Marion named nation's Strongest Town
MARION, Ohio (WCMH) — It's been an exciting few days for the city of Marion since the community found out it won the Strongest Towns Contest.
'Everyone is thrilled over the moon and the town is electric right now,' said James Walker, part of the Marion County Regional Planning Commission.
The non-profit Strong Towns organized the contest which is open to communities across the United States and Canada. Walker was born and raised in Marion and put together the city's application for the competition.
Watch: JD Vance fumbles Buckeyes' national championship trophy
'Really a lot of the strength from this town comes from the collaborative efforts, it just comes from a determination to make something of this place that we've all decided to call home,' he said.
A 'strong town' is not perfect but prioritizes progress in transportation, housing, and fiscal resilience, according to the contest's website.
Others heavily involved with the community said Marion battling through big employers leaving town and the opioid epidemic, along with the help of local revitalization efforts, have made the city what it is today.
'It's been a long effort step by step,' said Ken Lengieza, who was the planning director from 1981 to 2018 and still works for the Marion County Regional Planning Commission.
Steve Estep, lead pastor of MarionNaz, said when he announced the win at the Sunday service, there was an eruption of cheering.
Questions surround Columbus council candidate's campaign mailers
'It makes an impact on not only how outsiders see Marion but how people from Marion see themselves, so I think it's been kind of a big boost to our collective sense of identity and community self-esteem that, 'Hey, there's something good happening here that's not happening everywhere.''
Walker said about 50 communities entered the competition with 16 making it into the bracket. Marion won with what Walker said was a combination of public voting and Strong Towns membership voting.
'It's been a long road,' he said. 'It took a lot of work, not just in this contest but just in this town over decades to get us to where we are.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lyft pushes back against potential increase in Portland ride fees
PORTLAND, Ore. () — Another app is weighing in on Portland's decision to more than double rideshare fees. an amendment to hike the per-ride fees on apps like Uber and Lyft from 65 cents to $2. Mayor Keith Wilson previously to $1.30 per ride. Wife dead, husband injured after 'tragic' house fire in Hood River County In a letter sent to city leaders on Monday, Lyft's Senior Policy Manager Jon Walker said the company would 'support' the initial proposal under three conditions: District 1 and 2 residents would be exempt from the new cost, 30% of revenue from the increased fee would supplement an electric vehicle grant fund managed by the Portland Bureau of Transportation, and subsidies for wheelchair-accessible vehicle would rise to $50 per ride. 'In addition to protecting riders in low-income areas, Lyft supports Portland's goals of lowering carbon emissions and expanding accessibility funding,' Walker wrote. 'An EV grant fund for rideshare would ensure companies like Lyft have the funds to continue launching creative EV initiatives in Portland, while increased WAV subsidies will help to spread the savings and benefits to everyone — not just the privileged few.' If the newly-approved ride fee is finalized during city council's June 18 meeting, it is expected to generate another $10 million in PBOT revenue — amid the government's looming budget deficit for the upcoming fiscal year. Lyft claimed the increase would make Portland an outlier compared to 'similarly situated' cities. According to the company, there are no per-ride fees in Milwaukee or Minneapolis, while Denver's will soon increase from 32 cents to 34 cents. In Seattle, there is an 85-cent fee and a majority of revenue goes to the city. 'If the city council insists on increasing the per ride fee, then Portlanders deserve to see the additional revenue used to advance the causes they care about. Otherwise, this fee increase is an unjust punishment on Portland's most vulnerable,' Lyft's Walker added. Vancouver weighs implementing district-based voting for city council elections Uber has also spoken out against the pending increase in Portland. Ahead of last week's vote, the company asked customers to 'keep rideshare affordable' by expressing their concerns in an email to local officials. The pushback is happening as Oregon lawmakers simultaneously consider a bill that would increase minimum wage and establish other benefits for rideshare drivers. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
American Press
4 hours ago
- American Press
Chamber CEO: 'We can't accept the status quo'
