
Utah poised to become first state to ban fluoride in public water system
The use of the mineral, which is added to water to strengthen tooth enamel and promote dental health, has been a hot-button political issue in some states for decades.
The Utah ban, set to begin in early May, follows the appointment of U.S. health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who opposes the addition of fluoride to public water systems and has said Republican President Donald Trump will call for an end to its use.
'It's not a bill I felt strongly about; it's not a bill I care that much about, but it's a bill I will sign,' Cox, a Republican, said in a weekend interview with Utah television station ABC4.
Hawaii does not use fluoride in its public water systems, but does not have any specific statewide ban against the practice.
Utah Representative Stephanie Gricius, a Republican and chief sponsor of the bill, said it allows pharmacists to prescribe fluoride for those wanting the mineral's protection for their teeth.
"I believe in individual choice when it comes to what prescriptions we put into our bodies and fluoride is federally regulated as a prescription," Gricius wrote in an email. "Community water fluoridation and informed consent, which is foundational to good health care, cannot coexist."
Gricius noted that just two of Utah's 29 counties currently add fluoride to water, and that by allowing citizens to obtain fluoride tablets from a pharmacist, her bill makes it easier for citizens in the entire state to obtain fluoride should they choose to do so.
The American Dental Association had sent a letter to Governor Cox urging him to veto the bill.
The association noted that about 50% of Utah residents reside in those two counties that currently add fluoride to water. It cited Utah Department of Health and Human Services data showing that areas of the state without fluoride in the water have experienced an increase in dental disease, whereas those with it have seen decreases.
The association also pointed to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates showing that fluoride-treated water saves about $6.5 billion each year in dental treatment costs nationally.
HEALTH CONCERNS
Those opposed to the use of fluoride in water say it is associated with numerous health issues, including certain cancers and lower cognitive ability among children.
The American Cancer Society on its website says the general consensus among scientific reviews examining possible links between fluoride and cancer show no strong evidence connecting the two. However, the society says more studies are needed.
In January, researchers at the U.S. National Institutes of Health who analyzed 74 studies from 10 countries found IQs were lower in children with higher fluoride exposure.
The results "support concerns for vulnerable populations living in communities with fluoridated water," an editorial that accompanied the NIH report said. A second editorial, however, detailed multiple weaknesses of the NIH analyses and warned that public policy on fluoride should not be affected by the study.
A federal judge in California last year ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to strengthen regulations for fluoride in drinking water, saying the compound poses an unreasonable potential risk to children at levels currently typical nationwide. The EPA under former President Joe Biden appealed that ruling.
About 63% of all Americans have fluoride in their community water systems, according to CDC statistics, opens new tab as of 2022, the most recent data available.
In most of the world, fluoride is not added to the public water supply. Some countries add fluoride to table salt. In some regions, fluoride levels in water are naturally high.
Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Top Republican spectacularly QUITS Congress after drama with Trump and plots next big move
A top Republican who has been a thorn in the side of the MAGA agenda has announced his intention to leave Congress. Texas Congressman Chip Roy announced that he plans to depart Capitol Hill after four terms and seek the role of Texas state attorney general back home in the Lone Star state. His decision comes after he earned the wrath of Donald Trump for getting in the way of his MAGA agenda. In a media release announcing his latest move, Roy noted that 'watching Texans unite in response to the devastating Hill Country floods made clear that I want to come home.' The deadly floods that raged through Texas earlier this summer claimed at least 135 lives, including the lives of over two dozen young girls and their counselors at the Christian summer camp, Camp Mystic. Roy also added in his media release that he wants to take his 'experience in Congress, as a federal prosecutor, and as First Assistant Attorney General to fight for Texas from Texas.' The congressman previously worked under current Texas AG Ken Paxton, who is running in a messy primary for U.S. Senate against incumbent John Cornyn. Roy notably turned on his former boss when Paxton was accused of 'bribery, abuse of office, and other charges' back in 2020, then urging him to resign from office. During his time in Congress, Roy has at times not been afraid to buck members of his own political party, causing headaches for House Speaker Mike Johnson and even President Donald Trump. Roy, along with other members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, were holdouts on President Trump's $3.3 trillion tax and spending cut bill. They caused a scene threatening to tank Trump's 'one big, beautiful, bill' due to projected increases in the national debt tied to the package. Despite weeks of threats, he eventually folded and voted for the bill. Roy also caused a headache for Speaker Mike Johnson's re-election bid in January. He didn't want Johnson to be elected speaker again because he claimed he wasn't conservative enough to lead the Republicans. Again, he eventually got in line and backed Johnson's re-election. It's become somewhat of a pattern for Roy to threaten to go against GOP leadership on key priorities, but then eventually fold and support. And it hasn't gone unnoticed by Trump, who has called him out publicly. Back in December of 2024, Trump accused Roy of 'getting in the way' of his agenda, and called for Roy to face a primary challenger for his congressional seat. Despite Roy's tough track record with GOP leadership, other lawmakers on Capitol Hill took time Thursday to congratulate Roy on his achievements during his time in Washington. Tennessee Representative Tim Burchett was one of Roy's colleagues to weigh in on the Texans' decision, posting on X that he hates to lose his friend in Congress, despite the desire to sometimes 'pinch his ears', adding that he 'will miss him.' Utah Senator Mike Lee posted on X that there is 'no more fearless and respected conservative in Congress than @chiproytx' adding that he 'wholeheartedly' endorses Roy in 'his campaign for Texas Attorney General' and that 'Chip has delivered for Trump in Congress.' In 2023, Chip Roy endorsed Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for president before he had even announced a formal bid for the office. At the time, Roy noted that the 'next President of the United States must be a vibrant and energetic leader with the faith, vision, and courage to chart a new course.' Roy is one of several high-profile members of the House Freedom Caucus to announce decisions to seek other offices, mainly in their home states. Rep. Ralph Norman announced a run for South Carolina governor last month, Rep. Andy Biggs will be seeking the same office in Arizona, and Rep. Byron Donalds is running to be governor of Florida.


