Massachusetts agrees to higher insurance plan deductibles
BOSTON (SHNS) – Regulators approved higher deductible limits for health plans in 2026, but stressed reforms are needed to tackle affordability concerns and ensure Bay Staters don't end up 'self-rationing' care.
Most residents ages 18+ are required to have health insurance under state law, and regulators set deductible limits each year that help specify what type of plan coverage is sufficient. People face tax penalties if they do not enroll in affordable coverage or their plan falls short of certain standards.
The Massachusetts Health Connector Board voted to raise the minimum creditable coverage (MCC) deductible limit for individuals to $3,200 in 2026, up from $2,950. The new limit for families would be $6,400 in 2026, compared to the current $5,900.
Regulators last year did not raise limits and maintained the same threshold from 2024 due to high inflation.
The higher deductible limits mean policyholders might need to pay more out of pocket, but also create more flexibility for insurers and employers as they design plans and keep up with rising care costs and inflation.
'Each year, we aim to balance our responsibility to set a common standard or floor, while also ensuring that people with generally robust or market-standard coverage are not penalized,' Kayla Scire, associate director of policy at the Health Connector, said during a meeting.
The tax penalty could cost people between $300 and $2,200, the Department of Revenue said this month.
Board member Erik Gulko, president of Innovo Benefits Group, was 'very happy' about the higher limits.
'I look at it this way: There are a lot of taxpayers that have plans that are $3,000-deductible,' Gulko said. 'And over the last year, when we had it at $2,950, because of a $50 difference, they have been unexpectedly and inadvertently subject to a tax. So I'm happy that all those that have that $3,000 deductible, they don't have to pay a tax now. It's a great change.'
Board member Michael Chernew said he supported the staff's recommendation to adjust the deductible limit, but more broadly criticized the use of deductibles and their impact on cost-sharing. Chernew, a health care policy professor at Harvard Medical School, said deductibles can discourage people from seeking care.
'I'm not a fan of deductibles because of a bunch of other distortionary things that deductibles use,' he said. 'I think what we're voting for is some level of flexibility to allow plans to battle how they use deductible and cost-sharing things, and they will do what they will do. But I am not a fan.'
As deductibles rise, more people forgo care, warned state Insurance Commissioner Michael Caljouw.
'You wonder if there's a somewhat illusory insurance target that isn't really as highly insured a number because of the prevalence of deductibles,' Caljouw said. 'At the same time, there's a connection between the level of the deductible and the overall premium amount. It's sort of a regrettable artifact of plan design.'
Caljouw encouraged regulators to explore additional tools to adjust deductible amounts and ensure 'members aren't the ones that are bearing the costs directly.' Massachusetts is at an 'affordability crossroad,' he said.
'As we grapple with those issues, consumer cost share at large has to be one of the priorities for us,' Caljouw said. 'Because if it remains largely unaddressed over time, through that policy lever conversation, I fear that we will begin to see rationing, self-rationing of care, increase even further than we have now, particularly with a disproportionate impact on low-income communities.'
Nancy Turnbull, who was elected Thursday to serve as the board's vice chair, noted escalating tension between the state's individual health insurance mandate and how regulators set creditable coverage standards.
'If deductibles keep going up, and up, and up, and we can't control premiums, I think one of the tensions — in addition to all of the others and choices that other members of the board have made — is whether we will continue to feel comfortable obligating our fellow residents of the state to buy coverage that has higher, and higher, and higher deductibles,' Turnbull said. 'And if we don't, and some of us might not, that will erode the mandate and that will erode some of the progress that we've made.'
The Group Insurance Commission, which provides coverage for state employees, has kept deductibles, copays and out-of-pocket limits stable for eight years, said Executive Director Matthew Veno. That's translated into lower consumer costs compared to plans available through the Health Connector, he said.
