
Spain's leader sticks by decision to break with Nato on defence spending
On Thursday, the progressive Spanish leader stuck by his decision to break with Nato allies and responded to Mr Trump's comments by pointing out that the European Commission — and not Spain — was who decided the bloc's trade policy.
'What is clear is that trade policy is a policy directed from here, from Brussels,' Mr Sanchez said. 'Spain is an open country. It is a country that is friendly to its friends, and we consider the United States a friend of Spain.'
At the military alliance's summit on Wednesday, members agreed to raise their defence spending to 5% of GDP. But Mr Sanchez secured a last-minute exemption, saying that Spain will only spend up to 2.1%, which he called 'sufficient and realistic'.
Mr Trump criticised the country after the summit, saying Spain wanted 'a little bit of a free ride,' and that it would 'have to pay it back to us on trade' through higher tariffs.
How Mr Sanchez's gamble could play out was up for debate on Thursday.
'It is not always easy to interpret exactly what Mr Trump means,' Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever told reporters at an EU summit.
'How he wants to impose import tariffs on Spain separately is a mystery to everyone. Could this perhaps concern specific products from Spain? We will have to wait and see.'
Spain's move on the international stage comes at a complex moment for Mr Sanchez at home as corruption cases involving his inner circle have ensnared his Socialist party and resulted in louder calls — even from some left-wing allies — to announce early elections. So far, Mr Sanchez has refused.
'To Trump's theatre, Mr Sanchez responds with something similar,' said Montserrat Nebrera, political analyst and professor of constitutional law at the International University of Catalonia. 'Domestic problems are piling up, and this resistance to meeting the arbitrary 5% target also seeks to wink at his partners most critical of defence spending.'
Spain was Nato's lowest spender last year, according to the alliance's estimates, spending around 1.28% of its GDP on defence expenditure.
In April, Mr Sanchez announced that the country would reach 2% this year, for which he was criticised by some left-wing allies.
On Thursday, Antonio Garamendi, president of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations, criticised Mr Sanchez for the spending opt-out.
'We have to stick with our allies and not going along with the other Europeans is an error, and even more so if that increases the chance we will be punished,' Mr Garamendi said.
While Spain is under the umbrella of the European Union, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of all 27 member countries, it could still be targeted by tariffs that hit its most vulnerable industries, Mr Garamendi said.
He specifically pointed to Spanish steel, cars and olive oil sectors.
'There are industries that can be impacted, and that has to concern us,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Tech expert believes Iran's missiles may have been hacked mid-flight over Israel
The tech expert described both jamming and spoofing as 'prolific', although he explained spoofing is less frequently used and is a bit harder to detect than jamming A tech expert has shared an 'exotic new' hack which he believes could have tricked Iranian missiles into plunging into the Mediterranean Sea during the Iran-Israel war. Israel launched attacks against Iran on June 13, claiming the country was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran then retaliated with its own series of airstrikes. But in recent days the two countries have now agreed on a ceasefire. Just after 5am GMT on Tuesday, June 24 Trump announced that the ceasefire had taken effect. The requirements for either side were slightly different, with Iran told to stop fighting a few hours from the time of the post, while Israel agreed to halt hostilities at 7.10am UK time. However, hours after Israel's side of the agreement, the state accused Iran of deploying missiles towards it - adding that defence systems were working to intercept the threat. Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz claims Iran's "violation of the ceasefire" will not go unpunished, adding that he's ordered the Israel Defence Forces to "respond forcefully". He said they will be deploying " intense strikes against regime targets in the heart of Tehran". Now, a tech expert believes that he and his team witnessed a new defensive tactic that involved tricking missiles into flying against their programming during the conflict between Israel and Iran, reports MailOnline. Sean Gorman, the co-founder and CEO of believes he and his team have seen is a highly sophisticated version of spoofing meant to mimic the arcing flight paths of missiles and send them to safer locations. Like many missile systems found across the world, Iranian missiles rely on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data to find their way to their targets. Sean said: "Missiles are guided munitions. They all track latitude and longitude and elevation the same way we navigate in our cars or the same way aeroplanes navigate. "You're basically providing that same navigation system in ammunition so that it lands in exactly the right place. Jammers and spoofers have been incredibly effective at preventing guided munition from landing where you where they wanted to land and maybe where you instead getting it to go somewhere else or to fail." Sean described both jamming and spoofing as 'prolific', although he explained spoofing is less frequently used and is a bit harder to detect than jamming. He also warned they're both risks to civilian and commercial operations. He said: "Collisions could be an issue both from an aviation standpoint, as well as a maritime standpoint', adding that the ability to 'detect spoofing will be critical for civilian safety."

