Gov. Braun brings property tax bill discussion to Evansville
EVANSVILLE, Ind. (WEHT) – Indiana Governor Mike Braun says the number one issue he's heard from Hoosier residents is about high property taxes. During a discussion with two people who live and work in the Evansville-area, the governor said Senate Bill 1, a proposed property tax relief bill, would cut tax rates.
'When we wanted to set it back to 2021,' says Governor Braun, 'that was with emphasis on helping the most vulnerable homeowners, which would be those newly into the arena, and retired elderly.'
Braun says the bill would provide relief to those homeowners, but those opposed fear the cuts that could come to cities and school districts. A pair of protesters outside of Braun's Evansville meeting say they are also concerned with a lack of transparency.
'Why didn't we know about it and how come we can't go in,' asks Evansville resident Barbara Rodenberg. 'Right, why can't we be a part of this conversation,' adds Amanda Rodenberg. 'It's in our library.'
Figures available on the state General Assembly website shows over the next three years, school districts could lose millions in property tax funding, including the Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation, which could lose an estimated $20 million. 'You'd have to divide $20 million by a figure to see if that's 1 or 2 percent,' says Governor Braun. 'A lot of those numbers don't mean anything unless you put it into perspective of what percentage is that.'
Evansville Mayor Stephanie Terry says these proposed cuts would be 'devastating'. She says the city alone could lose just over $7.5 million in 2026. 'At the top of the list when we talk about where our property tax revenue is going, over 50 percent, between 50 to 60 percent, is for public safety. Our police officers, our firefighters,' explains Mayor Terry. 'There would be some tough decisions that would have to be made.'
Mayor Terry says she will return to Indianapolis to meet with other mayors to discuss the bill's impacts, with hopes of sitting down with Governor Braun. 'I was hopeful that I was going to get 10 minutes of the Governor's time today while he was here in the city,' says Mayor Terry, 'but he left before our scheduled appointment.'
Click here to read the full text of Senate Bill 1.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Graduate test prep program to lose state funding
A state program that provided free test preparation to students at public universities and some community colleges that organizers said has helped some 4,700 students since its launch in February went unfunded in the state budget approved by Illinois lawmakers last month. The program received $10 million in the budget year ending June 30 and provided students with free access to more than 40 test prep courses, including graduate-level admission exams, according to Lynne Baker, a communications director at the Illinois Student Assistance Commission, one of the program's partners. Most of the funding, about $8.6 million, went to Kaplan, a long-standing educational services company. The funding won't run out until Dec. 23, when students who rely on the financial help will lose access to the courses, Baker said. Pritzker did not include funding for the program in the budget he proposed in February, so the General Assembly's decision to pass a budget without the money was not a surprise. Nonetheless, state Rep. La Shawn Ford, a Chicago Democrat, said he pushed to secure another year's funding. 'We knew there would be cuts, but I thought that, if anything, it would probably be agreed that a reduction in the appropriation might happen, but not a total elimination,' Ford said. 'It was just assumed that this would be in it, since it was an item that there was no opposition to … this is actually something that we found is taxpayer worthy.' Andres Correa, a spokesperson for the governor's office said 'Illinois made the difficult decision' to eliminate the program as part of the state's larger effort to 'responsibly balance this year's budget.' Correa noted the budget included funding for educational programs such as the Monetary Award Program, which supports Illinois residents in attending some Illinois colleges. Ford said he will continue efforts to get money for the test prep program, and encouraged students to publicly advocate for it. 'I think the governor will listen to his students at public universities and parents, and when they continue (advocating for) just how valuable this is,' Ford said. 'We will begin to see students pretty devastated by having a program that they're relying on to get their license for professions that Illinois needs to increase the workforce — nurses, lawyers, medical students, you name it.' Asa Asad, who graduated from the University of Illinois Chicago in May with a degree in neuroscience, said the free coursework offered by the program convinced him to take the Medical College Admissions Test after studying for the exam on his own last fall left him feeling unprepared. 'Honestly I don't think I would have taken it (the MCAT) without this,' said Asad. 'The MCAT is just such a monster of a test that there's really no way to prepare for it without trying to get some sort of guidance from somebody and a lot of that is behind a paywall or a cost of some sort.' 'This program is free, which helps me be able to fully invest in my education versus having to work to pay for the class,' he said. Asad said he doesn't think a lot of students are aware that funding for the program was eliminated. 