'But that comes at a tremendous cost, right? And it's a cost to the plan sponsor, and in my case, it's a cost to the state budget,' Veno said. 'And it's not insubstantial.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill targets 'glaring loophole' in abuser registry law
BOSTON (SHNS) – As disability advocates again push to strengthen abuse protections through a string of refiled bills, the general counsel of an independent state agency charged with handling allegations and investigations says there was no pushback to previous legislative efforts. The latest proposals, intended to improve operations at the Disabled Persons Protection Commission, would also expand the scope of Nicky's Law, which created a state registry of certain providers who abused individuals ages 18-59 with intellectual and developmental disabilities. 'We did not have any opposition last session, and we have reached out to stakeholders. Anybody that has any questions around this bill, we're like, 'Please call us, we'll speak to you about it.' We've heard nothing,' Julie Howley Westwater, general counsel at the DPPC, told the News Service Tuesday. Referencing the Department of Children and Families and the Executive Office of Aging and Independence, she added, 'There were initially some questions around the confidentiality provision and there was some concern that, does that mean we're not going to share records when we should? We clarified that and said, 'No, we want the same protection of records as DCF and AGE.'' The Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities favorably reported out redrafted legislation last session on Feb. 15, but the House Ways and Means Committee did not advance it. 'It's so frustrating for us because we feel like this really is a bill that will protect a lot of people with disabilities, and it's not going to cost any additional money to do that,' Westwater said. The DPPC faced scrutiny last year after the Massachusetts Coalition of Families and Advocates sounded the alarm about abusive providers potentially slipping through the cracks on the registry and continuing to care for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Providers can petition for their cases to be reviewed after officials make initial determinations that their conduct constituted abuse. Pending bills from Reps. Sean Garballey and Simon Cataldo and Sen. John Keenan (H 243 / S 139) would update and accelerate the DPPC's process for referring reports of alleged abuse to agencies within the Executive Office of Health and Human Services in situations with an 'imminent risk of substantial harm to the person with a disability,' according to a commission summary. The bills streamline how reports are filed in non-emergency situations, codify that privileged and confidential information within DPPC reports are not public records, and remove terms limits for DPPC commissioners. 'For several consecutive sessions, this legislation has received a favorable report from the committee, and I respectfully request that you do so again so that we build on that momentum,' Keenan told the committee during a hearing Tuesday. DPPC fields more than 15,000 abuse reports each year, said DPPC Executive Director Nancy Alterio. 'In every case, DPPC seeks a positive and just outcome, whether that be additional supports for the victim, removal of the abuser from serving this population, or at the very least preventing similar circumstances from occurring in the future,' Alterio said. 'Changes in this bill, while seemingly small, will improve vital areas of the DPPC's operations, require no additional appropriation, has been duly vetted and debated, and will enhance the safety of persons with disabilities throughout the commonwealth, so that we can provide the best possible response for every one of the 15,000 citizens who reach out the DPPC for assistance.' Echoing a narrower proposal from Sen. Michael Moore (S 165), the DPPC reforms bills would also broaden the abuser registry to enable MassHealth day habilitation program providers to consult the database. For now, the registry only installs guardrails around individuals who receive care from the Department of Development Services. Providers whose names appear on the registry are barred from working for DDS or DDS-contracted employers for five years. 'We have a glaring loophole in the law. This exclusion allows numerous abusive care providers to keep working with the vulnerable population,' Moore said. 'S 165 is necessary to ensure that no mistreatment goes unreported.' Committee member Rep. John Marsi thanked Moore for tackling the issue. 'I know this didn't quite get over the finish line last session, but I hear from a lot of people in my community that this is very important,' Marsi, a Dudley Republican, said. Maura Sullivan, CEO of The Arc of Massachusetts, said the proposals to update Nicky's Law, which former Gov. Charlie Baker signed in 2020, would fill a 'dangerous gap.' Sullivan, who has two sons with autism, recalled how she advocated for the original law to 'keep people like my sons safe from abusers.' 'Now, my sons are part of the adult service world, and I am grateful that the registry is doing its job. Over 150 known abusers are prohibited from hurting or neglecting people with IDD, but not in MassHealth day hab programs,' Sullivan said. 'Seven or 8,000 people are served by day habs, and at least a 1,000 or more are waiting.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
