Drivers to face 43-mile diversion on rural road
Peter Royce, chairman of Great and Little Whelnetham Parish Council in Suffolk said weekend closures on the A134 Sicklesmere Road, just outside Bury St Edmunds, could add 90 minutes to journeys.
Abbots Vale developers Hopkins Homes said it had listened to feedback and that Rushbrooke Lane and Low Green would reopen for local residents.
Work starts on the road on 17 February, with full closures in place during eight weekends from 21 February to 5 May.
Hopkins Homes insisted road closures were needed to "improve traffic flow" and avoid rat-runs.
The company said traffic plans had been updated following feedback: "Rushbrooke Lane and Low Green will both now become 'no through roads' and therefore only accessible to residents."
Rushbrooke Lane will be closed from the junction of North Hill and only accessible from Rougham Hill.
Low Green will be closed at the junction with the A134 and only accessible from Nowton Road.
Mr Royce said: "We've got the potential for a three-hour, 90-mile diversion route that is going to cost them an arm and a leg in comparison to the short journey that they did before."
He is also concerned smaller, more minor routes could be "destroyed" if they are used as alternative routes.
A spokesperson for Hopkins Homes said: "We understand these essential roadworks will cause some disruption, and we are committed to working closely with Suffolk Highways to minimise this as much as possible.
"We will closely monitor the impact of these changes from the start of the works."
During the week, from 17 February, Sicklesmere Road will remain open, but temporary traffic lights will be in operation.
Rushbrooke Lane and Low Green will be closed at their southern ends, accessible to two-way traffic from the north only.
The A134 is due to be closed from 20:00 GMT until 05:00 on various weekends between 21 February and 5 May.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Bridge replacement on hold after concrete issues
Bus services linking towns and villages extended
Great Whelnetham & Little Whelnetham Parish Council
Abbots Vale
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
5 days ago
- CNBC
Air Canada, flight attendants at impasse with strike looming
The prospect of a systemwide work stoppage by Air Canada's unionized flight attendants loomed large on Friday with a strike deadline just hours away, despite a government plea for the two sides to return to the bargaining table. Canada's largest carrier has said it expects to cancel 500 flights by the end of the day, ahead of a threatened strike just before 1:00 a.m. ET on Saturday, leaving some 100,000 passengers to find travel alternatives. Air Canada has asked the minority Liberal government of Prime Minister Mark Carney to order both sides into binding arbitration. The Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents the attendants, said it opposed the move. "The mere prospect of ministerial intervention has had a chilling effect on Air Canada's obligation to bargain in good faith," said the union, which made clear in advance that it would reject the idea. FlightAware data showed Air Canada had cancelled 174 flights as of 1:00 p.m. ET on Friday (1700 GMT). A further 94 were delayed. The carrier's 10,000 flight attendants are gearing up to walk off the job over stalled contract talks. The union is demanding higher wages and compensation for unpaid work. A strike would hit Canada's tourism sector during the height of the summer travel season and test Carney. Recording studio owner Robyn Flynn, 38, told Reuters that her Friday afternoon flight from St. John's in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador to Montreal had been delayed twice. Despite the inconvenience, she said she backed the attendants. "They deserve a salary increase ...and if our flight gets cancelled, I 100% blame Air Canada, not the flight attendants," said Flynn, travelling with her three-year-old daughter. The Canada Labour Code gives Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu the right to ask the country's Industrial Relations Board to impose binding arbitration in the interests of protecting the economy. Although the board is independent, it routinely agrees to request for arbitration once it has studied the matter, a process that can take a few days. The Toronto region Board of Trade called on Ottawa to step in, saying a strike would hurt Canada's global reputation. Under Justin Trudeau, Carney's predecessor, the government intervened quickly last year to head off rail and dock strikes that threatened to cripple the economy. "(Ottawa) might decide to use that, but it's not as pressing an economic issue for the country as when the railway or the ports were on strike," said Rafael Gomez, director of the University of Toronto's Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources. "The stakes are not as fraught." In a note, TD Cowen analyst Tom Fitzgerald estimated a three-day strike could cost the airline C$300 million in EBITDA, referring to earnings before interest, depreciation, taxes and amortization. Shares in the airline were trading up by almost 1.50% at 12:45 p.m. ET on Friday on the stock exchange. The dispute hinges on the way airlines compensate flight attendants. Most have traditionally paid them only when planes are in motion. But in their latest contract negotiations, flight attendants in North America have sought compensation for hours worked, including for tasks such as boarding passengers and waiting around the airport before and between flights. Air Canada and its low-cost affiliate Air Canada Rouge normally carry about 130,000 customers a day. Air Canada is also the non-U.S. carrier with the largest number of flights to the U.S., despite recent cutbacks in travel there from Canada due to trade tensions.