'It feels like it's a little hidden away from the population that would really want to use it the most,' said Asad. The opportunity to take free test prep courses was especially helpful at UIC, Asad said, because many students 'come from a background where it's not feasible to drop $3,000 or $4,000 on a course.' Asad, the mentorship chair of his pre-med club in graduate school and a student body president, said he signed up over 200 students for the test prep program. 'I think losing the program is such a blow to our students,' Asad said 'I feel like because the resources needed to actually get into these careers are so limited that only a certain population can really afford to get in, and it's going to be such a loss for representation as a whole.' Baker, the ISAC communications director, said more than 1,400 UIC students registered for test prep courses through the program, second most in the state behind the 1,600 students at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign who took advantage of the program. Jenny Neef, executive director of the U. of I. career center, said the number of students who benefited from the program in such a short time indicates cost had previously been a barrier to accessing test prep services. The program allowed her to suggest high quality resources to students without worrying about the cost. 'Test prep is one of those pieces that helps us have a highly qualified, highly educated, well-prepared workforce to move into the jobs that are available within the state, and so I see it as part of this continuum of how higher education is part of the whole ecosystem, as it relates to a well-prepared workforce,' Neef said. As of early May, more than 60% of students utilizing the state program were minority students and over a third were low-income or first-generation students, according to Dave Adams, a senior vice president with Kaplan. A Kaplan spokesperson said the company hopes the state will continue funding the program, but 'regardless, we are focused on continuing to deliver the full program.' 'Among its most important impacts, this program jump-starts the pipeline of future nurses, doctors, and other essential professionals, addressing critical shortages across Illinois by getting skilled, motivated students on the path to serving communities and delivering life-saving care where it's needed most,' the Kaplan spokesperson added. Ford said that if lawmakers convene in the next few months to address transportation funding and other issues, he would advocate for using discretionary funding under the governor's control to continue the test prep program. 'We give the governor lots of power and authority over a certain amount of money so that he can decide what he would like to do with it in the case of emergencies,' Ford said. 'He would have some authority to make some decisions, but we will see, as we know that it wasn't in his introduced budget. So, hopefully students will make it known that this is will be a tragedy.'
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
$2.5M in unclaimed money heading to Virginians this week
The state is mailing roughly $2.5 million in unclaimed money to Virginians this week. Why it matters: Some of that money could be yours. The big picture: The Virginia Department of Treasury's Unclaimed Property Division is doling out checks for everything from funds in lost or misplaced bank accounts and unpaid wages to uncashed checks, utility deposits, refunds or insurance policy proceeds. Between the lines: The department has always collected and held this money for residents, but previously, one had to file a claim with the state to get it back. Under a new law, Virginia is automatically returning the money to its " rightful owners." Catch up quick: This year, the General Assembly passed legislation creating the VA Cash Now program, which requires the state to automatically return unclaimed funds valued up to $5,000. The law went into effect when Gov. Youngkin signed it in March. Since then, the Treasury has been mailing notices to Virginians that they have money coming, Bradley Earl, director of the Unclaimed Property Division, tells Axios. The first batch of letters went out May 1, and they've been sending more every Thursday since then. The first round of checks goes out this week. By the numbers: More than 10,000 unclaimed property notices have been sent since May 1, reports WTKR News, whose investigation into issues with the previous process led to the new law.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ousted NC elections director led through chaos. Her replacement promises change
Karen Brinson Bell's departure from her post as North Carolina's top election official was hardly unexpected. For nearly a decade, lawmakers had sought to restructure the state's election apparatus to strip appointment power away from the governor — an office which Democrats have won in the last three elections despite Republicans maintaining strong majorities in the General Assembly. After five attempts were foiled by courts or voters, the sixth proved successful. The state's appellate courts allowed a new law to take effect transferring appointment power over the State Board of Elections away from the governor and toward the newly elected Republican auditor. So when the board's new Republican majority voted last month to replace Brinson Bell with Sam Hayes, a lawyer who had worked for the state's top lawmakers, it didn't come as a surprise to her. 'You know when you're in an appointed position that it can always come to an end,' Brinson Bell told The News & Observer in an interview. 