DPH chief: Mass. prepared to maintain vaccine access
BOSTON (SHNS) – The state public health chief called the firing of all 17 members of a federal vaccine advisory panel 'troubling' on Wednesday, while acknowledging that Massachusetts officials have been bracing for such a scenario. On Monday, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. dismissed all members of the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, or ACIP. President Joe Biden's administration had appointed all 17 members, including 13 in 2024, and 'these appointments would have prevented the current administration from choosing a majority of the committee until 2028,' Kennedy's office said. 'In dismissing the members, the secretary stated his intention to repopulate the committee and to hold the scheduled ACIP meeting June 25 to June 27,' Public Health Commissioner Robbie Goldstein said. 'This news is troubling. It amends a science-based process that has informed vaccine recommendations and promoted vaccine access for decades. The future of federal vaccine policy is unclear.' In a statement Monday, Kennedy said the move was 'necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science.' New members were not announced but Kennedy's office said they will 'ensure that government scientific activities are informed by the most credible, reliable, and impartial scientific evidence available.' At a virtual state Public Health Council meeting Wednesday, Goldstein said it's unclear if new ACIP members 'will continue to use evidence and science to guide our vaccine recommendations and vaccine policy.' 'We've been been preparing for a number of scenarios, including this one, and we are well positioned to respond and maintain access to vaccines across the state,' Goldstein said. 'Starting in November, we've been analyzing the legal and regulatory landscape, identifying resources that could be used to guide vaccine recommendations, strengthening our data systems to understand vaccine effectiveness, and building a coalition of like-minded, evidence-based public health organizations in this state and others.' The Massachusetts Vaccine Purchasing Advisory Council, which helps distributes vaccines recommended by the ACIP, is slated to meet Thursday in Waltham. At a public hearing on Friday, Massachusetts parents and medical providers urged state lawmakers to scrap religious exemptions for school immunization requirements. The plea came amidst measles outbreaks in the U.S. Meanwhile, vaccine opponents lamented potential state infringements on their faith and personal beliefs. Students from preschool to college are required to receive a bevy of vaccines, including for polio, Hepatitis B, and measles, mumps and rubella, according to the state Department of Public Health. State law allows students to seek medical and religious exemptions, and refiled bills from Rep. Andy Vargas and Sen. Edward Kennedy (H 2544 / S 1557) would eliminate the religious carveout for immunizations required in public, private and charter K-12 schools. Under the proposals, schools must submit data annually to DPH about how many students are vaccinated and how many received a medical exemption — with that information then made publicly available. 'Three of our Northeast neighbors — Connecticut, Maine and New York — have eliminated their non-medical vaccine exemptions in recent years,' Katie Blair, executive director of Massachusetts Families for Vaccines, told the Joint Committee on Public Health. 'They have seen subsequent improvements in immunization rates, increasing the herd immunity protection that their most medically vulnerable residents depend upon. It's time for Massachusetts to do the same.' The committee reported the legislation out favorably at the end of last session on Dec. 16. Democrats in the Health Care Financing Committee did not advance the proposal. The majority of vaccine exemptions are for religious reasons in Massachusetts, according to DPH. Some western and southeastern parts of the state, especially on the Cape and Islands, have higher rates of vaccine exemptions, and those areas 'may be more susceptible to disease outbreaks because these students are not fully protected,' DPH says. Kyle Abrahamson, a biomedical engineer, said he opposed the bills because they encroach on his 'free exercise of religion' and constitute 'tyrannical overreach' from state government. Abrahamson argued that removing the religious exemption would force him to choose between his faith and his child's education. He also spoke against Sen. Becca Rausch's so-called Community Immunity Act (S 1618) that would preserve religious vaccine exemptions but strengthen the exemption process and improve data reporting. 'Parents — not the state, nor any medical professional or anybody else — but parents are the paramount advocates for their own children,' Abrahamson said. 'If H 2554, S 1557 and S 1618 move forward, the state is taking away parents' faith and forcing parents to put their faith in them.' Julie Booras, co-founder of Health Rights Massachusetts, said she 'strongly' opposes all school-related vaccine bills before the committee. She testified in support of a Rep. John Gaskey bill (H 2431) that would block the state from requiring COVID-19 shots, mRNA vaccines or gene-altering procedures to enroll in K-12 schools, colleges or universities, as well as to enter private businesses or seek employment. 'This bill is critical to ensure the injustices of the COVID era can never happen again,' Booras said. 