#Reportback: Tracking the four investigations at KDM
Four high-profile investigations are currently underway at KwaDukuza municipality (KDM), and I want to ensure the public remains informed with clarity and transparency.
Firstly, the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) is probing three high-value tenders issued between 2018 and 2019, relating to roadworks and electrical infrastructure for the KwaDukuza Mall.
These multimillion-rand projects are being scrutinised for possible irregularities, wasteful expenditure and misconduct.
The investigation may run until late 2026, as SIU cases typically span up to 24 months. The process is expected to cost about R24- million, which will be billed to the municipality.
Council has formally appealed to the SIU for a waiver or reduction of these costs and we remain hopeful that the request will be favourably considered.
In addition, KDM is subject to an investigation by the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta), initiated under Section 106 by MEC Rev Thulasizwe Buthelezi in March this year.
The probe focuses on alleged asset misuse, political interference and irregular appointments and hiring practices.
Cogta requires around 90 days to gather evidence and finalise its findings. Once the report is submitted to the MEC's office, it will be tabled before Council and shared with the public.
On the electricity front, we have heard your frustrations loud and clear. Following years of outages and deteriorating infrastructure, the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) is conducting a full audit of the municipality's electrical systems.
Their findings are expected to clarify the root causes of service delivery issues and provide guidance on corrective action.
Nersa typically completes its audits within a month, and the report is expected to be tabled before Council by the end of this month. Lastly, I must address the R35.7- million cyber fraud incident that struck the municipality earlier this year.
Hackers infiltrated our ABSA account using spyware, resulting in a significant financial loss.
While R30.8-million has been recovered, R4.9- million remains unaccounted for.
The Hawks are currently investigating all parties involved, including a company that received R4.4- million and withdrew it immediately.
Council has secured a High Court liquidation order to aid in recovering the stolen funds and has established a commission of enquiry to ensure accountability.
These measures are not without cost – the total legal and administrative expenses are estimated at between R1.5-million and R2-million, but they are necessary to ensure justice is served.
Shortened – Ed.
Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news.
Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: The staggering size and stumbles of the colossal PIC
While so many of the Public Investment Corporation's investments are in listed entities and we can all see whether it's making good decisions, the problems come in with its unlisted investments where, perhaps, someone gets to play with a huge amount of money without a huge amount of attention. If it is true that compound interest is the 'eighth wonder of the world', then the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) must be its colossus. It is so staggeringly big that it almost defies comprehension. The PIC currently has more than R3-trillion in assets. And it controls about 10% of the JSE. The scale of it is so big that its investment decisions could not just make or break companies, they might even make or break entire industries in South Africa. It makes the proposed Transformation Fund that would invest R100-billion look like a tiddler by comparison. It is just that big. There are important reasons it got so big, but one of them must be its age. It was created in 1911. That's just one year after South Africa was formed as a nation state in a colonial project. Like Warren Buffett's investing career, the PIC is a really good example of how time in the market is such an important factor. At the same time, of course, as the number of government workers has increased (leading to many, many bitter fights), so has the money it has to manage. The Government Employees' Pension Fund is its main client – millions go from government employee salaries into the fund every month. Considering how much money we are talking about, it is quite strange that we don't talk about it more. One of the reasons for that is so many of its investments are in listed entities. Basically it is putting money into companies listed on the JSE. And that means we can all see whether or not it's making good decisions. This is a kind of forced transparency (in its 2024 annual financial statements it flags 'transparency' as its first pillar of governance'). And by and large, it works. The problems come in, obviously, in its unlisted investments. This is where it makes decisions that we cannot see so easily. And I suspect we are going to see a lot more attention on this soon. On Monday, News24 published an important story saying that the acting head of the manager's unlisted investments unit, Thabiso Moshikara, is being accused of trying to get a R3-million bribe from someone whose company is being funded by the PIC. The person making the claim, Ralebala Mampeule, even claims Moshikara came to his house with 'unidentified males'. This must have come as a huge shock to the PIC and they will now have to investigate thoroughly. The problem is that it could take quite a while to know for sure what happened. Unfortunately, we now live in a society where it's entirely possible that someone offered Moshikara money for his influence, and when he refused, decided to simply make something up to get rid of him. Or it could all be true. At the same time, the PIC has recently been under fire over the Daybreak Farms fiasco. There it was quite clear that some of the directors and managers were just extracting money from a failing enterprise. While workers were protesting because they had not been paid and chickens were suffering because they were not being fed, the chair, Bojane Segooa, hung on until the last minute. The moment she received a payment of R625,000, she resigned. Daybreak is wholly owned by the PIC. Sunday Times journalist Sabelo Skiti had been warning us for years and years that this would happen at Daybreak. And his reporting and warnings were