logo
At least 22 dead in Angola fuel price hike protests, officials say

At least 22 dead in Angola fuel price hike protests, officials say

Euronews30-07-2025
At least 22 people have been killed and more than 1,200 arrested in violence that erupted during protests this week in Angola sparked by the government's decision to raise the price of fuel, the president's office said on Wednesday.
Joao Lourenco's office released the death toll in an official statement and said that 197 people were also injured in the two days of violence that began on Monday and spread from the capital, Luanda, to at least six other provinces in the southern African nation.
Earlier this month, the government said it was removing subsidies on diesel and raising the price by more than 30%.
That prompted minibus taxis, a common method of transport for Angolans, to hike their prices by as much as 50%.
Lourenco's office said dozens of shops were looted and vehicles were damaged in rioting by people angry at the new fuel price and the rising cost of living.
The army was deployed to restore order as the riots "triggered a climate of widespread insecurity," the statement said.
It did not elaborate on how the people died.
Protests against the price hikes in Angola first erupted two weeks ago, when Human Rights Watch accused the police of excessive force against what was a largely peaceful demonstration.
Police unnecessarily fired tear gas and rubber bullets and assaulted protesters in those demonstrations, the rights group said.
Authorities have often been accused of clamping down harshly on protests to silence dissent in Angola, where the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola party has been in power for 50 years since independence from Portugal in 1975.
Angola is one of Africa's largest oil producers, but the country does not have enough refineries to meet domestic demand, so it imports diesel and gasoline at high prices.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration unveils plan to charge visa security deposit
Trump administration unveils plan to charge visa security deposit

Euronews

time8 hours ago

  • Euronews

Trump administration unveils plan to charge visa security deposit

In the latest in a series of anti-immigration policies, the Trump administration has announced a pilot measure to require some visa applicants to put down a $15,000 (€12,901) deposit. The decision, published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, will be tested for a year starting 20 August and aims to ensure that visitors adhere to the legally prescribed length of stay. According to the US State Department, the bond will only be refunded after the visa holder leaves the US and their visa expires. The US State Department has said the pilot will so far include Zambia and Malawi. It has made it clear that the measure will apply to "nationals of countries with high overstay rates" or those that raise suspicions due to the lack of reliable monitoring systems. The decision covers both tourist and business visas. Tougher measures against African countries According to US administration figures, more than 500,000 people overstayed their visas in 2023. In the context of tightening visa requirements, Trump has announced decisions in recent months that have particularly targeted a number of African countries. The measure comes as the US, along with Canada and Mexico, prepares to host the FIFA World Cup in the summer of 2026, followed by the Olympic Games in San Francisco in 2028. The decision has sparked concern on social media about the ability of athletes, especially from Africa, to participate in these major events. Around forty countries, mostly European, still benefit from the Visa Waiver Programme, which allows their nationals to stay in the US for up to 90 days without the need for a visa. There are no African countries on the list, while Qatar is the only Middle Eastern country included in the programme.

Cyber gulag: How Russia tracks, censors, and controls its citizens
Cyber gulag: How Russia tracks, censors, and controls its citizens

