logo
The 7 best sausage rolls in London have been crowned by the New York Times

The 7 best sausage rolls in London have been crowned by the New York Times

Time Out27-05-2025

If there's one food that brings Brits together, it's the humble sausage roll. A trusty hangover breakfast, a summer picnic essential, a hearty pub snack – soft minced pork wrapped in a crispy slap of puff pastry has a magic hold over the nation.
Obviously, Americans are less acquainted with the beloved British staple, so for its list of the best sausage rolls in the capital, the New York Times asked a batch of London creatives to share their favourites. From simple traditional rolls, to gourmet interpretations, here's what they picked.
Cynthia Shanmugalingam, chef and owner of Sri Lankan restaurant Rambutan, chose the sausage roll at the Ginger Pig in Borough Market. She called it the 'Rolls Royce of sausage rolls' and said that 'the pastry is like a crispy cloud, all buttery flakiness, and the filling is an explosion of juicy, dense, delicious pork, with a little black pepper and herbs'.
The sausage roll at Jolene in Stoke Newington, which is seasoned with red wine, fennel seeds, garlic and black pepper, was picked by jewellery designer Fernando Jorge. Chef Joseph Denison Carey declared that the sausage roll at the Hampstead outpost of bakery chain Gail's is 'the best on the market'. He said of the pastry, made with pork, rosemary, thyme, sage, oregano and mustard: 'It's always perfectly seasoned, and the consistency of the filling is ideal. It's almost meatloafy.'
Angus Buchanan, creative director of Buchanan Studios, chose the meaty pastry at Notting Hill's Layla Bakery, which is made using scraps of croissant dough. He said: 'The sausage roll is something of an enigma, as it's only available on the weekends and they don't even always have it, but if they do, it's the best!'. For veggies, Layla also do a roll stuffed with sweet potato, chestnut mushroom and chickpeas.
Of course, no list of the best sausage rolls is complete without a Greggs shoutout. Fashion designer Chet Lo nominated the high street classic, which he called 'unpretentious and good'. Alexis Burgess, director of Livingstone whisky and Burgess Studio, selected the rolls served at the bar at the Marksmen in Hackney which come packed with pork, spices, sage, onions and chopped cep mushrooms.
Alex Eagle, the creative director of Alex Eagle Studio, hailed the pastry at Mayfair's Rex Deli stuffed with pork, apple and sage, 'that is really spoiling with some mustard, and maybe a beer, on a Sunday afternoon'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Coronation Street 'robbed' at British Soap Awards, say fans
Coronation Street 'robbed' at British Soap Awards, say fans

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Coronation Street 'robbed' at British Soap Awards, say fans

