logo
Border Force Demonstrates Anti-Material Rifle 'Vidhwansak' Used In Op Sindoor

Border Force Demonstrates Anti-Material Rifle 'Vidhwansak' Used In Op Sindoor

NDTV27-05-2025

Jammu:
The Border Security Force (BSF) on Monday showcased a range of weapons, including the 'Vidhwansak' anti-material rifle, which was used during Operation Sindoor to target Pakistani posts. The demonstration was held during a weapon exhibition at the BSF Frontier Headquarters in Jammu.
The visuals from the event showed BSF personnel demonstrating the use of the anti-material rifle (AMR), the automatic grenade launcher system, and other heavy weaponry.
BSF official Rakesh Kaushik said that the Vidhvansak has a range of 1800 m and 1300 m. The barrels, bolts and magazines are changed as per the need. One magazine has three rounds. It destroys the enemy's pillboxes, bunkers and armed cars. It is made in India and destroyed all the given targets during Operation Sindoor.
A BSF officer said that the medium machine gun is operated by three personnel. This was used by the BSF to counter Pakistan's attacks during Operation Sindoor. He added that Pakistan's observation outpost was destroyed using Vidhwansak.
He added, "It fires at 650-1000 rounds per minute and can even stop the flowing water with its speed...It has a huge effect. The post within the range of the rifle was also destroyed."
BSF officer Ram Niwas said, "This Automatic Grenade System proved a very successful weapon during Operation Sindoor to destroy enemy posts, hideouts and also their bullet-proof vehicles. Its range is 1700-2100 meters. The grenade fired from it has a killing area of 10 meters. Its fire is very effective."
BSF official Ravi Kant talked about the 12.7 mm anti-craft gun and said that it is a belt-loaded crew weapon, operated by three soldiers. It has a range of two kilometres. It is useful in destroying the enemy's cars and tanks.
He said, "Operation Sindoor went well; whoever came in front of us was destroyed. He added that the gun forced the enemy to leave their BOP (Border Outpost)."
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Did Pakistan destroy India's Sukhoi and S-400 in Adampur, Bhuj airbases? Expert debunks claim; THIS is what he said
Did Pakistan destroy India's Sukhoi and S-400 in Adampur, Bhuj airbases? Expert debunks claim; THIS is what he said

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Did Pakistan destroy India's Sukhoi and S-400 in Adampur, Bhuj airbases? Expert debunks claim; THIS is what he said

Pakistan, in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, has been claiming to have successfully attacked India. New reports have also claimed that Islamabad was successful in hitting the Adampur air base in Punjab and causing damage to a Sukhoi-30 MKI standing there. However, Damien Symon, a top imagery analyst of Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) has junked this claim, saying that Pakistan used an image from before the conflict to support its narrative. In a post on X, Symon alleged that the image used by Pakistan was taken in March, which pre-dates the recent India-Pakistan conflict. 'New report alleges a direct hit at India's Adampur Air Base by Pakistan damaged a Su-30, however a review reveals this image taken in March 2025, pre-conflict actually shows a MiG-29 undergoing maintenance, the dark soot near the engine test pad is routine, not battle damage,' the expert said. Livemint was not able to verify the authenticity of Pakistan's claim or Symon's version. Pakistan has also made a similar claim about destroying an S-400 radar of India in Bhuj. Damien Symon debunked this claim too, saying that the claimed damage is likely to be just oil stains in the service yard. 'An image is being circulated now as a Pakistan destroyed S-400 radar in India, a review however indicates it's likely just oil stains at Bhuj military base's vehicle service yard, also the image predates the recent Indo-Pak conflict as it was taken in February 2025,' he wrote in an X post. Livemint could not verify this claim either. This article will be updated if there is an official statement from India regarding the matter. On May 7, India launched Operation Sindoor to strike nine terror bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir in response to the deadly terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22, where terrorists killed 26 people, mostly tourists. Following the attack, Pakistan retaliated with cross-border shelling across the Line of Control and Jammu and Kashmir. Islamabad further attempted drone attacks along the border regions. In response, India launched a coordinated attack and damaged radar infrastructure, communication centres, and airfields across 11 airbases in Pakistan. After this, on May 10, an understanding of the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan was announced.

