Starmer's start as PM worse than Liz Truss, claims expert
Leading historian Sir Anthony Seldon has described Sir Keir Starmer 's start as prime minister as the most inept in a century, suggesting it is even worse than Liz Truss 's brief tenure.
Mr Seldon criticised Sir Keir for lacking a clear plan, not consulting previous prime ministers, and having an unclear purpose for his leadership.
Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice agreed, stating it has been the "worst start for any newly elected prime minister, Labour or Conservative".
Sir Keir recently admitted he was slow to address a growing rebellion over welfare reforms as he was focussed on foreign affairs like G7, Nato summits, and Middle East tensions.
Despite significant backbencher opposition, Starmer is expected to win a crucial vote on welfare reforms on Tuesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Bob Vylan stands by Glastonbury IDF chant: ‘I said what I said'
Bobby Vylan, half of the punk rap duo Bob Vylan, led a controversial chant of "death, death to the IDF" during their performance at Glastonbury Festival on Saturday, June 28. Glastonbury organisers condemned the chants as "appalling" and crossing a line, stating there is no place for antisemitism, hate speech, or incitement to violence at the festival. Following the performance, Bobby Vylan issued a statement on Instagram, asserting that he stood by his comments and called for a "change in foreign policy." Police are currently assessing footage of comments made by both Bob Vylan and another band, Kneecap, who also performed politically charged chants, to determine if any offenses were committed. Keir Starmer also condemned the performances by both bands and demanded an explanation from the BBC regarding the live broadcast of the "appalling" chants.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Ban trans women from female lavatories now, Starmer tells hospitals
Sir Keir Starmer has told hospitals and universities to obey the law and ban transgender women from female lavatories 'as soon as possible'. The Prime Minister said public bodies must stop dragging their feet and comply with April's Supreme Court ruling, which found that trans women are not legally women. The judgment on the meaning of the word sex in the Equality Act means that amenities such as toilets and changing rooms have to be separated by biological sex and not by self-identified gender. But two months on, dozens of NHS trusts and other organisations up and down the country have failed to change their guidance, meaning biological men are still being allowed in women's lavatories and changing rooms. Women's rights groups say this puts female staff at risk because most sexual abuse is carried out by biological men. Now, Sir Keir has lost patience with organisations that are still failing to comply with the law. 'We've accepted the ruling' The Prime Minister said: 'We've accepted the ruling, welcomed the ruling, and everything else flows from that as far as I'm concerned. 'Therefore all guidance of whatever kind needs to be consistent with the ruling and we need to get to that position as soon as possible.' Soon after the ruling, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issued interim guidance that said that in places such as hospitals, shops and restaurants, 'trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women's facilities'. It is now consulting on the details of its guidance, but Baroness Kishwer Falkner, chairman, has said the main thrust of the advice will not change. Despite this, most NHS organisations and universities have said they are waiting for the EHRC guidance before updating their policies. But Sir Keir's comments indicate he has little sympathy with this argument. 'No need to wait for further guidance' Maya Forstater, chief executive of the women's rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'This is an important intervention from the Prime Minister, given the huge number of public bodies failing to implement the Supreme Court judgment and therefore operating outside the law. 'Political leadership is essential if women whose rights are being stolen are not to be forced to turn to the courts, where public bodies will end up losing, at great expense to taxpayers.' She added that the law is clear and there is 'no need to wait for further guidance from the EHRC or anyone else'. A growing number of public bodies are changing their guidance in light of the judgment. The Football Association, for example, has said trans women would be banned from women's sport. The Houses of Parliament announced last week that it had changed its position, saying that visitors should use 'the facilities that correspond to their biological sex'. Trans people were instructed to use gender-neutral lavatories on the estate. However, a large number of public organisations have still not changed their guidance. The ruling is of particular importance for universities, many of which organise sports teams and continue to allow biological men to participate in female sports. 'Not making changes' Leeds University said: 'For the avoidance of doubt, we are not making any changes to how we provide campus facilities. 'We will not do so unless there is clear legal obligation, and we have meaningfully consulted with those most directly impacted. This is about getting things right – not about rushing to respond.' Liverpool University said: 'Any practical implications in applying the ruling to our facilities and activities are not yet clear and along with other universities, we now need to wait for more detailed guidance. 'As such, there are no immediate changes to any university policies.' As for the NHS, a group of eight nurses in Darlington is challenging their health trust's policy over allowing a trans colleague to use the female changing rooms at work. The national body – NHS England – is still to publish guidance on the Supreme Court ruling. The NHS Confederation, which represents trusts, has withdrawn pro-trans guidance but has not yet updated it. Several other regional organisations have indicated their advice will not change, at least for the time being. NHS Sussex said: 'There should be no change in terms of how services are delivered as the NHS nationally considers the judgment. 'Further to this, we understand that the update provided by the Equality and Human Rights Commission has led to concern. NHS Sussex will fully participate in a code of practice consultation when it launches to ensure that the protections of the Equality Act endorsed by the Supreme Court are upheld.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How much private school fees will rise in September after Labour's VAT raid