Yahoo
11-08-2025
- Yahoo
Photos of bizarre yacht near port spark backlash: 'Can't believe someone spent millions and millions on that thing'
Seen from a distance, it looked more like a floating bird's head than a yacht. One Redditor caught sight of the Olivia O near Capri and dropped a few blurry photos into r/yachtporn. "Sorry for the grainy and distant photos. The distance we were away doesn't do the size justice," they wrote. "Very interesting bow. Wish I had more to go on but any details?" The comments section didn't disappoint. One user quickly identified it: "Olivia O 89m with an X bow. Made by Ulstein out of Norway." Another added: "Owned by Israeli billionaire Eyal Ofer. Google Circle Search is very handy sometimes." And then came the performance talk: "Great use case on expedition vessels, but I highly doubt Olivia O sea states that large on a regular basis." So what's the deal with Olivia O? SuperYacht Fan reported that the vessel cost roughly $200 million and runs about $15 million to $20 million per year on twin Rolls-Royce marine engines over 2,000 horsepower each. Ulstein Verft in Norway built the yacht and delivered it in 2020 after a design collaboration with Espen Øino. It's the first private superyacht to use Ulstein's X‑Bow inverted‑bow hull, a design that cuts through waves instead of pounding them. Now zoom out. Oxfam estimates that billionaire toys such as megayachts and private jets can dump more pollution in 90 minutes than the average person does in a lifetime. With Olivia O's scale and engine power, it's safe to assume that cleaner fuel use still can't cancel out the sheer volume of pollution. To its credit, Ofer Global says it's aiming for net‑zero emissions with a focus on hydrogen. That said, yachts like this one aren't outliers. One yacht made headlines for being built specifically for dogs — complete with fake grass for puppy paws. Others stack up along the shores of Porto Cervo and Monaco during luxury-packed events such as the Grand Prix. Ownership is booming in places such as Ha Long Bay, where more travelers are buying sea-based status symbols. Here's how Reddit wrapped it up. "Is it an icebreaker? Cant believe someone spent millions and millions on that thing. Did the designer ever step back from the drawing board and go, 'Yes, that looks amazing'?" said one commenter. Do you think billionaires spend their money wisely? Definitely No way Some do Most do Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
06-08-2025
- Yahoo
A few more O-Train changes in August for extension, wheel work
Partial closures and schedule changes continue this month for Ottawa's rail transit system. OC Transpo said Tuesday that Line 1 service will be scaled back Saturday Aug. 16, Sunday Aug. 17 and Sunday Aug. 31 for more work on the extension east from Blair to Trim stations and on the St-Laurent station tunnel. On Aug. 16 and 17, trains won't run east of Tremblay station. R1 buses will connect Hurdman station and Blair, with the usual shuttle between St-Laurent and Cyrville stations. R1 buses will run instead of the east-west rain line the morning of Aug. 31. Trains should come back at noon. This eastern connection work includes cameras, security systems and software and allows more driver training through the 12.5 kilometres of new track and five stations, according to OC Transpo. There should be more changes in September. The transit service's website says the east extension should open this year. The target for its western extension to Moodie Drive and Algonquin College is 2027. Fewer Line 2 trains some nights The north-south Line 2 will run every 24 minutes instead of every 12 minutes after 8 p.m. from Aug. 11 to 15. This will let OC Transpo install equipment to monitor the axle bearings on its trains. Problems with those bearings, part of what hold the wheels to the train, have plagued Line 1. Line 4 to and from the airport won't be affected.
