Parents seeking religious exemptions to school vaccines win reprieve in a West Virginia county
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Morrisey, who served as West Virginia's attorney general from 2013 until he was sworn in as governor in January, said he believes the religious exemptions to vaccinations should already be permitted under a 2023 law passed by the Legislature called the Equal Protection for Religion Act.
Advertisement
'Today's ruling is another legal victory in the fight for religious freedom,' Morrisey said in a statement. 'No family should be forced to choose between their faith and their children's education, which is exactly what the unelected bureaucrats on the State Board of Education are attempting to force West Virginians to do.'
The board said in a statement that it was disappointed by the ruling and that its members 'will decide next steps in the near future.'
Advertisement
The original lawsuit doesn't explain what specific religion the families follow. It was filed on behalf of parent Miranda Guzman, who identifies as a Christian and said that altering her child's natural immune system through required vaccinations 'would demonstrate a lack of faith in God' and 'disobey the Holy Spirit's leading.' The suit was later amended to add two other parents.
Most religious denominations and groups support medical vaccinations, according to the American Bar Association.
Vaccination mandates for public schools are seen as a way of to prevent the spread of once-common childhood diseases such as measles, mumps, whooping cough, chickenpox and polio. But due in part to vaccine hesitancy, some preventable and deadly diseases are on the rise. For example, the U.S. is having its worst year for measles spread in more than three decades.
Medical experts have long heralded West Virginia's school vaccination policy as one of the most protective in the country for children. State law requires children to receive vaccines for chickenpox, hepatitis B, measles, meningitis, mumps, diphtheria, polio, rubella, tetanus and whooping cough before starting school.
Several states grant medical exemptions from school vaccinations. At least 30 states have religious freedom laws modeled after the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, signed in 1993 by then-President Bill Clinton. It allows federal regulations that interfere with religious beliefs to be challenged.
On Wednesday, a Kanawha County judge dismissed a separate lawsuit against Morrisey's executive order because it didn't give the required 30 days' notice prior to being filed. That lawsuit, filed on behalf of two Cabell County parents, will be allowed to be refiled. It alleged that only the Legislature, not the governor, has the authority to make such decisions.
Advertisement
During their regular session that ended in April, lawmakers failed to pass legislation that was introduced to allow religious exemptions for school vaccine mandates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
She fell on a Boston sidewalk, fractured her jaw, and got nothing from the city. Why?
And she needs dental implants at an out-of-pocket cost of about $20,000. (Medicare pays medical bills, but not dental costs.) The section of sidewalk where she fell has a history. It was paved long ago by the city of Boston with five-foot sections of concrete. Advertisement Next to where Pagliarulo fell, a tree was planted in a carved-out section of the sidewalk. The tree's roots grew under the sidewalk and gradually lifted a section of concrete a couple of inches higher than its surroundings. Pagliarulo and a former neighbor say they reported the tripping hazard to the city of Boston a couple of years ago. They told me the city responded by placing a couple of shovelfuls of asphalt along each protruding lip. Related : I asked the city of Boston what it did and when, and whether it received reports of a hazard. The city said it was working on my request but did not answer my questions in time for publication. The asphalt patch helped but didn't eliminate the hazard, according to neighbors, who showed me pictures of the uneven and bumpy sidewalk. Advertisement And the city seemed to confirm the hazard when, a couple of months after Pagliarulo's fall, it removed the tree and the section of sidewalk next to it, replacing both with a smooth expanse of asphalt. Pagliarulo wants the city of Boston to pay at least some of her dental costs because she believes it was negligent in maintaining that section of sidewalk. What, if anything, does the city owe her? The dispute : Property owners, including municipalities, have a legal duty to keep their property safe for those who use it. That's why almost all homeowners have liability insurance, in case, for example, someone catches their foot on an unrepaired defect on the front stairs. But several laws passed long ago by the state Legislature are highly protective of municipalities, making it almost impossible for ordinary folks like Pagliarulo to get adequate compensation for injuries. Related : I've previously written about frustrated victims who took nasty falls in the There are three ways the law minimizes the number of cases brought against municipalities. First, That's an extremely short notice period. By contrast, In the days after her fall, Pagliarulo concentrated on merely surviving; it often felt like an hour-to-hour struggle. She had to be fed through a syringe and lost almost 25 pounds. Advertisement For a while, three nieces took turns staying overnight with her. A devout Catholic, Pagliarulo spent much time in prayer. Liability was not foremost in her mind. 'I was just so concerned about staying alive,' she told me. Pagliarulo, a widow and retired nurse, said she also felt disoriented and frequently cried. Tears came several times when we met and talked about her fall. Neighbors on Denton Terrace, near Roslindale Square, rallied around her. 'She was in no shape to be researching liability or anything else,' neighbor Josh Jacks said in an interview. After she fell on a Boston sidewalk and fractured her jaw, Tammy Pagliarulo (seated) got support from neighbors (from left) Kim Fanning, Josh Jacks, and Elana Wolkoff. Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff When she first contacted City Hall months later, Pagliarulo got one question from the legal department: When did she fall? When she gave the November date, the legal department representative said she had missed the notice deadline and no claim could be made. 'But I was incapacitated,' she recalled telling him. The legal department rep said he was sorry but there was nothing he could do, Pagliarulo said. Neighbor Elana Wolkoff then found But the city legal department told her the courts have narrowly defined 'incapacitated' in previous, precedent-setting cases. Pagliarulo looked for a lawyer, but none were interested. The reason is the second way the law protects municipalities: a $5,000 cap on compensation. Personal injury lawyers are paid one-third of any amount they win. But lawyers can't justify taking a case when the potential payout is limited to one-third of $5,000, or $1,666. That cap was enacted in 1965 and hasn't been updated. If the cap was adjusted for inflation, it would be about $50,000 today, making it more feasible to hire a lawyer. Related : Advertisement Finally, the law disallows such cases unless the victim can show the defective sidewalk was previously reported to the city or town and that the municipality took no action. The law does not define defects. The resolution : After Pagliarulo's fall, City Councilor Enrique Pepén, whose district includes Roslindale, helped arrange for the removal of the tree and section of the sidewalk. 'It was definitely something that needed repair,' he said. 'It was a big hazard, and they leveled it out.' When he found out about the 30-day notice requirement, Pepén said he was 'taken aback' by how short it is. 'It's not fair to citizens,' he said. Pepén said he wants to collaborate with state lawmakers in reviewing the state laws governing such cases. Bills to change the law get filed virtually every session of the Legislature, but none have passed. Related : The takeaway : The way the law favors cities and towns (and the state, too) is grounded in the centuries-old concept of sovereign immunity, which originated in England and is based on the antiquated notion that 'the King could do no wrong.' Keeping those laws undisturbed saves money for cities and towns. And municipalities do not lack influence on Beacon Hill. But imagine that you or a loved one were affected. You have thousands in medical or dental bills or you've lost income because you can't work, all because of a defective sidewalk and through no fault of your own. Advertisement Wouldn't you want fair compensation? Got a problem? Send your consumer issue to
Politico
a day ago
- Politico
Will feds weigh in on religious vax carveouts?
Driving the Day RELIGIOUS VAX EXEMPTIONS — It's back-to-school season, which means parents are shuttling their kids to pediatricians for annual checkups — and advocates for and against states' exemptions to vaccine mandates for school entry are gearing up for a fight, Lauren reports. Vaccine skeptics have sought to make their case to the Trump administration's Religious Liberty Commission — created by executive order in May — for executive action to bolster religious carve-outs. But they face pushback from public health experts who warn that more exemptions could threaten public health, setting up another front in the vaccine wars. Four states — California, Connecticut, Maine and New York — don't offer religious exemptions to school vaccine requirements, and Massachusetts lawmakers are considering banning them. West Virginia provides exemptions after GOP Gov. Patrick Morrisey signed an executive order earlier this year invoking the state's religious freedom law. Some religious liberty groups have called on the federal government — which has no say in state vaccine mandates — to use federal education funding as leverage to expand religious opt-outs from school immunization requirements, pointing to a Clinton-era religious protection statute. Precedential web: Some vaccine law experts question how far the executive branch could go to nudge those outlier states toward accepting religious exemptions. The Supreme Court curtailed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act's application to the states in 1997, and administrative conditions on federal funding can't run afoul of Congress' directions. But proponents say those lawyers ignore more recent opinions that work in exemption advocates' favor, pointing to a Covid-19-era decision lifting in-home gathering restrictions on religious grounds and, more recently, the court's ruling in favor of parents who want to opt their children out of LGBTQ+-themed lessons in public schools. Shifting winds: The number of kindergarteners entering school with at least one vaccine exemption continues to tick up, with the CDC reporting last week that 3.6 percent had one in the 2024-2025 school year, compared with 2.2 percent a decade ago. Days before the updated data was released, the American Academy of Pediatrics reaffirmed its opposition to religious exemptions, arguing they should be abolished to protect public health. 'In practice, nonmedical exceptions based on religious belief can substantially limit the public health value of vaccine requirements for school attendance,' the group said in a statement. 