Toyota's Big Electric Leap: 7 New EVs Are Coming to the United States
Toyota currently has two all-electric models between its main and premium Lexus brands. The Toyota bZ4X, renamed to bZ for the 2026 model year, receives several major updates that make it more attractive, including a 314-mile range. The 2026 Lexus RZ follows suit, with improved performance and up to 300 miles of range on a single charge. Toyota also announced that the C-HR will arrive sometime in 2026, presumably for the 2027 model year, and offer a 290-mile range.
Production of two new EVs will begin at its American manufacturing facilities in 2026, while three others will be imported. According to executives, the Japanese automaker expects slow but steady growth in the EV segment. If there's a surplus for American-made EVs, Toyota will export that surplus to overseas markets with faster EV adoption rates.
"We'll sell a little bit more every year and grow with the market," Cooper Ericksen, a senior vice president of planning and strategy at Toyota Motor North America, told Bloomberg. "But we have to think about how many Canada will use, how many the US will use, and we can then export to other global destinations."
Toyota previously pledged to offer an electrified version of every nameplate on its global lineup. To date, approximately 80% of Toyota and Lexus models are available with hybrid or all-electric powertrains. Most recently, Toyota announced that the 2026 RAV4 will come with hybrid-only powertrains.
Toyota plans to manufacture at least two new EVs in the United States, but their production efforts don't end there. The Japanese automaker has plans to begin producing and shipping lithium-ion batteries from its US facility later this year. The battery plant spans more than 1,850 acres in Liberty, North Carolina. Once fully operational, the facility will have 14 lines producing batteries. Of those, four will manufacture hybrid batteries, while the other 10 will supply batteries for the two American-made EVs.
The first hybrid battery line is expected to start production in June, with the rest beginning operations through 2034. Once all 14 lines are running, the production facility will produce up to 30 gigawatt hours, the equivalent of 800,000 hybrid, 150,000 plug-in hybrid, and 300,000 EV batteries.
Toyota sold less than 30,000 EVs in 2024, during which US EV sales rose 7.3% to 1.3 million. That isn't surprising, considering the automaker has been fairly outspoken regarding government policy towards EV adoption. Instead of using incentives to speed up EV sales, such as the $7,500 tax credit, Toyota executives indicated that governmental bodies should allow the EV segment to grow organically.
"The whole EV ecosystem is ahead of the consumer," said Jack Hollis, COO of Toyota North America, in November 2024 regarding emissions regulations. "It's not in alignment with consumers. It's just not."
Even so, the Japanese automaker expects EV market share to double over the next five years. According to Cox Automotive, EV sales made up 8.1% of total vehicle sales in 2024. Currently, competitors like Tesla and Hyundai are dominating US EV sales. While all-electric vehicles might not be a major seller for Toyota now, executives aren't willing to cede the segment to competing manufacturers.
Tariffs aside, it looks like Toyota has a solid plan to become a true competitor in the EV segment. Considering the original bZ4X crossover was met with mixed reactions thanks to its slow charging speed, lackluster performance, and disappointing range, Toyota's upcoming EVs are a breath of fresh air. The updated bZ and RZ seem promising enough, and the upcoming C-HR looks like a stylish addition to the all-electric lineup. If the pricing is right, Toyota could very well overtake General Motors and Hyundai within a few years. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if the Japanese manufacturer manages to topple Tesla, too.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tariffs are pummeling top automakers. The hit is $11.7 billion — and climbing
The auto sector is taking President Trump's tariffs on the chin. Toyota (TM), the world's largest automaker, was the latest to reveal the impact it's seeing from tariffs in its earnings on Thursday morning, with slightly over $3 billion wiped from its fiscal Q1 (June 30) operating income. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service With Toyota's results in, the cumulative tariff hit from the largest automakers following the end of the June quarter stands at around $11.7 billion, per automakers' financial disclosures. Toyota had the largest exposure, followed by rivals like Volkswagen (VWAGY), GM (GM), Ford (F), Honda (HMC), and others. China's top automakers were excluded from the list as they do not operate in the US. Automakers, including Toyota and Honda, are not only seeing imports from their home market of Japan hit with tariffs (15%). They're also dealing with higher overall auto sector tariffs of 25% impacting operations from countries like Canada and Mexico. This also goes for the Big Three — Ford, GM, and Stellantis — which have significant operations with US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) partners. Even Tesla (TSLA), which makes all of its vehicles in the US, had a significant tariff impact from duties on auto parts like batteries for EVs. "The cost of tariffs increased around $300 million with approximately two-thirds of that impact in automotive and less in energy. However, given the latency in manufacturing and sales, the full impacts will come through in the following quarters," Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja said on the company's earnings call on July 23. The knee-jerk reaction for automakers would be to raise prices while eventually moving toward more US production. But neither option is an easy fix to avoid tariffs. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet "Investment for new assembly plants is considerable and requires a larger rationale than a one-term presidential administration," AutoForecast Solutions auto manufacturing expert Sam Fiorani said. "Building a new factory requires three to five years of planning and, likely, one or two billion in investments. Even retooling an existing facility will need around half a billion dollars." Fiorani noted that the financial outlays for factory spending have to be weighed against the cost of paying tariffs over the next three years. Most high-volume models, which typically have lower profit margins, like the Nissan Rogue, are already built in the US. Moving some high-volume vehicles that are built at scale in a foreign location, like the Chevrolet Equinox, may not make sense to move to the US. On the flip side, building certain low-volume, high-profit vehicles in the US wouldn't make economic sense either. How automakers are responding For its part, GM said it will spend $4 billion to bring more truck and SUV production to the US. GM said it will add production of the gas-powered Chevrolet Blazer and Chevrolet Equinox, currently made in Mexico, to the US starting in 2027. GM will also begin making gas-powered full-size SUVs like the Chevrolet Tahoe and light-duty pickups like the Silverado at its plant in Orion, Mich. It will also shift EV production from that plant to the Factory Zero Michigan plant, which produces only EVs. Honda said this week it is considering adding a third shift to its US production facilities to blunt the effect of tariffs. Though Honda didn't say which models would be affected, it had reportedly considered moving Civic sedan production from Canada to the US, which Honda denied. Adding a third shift would enable the automaker to limit tariff exposure and avoid the cost of constructing a new factory or adding tooling for a new production line somewhere else. But Honda isn't out of the woods either. CFRA's Garrett Nelson believes its margins will remain "deeply negative due to unabsorbed EV transition costs and structural tariff headwinds," which Nelson wrote could worsen if Trump's tariff policies ramp up again. Even Tesla is looking to onshore some of its parts production. Tesla vice president of engineering Lars Moravy said during the Q2 earnings call that Tesla's use of LFP batteries from China was a major source of tariffs, and that the company's first LFP battery factory would be coming online by the end of the year to defray some of those costs. The other alternative to evading the margin-eating costs of tariffs would be to pass those costs to buyers. "In the short term, automakers did carry the costs and it showed up in the second quarter financial reports," Fiorani said, adding that at some point, something has to give, with prices rising. "While it will vary depending on the profit margin on luxury models versus the need to be price competitive on the lower end, consumers of all vehicles, imported or not, will find prices going up starting this fall and increasing more next year." Ford initially instituted an "employee pricing for all" campaign for most models, effectively cutting prices in the face of tariffs and likely eating into its pre-tariff inventory. That only lasted until the end of June. Ford has since moved prices higher, especially for products like the made-in-Mexico Maverick pickup. GM, for its part, said it hasn't had to discount at all to maintain its pricing power and that it did not have any specific actions in place to hike prices. One way, however, that automakers can raise profits without hiking retail prices is by removing incentives and charging more for financing. "We think automakers are doing everything possible to offset tariff impacts through a combination of cost cuts, pricing, and mix, but the fact is they're going to have to absorb a large percentage of the impact of tariffs," CFRA's Nelson said to Yahoo Finance. Nevertheless, even if automakers are able to move production to the US, cut unprofitable products, and streamline operations and costs, it seems one thing will remain true for the foreseeable future. "Everyone will pay more," Fiorani said. Pras Subramanian is the lead auto reporter for Yahoo Finance. You can follow him on X and on Instagram. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
The American Click: How Facebook Likes Influence Shop-Based Content in the USA
You'd be forgiven for thinking likes on Facebook are dead. Public counters are mostly hidden. Comments and shares steal the spotlight. But when it comes to Facebook's Shop-integrated content—especially in the U.S.—likes still matter. A lot. In a space where algorithmic trust and consumer psychology overlap, likes act as subtle validators. They hint at popularity, legitimacy, and relevance. And when your Shop post appears in a scroller's feed beside sponsored competitors, those tiny thumbs-up can be the difference between a bounce and a click. So, why do Facebook likes still hold influence in the USA's evolving social commerce landscape? And where does the practice of buying likes (yes, including the USA Facebook likes ) fit into this ecosystem of credibility and conversion? American consumers have grown suspicious of overly-polished digital storefronts. But they also crave social proof. On Facebook, where familiarity fuels decisions, likes still work as frictionless validators. Especially in Shop-linked content, likes create what marketers call perceived traction . It's a psychological nudge: 'If others liked it, maybe I should care too.' This matters even more when you're introducing a product to a new audience—likes can offset skepticism by suggesting community approval. For small brands trying to gain visibility in a saturated feed, even 100 likes from the real US-based user accounts can be enough to make a product post feel 'seen.' That's why many emerging sellers quietly purchase US likes for Facebook—to simulate momentum while their organic base builds slowly. The Facebook Shop ecosystem is built to reduce steps between discovery and purchase. But the system still leans heavily on engagement metrics—likes included—for algorithmic placement. That means more likes can translate into higher visibility, especially among local and demographically-targeted audiences. In the U.S., where mobile-driven shopping and community-focused buying trends dominate, these micro signals feed the machine. A product with zero engagement looks risky. But one with 45 USA likes on Facebook, even passively earned (or purchased), feels more viable. It's not just about visibility. It's about inertia. If the post looks active, users are more likely to tap. Let's be clear—buying likes is controversial. But it's also widely practiced. And when executed carefully (read: not in bulk, not with bots, not overnight), it can function as reputation scaffolding. Not manipulation, but social proof buffering. The phrase buy USA Facebook likes trends for a reason. U.S.