Going alone is not the answer to security questions: Chan Chun Sing
Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing speaking at the sixth and final plenary session of the Shangri-La Dialogue on June 1. ST PHOTO: JASON QUAH
Shangri-La Dialogue 2025 Going alone is not the answer to security questions: Chan Chun Sing
SINGAPORE – Political and military leaders must arrest the temptation to go it alone when they feel insecure, as history has numerous examples of such an approach backfiring, Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing said on June 1.
This is as attempts to prioritise one's security without due regard for international laws and norms could easily lead to greater insecurity in others, sparking a vicious spiral that begets greater insecurity, Mr Chan said at the sixth and final plenary session of the Shangri-La Dialogue.
This applies to all aspects of security, including countries' economic well-being, he added, recalling a point made by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim at the forum a day earlier that faltering trade has consequences that ripple beyond any one region.
Mr Chan said today's world is not unlike the 1930s, when beggar-thy-neighbour policies arguably contributed to expansionist and irredentist foreign policies that culminated in World War 2.
As competition in the security and economic domains increase, so has the need for guardrails and communication channels to reduce the risk of miscalculation, he said.
He cited how Singapore and Malaysia both respected an international tribunal's directive when there was a disagreement over reclamation works, and thereby managed to reach an amicable settlement.
'While the issue began with acrimony, the warmth and civility between the negotiating teams led to an amicable resolution,' he noted.
The two neighbours still have their differences, but have continued to deepen coop e ration, such as through the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone, he said.
Mr Chan emphasised that while great powers have great responsibilities when it comes to upholding international rules, small countries also have agency and responsibility in upholding the global economic and security order.
On its part, Singapore is committed to engaging both the US and China, without taking any sides.
'We believe that taking sides, regardless of issues and context, breeds irrelevance,' he said. 'And if one is irrelevant, it will almost certainly require (one) to take sides.'
Instead, Singapore takes the side of principles that promote a more integrated global economic and security order, where states have a fair chance to compete and can improve the lives of their people through trade rather than war, he added.
Noting that emerging security challenges have to do with threats against networked infrastructure that transcend borders, Mr Chan said Singapore is working with Asean partners to develop principles to facilitate defence cooperation of the region's critical underwater infrastructure.
Fellow speakers at the plenary also shared different ways by which small states can contribute to tackling security problems.
Sweden's defence minister Pål Jonson noted his country's expertise in psychological defence and in responding to information operations, and how small states like Sweden and Singapore are well-ranked when it comes to innovation and research capabilities.
Papua New Guinea defence minister Billy Joseph said his country amplifies its voice by working through multilateral forums such as the South Pacific Defence Ministers' Meeting and the Pacific Islands Forum.
The Pacific Response Group, a disaster coordination organisation formed in November 2024, also assisted Vanuatu following an earthquake there a month later, added Mr Joseph.
Responding to a question about Singapore's diplomatic approach, Mr Chan said small states are realistic that engagement is not on the basis of sympathy or charity, but on being successful and having value-add.
Singapore's approach is to look at the principles that will best enable it to survive and thrive, he added.
For instance on Ukraine, Mr Chan said the principle the Republic holds dear is that of the sovereignty of nations, as it would be a dangerous world if one country can march into another on the basis of wanting to right the wrongs of history.
Holding to this principle meant it has stood up to great powers in the past for doing the same, as the greater risk is of the principle no longer being observed by countries big and small, he added.
On questions about understanding China's perspectives, Mr Chan said it is in the interest of everyone to work with China, and vice versa.
This year's summit was the first time since 2019 that China did not send its defence minister, which raised questions about Beijing's continued engagement with the region.
If China perceives that the world does not respect or understand it sufficiently, it is incumbent upon the country to use every opportunity possible, including the Shangri-La Dialogue, to get its voice heard and make clear its stance, said Mr Chan.
Mr Chan urged countries to deepen efforts to understand others, so that they do not end up with simplistic interpretations or misreadings of other people's intentions.
Mr Chan was also asked if Singapore would apply the concept of self-determination to the case of Taiwan.
Responding, he said it was scary to hear simplistic explanations that try to frame the conflict as one between democracy and autocracy, or to draw 'unhelpful parallels' between Taiwan and Ukraine.
How the issue is going to be resolved, if not managed, will have to be determined by the Chinese people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, he added.
People on both sides share similar end goals of having security, including economic security, and the hope is that channels of communication can be opened so they can discuss where their shared future lies, said Mr Chan.
Mr Chan said his final takeaway from the forum was the need for deeper cooperation, given the complexity of the issues confronting the world.
'Today, the challenges that we face are not geographically isolated challenges (but) are interwoven,' he said.
'And to solve those issues...we need to build the solutions at the network level, and all of us can contribute to that - be it big or small countries.'
