Sauna plan for Loch Ness pub owned by Scotland's richest man
A sauna, shop and beach café have been proposed for a pub and restaurant taken over by a company owned by Scotland's richest man.Danish billionaire Anders Holch Povlsen's WildLand purchased the Dores Inn on Loch Ness last year.The property in the village of Dores, about 10 miles (16km) south of Inverness, is currently closed.Under plans outlined to Highland Council, WildLand has also proposed renovating and expanding the inn, revamping its car park and public toilets.
Mr Holch Povlsen made his fortune in retail and is worth almost £8bn, according to the latest The Sunday Times Rich List.
WildLand, a conservation and hospitality business, already owns the nearby 300-year-old Aldourie Castle and 500 acres of grounds and woodland.The Category A-listed castle was among 11 buildings named as winners of the annual Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland (RIAS) awards last month.WildLand said in October the Dores Inn would be closed for about 24 months for restoration work and should reopen in 2026-27.The company is holding public exhibitions on its plans at the inn on 27 and 28 June.Chief executive Tim Kirkwood said: "The Dores Inn sits at the heart of a much-loved community setting. "As we explore options for its restoration and long-term operation, we're committed to involving the community from the outset."
A full planning application is expected to be submitted with Highland Council before the end of the year.Lavinia Turner, head of region at WildLand Loch Ness, said: "The Dores Inn has always been more than a pub - it's a gathering place, a gateway to the loch, and an important part of local life. "We want to restore that role and build on it, creating something that works year-round for the area."The Dores Inn pub and restaurant is a landmark on the southern shore of Loch Ness.It was visited by Queen Elizabeth and her husband Prince Phillip in 1967.Over the years, owners of the Dores Inn have included local community stalwart Ella Macrae.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Train ticket website sues Transport Secretary after making claims about 'secret' £32million agreement involving state-owned firm
Trainline has sued Labour's Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander over allegations she snubbed them by offering a £32million contract elsewhere. State-owned London North Eastern Railway (LNER), which has been run by the Department for Transport (DfT) since 2018, was said to have recently extended a ticketing sales platform contract. But the company did not offer rivals like Trainline the chance to bid for the 10-year-deal, it is claimed. Trainline has alleged the failure to seek alternative bids means due process was ignored - as were the best interests of passengers and the taxpayer. LNER reportedly awarded the contract for the central booking engine that supports its digital ticket sales to Australia's Vix Technology. Trainline also alleges the publication of the award on the Government's website on December 23 was too opaque as it buried the news during Christmas week, limiting the ability of other parties to respond. It comes as Trainline, who would have expected to compete for the work, has its own rival division which provides a similar 'white label' service to train operators. The company is understood to be claiming that a direct award of the contract was not permissible under procurement law because the terms were varied in scope, duration and beneficiaries. Given the terms of the award, the ticketing platform used by LNER, which operates between London Kings Cross and Scotland via Leeds and Newcastle, could be extended across the rail network. However, both LNER and the DfT have denied a new contract exists saying the allegations are 'categorically untrue'. Rail Unions have previously raised concerns about third party ticket operators like Trainline, accusing the company of being engaged in 'relentless profiteering'. Despite the government's plans for simplification through the nationalisation of its railway, it has maintained there would still be a need for 'an innovative and competitive third-party retail market'. Labour also ruled out establishing a national website and app to promote to promote cheaper fares in competition with the firm. But in guidance from January it said a plan to bring together ticket websites of individual operators was now in the pipeline. An LNER spokesman said of Trainline's allegations: 'This is unequivocally untrue. No such contract exists. Trainline is aware this is the case as we explicitly advised them as much earlier this month.' A DfT spokesman added: 'This is completely and categorically untrue – not least because no such contract exists, which Trainline is well aware after being explicitly told as much by LNER earlier this month. 'The Department has been clear we are working industry to simplify ticketing for customers, as part of the biggest overhaul of our railways in a generation.' Trainline has suggested it is challenging the lack of opportunity for alternative providers to bid, regardless of whether a contract has been entered into at this point in time. The company has filed a claim at the Technology and Construction Court.
BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Could Glasgow's skyline be set to change with skyscrapers?
Think of skyscrapers and images come to mind of New York City's skyline, or hundreds of buildings soaring above the streets of Hong could Glasgow be poised for a similar boom in tall buildings?The city council formally approved its new tall buildings policy on Thursday, with a design guide establishing what areas could benefit from construction, such as Charing Cross and local authority hope the plans would lure more developers to the city, building upwards and therefore creating more accommodation and also space for businesses - at a time when land for development is becoming limited. It's a strategy other cities in the UK have pursued in recent years, with London and Manchester building clusters of skyscrapers at Scotland News understands the hope from some in the city council is that the new policy would shatter misconceptions regarding Glasgow having limits on building heights, and therefore encourage more interest from the moment the city's tallest building - the tower at the Science Centre by the River Clyde - is under the minimum height for a skyscraper, which is taller than 150m. It sits at began last year on the Ard development in Blythswood Hill, a 36-storey tower of student accommodation. But some of the city's tall buildings already lie vacant, while large blocks of flats - like on Wyndford Road - have been demolished in recent to redevelop the 14-storey Met Tower as a digital tech hub were cancelled last year. The new design guide doesn't set sights quite so high, defining tall buildings via various factors - including how it's perceived on street level and how it affects the skyline around highest category - metropolitan - is classed as a building three and a half times above the height of "the broader context" surrounding it, meaning somewhere like the Met Gerry Hogan, who works with the firm Collective Architecture, believes the policy is quite conservative, but welcome nonetheless."We've been a little reticent to be bold with in our approach to tall buildings, and arguably with architecture in Glasgow generally," he says. "If anything, the guide doesn't go far enough – they go through a very careful analysis of where tall buildings should be located and it doesn't give much encouragement for parts of the city." That belief is centred on the guide's suggestion on placing larger spaces - ideally mixed-use developments with shops or leisure facilities below housing - in certain parts of the city, therefore avoiding clashes with conservation areas like Pollok Park. Russell Baxter, a director with architecture and engineering firm NORR, believes the guide encourages clusters of buildings together."If you look at London, there's a lot of clusters there," he says. "It has a very protected skyline, so things like cathedrals and churches are retained, and key views are retained – that's everything in these cities. "So in Glasgow something like Trinity Tower at Park Circus is a key view – you can't obliterate that view for people. The idea is to cluster them together so you get a number of them in one area - the edge of the motorway is always seen as a place where that can happen." Mr Hogan believes that the quality of the new builds themselves will be key to making them a success, wherever they are situated in the city."A tall building is the same as any building, it comes down to how good it is," he explains. "Sure, height is a factor but if it's well designed and how it sits in the skyline has been considered then there's no reason it couldn't be put in more sensitive areas if they were well enough designed."What this seeks to promote, and what I agree with, is having multi-use buildings that bring in people throughout the day and engage people in using both the building and the wider area around it. "You don't want it putting a nearby park in the shade for example." 'You have to justify these buildings' Cllr Ruairi Kelly, the convener for development and land use at Glasgow city council, said the proposals will play a "significant role in our ambition to grow the city centre population" through providing a housing Manchester's recent boom in tall buildings was driven by public money, in particular the £300m Greater Manchester Housing Investment Glasgow will have to box clever, including with locations."You've not got the ability to do what you could do in Victorian times where you could just place a church or town hall at the end of a street, like a church being right on Ingram Street," says Mr Baxter. "If you go down Buchanan Street and the way the station entrance is sitting there – those were classic Victorian moves for how you masterplan cities and those buildings were key public buildings. "Now what you get are all buildings that are full of students and you have to justify them taking up these key positions."The guidance itself was drawn up through a public consultation and feedback from designers, developers and amenity Baxter believes the guidance will be helpful, even if the city having its own version of the Burj Khalifa remains a pie in the sky thought for now. "At the end of the day, you're not going to stop developers building tall. So what you need to do is control it, and that's what the policy is there to do – control where they are and control the quality of them."