-based likes carry more algorithmic and psychological weight for American shoppers. A buyer in Austin is more likely to trust likes from a familiar geographic sphere than random names with no visible relevance. It signals proximity, which implies legitimacy. Of course, the danger lies in misuse: overdoing it, mixing in low-quality engagement, or using services that don't match the intended audience. Authenticity still matters. But buying likes isn't inherently inauthentic—it depends on the execution and the intent. Facebook's current content-ranking model blends user interest, post engagement, and post type. While video and carousel posts generally get priority, Shop-integrated content that garners early interaction—including likes—gets nudged further. For new or mid-tier sellers, that nudge can make or break reach. Especially when the budget for boosting posts is limited. Buying a small batch of Facebook likes from the USA users can kickstart an algorithmic feedback loop: higher engagement = higher ranking = more organic reach. This matters most during time-sensitive promotions or product drops, where a stall in the first hour can mean invisibility for the rest of the campaign. Not all likes are created equal. Facebook knows this. And increasingly, so do consumers. That's why many growth-focused marketers now avoid generic like-buying packages that deliver irrelevant or foreign accounts. If your brand is U.S.-centric, choosing likes from the US-based users isn't just preferable—it is necessary. They align your visible metrics with your actual audience, which makes retargeting and lookalike ad strategies more effective. It also helps avoid red flags. A Facebook post about handmade jewelry in Kansas getting 700 likes from Southeast Asia? That's a trust-breaker. Buying USA Facebook likes—in moderation—avoids this pitfall. One site that consistently stands out in this space is . Operating since the early 2010s, fbskip has built a reputation as a reliable source of real Facebook and Instagram likes, with specific options for USA-based engagement. Their services are designed for authenticity—not inflated numbers—and offer a spectrum of targeted packages to suit small sellers and established brands alike. Whether you're aiming to grow gradually or just need a small boost for a new campaign, their user-friendly platform makes it easy to explore ethical, real-user interaction. The short answer: yes, but indirectly. Likes influence perception. Perception influences click-through. Click-through influences Facebook's ranking of your content. And higher-ranked posts get more Shop traffic. For small businesses without a dedicated content team or ad strategist, likes become the cheapest form of engagement signaling. They don't guarantee conversion. But they improve the context in which a decision is made. Boutique beauty brands use likes to add weight to skincare routine videos. Local fashion resellers tag U.S. likes to make their story highlights more trustworthy. Indie bookstores post seasonal product shots and seed them with 30–50 USA likes to increase story impressions. Subscription coffee startups rely on steady Facebook likes from the USA users to boost organic reach for their bundle promotions. In each case, likes act not as clout, but as contextual validators. They reassure, without needing to impress. Buying US Facebook likes can improve trust and geo-relevance. Organic reach often favors posts with early engagement—including likes. Shop-integrated content performs better when supported by visible validation. Avoid bulk packages from unrelated regions—they risk undermining credibility. USA likes on Facebook posts help build retargeting audiences within the U.S. market. Use likes to frame perception, not fake popularity. The keyword buy Facebook likes USA on Google and the offers you find there should be viewed as a tactic, not a strategy. In the U.S. retail content space, where Facebook still drives discovery and trust, likes are not dead currency. They're shorthand. A sign that others noticed. A sign that maybe, just maybe, this post is worth clicking through. That doesn't mean every brand should buy Facebook likes. But dismissing them outright? That's ignoring one of the few metrics Facebook still lets users see and interpret. For Shop-based content, especially among U.S. audiences, likes remain part of the buying funnel—quietly, invisibly, but decisively. Because in the era of scrolling commerce, the American click doesn't come from nowhere. It follows a signal. And sometimes, that signal looks like a thumb. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rolls-Royce nears deal to offload $5.37 billion of UK pension liabilities, Bloomberg News reports
(Reuters) -UK's Rolls-Royce is close to announcing a deal with insurer Pension Insurance Corporation (PIC) to offload almost 4 billion pounds ($5.37 billion) in pension liabilities from the aircraft engine maker's balance sheet, Bloomberg News reported on Friday. The deal may be announced as soon as this month but talks could still be delayed or fall apart, the report added, citing people familiar with the matter. PIC specializes in defined benefit pension schemes, known as bulk annuities. Demand for bulk annuities has surged in the last few years as companies seek to shed defined benefit, or final salary, pension schemes from their balance sheets. According to Rolls-Royce's 2024 annual report, its funded obligations under the so-called UK defined benefit schemes stood at 3.96 billion pounds, with associated assets of 4.74 billion pounds. In July, PIC agreed to a 5.7 billion pounds takeover offer from specialised life insurance group Athora. Rolls-Royce and PIC declined to comment on the Bloomberg report. ($1 = 0.7444 pounds)
