
Meta Privacy Lawsuit: What To Know About $8 Billion Trial Against Zuckerberg Over Cambridge Analytica
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrives to testify before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol ... More Hill in Washington on Jan. 31, 2024. Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Facebook shareholders sued the company's leadership in 2018, alleging they knowingly violated an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission by sharing data about users' friends with third-party apps without those friends' knowledge.
Facebook, which rebranded to Meta in 2021, signed a consent order with the FTC in 2012, in which the company agreed to create a 'comprehensive privacy program' to address privacy concerns arising from its products.
The FTC prohibited Facebook from misrepresenting how it maintains and shares 'covered information' about its users—such as their names, addresses, emails, or physical locations—and what controls users have over the privacy of that information.
Zuckerberg, Sandberg and other Facebook leadership knowingly didn't comply with that agreement, the plaintiffs allege, as they still allowed third-party apps to collect app users' data about their friends and those friends' personal information, even if the friends didn't consent to using the app themselves.
That issue came to light with the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in which millions of users' Facebook data was harvested through a third-party app, and that data was allegedly used to influence major political events such as Brexit and the 2016 election.
The plaintiffs also allege Facebook entered into agreements with specific companies that granted them access to users' friend data, even after Zuckerberg said Facebook was making that data sharing more secure—making those agreements with companies run by venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel and Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, who all also served on Facebook's board.
The trial begins Wednesday in Delaware Chancery Court—as Meta is incorporated in the state—and will last for eight days. There's no jury in the trial and the judge will issue the verdict in the case. That will likely come out in the weeks or months following the trial, rather than when the trial wraps up. Zuckerberg, Sandberg, Thiel, Andreessen and Hastings are all expected to testify, according to Reuters. Who Are The Key Players Being Sued?
Defendants in the lawsuit include Zuckerberg, Sandberg and former Facebook Partnerships VP Konstantinos Papamiltiadis, whom the lawsuit alleges knowingly made deals with third-party apps that violated the 2012 FTC agreement. The lawsuit also names Andreessen, Thiel and Hastings, who were board members at the time and allegedly knew about the non-compliance with the FTC consent order, given their companies were given favorable agreements that allegedly violated it. Other Facebook board members named in the complaint are former Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation CEO Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellman, eBay CFO Peggy Alford and former American Express CEO Kenneth Chenault. The lawsuit additionally names two former White House chiefs of staff as defendants based on their roles on Facebook's board: Erskine Bowles, who served during Bill Clinton's presidency, and former chief of staff to President Joe Biden, Jeff Zients, who served on the board prior to his role at the White House.
$8 billion. That's how much the shareholders are asking for the defendants to pay in damages, which they said reflects the amount Facebook had to pay in costs as a result of the leaders' allegedly unlawful activities. What Else Does The Lawsuit Allege?
The shareholders bringing the suit make a number of allegations suggesting the defendants in the case knew that they were not in compliance with their privacy obligations. Facebook allegedly moved a notice to users that their privacy could be shared with third-party apps to be more noticeable after reaching the consent order with the FTC, for instance, only to then move it back to the less-prominent place it was in before the order, allegedly with Zuckerberg's knowledge. Facebook's privacy head Yul Kwon also allegedly warned Zuckerberg and Sandberg in 2015 that the company was not doing enough to address privacy concerns, warning Facebook's 'privacy program was disorganized and under-resourced' and the company hadn't properly 'prioritized' privacy concerns, which was causing a 'colossal problem.' Zuckerberg and Sandberg allegedly didn't implement Kwon's suggestions for the improving privacy infrastructure until after Cambridge Analytica, however, and Kwon testified the company may have avoided that scandal had they heeded his advice. The plaintiffs also take issue with Facebook's board of directors approving a $5 billion settlement with the FTC in 2019, arguing they paid a higher-than-required rate in order to protect Zuckerberg and shield him from legal liability. The lawsuit separately details Zuckerberg selling approximately $5 billion in Facebook stock in 2018, which the plaintiffs allege he did because he knew about the company's non-compliance with its privacy obligations. What Do The Defendants Argue?
The defendants strongly deny any claims of wrongdoing, alleging in a court filing the plaintiffs do not have any evidence to back up their claims of officials acting unlawfully and, 'To the contrary, the evidence will show that under the board's leadership, Facebook worked effectively to comply with the 2012 order.' 'The evidence will show that Facebook implemented a robust system of privacy controls' and consistently updated the FTC on its efforts, the defendants argued, claiming the evidence in the case 'negates plaintiffs' pleaded portrait of a company indifferent to compliance.' The defendants also allege their deals with specific companies allowing them to access more data did not violate the 2012 FTC order and that Zuckerberg's sale of his stocks was in compliance with the law and was done in order to fund his charitable pursuits. They also deny the Cambridge Analytica scandal reflects any wrongdoing on Facebook or its officials' part, alleging that while the scandal was 'decidedly a traumatic event' for the company, 'it was the product of Cambridge Analytica's studied deceit—not remotely the product of the bad faith inattention of Facebook's fiduciaries.' Forbes Valuation
Forbes estimates Zuckerberg's net worth at $242.3 billion as of Wednesday afternoon, making him the third-richest person in the world. Many of the defendants named in the lawsuit are among the richest people in the world, including Sandberg (valued at $2.4 billion as of Wednesday), Andreessen ($2 billion), Thiel ($22.7 billion) and Hastings ($6.8 billion).