Wong Pei Ting is a correspondent at The Straits Times. She covers politics and social affairs.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
28 minutes ago
- Business Times
Asean increasingly pulled in opposite directions
ALL eyes are on US trade talks, but for the Asean countries, visibility on progress remains poor. This partly reflects the US administration's priority to strike deals with other larger economies including India, Japan, and China. For Asean, only preliminary talks have taken place and formal discussions are yet to happen. In the case of Thailand, it is yet to get a schedule for its first-round talks with high-level officials. Big ask from the US There are other fundamental factors at play. Where some preliminary talks have already occurred, it is unclear what the US wants exactly and officials have been trying to figure out the specific demands. Once they have a sense, a framework to pursue formal negotiations will be put together along with possible proposals. The US has made it unequivocally clear to its trading partners to clamp down on transshipments from China aiming to circumvent US tariffs. This demand is most relevant for Asean countries, but compliance will also likely be challenging. A few of them, especially Vietnam and Thailand, have benefited from these trade diversion effects since the first round of the US-China trade war and these will be difficult to reverse in the short run. Even in Singapore, where we did not see much re-routing in Trump 1.0, a surge in re-exports boosted its trade surplus to a record high in April. The concern is that this demand seems to be a hard constraint from the US. In Thailand's case, ahead of talks with the US, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra reportedly ordered a tightening of the issuance of certificates of origin. But by her own admission, it will take time to resolve, likely longer than the 90-day reprieve period for tariffs which expires in early July. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The US administration is likely bent on using negotiations with other countries to keep the pressure on China by preventing a re-routing of exports to the US via these third countries. China's calculated charm offensive At the same time, China is making its move to strengthen ties with the region, indicated by no less than President Xi Jinping's visit to Vietnam, Malaysia and Cambodia in April. Greater cooperation is the big buzzword from official statements. Key proposals from China include building an economic community and deepening supply chains with the region via the creation of industrial parks, special economic zones and technological corridors. Under China's Belt and Road Initiative, it also proposes fast-tracking the construction of infrastructure projects, particularly railways and an 'Air Silk Road' to improve regional connectivity. While the timeline for implementation of these initiatives remains unclear, the consistent theme across Asean to enhance trade and investment relations with China suggests these have likely been shaped by the desire for a common response to rising US protectionism. Follow-up action from China has also been swift, sending an even clearer signal to Asean leaders that its larger northern neighbour is serious in its intent. Before the Asean Summit in Kuala Lumpur last week, negotiations had already been completed to implement version 3.0 of the Asean-China Free Trade Area, an initiative that President Xi was encouraging as recently as his visit. This upgrade covers new sectors such as the green and digital economy and puts greater emphasis on developing regional supply chains. The inaugural Asean-China-GCC Summit also took place last week, attended by Premier Li Qiang. Malaysia can claim the unique distinction of hosting President Xi and Premier Li back-to-back within a month. In contrast, progress among Asean countries on trade talks with the US have been slow. A pivot adds to the uncertainty In addition to the complex nature of these trade negotiations with the US and the difficulties that Asean countries face in removing non-tariff barriers and reducing transshipments, being caught in the crossfire between the US and China will likely present more challenges for the region. The difficulty in coming up with a deal with the US could encourage a pivot by these countries to trade more with China and try to substitute exports to the US. China's share in Asean's total trade is already nearly twice that of the US, so this is not inconceivable, especially with China's initiatives that could bring benefits such as more investment inflows and assistance in infrastructure roll-out. On the flip side, signs of greater economic cooperation with China could prompt the Trump administration to keep US tariffs high against the Asean countries. The upshot is that uncertainty will likely remain elevated and tariffs may go back up after July, posing more downside risks for the region's growth outlook. The writer is chief Asean economist at Nomura


Independent Singapore
18 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Singapore Minister: Bridge ties with China now or risk dangerous misunderstandings
SINGAPORE: The city-state's new Defense Minister Chan Chun Sing delivered a clear call for profound involvement and collaboration between China, the United States, and regional countries, cautioning that worldwide confidence and stability are contingent on sincere discussions and genuine negotiation, not hot air and inflated language. Speaking after the yearly Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier defence conference initiated by the International Institute of Strategic Studies, Chan stressed that 'every opportunity possible' should be seized to foster meaningful conversations among global powers, Breaking Defense reported. 'Having spoken with both the US and the Chinese, I think both sides will benefit from a deeper understanding of each other's positions,' Chan said at a media session on Sunday. 'This way, we don't oversimplify complex issues or seek simplistic solutions.' But Chan highlighted that such discussions must go beyond superficial peacekeeping or mediation. 'It must be a true dialogue—one where both sides actively listen, not merely speak past each other,' he said. Pointing to U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's comments that Washington is not pursuing conflict or government change in China, Chan said such explanations were 'very useful' in dissipating distrust. 