'So I tried to treat each day of the job just like you're supposed to treat your life: you never know if you'll get another day, so just do with it what you can while you can.' With Brinson Bell gone and the board's partisan majority flipped for the first time in nearly a decade, major changes are likely coming to the way the state runs its elections. Procedures surrounding voter registration and military and overseas voting are in question. So is the agency's independence. And all of this comes on the heels of a dramatic six-month legal battle over the results of the 2024 state Supreme Court election. Hayes has promised change for the oft-embattled agency, but says it will not come at the expense of voters. 'We will focus not only on access to voting for eligible voters, but also on election integrity and making sure that voters trust the system. These two goals are not mutually exclusive,' he said in an email to The N&O. 'We can have secure elections that are also accessible to any eligible voter who wants to cast a ballot.' Brinson Bell's unceremonious ousting last month — in which the board refused to allow her to give a farewell speech — was not the cap she had envisioned to her 19-year career in elections. 'I wanted to give recognition to an incredible group of people at the state agency and across the state who really pulled off some very remarkable, unprecedented things and give that recognition as it was due,' she said about that moment. 'I think not only did it disrespect me, it disrespected the state staff and all 100 counties.' The vote came shortly after the state's Republican-dominated Court of Appeals allowed Senate Bill 382 — a wide-ranging power shift bill — to take effect. The bill stripped the governor of his power to appoint a majority of members to the State Board of Elections — a practice which has been in place for over a century. Instead, that power was given to the state auditor, Dave Boliek, the first Republican to win the office in 16 years. A trial court had ruled that the law was unconstitutional, but the appeals court reversed that ruling in an unsigned order that did not include the reasoning for the judges' decision. Within a week of that order, the new board had taken office and voted to remove Brinson Bell as one of its first actions. It was a dramatic end to a tenure that had already been far from ordinary. During her six years as director of the State Board of Elections, Brinson Bell contended with COVID, Hurricane Helene and an unprecedented effort to overturn the results of a Supreme Court election. Each disruption to the normal election process brought increased scrutiny to the board and to Brinson Bell herself, who Republican lawmakers frequently lambasted on social media or in hearings at the legislature. While state lawmakers had voiced concerns with the board before, hostilities reached a tipping point in 2020, Brinson Bell said. As President Donald Trump spread false claims of voter fraud nationwide, North Carolina dealt with its own challenges to voting. Prior to the election, an advocacy group had sued the elections board over its mail-in voting rules, arguing that voters needed more opportunities to get their ballots in given the COVID-19 pandemic. The board (which at the time had three Democrats and two Republicans) unanimously agreed to a settlement with the group that allowed the state to accept mail-in ballots up to nine days after the election and gave voters more opportunities to fix issues with their ballots. To this day, state lawmakers refer to this as a 'collusive settlement' and list it as one of the primary reasons the board needed to be changed. 'It's unfortunate, because it's sowing distrust in the system that obviously, fairly and securely got them elected — and they didn't question their results,' Brinson Bell said. 'So why are we questioning the results of other contests that were carried out the exact same way?' Only four years after organizing voting in a pandemic, Brinson Bell had to organize voting in the wake of a deadly hurricane that ravaged Western North Carolina. The storm was personal for Brinson Bell, who lived in the area for 20 years. 'I knew the creeks and the hollers and the ridge lines that were being affected, and I knew a lot of the people being affected,' she said. Shortly after the storm hit, the board approved a variety of rule changes to make voting easier for mountain residents — all of which were later adopted by the legislature. Despite Helene, voters in Western North Carolina actually outpaced the rest of the state in turnout during early voting. The board's response to Helene won the agency a national Clearinghouse Award from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission — its fourth such award during Brinson Bell's tenure. But shortly after a national election in the wake of a massive hurricane, Brinson Bell had one more unexpected complication to deal with, one that would not be resolved until the very day the board voted to oust her. After all outstanding mail-in and provisional ballots from the 2024 election were counted, Republican Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin came in 734 votes behind Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs. The state proceeded to two recounts, which are standard procedure for a close election such as this one. But both affirmed the result. Rather than ending there, a novel and chaotic legal battle erupted. Griffin, alongside the NC GOP, challenged the validity of over 65,000 ballots cast in the election. Targeting a variety of longstanding voting and registration practices, Griffin sought to toss out tens of thousands of votes — potentially flipping the race in his favor. After six months of courtroom fights, Griffin conceded the race after a federal judge appointed by Trump decisively ruled against him. His concession came just as the election board's new Republican majority prepared to vote on replacing Brinson Bell. She alluded to the challenge in her farewell message, telling the attendees who stuck around after the board adjourned that she hoped election workers could be 'rewarded for their work, rather than vilified by those who don't like the outcome.' 