The glitzy event, which took place at Hackney Empire in London last weekend, got off to a tricky start as ITV encountered technical difficulties for its broadcast last night (June 5). ITV1 displayed a message apologising for the delay as the show started almost 10 minutes late. Hosted by Jane McDonald, the biggest soaps in the country went head-to-head for best scenes, performances and storylines. However, some viewers were disgruntled that their favourite soap didn't scoop as many awards as hoped. The British Soap Awards through the years… But can you remember which year each image is from? Tickets for the 2025 Awards are available now! 🤩 — British Soap Awards (@SoapAwards) May 15, 2025 Coronation Street fans say soap was 'robbed' Taking to X, formerly Twitter, viewers were quick to react to the string of awards won by EastEnders and not Corrie. Two particular awards not being won by the ITV soap caused fans to react the most. Best Dramatic Performance was won by Steve McFadden, who plays Phil Mitchell in EastEnders, and Best On-Screen Partnership went to Rudolph Walker and Angela Wynter who play Patrick and Yolande. However, fans argued that Coronation Street's Peter Ash should have won for his MND portrayal and Alison King and Vicky Myers for their on-screen partnership, with their characters affectionately known as 'Swarla' on social media. 'Swarla should have won!' one person tweeted. The Longest-Running UK Soaps Someone commented: 'Swarla will always be our best partnership…they are a powerhouse couple. So proud of them.' 'Corrie has raised the bar for relationships and storylines over the past year, they should have won. Corrie has been robbed tonight,' another added. While in relation to Peter's powerful storyline, one person said: 'Gutted Peter Ash didn't win best dramatic performance.' Another added: 'Cannot believe Corrie didn't get more awards. Peter Ash especially his acting was worth an Oscar, let alone a soap award.' Commenting on ITV's techincal difficulties at the start of the show, one person added: "Well what a cracking chaos and then EastEnders takes all the awards from Corrie." Who won Best British Soap? EastEnders won eight prizes at the British Soap Awards. The BBC soap also took home the highly anticipated award for Best British Soap, with the trophy presented by Only Fools and Horses actor Sir David Jason. Eastenders takes the award for 2025's Best British Soap! Huge congratulations, what an absolutely amazing year! 🏆 — British Soap Awards (@SoapAwards) June 5, 2025 The full list of all the winners at the Soap Awards is as follows: Best British Soap - EastEnders Best Leading Performer - Lacey Turner (Stacey Slater, EastEnders) Villain of the Year - Navin Chowdhry (Nish Panesar, EastEnders) Outstanding Achievement Award - David Neilson (Roy Cropper, Coronation Street) The Tony Warren Award - Mike Plant, Cameraman, Emmerdale Best Comedy Performance - Patsy Palmer (Bianca Jackson, EastEnders) Best Family - The Osbornes, Hollyoaks Best Dramatic Performance - Steve McFadden (Phil Mitchell, EastEnders) Best Single Episode - EastEnders, Phil's Psychosis – The Mitchells in 1985 Best On-Screen Partnership - Rudolph Walker & Angela Wynter (Patrick & Yolande Trueman, EastEnders) Recommended reading: Best Newcomer - Isabelle Smith (Frankie Osborne, Hollyoaks) Best Storyline - Hollyoaks, Sibling Sexual Abuse Best Young Performer - Amelia Flanagan (April Windsor, Emmerdale) Scene of the Year - EastEnders, Angie Watts' return

‘This is their way of phasing us out': inside the busking battle in central London
‘This is their way of phasing us out': inside the busking battle in central London

Time Out

timean hour ago

  • Time Out

‘This is their way of phasing us out': inside the busking battle in central London