'Despite all of the information now available about the physical, emotional and financial harms caused by the COVID countermeasures, nothing has changed. No meaningful action has been taken to rein in the sweeping powers granted to the governor and public health agencies by the Massachusetts Legislature.' Vaccine supporters had emphasized new urgency over removing religious exemptions as they invoked the worsening measles outbreak in Texas and other hotspots. Texas has logged 744 measles cases since January, causing 96 people to be hospitalized and two deaths among school-aged children, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services. There were 1,168 confirmed measles cases and three confirmed deaths across the U.S. as of June 5, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Massachusetts has not recorded any cases. 'Measles is an awful disease with dangerous complications and side effects,' Dr. Richard Moriarty, a retired pediatric infectious disease specialist, said. 'With cuts in health care funding, how are we going to pay if there are outbreaks? Outbreaks are very expensive.' Moriarty did not specify the funding cuts, but the Trump administration has moved to slash billions of dollars in public health grants and congressional Republicans are advancing proposals to drastically cut Medicaid dollars to states. 'Measles is so infectious, we need 95% of a population immunized to prevent an outbreak,' Moriarty continued. 'We thought our schools were good in Massachusetts, but if you take a deep dive into them, 119 kindergartens have MMR rates less than 90%, 31 schools are below 80% in Massachusetts, 19% of our schools didn't even bother to report their immunization rates this year, and 24% report their rates only on rolling three-year averages.' Supporters emphasized that vaccine skepticism and misinformation is more common across the country, and the landscape is also marked by shifting federal vaccine recommendations and immunization schedules. 'My colleagues are spending so much time just re-educating parents who have trusted the medical system for years and now have been instilled with this fear, which is completely based on misinformation,' said Dr. Christina Hermos, division chief of infectious disease at UMass Memorial Children's Medical Center. 'The frontline pediatricians are burning out having these conversations. We're already having a crisis of people going into primary care across this nation.' Kennedy last month announced the CDC is no longer recommending COVID vaccines for healthy children and pregnant individuals. Goldstein on Wednesday said that COVID vaccines remain available. He stressed that vaccinating pregnant women can protect newborn babies who cannot get immunized yet. 'I want to be clear: We know that COVID vaccination prevents severe illness, hospitalization and death in those at risk, which includes children and pregnant people,' Goldstein said. 'DPH will continue to lift up the data and the evidence that are available to inform our recommendations. And we'll work with insurers, health care providers and others across the state to maintain access to evidence-based safe vaccines.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Boston Convention & Exhibition Center becomes Menino Convention Center in July
BOSTON (SHNS) – The largest building in New England will officially be renamed next month in honor of the late Boston Mayor Thomas Menino, eight months after the Legislature ordered the change. The Mass. Convention Center Authority announced Tuesday that it will hold an event on Saturday, July 12 to formally relabel the Boston Convention & Exhibition Center in the Seaport as the Thomas Michael Menino Convention and Exhibition Center. The new name is meant to honor Menino, the city's mayor from 1993 until 2014 who oversaw the start of the Seaport building boom. 'Mayor Menino loved Boston deeply, and he made our city into the global hub for business, commerce and tourism that we know it to be today,' Gov. Maura Healey said. 'I was honored to sign this law renaming the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center after Mayor Menino because it is a wonderful way to pay tribute to his amazing legacy and send a strong message that Boston is a place to be for people and businesses from around the world.' The name change was included in an economic development law that Healey signed in November. Sen. Nick Collins, the South Boston Democrat who represents the Seaport, said the relatively new neighborhood of Boston 'would not be what it is today without the late Mayor Tom Menino.' Collins pointed to Menino's collaboration with state and federal lawmakers to develop the Seaport and open the BCEC in 2004. Menino served on the Boston City Council before he served as mayor. 'That's why so many of our colleagues in the Legislature joined in supporting the renaming with a near unanimous vote on the economic development bill last session,' Collins said. The late mayor's widow said the entire Menino family is grateful for 'this incredible honor.' 'Tommy believed in the potential of every neighborhood in our city, and in the power of development to improve people's lives. We thank our legislative leadership for acknowledging his legacy and his vision for how this convention center would lead to the transformation of Boston's Seaport,' Angela Menino said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.