Scott Walker, the new president and CEO of the Southwest Louisiana Economic Development Alliance, told Calcasieu Parish police jurors at their most recent meeting his plans for the area's future. 'If you think about it and what's happened since COVID, we feel that here Louisiana has lost population, our region has lost population,' Walker said. 'We're trying to build that back, but we're not where we used to be.' According to Walker, regional success has common factors — winning regions are strategic and have a long-term focus because they invest in themselves, they're organized for collaboration, they have a customer-service focus and they continuously improve. Walker said he has a strategic plan that kicked off in May to help the region rebuild. 'We can't rest and we can't just accept the status quo,' Walker said, and sentiment echoed by Judd Bares, president of the jury. 'I've sensed from the few times we've met that you're here to work and it shows and we're excited,' Bares said. 'We can't wait to collaborate and help in any way we can.' Also at the meeting, the jury adopted a resolution approving the submittal of a grant application to the state's Department Children and Family Services for participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Education and Training Program for Oct. 1-Sept. 30. The move would also mean a cost reimbursement share for the grant. Erika Garrison, assistant director for the Calcasieu Parish Police Jury Human Services Department, explained what this means for those qualifying. 'This is essentially for individuals who are receiving SNAP benefits, they can connect to our program and we work with them to provide access to different types of training to receive a certification where they can then go and apply for a higher paying wage job and get off of benefits essentially, so it's a way for them to achieve economic stability,' Garrison said. The Police Jury rejected a resolution on bids received by the Parish Purchasing Agent for the paving and exterior improvements at various Calcasieu Parish Libraries Project due to budgetary constraints and requested permission to readvertise with a revised scope of work. The Calcasieu Parish Police Jury will meet again on June 26 at 5:30 p.m.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
China's maritime lead a security threat, say ‘Zero Point Four' authors
A significant decline in the number of U.S.-flagged vessels and the collapse of domestic shipbuilding have created vulnerabilities in national security, say two of the co-authors of 'Zero Point Four: How U.S. Leadership in Maritime Will Secure America's Future.' James Watson and Carleen Lyden Walker said the U.S. maritime industry is at a critical moment. U.S.-flagged ships have declined to a 0.4% (200 ships) of the estimated 55,000 oceangoing vessels serving the global supply chain. 'We have lost our [maritime] leadership as a nation and we can recapture that if we decide to recognize the incredible impact of maritime security on national security, economic, energy, and food, climate and workforce,' Walker told FreightWaves in an interview. Watson and Walker said the U.S. has become so dependent on foreign-manufactured ships that it has created vulnerability in supply chains and risks shortages in military maritime than 90% of the world's goods and energy travel by ship, and most people don't understand the U.S. dependency on the maritime industry, the authors said. 'The big part of why we wrote the book … is all the opportunities that actually do exist for investments by Americans into American ships, but also industries that involve the oceans, that involve what we call the fourth industrial revolution, the use of AI, the use of the developments in science and technology that ought to be opportunities for America to basically leapfrog China,' Watson said. Watson is a retired Rear Adm. in the U.S. Coast Guard and is currently an independent consultant providing business development services to maritime clients. Walker is co-founder and managing partner of the Maritime Accelerator for Resilience and co-founder and CEO of the North American Marine Environment Protection Association.'Zero Point Four' was published in March 2024. In addition to Watson and Walker, the book was co-authored by global supply chain specialist Jonathan Kempe; technology and sustainability economist Nishan Degnarain; enterprise resilience veteran Rich Mason; and Anuj Chopra, managing director of the MaritimESG Middle East Project Management LLC. While the trade war between China and the United States appears to be cooling off in recent weeks, the nation's push to revitalize the nation's shipbuilding industry is gaining momentum. In February, the White House proposed port fees for China-built, -owned and -operated ships docking at American ports. The fees aim to minimize China's maritime dominance and help kick-start U.S. shipbuilding. The initial proposal called for vessels operated by Chinese companies to pay a $1 million port call fees and ships built in China would have to pay a $1.5 million fee per port call. The proposal now calls for fees based on net tonnage and number of containers carried. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative also recently announced exemptions from the fees for ships carrying liquified natural gas. The USTR is accepting comments through July 7 from the maritime community on the impact of port fees associated with Chinese ships. New fees proposed by the USTR are set to take effect on Oct. 14. President Donald Trump also signed an executive order on April 9 that aims to boost the U.S. international maritime presence, which has been in decline for decades. On April 20, a bipartisan bill — the Shipbuilding and Harbor Infrastructure for Prosperity and Security for America Act of 2025 (the SHIPS Act) — was introduced in Congress with the aim of expanding the U.S.-flag international fleet by 250 ships in 10 years, while enhancing U.S. competitiveness and making more investments in the maritime workforce.A predecessor bill, the SHIPS for America Act of 2024, garnered bipartisan support last year during the Biden administration. Walker said placing fees on Chinese-built ships might ultimately hurt American consumers instead of creating more domestic ship production in the U.S. 'Passing the cost of our deficiency on to the consumer, which is what will happen with these taxes, if you will, on Chinese-built ships, I don't know how viable that is,' Walker said. 'It's like tariffs: The ultimate payor is going to be the American consumer.' Walker said a more viable proposal could be a tariff hike on U.S.-flagged ships doing repair work in shipyards in China. The tariff could be an impetus for U.S. ships to be repaired in domestic shipyards. U.S. officials floated the idea of imposing a 200% duty for work carried out on many U.S.-flag ships at yards in 'countries of concern,' according to the SHIPS Act. 'I think that one of the possibilities is restricting U.S.-flagged Jones Act ships from doing ship repair in China, which they do, and that could be a first step,' Walker said. Of 80,000 U.S. port calls each year, only a very small percentage are currently by U.S.-registered ships. '[The U.S.] intentionally walked away from its shipbuilding capability in the 1980s … and to blame China for recognizing an opportunity and capitalizing on it, I think is the wrong cast,' Walker said. 'I would rather see us say, 'Well, look, China in the early 1990s is when they decided to become a shipbuilding nation.' In the last 35 years, they have become the dominant shipbuilding nation with about 60% of the order book. How they got there also needs to be recognized.' Watson said for various reasons — including cost and efficiency — many companies in the U.S. in the 1970s and 1980s decided to outsource shipbuilding to countries such as Japan and South Korea initially. 'I think what happened was they just said, 'Well, we can just sacrifice that industry and we can buy ships from Korea and Japan, because they're building fine ships over there, and use our open registries to help the world globalize even more and focus on military shipbuilding,' Watson said. 'Then the Cold War ended and we looked around and took our peace dividend, balanced the budget again, and realized we didn't have a commercial shipbuilding industry anymore. So we just stuck … with the plan to buy ships from Japan and Korea, and then I think China saw the opportunity.' Walker and Watson said maritime security not only impacts national security, it impacts energy security, environmental security, economic security and workforce development. 'We think we can lead the world, but we probably shouldn't basically give away our designs and our technology to the cheapest place in the world to build,' Watson said. 'I guess just going to my position on the USTR thing … some of the things that they're doing probably have a time and a place and maybe now is the time and the place to do it.' Watson said it's critical that the government produce programs to restore the maritime industry in the U.S. 'You've got to have a program that creates investment here,' Watson said. 'If you look at the CHIPS Act, for example, where you actually have an act of Congress instead of effectively an executive decision of an agency, then you can put in some provisions that are bankable. You can have companies invest in a legislative initiative with a lot more security that it won't flip in four years compared to an executive mandate, like a tariff or a penalty on Chinese shipping.' The ultimate goal the U.S. government should be looking for is bringing in more mariners and reinvigorating the country's industrial shipbuilding complex, Watson and Walker said. 'It's the ships that come first,' Watson said. 'Then that causes an interest in terminals and shipyards and everything else. So there's been a lot of talk about … 'We've got to be more involved in the Panama Canal, we've got to stop [China's] Belt and Road Initiative.' If we just had a robust marine industry, a ship-operating industry, if we had merchant mariners, if we had the lead on marine technology, we would naturally want to own the terminals and the ships and have stakeholdings in great shipyards to service our ships.' The post China's maritime lead a security threat, say 'Zero Point Four' authors appeared first on FreightWaves.