‘Government Gave Freedom, Country Gave Strength': Army Chief Hails Op Sindoor's Success
‘Government Gave Freedom, Country Gave Strength': Army Chief Hails Op Sindoor's Success

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

‘Government Gave Freedom, Country Gave Strength': Army Chief Hails Op Sindoor's Success

Last Updated: Indian Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi hailed the army saying that the military destroyed nine terrorist hideouts without any civilian casualties. Indian Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi on Sunday hailed Operation Sindoor- India's military strikes targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan in response to April 22's ghastly Pahalgam terror attack—saying that it was not just a military operation but was an expression of the nation's unity, resolve, and self-confidence. In his inaugural podcast with Ibex Tarana 88.4 FM, the first-of-its-kind Community Radio Station based in Jyotirmath in Uttarakhand, which General Dwivedi inaugurated, he said that the military operation was successful because of the two reasons: one the government gave the freedom and the public trusted the military, which inspired them. to carry out the strikes. He further hailed the army saying that the military destroyed nine terrorist hideouts without any civilian casualties which demonstrates that the Indian Army is not only powerful but also responsible. 'I am proud that the soldiers of the Indian Army completed this mission with discipline, restraint, and immense courage. This victory belongs to the entire nation. Operation Sindoor is a decisive response to terrorism," he said. General Upendra Dwivedi further remarked that whenever a mother or sister applies sindoor, she would remember the soldiers of the Indian Army. Operation Sindoor India launched 'precision strikes" under Operation Sindoor on nine terror targets in Pakistan and PoK following the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians. The strikes killed over 100 terrorists including 10 family members of Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) chief Masood Azhar and four close aides. Targets included Jaish's Markaz Subhan Allah in Bahawalpur, Sarjal camp in Tehra Kalan, Markaz Abbas in Kotli, and the Syedna Bilal camp in Muzaffarabad. Lashkar's strongholds — Markaz Taiba in Murdike, Markaz Ahle Hadith in Barnala, and Shwawai Nalla camp in Muzaffarabad — were also hit. Hizbul Mujahideen's facilities at Makaz Raheel Shahid in Kotli and Mehmoona Joya in Sialkot were among those targeted. The strikes, carried out with surgical precision, mark one of the most significant cross-border counter-terror operations since Balakot. Why It Was Named 'Operation Sindoor'? The codename 'Operation Sindoor', under which India responded to the dastardly Pahalgam terror attack carried a message that was both emotionally resonant and symbolically heroic. Approved by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the name was chosen to symbolically reflect India's response to the Pahalgam attack, keeping in mind the widows of the terror attack. Himanshi Narwal from Haryana, Aishanya Dwivedi from Uttar Pradesh, Shital Kalathiya and Kajalben Parmar from Gujarat, Sohini Adhikari from Kolkata, Pragati Jagdale from Maharashtra, Sheela Ramachandran from Kerala, Jennifer Nathaniel from Madhya Pradesh and Jaya Mishra were the women whose husbands were killed by the terrorists in Pahalgam. It was Himanshi Narwal, married for just six days, kneeling beside the body of her husband, Navy officer Lieutenant Vinay Narwal, who became the face of the tragedy. Days later, Himanshi appeared paying tribute to her husband, but without the sindoor (vermillion) that shines on the forehead of married Hindu women. First Published: June 08, 2025, 20:17 IST

Soundly Thrashed, Yet Pakistanis Convince Themselves Of Victory
Soundly Thrashed, Yet Pakistanis Convince Themselves Of Victory

