EU prepared to retaliate to Trump's steel and aluminum tariff hikes
Europe is prepared to retaliate against US president Donald Trump's plan to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, the European Commission, raising the prospect of an escalating trade fight between two of the world's largest economic powers.
Mr Trump's announcement on Friday that he would increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%, intensifies his global trade war and came just hours after he accused China of violating an agreement with the U.S. to mutually roll back levies and trade restrictions for critical minerals.
The European Commission said it "strongly" regrets Trump's plan to increase tariffs, adding it "undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution."
"This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," a European Commission spokesperson said, adding that "the (European Union) is prepared to impose countermeasures."
The spokesperson noted that the European Union had paused its countermeasures to create space for continued negotiations.
"The European Commission is currently finalising consultations on expanded countermeasures. If no mutually acceptable solution is reached, both existing and additional EU measures will automatically take effect on 14 July — or earlier, if circumstances require," the spokesperson added.
Trump announced the higher tariffs just outside Pittsburgh, where he was talking up an agreement between Nippon Steel and US Steel. Trump said the $14.9bn (€13.1bn) deal, like the tariff increase, will help keep jobs for steel workers in the US.
He later posted on social media that the increased tariff would also apply to aluminum products and that it would take effect on Wednesday. The planned move ratchets up pressure on global steel producers, and has sparked protests from trading partners around the world.
Canada's Chamber of Commerce quickly denounced the tariff hike as "antithetical to North American economic security."
"Unwinding the efficient, competitive and reliable cross-border supply chains like we have in steel and aluminum comes at a great cost to both countries," Candace Laing, president of the chamber, said in a statement.
Canada's United Steelworkers union called the move a direct attack on Canadian industries and workers.
Australia's centre-left government also condemned the tariff increase, with Australia's trade minister Don Farrell calling it "unjustified and not the act of a friend."
The US is the world's largest steel importer, excluding the European Union, with a total of 26.2m tons of imported steel in 2024, according to the US Department of Commerce. As a result, the new tariffs will likely increase steel prices across the board, hitting industry and consumers alike.
Steel and aluminum tariffs were among the earliest put into effect by Mr Trump when he returned to office in January. The tariffs of 25% on most steel and aluminum imported to the US went into effect in March, and he had briefly threatened a 50% levy on Canadian steel but ultimately backed off.
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the Polish election: a landmark win for the right
There is a sense of déjà vu about the victory of Trump-endorsed, nationalist right-winger Karol Nawrocki in Sunday's Polish presidential election. Polish voters had decided last year to replace the conservative and Eurosceptic Law and Justice (PiS) government with a coalition led by Donald Tusk's liberal centrist Civic Union (CU). However, at the weekend they voted by the narrowest of margins – 50.9 per cent to 49.9per cent - in favour of the PiS retaining the presidential office. The outgoing president Andrzej Duda repeatedly used his right to veto much of Tusk's reformist agenda. A key area has been the reform of the judicial system ,where wholesale manipulation by the former PiS government had seen Poland leading Hungary into a major confrontation with its European allies over their determination to protect the rule of law. Hungary was unsurprisingly the first country to congratulate Nawrocki. Now, if Nawrocki is successful in blocking EU-required reforms, he may well also undermine Warsaw's attempts to restore billions of withheld EU funding. In 2020, Duda had won the presidency, defeating Nawrocki's opponent, liberal pro-EU mayor of Warsaw, Rafal Trzaskowski, by a similar margin to the weekend vote. The deep, urban-rural, conservative-liberal divisions that have riven Polish society seem not to have healed an inch, and the PiS views Sunday's election as a harbinger of its return to power in government in 2027. READ MORE Now the prospect is for legislative gridlock that will delight not only fellow EU populist parties but seriously undermine Poland's emerging leadership role in the EU. It comes just two weeks after the defeat in Romania of a populist candidate, George Simion, which many over-optimistically felt suggested the ebbing of the tide of populism. Nawrocki, a historian , amateur boxer and former football hooligan with no political experience, vigorously denied an avalanche of allegations against him during a campaign he fought under a slogan of 'Poland First'. He attacked EU policies on climate change, Ukraine's Nato accession, and promised to torpedo attempts to promote LGBTQ+ rights and more liberal abortion laws. 'We will save Poland, we will not allow the power of Donald Tusk to be complete,' he promised as word of the result came in. The Polish constitution limits the presidency to largely ceremonial duties. However, the president can obstruct – and holds a veto on legislation which can only be overturned on a now-elusive three-fifths majority vote of parliament. Poland faces in to a prolonged period of polarised confrontation, unable to move forwards or backwards politically, and one that will certainly hobble the EU's efforts at a critical time. And Nawrocki's victory is telling evidence of the continued resilience of populism and nationalism.