'I hope we return to a time when those who lost elections concede defeat rather than trying to tear down the entire election system and erode voter confidence,' she continued. 'And I hope we recognize that the conduct of elections is the very core of our democracy.' Since taking over as director last month, Hayes has mostly worked behind the scenes. The new board has yet to meet since it voted to select him as director, and Hayes has not issued any press releases — other than the one announcing his hire. But changes are sure to come to the state's election processes under his leadership. While Griffin's effort to overturn his election loss is dead, the board is working to implement changes to the state's election policies based on the arguments he made. Griffin's main challenge argued that over 60,000 voters who didn't have a driver's license or Social Security number in the state's registration database should have their votes thrown out. Those identification numbers are required by a federal law called the Help America Vote Act, which includes exceptions for voters who do not possess either form of identification. The Trump administration sued over the issue late last month, asking a judge to order the state to fix the discrepancy within 30 days and cancel the registrations of any voter who does not provide the missing identifications. Hayes said he plans to work with the administration to address the problem. 'We don't need a lawsuit to tell us what's right,' he said. Voters with missing identification numbers will receive a mailing from the board informing them of how to fix it, Hayes said. If they don't respond, they will be contacted by phone and email. Instead of outright canceling the registrations of voters who don't answer at that point, Hayes said the voters would be flagged in the system to provide the missing information the next time they show up to vote. While Brinson Bell agreed that earlier registration practices were unclear pertaining to the HAVA numbers, she said Griffin's challenge of the election results was unnecessary and damaged trust in elections. 'It conveys such inaccurate information (and) a lack of understanding,' she said about the challenges. 'Just by filing it, you're sowing those seeds of distrust.' But Hayes shifted blame to the former board. 'I think failing to collect the information required by HAVA undermined trust in the 2024 election results,' he said. Collecting that information won't be the only change under Hayes. Despite being exempt from the state's voter ID law in the past, military and overseas voters will have to provide identification in future elections to have their votes counted in state and local races. This was another issue Griffin had sued over, though he only challenged voters registered in Democratic-leaning counties for this part of his complaint. While his effort to have those ballots canceled was unsuccessful, courts agreed with him that these voters should be subject to the ID requirement going forward. Changes could also come from the state legislature through the budget process. The House's budget proposal would add seven new employees to the State Board of Elections who would be exempt from the State Human Resources Act — essentially making them political appointees. Brinson Bell said this move could chip away at the agency's independence. 'You're losing the established public servant who works for the state, who works for the voters,' she said. ' And now inserting someone or individuals who — that's not who they answer to — they answer to that person who appoints them.' Hayes confirmed that he requested this change be added to the House budget, saying it would give him staffing flexibility. It isn't the only staffing change he's made. Shortly after taking office, Hayes hired Brian LiVecchi as his chief of staff — a position that had not previously existed in the agency. LiVecchi previously served as chief of staff to former Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson. He resigned in the midst of Robinson's gubernatorial campaign after bombshell reporting from CNN tied Robinson to a series of sexually explicit and disturbing online comments. Hayes said that most other agencies have a chief of staff and that he chose LiVecchi because he has a 'wealth of experience in election law and administration that will be of great benefit to the agency.' Amid this change, an audit is likely coming. Hayes said he asked Boliek — who appointed the board's members — to conduct a performance audit of the agency. 'It will help us determine where we need to spend energy and resources in the future to ensure we are efficiently fulfilling the many duties and responsibilities of this agency and providing the best possible service to voters, candidates, and the 100 county boards of elections,' Hayes said. As for Brinson Bell, she plans to continue working on elections — though she isn't sure exactly how, yet. Her husband calls her 'the busiest unemployed person he's ever met,' she said, as she continues to connect with election directors across the country and share advice on best practices. To her successor, Brinson Bell also has one piece of advice as he assumes the role of elections director for one of the country's most consequential swing states. 'He should never forget that he is now the caretaker of democracy,' she said. 'And that's a pretty big charge.'