Euronews

timea day ago

  • Euronews

Cyber gulag: How Russia tracks, censors, and controls its citizens

YouTube videos that won't load. A visit to a popular independent media website that produces only a blank page. Mobile phone internet connections that are down for hours or days. Going online in Russia can be frustrating, complicated, and even dangerous. It's not a network glitch but a deliberate, multipronged, and long-term effort by authorities to bring the internet under the Kremlin's full control. Authorities adopted restrictive laws and banned websites and platforms that won't comply. Technology has been perfected to monitor and manipulate online traffic. While it's still possible to circumvent restrictions by using virtual private network (VPN) apps, those are routinely blocked, too. Authorities further restricted internet access this summer with widespread shutdowns of mobile phone internet connections and adopting a law punishing users for searching for content they deem illicit. They also are threatening to go after the popular WhatsApp platform while rolling out a new 'national' messaging app that's widely expected to be heavily monitored. Russian President Vladimir Putin urged the government to 'stifle' foreign internet services and ordered officials to assemble a list of platforms from 'unfriendly' states that should be restricted. Experts and rights advocates told The Associated Press that the scale and effectiveness of the restrictions are alarming. Authorities seem more adept at it now, compared with previous, largely futile efforts to restrict online activities, and they're edging closer to isolating the internet in Russia. Human Rights Watch researcher Anastasiia Kruope describes Moscow's approach to reining in the internet as 'death by a thousand cuts'. 'Bit by bit, you're trying to come to a point where everything is controlled'. Censorship after 2011-12 protests Kremlin efforts to control what Russians do, read, or say online dates to 2011-12, when the internet was used to challenge authority. Independent media outlets bloomed, and anti-government demonstrations that were coordinated online erupted after disputed parliamentary elections and Putin's decision to run again for president. Russia began adopting regulations tightening internet controls. Some blocked websites; others required providers to store call records and messages, sharing it with security services if needed, and install equipment allowing authorities to control and cut off traffic. Companies like Google or Facebook were pressured to store user data on Russian servers, to no avail, and plans were announced for a 'sovereign internet' that could be cut off from the rest of the world. Prosecutions for social media posts and comments became common, showing that authorities were closely watching the online space. Still, experts had dismissed Kremlin efforts to rein in the internet as futile, arguing Russia was far from building something akin to China's 'Great Firewall,' which Beijing uses to block foreign websites. Ukraine invasion triggers crackdown After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the government blocked major social media like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, as well as Signal and a few other messaging apps. VPNs also were targeted, making it harder to reach restricted websites. YouTube access was disrupted last summer in what experts called deliberate throttling by authorities. The Kremlin blamed YouTube owner Google for not maintaining its hardware in Russia. The platform has been wildly popular in Russia, both for entertainment and for voices critical of the Kremlin, like the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Cloudflare, an internet infrastructure provider, said in June that websites using its services were being throttled in Russia. Independent news site Mediazona reported that several other popular Western hosting providers also are being inhibited. Cyber lawyer Sarkis Darbinyan, founder of Russian internet freedom group Roskomsvoboda, said authorities have been trying to push businesses to migrate to Russian hosting providers that can be controlled. He estimates about half of all Russian websites are powered by foreign hosting and infrastructure providers, many offering better quality and price than domestic equivalents. A 'huge number' of global websites and platforms use those providers, he said, so cutting them off means those websites 'automatically become inaccessible' in Russia too. Another concerning trend is the consolidation of Russia's internet providers and companies that manage IP addresses, according to a recent Human Rights Watch report. Last year, authorities raised the cost of obtaining an internet provider license from 7,500 rubles (about €80) to 1 million rubles (about €10,700), and state data shows that more than half of all IP addresses in Russia are managed by seven large companies, with Rostelecom, Russia's state telephone and internet giant, accounting for 25 per cent. The Kremlin is striving 'to control the internet space in Russia, and to censor things, to manipulate the traffic,' said HRW's Kruope. Criminalising 'extremist' searches A new Russian law criminalised online searches for broadly defined 'extremist' materials. That could include LGBTQ+ content, opposition groups, some songs by performers critical of the Kremlin – and Navalny's memoir, which was designated as extremist last week. Right advocates say it's a step toward punishing consumers, not just providers, similar to the situation in Belarus, where people are routinely fined or jailed for reading or following certain independent media outlets. Stanislav Seleznev, cyber security expert and lawyer with the Net Freedom rights group, doesn't expect ubiquitous prosecutions, since tracking individual online searches in a country of 146 million remains a tall order. But even a limited number of cases could scare many from restricted content, he said. Another major step could be blocking WhatsApp, which monitoring service Mediascope said had over 97 million monthly users in April. WhatsApp 'should prepare to leave the Russian market,' said lawmaker Anton Gorelkin, and a new 'national' messenger, MAX, developed by social media company VK, would take its place. Telegram probably won't be restricted, he said. MAX, promoted as a one-stop shop for messaging, online government services, making payments and more, was rolled out for beta tests but has yet to attract a wide following. Over two million people registered by July, the Tass news agency reported. Its terms and conditions say it will share user data with authorities upon request, and a new law stipulates its preinstallation in all smartphones sold in Russia. State institutions, officials, and businesses are actively encouraged to move communications and blogs to MAX. Anastasiya Zhyrmont of the Access Now digital rights group said both Telegram and WhatsApp were disrupted in Russia in July in what could be a test of how potential blockages would affect internet infrastructure. It wouldn't be uncommon. In recent years, authorities regularly tested cutting off the internet from the rest of the world, sometimes resulting in outages in some regions. Darbinyan believes the only way to make people use MAX is to 'shut down, stifle' every Western alternative. 'But again, habits ... do not change in a year or two. And these habits acquired over decades, when the internet was fast and free,' he said. Government media and internet regulator Roskomnadzor uses more sophisticated methods, analysing all web traffic and identifying what it can block or choke off, Darbinyan said. It's been helped by 'years of perfecting the technology, years of taking over and understanding the architecture of the internet and the players,' as well as Western sanctions and companies leaving the Russian market since 2022, said Kruope of Human Rights Watch. Russia is 'not there yet' in isolating its internet from the rest of the world, Darbinyan said, but Kremlin efforts are 'bringing it closer'.

