are superbly tight, and there have been no corners cut in the design or construction phase. The seat is superbly comfortable and padded, and you could spend over an hour on the machine with no ailments whatsoever. Getting a 22-inch touchscreen with the machine is a huge bonus, and being able to connect to this to follow live workouts is a godsend - much better than using your phone. I also found that having the resistance buttons on the handle worked really well, rather than reaching beyond to the front of the machine, so I could flick through the levels instantaneously as the workout progressed. The Row-7s does take up quite a bit of room in our spare bedroom, but it is foldable, which is superb, allowing it to slide alongside the bed and out of the way. Echelon has hit the jackpot on this machine, with only a point taken off for the connectivity issues. If they can sort this in the long term, this could be a perfect 10.
RTÉ News
20-05-2025
- RTÉ News
Expert warns parents over AI deepfakes of children
Only 20 images of a child are needed to create a deepfake video of them, a leading expert in cybersecurity has warned. The study, conducted by Perspectus Global, focused on 2,000 parents with children under the age of 16 in the UK, and showed that parents upload an average of 63 images to social media every month. Over half of these photos include family photos (59%), with one in five parents (21%) uploading these types of images multiple times a week. Speaking on RTÉ's Today with Claire Byrne, CEO of Mick Moran, said that as AI gets stronger, the 20 images required to create the videos will be reduced to only one. "The big worry is that these AI models will be used to create CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) and children involved in sex acts," he said. "We've already seen in the past, innocent images that kids themselves are posting, or their parents are posting, being used in advertising pornography sites. "In this case however, giving a certain data set of images, 20 of them, will allow you to produce a non-limited amount in any scenario of that child." Mr Moran explained that the risk of CSAM is only one aspect of the issue, and the deep-fake videos could also be used for fraud or for scams. "You have to be aware that your data is being used to train these models and fundamentally, any information you share online can be used in ways you never intended." He said that if images are being shared publicly, the expectation of privacy is "gone," adding that some companies see uploaded material as under "implicit consent." "If you're an adult and you share a picture... it attracts different rules under data protection. However, if you're a parent and you share a picture of your child or another child, it is deemed to be implicit consent from the parent that transfers to the child, and therefore they can use the image." Parents urged to limit social media privacy settings Mr Moran said that there is "no problem" in sharing images online, as long as the audience who can view it is limited through social media privacy settings. He called on the Government to bring in legislation to make it illegal to possess or to make an engine which trains AI to produce CSAM. "CSAM and child pornography are illegal under the Child Trafficking and Pornography Act of 1998, so it's illegal to possess it, whether it's made by AI or not," he said. "What I'd be calling on the Government to do here would be to make it illegal to possess, make an engine, or to train an AI engine that will produce CSAM - that's not illegal. "What you put into it might be illegal, what comes out of it might be illegal, but the act of doing it is not necessarily illegal," he added.
Irish Independent
14-05-2025
- Irish Independent
Criminals need just 20 images of one child to produce deep fake, cyber experts say
Parents who share pictures of their children online have been warned that these images could expose them to serious risks and long-term problems, such as identity theft and fraud. Other risks include extortion or exploitation, allowing cyber criminals to create bank accounts and claim benefits in their name. A new research of 2,000 parents with children under 16 in the UK, conducted by Perspectus Global and commissioned by Proton, showed that parents upload an average of 63 photos to social media every month. The majority of these photos – 59pc – include family photos, with one in five parents – 21pc – uploading such pictures multiple times a week, while two in five – 38pc – several times a month. Professor Carsten Maple from the University of Warwick in England and the Alan Turing Institute warned that parents are "unwittingly opening their children up to possible exploitation by criminals who want to use their data for their own purposes". 'It takes just 20 images for sophisticated AI tools to create a realistic profile of someone, or even a 30-second video," he said. 'But it's not just images that can be used, social media posts also reveal sensitive information such as location data and key life moments, that can effectively be used to create an online profile for children long before they're old enough to consent to it. 'Oversharing by parents can lead to numerous problems for the child in the future, including digital records that can be extremely difficult and painful to remove, leading to mental anguish, negative reputations and harm to others," he added. Professor Maple also warned that 'it's not just criminal gangs who can use the data', as Big Tech companies also use images posted on their platforms for their own agendas. It comes as only a few months ago, Instagram changed its user agreement to allow it to use people's images to train its AI. ADVERTISEMENT The professor added that many cloud storage services, such as Google Drive and Photos, use personal information in ways that many parents are unaware of. More than half – 56pc – of respondents said their family photos are uploaded to cloud storage, with an estimated 185 photos of their children on their phone and cloud. When asked what information they think tech companies can access, almost half – 48pc – did not know that data from pictures stored on a cloud can be accessed and used by the companies that hold them. Parents have been advised to think about what they are sharing; ensure their personal moments are held using secure storage; read the small print and set their privacy and security settings; be aware of phishing scams; and be aware of free public wi-fi. They have also been asked to set clear ground rules with their children; use parental controls, filters in search engines, antivirus software; and model healthy online habits.