Private school fees will rise by more than 17pc in the upcoming academic year thanks to a 'triple whammy' of Labour tax increases, Telegraph analysis shows. The average Year 13 day fees will jump from £21,035 to £24,600 between September 2024 and September 2025, analysis of 228 independent school fees reveals. The majority of the increase is due to Labour's 20pc VAT raid introduced in January when fees rose by around 14pc. However, schools were further stung by an increase in National Insurance and the loss of business rates relief in April, which has forced them to increase fees by another 3.1pc. Across all year groups, fees will rise on average by 17.6pc in September – by far the largest year-on-year increase on record, with early evidence suggesting parents are already pulling their children out of private education. The analysis, which was conducted as part of The Telegraph's value for money private school tool, has cast fresh doubt on the Treasury's claim the policy will raise £1.7bn with this forecast assuming school fees would only rise by 10pc and the exodus into state schools would be minimal. Neil O'Brien, shadow education minister, told The Telegraph: 'So many independent schools in this country are on the brink thanks to Labour's education tax. 'As more face the strain, inevitably more will close, forcing pupils into a state sector that in many places does not have the capacity to absorb them – something that is already happening well beyond the Government's own predictions.' Data from the Department for Education's School Census revealed that across 1,218 traditional private schools, student roll numbers declined by 2.7pc in January 2025 when compared with the previous year. Across all independent schools, the number of students fell by 11,000, four times more than the Government predicted in its policy impact statement. Schools with the most affordable fees saw larger declines, vindicating those who warned that 'scrimpers and savers' would be the most impacted by the tax. Simon Nathan, head of policy at the Independent Schools Council, a trade body, said: 'Many schools took the step of reducing their fees, excluding VAT, in January to try to cushion the impact on parents. 'But schools' options were limited: they were hit with a triple tax whammy of the loss of business rates relief, the rise in National Insurance employer contributions and the requirement to place 20pc VAT on fees. 'The majority of any school's budget would be spent on staff costs, which cannot be reduced quickly nor easily. It seems clear that the Government underestimated the impact their decision to tax education would have on schools, families and children.' Despite this, a government source suggested the blame for fee rises lay with private schools. They said it was a 'commercial decision', and they could have chosen to cut back on 'non-essential expenditure' or 'reduce their surpluses or reserves'. Last week, Moorlands School, a 127-year-old prep school in Leeds, became the latest school to announce its closure as a result of Labour's VAT raid. The prep school's closure follows Bishop Challoner School in Kent, which was forced to shut its doors after losing more than a third of its pupils since last summer's general election. It comes as headteachers warned they had been left with no choice but to lower entry requirements in a desperate bid to attract pupils. One headmaster said: 'Schools where pupils traditionally had to work hard [to gain a place], where it's usually very challenging to secure places, it is less challenging this year.' The Telegraph has been monitoring fees since the 2022-23 academic year from around 1,200 private schools across Britain. The past two years in particular have seen private schools grapple with inflationary pressures, staff pay rises and, now, Labour's tax on education. While a number of schools are yet to publicly reveal their 2025-26 fees, many of Britain's most high-profile institutions have already passed on the VAT raid to parents. Between September 2024 and January 2025, Eton College increased its annual fees from £52,749 to £63,298 a year, implementing the full 20pc raid. Harrow increased its fees by 15pc to £61,584, whilst Charterhouse implemented a 12.4pc increase to £45,018. Dulwich College has announced its fees for 2025-26, increasing their boarding fees from £51,708 in September 2024 to £60,060 in September 2025. Winchester College has seen its annual fees increase by £51,855 to £60,000 per year. However, while the most prestigious private schools have raised fees significantly, there are early indications that student numbers have seen less of an impact than at more affordable schools. The Department for Education's census showed that for Year Eight pupils at the cheapest 25pc of private schools, pupil numbers fell by 4pc in the year to January, compared to a 2.4pc decrease at the most expensive schools. For Year 13 day pupils, the fall in pupils was 3.6pc for the cheapest schools compared to 1.8pc at the dearest. A government spokesman said: 'Before the Government ended private schools' tax breaks, these institutions had, on average, increased their fees by 75pc in real-terms since 2000. 'Ending private schools' tax breaks will raise £1.8bn a year by 2029-30 to help fund public services, including supporting the 94pc of children in state schools to achieve and thrive. 'It will be a commercial decision for individual private schools as to how they manage their finances, in the same way as any other private business.'