ignored by the PIC. This has infuriated Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana to the point where he has instituted an inquiry into the unlisted fund. I've never understood why an institution as massive as the PIC would not act when someone like Skiti reports on Daybreak in the way he did. It surely has the resources to monitor its unlisted investments. It is negligence that borders on the criminal to allow this to happen. I would think that its main customers, government workers, would be the first to shout and scream when this happens. It is their money that is going up in smoke. But they don't, because they're going to be fine. The pensions they receive are a defined benefit, meaning they'll receive the same amount of money no matter what happens to the PIC's investments. This is probably a very good thing. Workers should not suffer in their old age because, for example, Markus Jooste took everyone for a ride at Steinhoff. But it does mean that perhaps, just perhaps, someone gets to play with a huge amount of money without a huge amount of attention. It does look like the PIC is going to change slightly. There will probably be a new system to appoint its chair (since 2021, the law has been that the finance minister can appoint a deputy finance minister to the position of PIC chair). And I think there will be more demands for more transparency. We should all know how the PIC makes its decisions in the unlisted space. There are many advantages to being a colossus; you can take a lot of pain and keep trucking. But you are impossible to hide. And so we will always want to know what is going on behind the scenes. DM
Eyewitness News
13 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa establishes 5th commission of inquiry since becoming head of state
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa has established his fifth commission of inquiry since becoming head of state, leading to some opposition parties accusing him of indecisive leadership. On Sunday, Ramaphosa announced he was setting up a judicial commission of inquiry to look into corruption allegations within the top brass of the country's law enforcement agencies. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa puts Mchunu on leave of absence, inquiry to probe Mkhwanazi's allegations This follows bombshell allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi of a criminal syndicate embedded in the country's police, judiciary, business and political class. When Ramaphosa became president in 2018, he established three commissions of inquiry. In 2025, he established two. While the state capture commission was established by President Jacob Zuma, it ran entirely under Ramaphosa's presidency. Reactions from political parties have focused on how these commissions have cost the state a lot of money without much return. GOOD Party secretary general Brett Herron said the government already has in-house institutions like the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), whose mandate is to investigate corruption. 'The appointment of a commission of inquiry, while well-intentioned, is too slow, too cumbersome, and too costly. We've walked this road before, most notably with the Zondo commission, and we have seen a commission of inquiry cannot replace a criminal investigation.' Ramaphosa said the South African Police Service (SAPS) commission will have to provide interim reports on the first three and six months of its work.
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
Almost 40 municipalities facing sanctions from Treasury over mismanagement
Water boards in four provinces are owed a combined R17.7 billion while municipalities have not been paying pension fund contributions. Municipalities with poor payment records are risking a backlash from National Treasury. A letter was recently sent to Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) Velenkosini Hlabisa, warning that vital payments to municipalities would be throttled should they not get their accounts in order. Almost 40 municipalities were flagged by Treasury for owing water boards billions, as well as not honouring pension fund and medical aid payments of staff. Defaulting municipalities Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana wrote to Hlabisa on 30 June, giving the Cogta minister seven days to acknowledge the treasury's demands. Godongwana threatened to invoke section 216(2) of the constitution, which would place restrictions on Local Government Equitable Share (LGES) grant payments. A total of 39 municipalities are in the finance minister's crosshairs, including eight that owe the South African Revenue Service (Sars) a combined R197.5 million. Those eight and a further 13 have unpaid third-party pension fund contributions amounting to R819.5 million. The worst offender is Kopanong Local Municipality with R330 million in unpaid pension contributions, followed by Mafube and Mohokare municipalities with R253.4 million and R147.9 million, respectively. All three fall under the Free State government, which has been accused of prioritising 'exorbitant' salaries over service delivery. 'Withholding funds from struggling municipalities is not enough. All three levels of government have a responsibility to ensure that residents' rights are protected,' stated the Freedom Front Plus' Armand Cloete. Over R17 billion owed for water Unpaid pension fund contributions were dwarfed by the amount owed by municipalities to water boards. Treasury singled out 18 municipalities from four water boards, which have a combined debt of R17.7 billion. Matjhabeng Local Municipality — also in the Free State — has amassed a bill of R8.1 billion, while Merafong and Emfuleni municipalities in Gauteng each have debts exceeding R1 billion. The municipalities must provide Godongwana with proof that the amounts will be settled or face receiving only partial LGES payments, which will be earmarked solely for the debts owed. The finance minister warned that should those conditions not be met, he would motivate to Parliament for the cessation of all LGES payments to these defaulting municipalities. Hlabisa's office did not respond to requests for additional information, but Cogta's Free State office did acknowledge questions sent by The Citizen, with that response still pending at the time of publication. NOW READ: When is the deadline to register for free basic electricity?