S.Africa eyes new markets after US tariffs: president
S.Africa eyes new markets after US tariffs: president

France 24

time2 days ago

  • France 24

S.Africa eyes new markets after US tariffs: president

Government ministers expressed frustration with the United States over the tariff -- among those due to take effect against several countries later this week -- saying South African exports do not compete with US industry and were only a fraction of that country's total imports. The 30-percent tariff is the highest in sub-Saharan Africa and comes as diplomatic relations between South Africa and the United States are in tatters over a range of domestic and international policies. "Our foremost priority is protecting our export industries," President Cyril Ramaphosa said in his weekly newsletter. "We will continue to engage the US in an attempt to preserve market access for our products. We must also accelerate the diversification of our export markets, particularly by deepening intra-African trade," he said. The United States is South Africa's second-largest trading partner by country after China. The tariffs will in particular hit South Africa's agriculture, automotive and textiles sectors, officials said, although 35 percent of exports are exempted, including copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber articles and certain critical minerals. The impact on growth depends on various factors, including the sourcing of alternative markets, Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola said in a statement. He cited forecasts that the impact may shave 0.2 percent off growth, which was only around 0.1 percent in the first quarter of this year. The South African Reserve Bank last week warned that the US levy could cost 100,000 jobs, with unemployment already at more than 30 percent. But trade department director general Simphiwe Hamilton told reporters Monday their estimate was that approximately 30,000 jobs could be affected. 'no threat' In a bid to avert the high tariff, South Africa has offered to import US liquefied natural gas and some US agricultural products, as well as invest in its mining and metals-recycling industries. Pretoria is focused on negotiations for a new deal despite the "very extreme provocation" on the part of the United States, Lamola told reporters. The 30-percent tariff was "inscrutable" considering that imports from South Africa only represented 0.25 percent of total US imports, the minister said. "Moreover, South Africa poses no trade threat to the US economy nor its national security," he said, arguing the imports supported US industry and did not compete with it. An example was that South African agriculture exports were "counter-seasonal" and so filled gaps in the US market without replacing domestic produce, he said. Pretoria's plummeting ties with Washington and failure to reach a new trade deal has been heavily criticised at home, including by some of the parties in the coalition government who have accused Ramaphosa and his team of diplomatic missteps. On top of disagreements over a range of issues, including South Africa's case accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza at the International Court of Justice, Washington in March expelled Pretoria's ambassador after he criticised Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. In his newsletter, Ramaphosa said the government has established a support desk that will help exporters and producers explore alternative markets in the rest of Africa, Asia and the Middle East. It will also push forward with plans for a free-trade area for the African continent, he said. The United States announced last week 15-percent tariffs on exports from several sub-Saharan countries, including the export-reliant small mountain kingdom of Lesotho, which had initially been threatened with 50-percent tariffs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store