Agriland
5 hours ago
- Agriland
Tánaiste unconvinced Irish Mercosur concerns have been ‘adequately addressed'
The Tánaiste is unconvinced that Ireland's concerns about the Mercosur trade agreement have been 'adequately addressed'. According to Simon Harris both he and his officials continue 'to engage at EU level at every opportunity, with both the European Commission directly through the trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic and with counterparts in EU member states, including France, to 'voice our concerns with the agreement'. Harris, also the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, said both he and his officials have sought to 'interrogate the outcome of negotiations to assess if our concerns have been adequately addressed'. But speaking in the Dáil on trade agreements last week the Tánaiste said: 'I am not convinced they have been'. The Tánaiste also reiterated to TDs that the government's policy is to 'work with like-minded EU countries to stand up for Irish farmers and defend our interests in opposing the current Mercosur trade deal'. Mercosur But, the Sinn Féin TD for Louth, Ruairí Ó Murchú, challenged the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade in the Dáil to detail exactly what engagement the Irish government has had with the commission and 'what answers have been given by the commission' in relation to the Mercosur agreement. The Tánaiste said he had a 'significant one-on-one meeting' with his French counterpart specifically about Mercosur and that the government's 'links and engagement with France on this remain intense and ongoing'. 'Our position within the European Commission is very well understood. I do not think other member states would be in any way surprised by Ireland's position. What happens next is important. 'At the moment, the agreement is undergoing a legal scrubbing, after which it will be translated into all the EU languages. 'It is worth repeating that there is still a degree of uncertainty over what form the final commission proposal to member states will take,' the minister stated. According to Simon Harris 'there is one of two ways it can go'. 'It can go as what is called a mixed agreement – this would require unanimous member state approval, which clearly does not exist, or it could go as a split agreement, with the trade elements applied on an interim basis, which would require approval at council under qualified majority voting. 'That is where the question arises as to whether there is a blocking minority, for want of a better phrase,' he added. The Tánaiste emphasised that it is his 'sense of the situation is that a number of member states remain resolute in their opposition' to Mercosur. He is also of the opinion that Europe, including its member states and the European Commission, 'must get better at working out how we can engage with farmers and the agriculture sector earlier on in the process'. The minister said: 'As we go forward, we must look at how we can involve farmers and the agriculture sector in protecting their interests much earlier in the process in order that we do not end up with a trade agreement that has good elements but leaves us asking, 'what about the farmers?' 'That is not a clever way for us to proceed'.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Public innovation investment ‘has not kept pace' with private sector, Ibec says
Ireland's largest business lobby group, Ibec has called on the Government to increase the amount of public investment into research and development as Ireland drops below the European average for public spend per capita. Ibec has described Ireland's national research and innovation (R&I) infrastructure as becoming 'obsolete and out of date', claiming it is limiting research and innovation capacity in the State. As part of a series of policy position papers on Ireland's competitiveness and productivity, the group called on the Government to increase public investment in R&I to 1 per cent of modified gross national income by 2035 to 'fuel the long-standing ambition of becoming a European innovation leader'. Ireland's national research and innovation strategy, Impact 2030, sets out the target for Ireland to be classified as an Innovation Leader under the European Innovation Scoreboard by 2030 by achieving a score in excess of 125 per cent of the EU average. In last year's scoreboard, Ireland's performance stood at 113.2 per cent of the EU average, against its 2021 baseline of 108 per cent. READ MORE As it stands, Ireland's public investment accounts for just 13 per cent of the €8 billion national spend on research and innovation. Ibec said, 'Simply put, public investment has not kept pace with the surge of financing provided by industry.' The Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science estimated that public investment in innovation surpassed the €1 billion mark for the first time in 2023. Despite this increase in spending, according to Ibec, the Irish State spends €199 per person on directly funding R&I compared to the EU average of €274. The group called on the Government to simplify access to innovation supports, which it said are 'underutilised by industry due to the administrative burden and challenges in navigating the system'. It said Ireland's research and development tax credit is 'too complex and time consuming to access for a lot of companies'. In addition to improving access to the credit, Ibec also suggested the credit's expansion to cover offshore related-party research. [ EU warns it could accelerate retaliatory tariffs over US duties Opens in new window ] It said this measure would 'reflect the realities of how [intellectual property] is developed across global operations' and would 'incentivise the retention of [intellectual property] in the Irish tax base'. To improve national research capability, Ibec has appealed for the creation of a new funding mechanism for higher education facilities in succession to the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions which was launched in 1998. The group has also called for the use of the National Training Fund to attract skilled research talent, as well as investing in developing the domestic workforce by 'expanding and subsidising pathways for skills development'.