It's a glaring hot afternoon and noise permeates Soho: shrieks of kids on school trips, '80s anthems blaring from pedicab speakers, the clumsy honks and growling engines of passing traffic. Turn the corner into Trafalgar Square and you're met with the sounds of amplified guitar strums and the sight of a growing crowd of couples tapping their feet, toddlers bobbing their knees and teenagers clapping their hands in time to a rendition of Coldplay's 'Viva la Vida'. Busker Johan Satre has them in a gleeful trance. After waiting in a queue of buskers since 8.30am before finally getting a slot at midday, Satre has a firm hold over his audience of around 40 to 50 people (a smaller crowd than normal, he tells me afterwards). After his grand finale ('Dancing Queen' by ABBA), the crowd line up to tap their phones onto his contactless machine as another busker starts to set up equipment within a large yellow circle marked on the ground – one of the few legal amplified busking pitches left in the borough. For as long as streets have existed, so have street performers. For centuries, fiddlers, troubadors, bards and one-man bands have serenaded the capital city, with the likes of Rod Stewart, Simon and Garfunkel and Ed Sheeran among those honing their trade on London's streets. At the same time, buskers have always been a divisive feature of the city. After several centuries of existence, they were only effectively legalised in the 1980s when British courts ruled buskers were in fact not committing an offence under the 1824 Vagrancy Act. In the past they've been dubbed vagrants, beggars and most recently, akin to 'psychological torture'. That's what a judge said in March during a court case between Westminster city council and Leicester Square businesses. Led by Global Radio (who own Capital, Heart and LBC radio stations) and the Hippodrome Casino, the companies and local residents took the authority to court for failing to 'abate a statutory nuisance' – in other words, failing to keep rowdy buskers and their amp volumes under control, particularly at night. Office workers complained of being 'plagued' by 'out of tune' musicians playing 'Sweet Caroline', being forced to take meetings in cupboards and to wear noise-cancelling headphones. The trial concluded with buskers being completely banned from Leicester Square – for now, at least. While that was a first of its kind case, a crackdown on central London's street performers has been stirring for several years. This is the buskers' side of the story. Now, it's a legal matter 'Singing a song is a criminal offence these days, apparently.' A month before the Leicester Square trial comes to a head, I'm chatting to singer-songwriter Harry Marshall over Zoom. Speaking in a mild Aussie accent, he's visibly despondent. After seven years of performing on the streets of Westminster, Marshall now holds criminal convictions for busking illegally. He had called Piccadilly Circus his second home, making a living singing and playing guitar there, since 2018. 'It was a great way to make music my full time job,' he says. 'Everyday I got to connect with hundreds of people emotionally and musically.' So, when he found out that a licensing scheme had been introduced by Westminster council in 2021 – with the aim to 'strike a balance between supporting performers and addressing issues related to noise, obstruction and inappropriate locations' – he dutifully applied. Under the new rules, buskers had to now pay to play in designated spots across the borough. It dictated that performances must end before 9pm, musicians have to play a 'varied repertoire' and only use amplifiers in designated spots. Prior to the scheme, the City of Westminster was home to seven amplified pitches. Once the rules were passed, that dropped down to four, though Marshall and several other seasoned buskers I speak to, say that half of those aren't worth playing on. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Harry Marshall (@harrymarshallmusic) '[The pitch at] Marble Arch is terrible because there's no foot traffic,' Marshall says. 'The only time you're not allowed to busk there is during Winter Wonderland when there are actually people there.' The other, he says, is King Charles Island, the small roundabout at the bottom of Trafalgar Square, which is 'wildly dangerous because there's moving traffic yet your job is to build a crowd.' That meant that suddenly, street musicians were queuing up for a 40-minute slot at one of the two viable amplified pitches remaining, marked by large yellow circles: one on Leicester Square and one at the top of Trafalgar Square. Demand for the limited pitches was high and it became harder to get enough slots to make a living. Marshall tells me that lots of performers who had been on the scene for decades simply gave up. He himself soon found that abiding by the rules wasn't going to be sustainable if he wanted to continue busking for a living. In protest, he decided not to reapply for a licence when his expired two years later. Then, he went back to play at the Piccadilly pitch that had been his stage for the best part of a decade. 'I got a lot of warnings from the council,' he recalls. 'But this was my way of saying: this isn't right. If I adhere to the licence [rules] I'm not going to be able to pay my rent.' A year and a half later, Harry was taken to court by Westminster Council. He pled guilty and slapped with eight charges of busking without a licence with the prospect of a £1000 fine per charge plus litigation fees. 'Luckily the judges saw sense and realised I'm a street performer, I don't have £10,000 in my account.' He says, resolutely, that the busking community in central London 'hate the licensing scheme' and it's widely believed that 'this is their way of phasing us out.' Four weeks later, amplified street performers were outlawed from Leicester Square. Press rewind For most of the UK and London, buskers don't need a licence – they simply have to adhere to a code of conduct (such as being mindful of noise levels and respecting the environment) and are kept under control through public space protection orders. But over the last four years, Westminster City Council has enforced some of the country's strictest rules around street performing. Like Marshall, keyboard player Elliot Herrington has witnessed the crackdown play out in real time. He moved to London from the south coast in 2017 and started regularly busking at Tottenham Court Road two years later. 'The busking scene at that point was amazing,' he recalls. 'It was completely free and on the 25-minute walk from the bottom of Tottenham Court Road all the way to Marble Arch, you'd probably see at least 10 buskers. Everyone was sharing spots, there was zero pressure from the council and people loved us, especially the tourists. 