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Why an independent Scotland should stay well away from Nato
Even more nauseating was the shameless brown-nosing of Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, who offered Trump his 'congratulations' on what he called the US president's 'decisive action in Iran'. Trump's spectacularly dangerous and inflammatory assault on the Islamic Republic was, Rutte snivelled, 'truly extraordinary and something no-one else dared to do. It makes us all safer'. On the 5% commitment, Rutte grovelled: 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.' READ MORE: Humanitarian aid must be allowed to reach Gaza, John Swinney says Rutte, with this display of arse kissing, has given Keir Starmer a run for his money where obsequious flattery towards the president is concerned. What Rutte means by European member states paying in a 'BIG way' for their Nato membership is that their citizens will pay the price in cuts to health, education and other social spending. When the Spanish delegation dared to suggest that its fiscal sovereignty belongs not to Nato but to its own parliament, Trump threatened Spain with economic sanctions. The US president is keen to be seen as a strongman. He left The Hague able to boast that he forced a deal whereby the US only agreed to uphold Nato's totemic Article 5 (the 'one for all, and all for one' clause that ensures collective defence among Nato members) after extracting the 5% commitment. However, the agreement reflects not the US's strength, but its relative weakness. Despite its seeming victory over the old Soviet Union, the US empire has suffered a long period of decline. Catastrophic defeats in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan have exposed the dangers of imperial overreach on the part of a US federal state that thought it had an unchallengeable global hegemony. (Image: Julia Demaree Nikhinson, via REUTERS) Trump's foreign policy – which, ironically, is based upon former president Barack Obama's 'pivot to Asia' – involves a tacit acknowledgement that a rising China threatens the US's position as the dominant world power. It is also an admission that the great US imperium cannot attempt to counter Chinese power in the South China Sea and the wider Asia-Pacific region while maintaining its current level of military expenditure in Europe. That is the fundamental reason for the 5% agreement. Trump's bullying is par for the course for a Western nuclear alliance that was established in 1949 as a belligerent creature of the Cold War. Now as then, Nato is predicated not on peacemaking diplomacy, but upon a sabre-rattling, militarist stance against its perceived enemies. In 1949, those enemies were the Soviet Union and its allied Warsaw Pact countries. Today they are Vladimir Putin's Russian Federation and Alexander Lukashenko's Belarus. (Image: Sergey Bobylev via REUTERS) Far from being a defender of the 'free world', the founding states of Nato included the brutal fascist dictatorship of António de Oliveira Salazar in Portugal. Following their coup d'état in 1967, the Greek colonels' fascistic junta was accepted readily as a Nato member. Little has changed. In the Nato 'family photo' taken in The Hague this week Starmer is – appropriately enough – sandwiched between two semi-fascists: namely, Trump and Türkiye's authoritarian president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Standing behind them is the ideological talisman of the global far right, Hungary's dangerously racist and antisemitic prime minister Viktor Orban. By contrast, standing on the outer edge of the group is Canadian prime minister Mark Carney. Having pledged Canadian 'elbows up' in the face of Trump's threat to his country's sovereignty, Carney stands, elbows down, having agreed to the US's 5% demand. All of which poses tough questions for the current party of Scottish government. The SNP aspire for an independent Scotland to be a member of Nato, yet also free of nuclear weapons. As this week's Nato summit underlines, the SNP's desire to join Nato would involve our country relinquishing a significant proportion of its hard-won economic sovereignty. READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Keir Starmer's in an historic mess. There's only one person to blame Scotland's admission would be dependent upon 5% of GDP being spent on the military, with devastating implications for spending on social goods such as health, social care, education and housing. If the fiscal implications of Nato membership are deeply worrying, the idea that an independent Scotland could join while simultaneously removing British nuclear submarines from the Firth of Clyde is naive at best. It is impossible to imagine Scotland's accession to Nato being granted without Holyrood agreeing, at the very least to lease the Faslane nuclear base to the UK Government for an extended period. The rationale would be that the Westminster administration would require Faslane until such time as it identified a site for, and then built, a new nuclear submarine base. In any case, it is hard to imagine a scenario in which a UK lease on Faslane was not negotiated and renegotiated in perpetuity, keeping nukes on the Clyde on a permanent basis. Nato membership would make the SNP's longstanding opposition to nuclear weapons a dead letter. From its highly dubious beginnings to its current recalibration in the face of the decline of the American empire, Nato is not a club that any progressive government should want to belong to. An independent Scotland would do well to follow the lead of our Irish neighbours and keep well out of it.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Trump's Pentagon vs the press: What comes next?
Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump's defence secretary, launched a tirade against the media yesterday as the row over the impact of the US strikes on Iran rumbles on. James Matthews and Mark Stone digest a dizzying week, and explore the questions that still remain over America's campaign in Iran. They also discuss Trump's deportation policy that's still continuing apace in the background. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.