Sandberg has already been punished as part of the lawsuit, as the ex-Facebook COO was sanctioned by the court in January for allegedly deleting personal emails that were material to the lawsuit. That could make it more difficult for her to prove her innocence at trial, Reuters noted, and information about the emails will not be used at trial. The former exec alleged she rarely used her personal email and that other users were copied on any now-deleted messages, so that the information was preserved. What Is The Cambridge Analytica Scandal?
Cambridge Analytica was a voter-profiling company that obtained data from Facebook users through Cambridge University professor Dr. Aleksandr Kogan, who created a quiz on Facebook that was used to harvest data about users who opted into it and, by extension, their friends. That data was then shared with Cambridge Analytica, and The New York Times and The Intercept reported the firm used that data and other records to create 'psychographic profiles' for approximately 30 million people—despite only some 270,000 actually opting into using Kogan's app. Cambridge Analytica, which had ties to Trump adviser Steve Bannon, then used that data to work on various political campaigns in the ensuing years, including Brexit, the 2014 U.S. midterms and the 2016 presidential election, in which President Donald Trump's campaign and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, worked with the firm, according to the Times. The news of Cambridge Analytica's use of such vast Facebook data was first reported by The Guardian in 2015, which alleged Cruz was using the data. Further reports by The Guardian and The New York Times in 2018 then detailed the wider scope of the firm's work, thanks to a whistleblower exposing the firm. Those reports set off a series of investigations and legal actions, including the shareholder lawsuit. Facebook and Zuckerberg apologized for their role in the scandal after it came to light and imposed new privacy controls, and Zuckerberg testified to Congress, admitting the company 'didn't do enough to prevent these tools from being used for harm' and saying about the data breach, 'It was my mistake, and I'm sorry. I started Facebook, I run it, and I'm responsible for what happens here.' Cambridge Analytica filed for bankruptcy in 2018, and in addition to the $5 billion fine from the FTC, Facebook has also faced consequences for the scandal including paying a $100 million fine from the Securities and Exchange Commission, a $725 million legal settlement and a £500,000 (approximately $645,000) fine from the U.K. Information Commissioner's Office. Further Reading
Meta ex-COO Sandberg sanctioned in investor lawsuit for deleting emails (Reuters)
Meta Trial Over Cambridge Analytica Scandal Tests Chancery Court (Bloomberg)
As Facebook Raised a Privacy Wall, It Carved an Opening for Tech Giants (New York Times)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
15 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
‘We're tired of this': Cicero residents demand action from town president after Latina aunt stopped by federal agents
Vanessa Mendoza, an early childhood educator in Cicero, was gathering materials for her classroom in late June when she paused to look at Facebook. What she saw shocked her. Posted on the social media site was a video of her aunt, Rocío, being pulled over by unidentified agents driving black vehicles who questioned her citizenship — despite her legal status to be in the United States. The agents did not specify why they pulled Rocío over or which agency they were affiliated with, Mendoza, 32, who grew up in Cicero, said at a news conference outside the town hall Thursday morning. After Rocío showed identification, she was not arrested or detained, her niece added. 'It was either a legal stop or maybe, I don't want to say, they were targeting her for being Latina,' she said. On Thursday, local officials and community members condemned 20-year Town President Larry Dominick for remarks he previously made about the immigrant community, especially as federal enforcement actions intensify under President Donald Trump. About 90% of Cicero's residents are Latino, a group that has been repeatedly targeted by the Trump administration. Rocío's interaction with the unidentified agents comes at a time of increased news and social media reports of citizens of Latino descent being stopped or detained. After a U.S. Army veteran was arrested during an immigration raid at a Southern California marijuana farm last week, representatives in Congress introduced legislation on Wednesday that would stop U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement from detaining and deporting U.S. citizens. Law-abiding residents aren't supposed to be arrested or detained, and there was no probable cause for Rocío to be pulled over, Mendoza said Thursday. She said her aunt is still shaken and won't go anywhere without her identification. Cicero has a complicated political history toward immigrants, said former U.S. Rep. Luis Guitiérrez, who used to represent the state's 4th Congressional District. Guitiérrez spoke strongly against Dominick, who he said has in recent years publicly spoken in a 'mean, nasty and violent' manner about immigrants. 'Stop destroying families that love each other,' he said. 'We're outraged. We're tired of this. ' At Thursday's news conference, lifelong Cicero resident Diana Garcia played a recording of Dominick allegedly speaking at public town meetings. In the clip, Dominick can be heard lamenting former President Joe Biden's border policies and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's approach to welcoming new migrants. 