'I used to busk with a DJ and a sax player and we'd have three or four hundred people dancing in the street. They all stayed for hours – homeless people dancing next to people in suits, children next to grandparents. There was so much community and love. Now you go up Oxford Street and there's maybe one [busker], if you're lucky.' We used to have four hundred people dancing in the street When Herrington returned to his (now illegal) Tottenham Court Road pitch after lockdown, he was informed that he wasn't allowed to play without a licence and yet, in a catch-22, his application was denied on account of him having played before being made aware of the rules. He tried to continue without the permit but tells me that by 2024 'you could not busk once on any given day without someone from the council coming up to you'. That's when he began to give in: 'At that point they had started sueing loads of buskers. I had my last warning and because I'd seen my mates get actual convictions, I decided I'm just going to accept that I can't play there anymore. Then I moved to Camden and the same thing happened. It was so much hassle.' Shanilee Tordilla, a regular on the Leicester Square pitch pre-ban, tells me that even with the license, busking had been made harder. 'It didn't take long to realise that the licence wasn't benefitting us but doing the opposite,' she says. 'If you had the licence then you had more opportunities to be prosecuted. There are people who don't know about the licensing scheme and frankly they get away with it because they just come and go as they like.' Serena Kaos, a local busker and member of the Westminster Street Performers Association (WPSA) agrees that those who follow the rules responsibly and abide by the licensing rules are being lumped into the same category as the buskers that play at excessive volumes in antisocial hours and being made to suffer the consequences. 'The buskers that are part of the WSPA are typically very reasonable. We operate on community-based actions.' Amping it up But if noise is the problem, wouldn't the solution simply be to ditch the microphone, switch off the electric amplifier and perform acoustically? 'Go and stand in the middle of Leicester Square and tell me that if I played or sang completely acoustically that anyone would even hear me,' Harry says. 'You need a certain level of amplification. The art of street performance is about capturing people's attention and holding them for a short amount of time to impress them enough to drop a coin in your case. That is hard enough to do in itself, let alone without an amplifier.' Kaos echoes his argument: 'Music does not cut through more than one metre in a central location like Leicester Square. By taking amplification away, you're just taking away street musicians.' Two years after the licensing scheme had been introduced, Westminster Council released a policy review. It revealed that noise complaints had actually increased considerably since the rules had been implemented. Between April 2021 and May 2023 there were 5,070 complaints lodged, up around 1,000 compared to the two years before. It reported that 'some buskers argue that due to the limited opportunities, they can only get onto the Leicester Square pitch once in a day, so they must play louder to attract audiences and maximise their potential earnings. This has meant that the volume can be much louder than they would use normally.' Still, prior to the ruling, the WSPA and the council had been taking regular meter readings (buskers are allowed to play on designated amplified pitches at no more than 78 decibels) and, according to Kaos, had agreed that members weren't playing to levels that could be considered a nuisance. What's next? 'With all the venues shutting down can we at least let people play on the street? What sort of grey world are you trying to create?' Herrington asks. He struggles to be optimistic about busking's future in the city. 'I hate to say it but it's done. I think a lot of buskers are quite fragmented from each other so it's quite hard to get everyone to rally together.' Nevertheless, the WSPA plans to fight to get the Leicester Square pitch back or at least get another pitch to replace it, with intentions to protest on the square every fortnight or so. A spokesperson from the organisation told Time Out: 'The solution lies not in banning street performance altogether, but in working together to establish reasonable compromises around volume levels, speaker types and designated locations. Leicester Square is a cultural landmark – not just for tourism and commerce, but for expression, spontaneity, and opportunity.' When I stop by one of these demonstrations, they're met with mixed reactions. Some members of the public stop to read the WSPA's appeal and sign its petition, encouraged by a supporter who has been coming to the square specifically to listen to its musicians for the past eight years. But there is also some hostility, with one man interrupting a protester mid-song to voice his disapproval. View this post on Instagram A post shared by •SHANILEE• (@sshanilee) 'I understand. If I was working somewhere and there's someone playing ''Wonderwall'' all day long I would go crazy,' says Mary Valiaka, music director at What Does Not, an organisation that champions London's grassroots musicians and backs the WSPA's cause. 'But there needs to be a middle ground'. She argues that pushing performers off the street will have a detrimental effect on London's (already dwindling) live music landscape as a whole. 'With busking, you learn how to engage, be charismatic and have a good presence,' Valiaka says. 'And that's 50 percent of what makes a good live performer. With busking under threat, how are people going to learn how to be a good live performer?' Kaos adds that central London streets provide an important stage for musicians from less privileged backgrounds. 'Working-class musicians don't get the opportunity to be musicians for a living very often. As working class performers, it allows you to have a platform in the first place.' Herrington is one such success story. Through his street performing, he got the 'opportunity of a lifetime' to tour with rising star Myles Smith. He was seen by a scout on the street and now plays keys in Smith's band. This summer he'll be playing at Glastonbury and on stadium stages across the globe supporting Ed Sheeran. 'I'm doing all this crazy stuff and it has all come from busking. I cannot quantify how impactful playing on the streets has been for my music career. I would not be where I am today without it.' Westminster city council has now appealed the Global Radio court ruling and is awaiting a response. A spokesperson told Time Out: 'Our view is the effect of the abatement order is too restrictive in controlling all buskers for the whole of Leicester Square and instead should have been limited to the single amplified pitch that was the basis of the Global Radio case. 'We believe that, with sensible measures in place, we can find a fair solution that minimises disruption while allowing performers to do what they do best.'