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

Soundly Thrashed, Yet Pakistanis Convince Themselves Of Victory

Last Updated: Operation Sindoor was a resounding success for India, resulting in considerable damage to Pakistan's air defence system and air bases. Yet, Pakistan claims that it won Deceiving others is bad, but deceiving oneself is worse. Having acquired consummate skills in lying to the world about anything, Pakistan's immersion into mendacity is complete. It can no longer distinguish between fact and fiction—and between defeat and triumph. It got smacked in the four-day skirmish with India last month; there is a mountain of evidence (including videos by Pakistani social media) to prove that Operation Sindoor was a resounding success, resulting in considerable damage to Pakistan's air defence system and air bases. And Pakistan's reaction? It claimed that it won! Never was a lie as blatant. Six days after the cessation of hostilities, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said in a statement, 'This is a victory of the Armed Forces of Pakistan as well as the self-reliant, proud, and dignified Pakistani nation. The entire nation is standing by the armed forces like a wall made of lead." The Army chief, Gen Syed Asim Munir, was made Field Marshal. It is not just the Pakistani government and military that claimed to have emerged victorious in a skirmish in which they were soundly thrashed; people believed in the lie. A Gallup Pakistan survey conducted between May 11 and 15 showed that 96 per cent of more than 500 respondents believed Pakistan had won the conflict," Al Jazeera reported. 'Initial data and survey trends shared exclusively with Al Jazeera showed 82 per cent rated the military's performance as 'very good,' with fewer than 1 per cent expressing disapproval. Most significantly, 92 per cent said their opinion of the military improved as a result of the conflict." Pakistanis, however, don't need a Copperfield to create a new reality; they themselves do it—and fall in love with it. Conspicuously, the Pakistani people did not fall prey to the propaganda by Rawalpindi and Islamabad; they chose to ignore the zillion social media videos they themselves had made and circulated showing attacks on their air bases and other places. Rejecting the sanctity of sensory perception, commonsense, and reason, and refusing to accept the unmistakable weaknesses of their military, they found refuge in the Islamist fantasy of the invincibility of the ghazi, the jihadist soldier. It needs to be mentioned here that the Western mainstream media and the Trump administration underpinned Pakistanis' self-deception. It took foreign journalists several days to realize that India had licked Pakistan. So, the New York Times reported on May 14, 'Where India appears to have had a clear edge is in its targeting of Pakistan's military facilities and airfields, as the latter stretch of fighting shifted from symbolic strikes and shows of force to attacks on each other's defense capabilities." Yet, Pakistan keeps celebrating its 'victory.' Most Pakistanis genuinely believe that they have won the military conflict with India. Pakistan may be a military dictatorship, but its state, deep state, and society are symbiotically intertwined. It is a weird totalitarianism. George Orwell, Rightists' favourite Leftist, is often quoted in describing and explaining totalitarianism, the ruthless exercise of power, the abuse of language, and so on. But even his genius will not be able to fully explain the monstrosity that Pakistan is. O'brien, the party commissar who tricks the protagonist Winston of 1984 into believing in him, tells him, 'We control matter because we control the mind. Reality is inside the skull. You will learn by degrees, Winston. There is nothing that we could not do. Invisibility, levitation—anything. I could float off this floor like a soap bubble if I wished to. I do not wish to, because the Party does not wish it. You must get rid of those nineteenth-century ideas about the laws of nature. We make the laws of nature." Winston rightly finds all this utter nonsense; though not philosophically sophisticated, he even knows that there is a word to describe this stupid theory. O'brien helps him: 'I told you, Winston," he says, 'that metaphysics is not your strong point. The word you are trying to think of is solipsism. But you are mistaken. This is not solipsism." Then the commissar goes on to explain, 'The real power, the power we have to fight for night and day, is not power over things, but over men." He continues: 'Obedience is not enough… Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing." Orwell's narrative beautifully describes the evil of a communist state, but Pakistan is even worse. It doesn't have a party; it has an army—and it has radical Islam. Radical Islam tears human minds to pieces, bestialises hearts, and coarsens sensibilities. And it makes the adherents see what they want to see. So, they see defeat as victory. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 08, 2025, 19:47 IST News opinion Opinion | Soundly Thrashed, Yet Pakistanis Convince Themselves Of Victory

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store