logo
From no deal to Putin's deal? A flummoxing summit, a Trump flip

From no deal to Putin's deal? A flummoxing summit, a Trump flip

Yahoo2 days ago
Vladimir Putin was smiling. Donald Trump was not.
When the leaders of Russia and the United States shook hands on stage after failing to reach a deal at their Alaska summit, President Trump had a look on his face that his four predecessors might have recognized after their own encounters with the former KGB agent who has defied the world in his determination to rebuild an empire.
Trump looked tired, annoyed and worried, his path ahead so uncharted that he uncharacteristically refused to take a single question from the phalanx of reporters raising their hands in front of him. Putin, who had a small smile on his face, was relaxed enough to teasingly suggest they next meet in Moscow − speaking in English, so no one would miss the point.
Hours after Air Force One landed back in Washington, though, Trump seemed revived, embracing a new and entirely different plan for peace. He jettisoned what until 24 hours earlier had been his first priority and a strategy supported by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO allies.
"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump said on the social media platform Truth Social.
Which was, by the way, the approach that Putin had wanted all along.
Zelenskyy would meet with him at the White House on Aug. 18, Trump announced, to consider what happens next. The Ukrainian leader has consistently opposed peace talks without a ceasefire because it would give Russia a chance to press its battlefield advantage undeterred.
The fear among Ukraine's supporters is a replay of the last time the Ukrainian leader was in the Oval Office, in February. He was berated by the president and Vice President JD Vance for insufficient gratitude toward the United States for its help and for standing in the way of a peace agreement with Russia.
"Now it is really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done," Trump told Sean Hannity of Fox News after the summit. Then a three-way meeting with Putin could follow.
For Putin, a limousine lift and a red-carpet welcome
There's no wonder why Putin looked pleased in Alaska.
The summit was a windfall for him, ending his isolation from the West since the Ukraine invasion with a red-carpet welcome and a rare ride in the back seat of the armored presidential limousine, nicknamed "The Beast." The Russian leader could be seen through the window talking and laughing with the president.
He looked delighted to be back on U.S. soil for the first time in a decade.
Joined by two advisers each, they spoke for about three hours before skipping a planned luncheon and economic meeting, instead heading to a news-conference-without-questions.
Afterward, the two leaders took separate cars back to the airfield.
The summit didn't achieve what Trump said beforehand he wanted most: A ceasefire. In their statements afterward, the word "ceasefire" wasn't mentioned.
Trump also had set a series of deadlines for Russia to agree to progress or face secondary sanctions. The most recent deadline passed on Aug. 8, the day they agreed to meet in Alaska. After the summit, he didn't mention the word "sanctions" either.
By the next morning, after all, a "mere Ceasefire Agreement" was no longer the goal.
A campaign promise, now 200 days overdue
No major promise Trump made during the 2024 campaign has proved harder to deliver than his assurance that he could settle the grinding war in Ukraine in his first day in office, a confidence based largely on his relationship with Putin. But that was more than 200 days ago, and despite Trump's move from friendly entreaties to undefined threats of "very severe consequences," Russia's attacks on Ukraine's armed forces and its civilians have not abated.
Despite the declaration "PURSUING PEACE" that was stamped on the blue backdrop behind the two men.
"So there's no deal until there's a deal," Trump told the expectant audience, an unhappy admission from a self-described master negotiator who titled his first book "The Art of the Deal." The flummox that showed on Trump's face at the Aug. 15 news conference would have been familiar to Barack Obama, who sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to meet with the Russian foreign minister with a red "Reset" button as a visual aid for a new era of relations, only to watch Moscow illegally annex Crimea in 2014. Or Joe Biden when Putin ignored his warnings and invaded Ukraine in 2022.
Or George W. Bush, when he watched events unfold after prematurely declaring after his first meeting with Putin in 2001 that he had "looked the man in the eye" and determined that he was "straightforward and trustworthy."
Those are not the adjectives presidents have generally used about Putin since then.
In contrast to his predecessors, though, Trump's tone toward Putin remained chummy even after the summit setback. "We got along great," he said, calling him "Vladimir."
Trump is still determined to strike a deal, whatever the details − and perhaps for more than one reason.
In the interview with Hannity, he touted his record as a peacemaker in conflicts between Cambodia and Thailand, India and Pakistan, Congo and Rwanda. He suggested a possible repercussion if he now orchestrates an end to the war between Russia and Ukraine.
"It's interesting," the president offered, " because somebody said, if I get this settled, I'll get the, you know, the Nobel Peace Prize."
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: From no deal to Putin's deal? A flummoxing summit, a Trump flip
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump declares victory in Washington DC after takeover of metro police
Trump declares victory in Washington DC after takeover of metro police

USA Today

time19 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump declares victory in Washington DC after takeover of metro police

WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump declared victory in the nation's capital, 10 days after announcing the federal takeover of the Washington metro police force to 'rescue' the city from crime. Trump on Aug. 21 met with law enforcement officers who had been deployed to patrol the city he recently described as rampant with 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor.' The president arrived at the United States Park Police facility in Anacostia Park Thursday evening and offered words of encouragement to law enforcement officers. He brought hamburgers and pizzas for the crowd. 'The numbers are down like we wouldn't believe, but we believe it,' he told the crowd. Among those who attended were officers from the National Guard, FBI, U.S. Marshals and the Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department. 'We've had some incredible results. The results have come out and it's like a different place. It's like a different city." "To me, I feel very safe now," he added. On Aug. 11, Trump deployed 800 National Guard troops in Washington DC, declaring a public safety emergency. Several Republican states including Ohio, Mississippi, West Virginia and Louisiana have sent guardsmen to the capital to support the Trump Administration's efforts. The troops are deployed at tourist-heavy locations such as the National Mall and transit hubs such as Union Station and Metro stops to aid local law enforcement. Since the deployment of the troops, carjackings have decreased by 83%, robberies by 46%, car thefts by 21%, and overall violent crime by 22% compared to the previous seven days, according to Metropolitan Police Department's police union. But crime had already been on the decline. Violent crime in Washington, DC, dropped 26% through Aug. 8, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, according to data from the Metropolitan Police Department. However, the city had the fourth-highest homicide rate among U.S. cities, after St. Louis, New Orleans and Detroit, at 27.3 per 100,000 residents in 2024. 'It's the capital. It's going to be the best in the world,' Trump said. 'We're going back to Congress for some money, and we're going to redo a lot of the pavement, a lot of the medians…the graffiti's all coming off real fast,' he said. He then pivoted to his latest passion project: building a 90,000 square foot ballroom in the White House. 'They've been after a ballroom for 150 years, but they never had a real estate guy,' he said. 'As a president, I've done a lot of ballrooms and we're going to make this one the best of them all.' Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House Correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal

Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump

Chicago Tribune

time19 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump

NEW YORK — A New York appeals court on Thursday threw out President Donald Trump's massive financial penalty while narrowly upholding a judge's finding that he engaged in fraud by exaggerating his wealth for decades. The ruling spares Trump from a potential half-billion-dollar fine but bans him and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Trump claimed 'TOTAL VICTORY' in the case, which stemmed from a civil lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. 'They stole $550 million from me with a fake case and it was overturned,' Trump said, echoing his earlier social media post as he addressed police in Washington, D.C. 'They said this was a fake case. It was a terrible thing.' James, a Democrat, focused on the parts of the decision that went her way, saying in a statement that it 'affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud.' The ruling came seven months after Trump returned to the White House, his political fortunes unimpeded by the civil fraud judgment, a criminal conviction and other legal blows. A sharply divided panel of five judges in the state's mid-level Appellate Division couldn't agree on many issues raised in Trump's appeal, but a majority said the monetary penalty was 'excessive.' A lower-court judge, Arthur Engoron, had ordered Trump last year to pay $355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organization, including sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr., have brought the total to $527 million with interest. 'While harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award' to the state, Judges Dianne Renwick and Peter Moulton wrote in one of three opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. They called the penalty 'an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' Both were appointed by Democratic governors. Engoron's other punishments, upheld by the appeals court, have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and the president was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. Donald Trump Jr. celebrated the decision by mocking James, who had periodically posted a running tally of the fraud penalty, with interest. Over a post from James in February 2024, when the tally was nearly $465 million, Trump Jr. wrote: 'I believe you mean $0.00. Thank you for your attention to this matter.' The five-judge panel, which split on the merits of the lawsuit and Engoron's fraud finding, dismissed the monetary penalty in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for an appeal to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. In the meantime, Trump and his co-defendants, the judges wrote, can seek to extend the pause to prevent any punishments from taking effect. While the Appellate Division dispatches most appeals in a few pages in a matter of weeks, the judges weighing Trump's case took nearly 11 months to rule after oral arguments last fall and issued 323 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions with no majority. Rather, some judges endorsed parts of their colleagues' findings while denouncing others, enabling the court to rule. Two judges wrote that they felt James' lawsuit was justifiable and that she had proven her case but the penalty was too severe. One wrote that James exceeded her legal authority in bringing the suit, saying that if any lenders felt cheated, they could have sued Trump themselves, and none did. Another wrote that Engoron erred by ruling before the trial that James had proven Trump engaged in fraud. In his portion of the ruling, Judge David Friedman, appointed by a Republican governor, was scathing in his criticism of James for bringing the lawsuit. 'Plainly, her ultimate goal was not 'market hygiene' … but political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business,' Friedman wrote. 'The voters have obviously rendered a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.' Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. At the conclusion of the civil trial in January 2024, Trump said he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' The Republican has repeatedly maintained the case and the verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney Abbe D. Lowell has said investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing last September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old and that James had misused a consumer protection law to sue Trump over private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said that while Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, his exaggerations led lenders to make riskier loans and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net worth numbers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider. Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. Trump also is appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store