'You can't go anywhere without people selling candy, soda or water. And they don't even want to sell. Some of them just want money. The Venezuelans are robbing everybody. And what do we do to them? Nothing. It's disgusting,' Dominick was heard saying in the audio, which was also reported by the local newspaper Cicero Independiente from a Feb. 27, 2024, meeting. In a statement released late Thursday night, Cicero officials dismissed the accusations as complaints from Dominick's political opponents. The statement didn't address the comments Dominick allegedly made. Garcia asserted that Dominick has chosen to remain silent on the issue of immigration at a time when ICE has been 'tearing families apart.' 'Cicero deserves a leader right now. And we don't have one,' she said. At one point during the news conference, a woman passing by with a grocery bag stopped to stand in the back to listen to the speakers. She nodded her head in agreement. In late February, ahead of the town's municipal elections, Dominick was criticized by opposition candidate Esteban Rodriguez for his failure to advocate for the town to adopt sanctuary status. Dominick maintained Cicero's policy is to treat everyone, documented or in the country without legal permission, the same. He referred to a 'Safe Space Resolution' passed in 2008, which formalized a commitment not to use local law enforcement for immigration matters, preventing Cicero police from asking about immigration status or enforcing federal immigration laws. Meanwhile, Illinois is a 'sanctuary state' under the 2017 Illinois Trust Act, meaning it has rules prohibiting arresting or detaining someone solely due to immigration status. The tension escalated several weeks before the election, when Rodriguez had a rock thrown through his home windows in what he described as a scare tactic. He believed his windows were shattered in retaliation for his public probing of Dominick's immigration stance. Dominick's Cicero Voters Alliance, however, brushed off the incident as a 'political stunt' by Rodriguez to 'get attention and stir controversy.' Rodriguez — who received 43% of the vote for town president over the winter — was at the news conference Thursday, where those in attendance hand-delivered a letter to Dominick's office that requested 'immediate action' to declare Cicero a sanctuary city and stop any cooperation between local law enforcement officers and ICE. The group took an elevator to the town hall's third floor, where Dominick's office is located. The town president's office was closed and locked. 'It's because he's never here,' Rodriguez grumbled under his breath. They knocked and waited several minutes before deciding to slip the letter underneath the door. A Tribune reporter was able to enter the office later in the day and spoke to a receptionist, who directed all media inquiries to Dominick's email. The group also delivered a printed-out Freedom of Information Act request to the town of Cicero for all emails, text messages, letters, memos and notes between top town leaders and trustees including Dominick with several defamatory words and phrases. The request sought all communication from Jan. 20, when Trump was sworn into office, to the present. The goal, the group said Thursday, was to uncover the type of communication about immigration that might happen behind closed doors under Dominick's leadership. Mendoza, who wore a polka-dot dress and earrings in the shape of crayons, said that as an educator in Cicero, she is constantly answering questions from worried families who ask her what to do if ICE pulls them over. She tells them to not talk to anyone who they don't know and to keep their windows up. Ultimately, she said she isn't trying to work against Dominick, but to make sure everyone feels protected leaving their homes and driving through their own neighborhoods. 'Just make this a loving and safe place for everybody,' she urged the town leader.


Bloomberg
17 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Meta Launches Oakley AI Glasses With 3K Video Recording
Meta has a new line of smart glasses that are aimed at athletes and include improved video recording. Samantha Kelly got her hands on a pair to try them out (Source: Bloomberg)


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
‘American Idol' exec, hubby dead for 4 days inside LA mansion — even though cops were called day of burglary
The junkie lowlife accused of murdering an 'American Idol' executive and her husband in their Los Angeles mansion may have still been hiding inside when cops were first called — but their bodies weren't found until days later. Robin Kaye and her husband, Thomas Deluca, both 70, were found dead inside their heavily fortified Encino property on Monday — four days after they were killed in a random home invasion, police said. Cops had responded to reports of a possible burglary on the day of the July 10 slayings but never actually went inside the home because they said there were no noticeable signs of forced entry. 4 'American Idol' exec. Robin Kaye and her husband, Thomas DeLuca, were found dead inside their heavily fortified Encino home on Monday. Facebook 4 The couple's bodies weren't found until days later. Chelsea Lauren/Shutterstock 4 The $5 million Encino home of the 'American Idol' executive and her husband Thomas Deluca. MEGA 4 Police reported that the suspect, Raymond Boodarian, may have been inside the home when the officers were called for a welfare check. TMZ They only made the grim discovery when they returned to carry out a welfare check on Monday. Police sources have since told People that the suspect — 22-year-old Raymond Boodarian — may have actually still been inside the home when officers were initially checking it out. Boodarian, a drug addict with criminal history, was charged with two counts of murder Thursday over the slayings. Investigators believe he was burglarizing the residence, which last sold for around $4.5 million in 2023, while the couple were out — and then shot them when they suddenly returned.