'There is no practicable way for schools or other involved community partners to distinguish fairly among religious or other nonmedical claims.' What's next: The Religious Liberty Commission will hold a hearing next month on public education issues, giving exemption proponents another opening to make their case. It's unclear where the White House stands on the concept — a spokesperson didn't comment — but the first Trump administration's HHS pursued avenues to grant health care workers expanded 'conscience' protections and to allow imports of certain vaccines due to some patients' religious beliefs. IT'S TUESDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. Your host is wondering whether concerns about a common allergy medicine's risks might catch the FDA's attention. Send tips to David Lim (dlim@ @davidalim or davidalim.49 on Signal) and Lauren Gardner (lgardner@ @Gardner_LM or gardnerlm.01 on Signal). Eye on the FDA NEW TOP LAWYER — FDA Commissioner Marty Makary named a longtime government attorney on Monday to be the agency's chief counsel, months after his first pick was torpedoed by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.). Sean Keveney, who most recently served as HHS's acting general counsel, served as a career civil servant at DOJ's civil rights division before becoming deputy general counsel at HHS in 2019, according to the department and his LinkedIn profile. His predecessor in the position, Hilary Perkins, was also a career DOJ lawyer whose appointment drew Hawley's ire before Makary's confirmation because of her record defending the Biden administration's abortion pill policies. While Perkins also defended the Trump FDA's mifepristone positions, that wasn't enough to overcome his opposition, and she ultimately stepped down days into the job. MDUFA KICKOFF — The FDA's medical device user fee program is not set to expire until Sept. 30, 2027, but the process to renew it has already begun. Despite HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vocal distaste for the user fee programs, the Trump administration has made it clear they are committed to the monthslong process that will likely result in their renewal for another five years. Industry and FDA leaders — including FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and Center for Devices and Radiological Health Director Michelle Tarver — met Monday to discuss the potential sixth iteration of the medical device user fee program. 'While user fees support timeliness and predictability by providing FDA with additional resources, user fees are not a guarantee of approval,' AdvaMed's senior executive vice president, Janet Trunzo, said according to prepared remarks. 'They never have been, and they never should be.' In Congress SENATE PASSES FDA FUNDING — Before leaving town for the August recess, the Senate passed a bill to fund the FDA for fiscal 2026 as part of a minibus package by an 87-9 vote. The legislation, which funds the agency at $7 billion, is made up of $3.6 billion in taxpayer funds and $3.4 billion in user fee revenues. But it is unclear whether lawmakers will have to turn to a continuing resolution before government funding runs out at the end of September. The House Appropriations Committee previously advanced an FDA bill that funded the agency at a lower level. Research Corner BOOST FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH — The Gates Foundation said Monday it would spend $2.5 billion through 2030 to speed global women's research into maternal, menstrual, gynecological and sexual health. Pharma Moves Erika Sward is now chief advocacy officer at UsAgainstAlzheimer's. She previously was assistant vice president of national advocacy at the American Lung Association. Document Drawer FDA Commissioner Marty Makary met with Rep. John Joyce (R-Pa.) for an introductory meeting on July 24. He also met with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals to discuss nonanimal testing approaches on July 21, according to newly posted public calendar disclosures. He also met with the leadership team of the Government Accountability Office on July 16 to discuss 'items of mutual interest.' WHAT WE'RE READING Top FDA cancer medicine regulator Richard Pazdur played a critical role in the rejection of Replimune Group's skin cancer therapy, STAT's Adam Feuerstein reports. Longevity companies are eyeing Montana as a potential hub for 'biohacking' treatments thanks to state laws embracing patients' 'right-to-try' experimental drugs, The Wall Street Journal's Alex Janin writes.
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
OF COURSE New York's bungled weed legalization fueled a wave of addiction
An explosive Post exclusive revealing that legal weed is fueling a wave of addiction is fresh proof of Albany's feckless legalization. 'It's one of the stupidest things our society has done — they legalized cannabis during the opioid crisis,' grumbled Luke Nasta, president and CEO of Camelot Counseling of Staten Island. Thing is, neither the Legislature's leaders nor Gov. Andrew Cuomo (then eyeing a 2020 presidential run) cared about the risks, the clear downsides or even elementary practicality when they rammed through legalization in 2019. Advertisement They let social-justice obsessions write the new rules, then installed a clueless crew to run the new state Office of Cannabis Management. As the OCM dithered over awarding the new licenses, illegal shops popped up all over the city and state — shielded from law enforcement by the new laws' lunatic provisions. So the outlets that had proven their ability by selling under the 2014 medical-marijuana law got crushed even as qualified new potential sellers couldn't open for business. Advertisement Oh, and Albany didn't even allow for common-sense limits on smoking dope in public, so the reek of weed is everywhere. Worst of all, the politicians shut their ears to warnings about the impact of cannabis on young brains — a prime reason the Medical Society of New York opposed legalization. So the state saw an explosion of flavored weed products and edibles, plainly aimed at hooking young people susceptible to addiction. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Any legalization risked bringing an avalanche of new addicts, but New York's move might as well have been timed and designed to maximize the damage. How mad does it get? Consider the nonprofit Housing Works, which runs drug-treatment services and a cannabis-dispensary arm. It tells its pot customers they're 'helping fund lifesaving services that support thousands of New Yorkers each year' — except that its treatment centers on the addict-enabling 'harm reduction' approach. Prospering by feeding misery: That's pretty much the essence of Albany's approach to legalization.