The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
Energy costs are killing our industries and communities… and they'll kill Labour too unless they bring them down
THE steelworks, chemical plants and paper mills that criss-cross our country are the lifeblood of so many communities across the UK, providing good jobs and supporting local economies. Work in these plants can often be tough. But they are highly-skilled, well-paid and secure jobs for people to work in throughout their careers. 5 5 5 A hard day's work is rewarded with the knowledge your graft is going into producing valuable goods for some of the nation's most needed goods, such as the steel for our warships, chemicals used in the production of antibiotics for cancer treatments, or indeed the paper for your daily newspaper. These sectors provide a sense of pride and place to communities. Think of the smoke piling from the furnace towers at the steelworks in Scunthorp e, or the cranes stretching over Port Talbot. Images that define towns, giving them a part in the story of our complex modern world. Greasy spoon And it's not just the people directly employed in these factories and the wider supply chain that are dependent on the factories and manufacturing sites. The family-run greasy spoon that fuels workers before a long shift. The kids' football club sponsored by the local plant. The local pub where workers congregate after a busy week. Without our industrial sector, the bedrocks of communities wouldn't exist. But new research from the Jobs Foundation finds these roles are at risk. In 1999, the UK had the fourth-largest industrial base in the world, with more than four million workers. Today, the UK has just the 11th largest. In this period, we have gone from more than four million people employed in the manufacturing sector, to just two and a half million, with little growth in value added over the past 30 years. Steel production has fallen from 12million tonnes in 2013 to 4million in 2024. Last of Redcar steelworks demolished with 105,000 tonnes of steel brought down in 30 seconds- Between 2021 and 2024, chemical output has fallen by 40 per cent, and aluminium and paper mills have been shuttered. We've been through this before. In the Eighties, the Thatcher government oversaw a dramatic turnaround in the economic fortunes of the UK. But in this process of national economic revival, certain communities, such as those centred around coal mines, were devastated. Not enough thought was put into the transition. And this is a mistake which we risk repeating today. UK factories and plants pay more than three times as much for their energy as similar users in Germany, and seven times the cost paid by businesses in France. This time, deindustrialisation isn't happening as part of a coherent economic strategy. Instead, high energy prices are allowing us to sleepwalk into the decimation of UK industry. Everyone is now familiar with the spike in energy costs in recent years, with the energy price cap for households. But the situation is even worse for industrial users. UK factories and plants pay more than three times as much for their energy as similar users in Germany, and seven times the cost paid by businesses in France. With these costs, it's no wonder that industrial output across the UK continues to dwindle, simply unable to compete with cheaper production costs overseas. And as our competitiveness falls away, so too do the good jobs that energy-intensive industries provide. We also mustn't forget that energy costs are crippling other sectors too. Empty shops fill high streets, as hospitality and retail businesses can't keep up with the ever-increasing cost of keeping the lights on. 5 And we aren't creating good new jobs in the sectors of the future like AI and data centres, because they also require a lot of energy to operate. There is much talk about how new, clean energy will provide us with abundant energy, lower prices and a host of good new jobs. Roll the dice Promises of new jobs in clean energy are just that: Promises. Promises that might come in the future, but might not. Jobs across heavy industry exist in the present, and time has taught us that once these jobs go, they don't come back. We must do everything that we can to protect them. If Labour wants to have a chance of holding these seats at the next election, the upcoming industrial strategy must include concrete policies to bring energy costs down. Since the last election, Labour MPs represent the vast majority of seats where our industrial bases are located. But that could quickly change. Our research shows Nigel Farage and Reform is poised to sweep the majority of constituencies that are most reliant on jobs in energy-intensive industries at the next election. And who could blame voters in these constituencies, watching jobs in their local areas at risk through no fault of their own, for wanting to roll the dice with Reform. If Labour wants to have a chance of holding these seats at the next election, the upcoming industrial strategy must include concrete policies to bring energy costs down. This is in the country's best interests too. Industry gives purpose to communities, dignity to workers, and protects our national security. Let's do our part to protect it. 5