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
US judge rejects challenges by Trump, affirmative action foe to Illinois nonprofit diversity law
Aug 21 (Reuters) - A federal judge has rejected a bid by the Trump administration and a group founded by a prominent affirmative action opponent to block enforcement of a new Illinois law that requires non-profits to publicly report data they collect on the race, gender and sexual orientation of their governing bodies. U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman in Chicago on Wednesday declined, opens new tab to issue a preliminary injunction sought by affirmative action foe Edward Blum's American Alliance for Equal Rights and concluded the Trump administration lacked legal standing to pursue its own challenge to the Democratic-led state's law. That measure, Illinois Senate Bill 2930, was signed into law in June 2024 by Democratic Governor JB Pritzker and requires certain nonprofit organizations to disclose aggregate demographic data about their boards of directors and officers. The American Alliance for Equal Rights filed a lawsuit in January arguing the law violates the U.S. Constitution's 1st and 14th Amendments by forcing charities to speak about demographic issues they do not want to discuss and by encouraging the organizations to discriminate based on race. The Justice Department intervened in the case in March and filed its own complaint, in furtherance of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's vow to help fulfill Republican President Donald Trump's pledge to eradicate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies. But Coleman, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, said the Justice Department had failed to show why the federal government had standing to pursue a case in the first place when it never argued the law caused it any harm. In the case of Blum's group, she said it likewise lacked standing to sue on behalf of two anonymous non-profits that are members of his organization because the state's law does not appear to require them to post anything online about their board's demographics if they never received such information. The judge said that was because officers and directors are not required to provide such information and only do so on an optional, voluntary basis. While the judge said Blum's group did have standing to challenge the law's related requirement that a nonprofit ask its directors and officers about demographic issues, she declined to enjoin it as she said all of the alliance's arguments focused on the provision concerning the data disclosure requirement. Coleman expressed disappointment that Blum's group and the Justice Department repeatedly insisted she rule on the case quickly, noting she had over 300 other active cases on her docket to juggle at the same time while devoting "significant attention" to their case. "The parties are placed on notice that this Court will assign priority to cases and motions as appropriate," she wrote. Blum in an email called the ruling disappointing and said his group will appeal. The Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment. The lawsuit is one of several Blum has filed challenging state and corporate diversity initiatives after another group he founded in 2023 convinced the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court to bar the consideration of race as a factor in college admissions. The case is American Alliance For Equal Rights v. Bennett, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 25-cv-00669. For American Alliance for Equal Rights: Cameron Norris of Consovoy McCarthy For the United States: Hilary Pinion of the U.S. Department of Justice For Illinois: Karyn Bass Ehler of the Office of the Illinois Attorney General Read more: Trump administration challenges Illinois nonprofit diversity law


Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Time traveller' spotted in Trump and Putin photo with eerie similarity to 1959
US President Donald Trump shared two photos of meetings between American leaders and their counterparts from Russia and the Soviet Union, with many people noticing a striking similarity Eagle-eyed online sleuths have noted an odd detail involving an apparent "time traveller" in photos showing meetings between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and between Richard Nixon and Nikita Khrushchev. US President Trump met with despot Putin for the Alaska summit last week where he hoped to squeeze out conditions for a peace deal with the Russian President. During the meeting, where Putin issued steep demands for peace, the two leaders appeared cordial and, at times, friendly. One photo from the meeting, shared by the US President on TruthSocial, showed Trump pointing his finger squarely at a smirking Putin's chest while an interpreter seemingly guiding the conversation between the pair. The snap was accompanied by another photo of then-Vice President Nixon and Soviet Union leader Khrushchev, with a similar finger pointing incident during the so-called "Kitchen Debate" in Moscow, in 1959. While Trump appeared to highlight the similarities between his gesture and his Republican predecessor, as an apparent show of strength, eagle-eyed people online noted another similarity. At the centre of both images were interpreters who appeared strikingly similar. The unidentified men were noted for having physical similarities including their hair, face shape and their clothes, namely a shirt, suit and tie. X/ Twitter user Carole Tahan said: "A time traveller from the Nixon/Khroutchev encounter (1959) to the Trump/Putin Alaska summit (2025). The striking resemblance of the 2 interpreters!" Another commenter, going by the handle @polymath1959 added: "2025 upper panel - Trump vs Putin 1959 lower panel - Nixon vs Khruschev. Weird fun fact? Same interpreter in both, not aged a day!" Body language expert Judi James also noted the similarity, telling The Mirror: "They even seem to have booked a double of the guy who stood between the leaders back then, to stand in the same spot with the same look of concern on his face, suggesting this is serious stuff." The US pursued a strategy of containment against the Soviet Union, which resulted in Washington DC challenging the emergence of communism in multiple countries, including Vietnam, as well as assisting its enemies, such as in Afghanistan. But Trump has struck up a more positive tone with Putin that had not been seen since Russia illegally annexed Crimea from Ukraine. Putin last enjoyed cordial relations with a Republican when George W. Bush was President. The pair met in 2001, with the former President commenting he looked into Putin's eyes and "found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy, and we had a very good dialogue. I was able to get a sense of his soul." Bush also said Putin "was a man deeply committed to his country and the best interests of his country and I appreciate very much the frank dialogue and that's the beginning of a very constructive relationship." Trump has had a friendly relationship with Putin and has spoken warmly about him, even appearing to favour him in talks about ending the war in Ukraine.