Meghan Markle's 'business like' approach to royal rift with Harry exposed
Meghan Markle's 'business like' approach to royal rift with Harry exposed

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Meghan Markle's 'business like' approach to royal rift with Harry exposed

Meghan and Harry have been estranged from the Royal Family for five years, with the Duke of Sussex recently expressing his desire to reconcile with his relatives Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are said to take contrasting stances on managing their distance from the Royal Family. Reports have suggested that the Duchess of Sussex adopts a rather "business" mindset towards the situation. The duke and duchess stepped back from royal duties five years ago back in 2021, and carved out a new path in the US with their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. Since then, they have been attempting to launch their careers in new directions. ‌ Despite having levelled numerous critiques at the Royal Family over time, recently, Prince Harry has signalled his desire for reconciliation. ‌ New insights, however, suggest that while Meghan is very supportive of Harry's legal battles and the "painful rift" with his family, she is perceived as having a more pragmatic "business"-like perspective, reportedly wishing Harry could be less affected "by the past and more present in the life they've built together". It is believed that the Sussexes feel excluded from intricate royal affairs taking place in the UK, reports the Express. "They [Harry and Meghan] are aware of everything going on in England, but they're being left out of the details - there's clearly no trust," a source speaking to People magazine remarked. Finding it challenging to be fully informed about his father, Prince Harry reportedly struggles to receive precise updates regarding King Charles. Last month, the duke expressed to the BBC his concern over the lack of communication with his father and his uncertainty about the time the King may have left. ‌ Moreover, he voiced a hope for mending ties with his relatives, saying: "Of course, they will never forgive me for lots of things, but there's no point in continuing to fight anymore." Prince Harry expressed his desire for reconciliation, stating: "I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point continuing to fight any more, life is precious." ‌ However, Sally Bedell Smith, a royal biographer, suggested that trust remains a significant hurdle. In an interview with People magazine, she revealed: "The King and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Valentine Low, another author, noted that although Harry's BBC interview wasn't intended as a direct attack on the Royal Family, "it would be seen as one," making it even more challenging for Charles to extend an olive branch. Elsewhere, the Duke of Sussex was reportedly left furious after the King and British officials caused "repeated delays" in issuing his children's passports, leading to a name change. ‌ Prince Harry allegedly considered changing his family name to Spencer following "repeated delays by British officials" in issuing passports for his children, Archie and Lilibet. The Duke of Sussex had reportedly "discussed the issue" with his late mother's brother, Earl Spencer. He allegedly "actively explored ways" to make the switch while in the UK, but it is said that "the legal hurdles were insurmountable". The claims have been rejected as "completely untrue" by sources close to the Sussexes, sparking debate among commentators who believe such a move could worsen tensions within the Royal Family.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store