'There are certain perceptions on both sides,' he clarified. 'But both must clearly state their bottom lines to build mutual trust and confidence.' His remarks came hours after his speech during the summit meeting's concluding plenary assembly, where he responded to a question from a Chinese People's Liberation Army representative, who voiced out concerns over what he labelled as recurring assaults on China during the summit meeting. 'If China feels misunderstood or disrespected, then it is even more important for China to step forward and articulate its stance,' Chan said. 'The Shangri-La Dialogue is exactly the kind of platform where China can do that.' China's subdued presence at this year's summit drew attention, with the country sending a lower-level team led by Rear Admiral Hu Gangfeng, vice president of China's National Defense University. Particularly, Beijing capered its customary post-speech press meeting, choosing instead to issue a scathing statement condemning Secretary Hegseth for making offensive remarks and making China look like a menace. See also Heroes on the front lines of battle against Wuhan virus outbreak As a former army chief turned minister, Chan utilised his speech to highlight Singapore's long-standing position: that tiny states must be permitted to flourish under an international order that is founded on transnational law and shared esteem. 'Singapore will stand on the side of principles,' he professed. 'We support a global economic and security system where all states—large or small—have the right to compete, cooperate, and improve lives through trade, not war.' Chan also delivered a warning note against nations that take one-sided steps in the name of national security. While he accepted the predisposition to value one's safety, he foretold the risk in ignoring long-held standards. 'If there is no trust in nations abiding by shared rules, the pursuit of security could trigger a vicious cycle—where seeking protection by one state leads to heightened insecurity in others,' he stated. With pressures festering in the Indo-Pacific and major powers steering a fluctuating global environment, Chan's message was clear: discussions and negotiations, not disconnection or conflict, are the only route to long-term armistice. See also Thai king fires royal guards for 'adultery'


AsiaOne
19 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Taking sides, without context, 'breeds irrelevance': Chan Chun Sing on global order and security, Singapore News
In a fragmenting global security and economic order, taking sides blindly can make a country irrelevant, Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing said at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue (SLD) on Sunday (June 1). Minister Chan was speaking at the sixth and final plenary of the 22nd SLD on the topic of enhancing security co-operation for a stable Asia-Pacific alongside Papua New Guinea Defence Minister Billy Joseph and Sweden Defence Minister Pål Jonson. "For Singapore, we believe that taking sides, regardless of issues and context, breeds irrelevance," Chan stated, adding that if we must choose sides, he hopes that it will be the side of principles. These principles are ones that "uphold a global order, where we do not descend into the law of the jungle, where the mighty do what they wish and the weak suffer what they must", he explained. "Singapore will choose the side of principles that promote a more integrated global economic and security order underpinned by international law and sovereign equality." 'For the common good' In this global order, states, regardless of size, will have a fair chance to compete and improve the lives of people through trade, he also explained. Chan further emphasised Singapore's stance that all states have agency and responsibilities to uphold the global order. This, he explained, is why Singapore works with "like-minded partners", making connections "for the common good". "Any functioning global rules-based economic and security order must be able to address the emerging challenges of the day and the challenges of tomorrow," he stressed. "Openness and inclusivity are important, because all stakeholders must feel that they have a voice in shaping the rules." He also pledged that Singapore would work alongside Asean to raise awareness and develop principles to "facilitate defence co-operation on critical underwater infrastructure security in our region". [[nid:717748]] Addressing those present, Chan stated: "To all the powers of the world: the greater one's power, the greater is one's responsibility. "All great powers can choose to demonstrate the power of its example, or you can choose to demonstrate the example of its power. We all have a choice to make." Don't go it alone, Chan Chun Sing warns In his speech, Chan also highlighted the need to co-operate with others instead of "going alone". He explained that prioritising individual security isn't wrong, but must be done alongside a commitment to international laws and norms. If there is no trust between countries to act in accordance with these laws and norms, individual security could come at the expense of the insecurity of others, Chan said. "'My security first should not become 'my security only'," he warned. "Otherwise, we all fall victim to the Prisoners' Dilemma, where the pursuit of self-interest leads to less ideal outcomes, both individually and collectively." A Prisoners' Dilemma refers to a logical paradox where individuals pursue their own self-interests, inadvertently causing a less optimal outcome for everyone across the board. Chan then shared the importance of domestic confidence, citing US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who had said that credible deterrence starts at home. "International co-operation and effective diplomacy must also start with domestic confidence," he said. "Externalising one's domestic issues cannot be the solution to one's domestic challenges." Conversely, it is domestic cohesion, policy coherence and leadership continuity that builds credibility, Chan stated. "Domestic security and external security must be mutually reinforcing… Political and military leaders must arrest the instinct or temptation to go at it alone when they feel insecure. Only then can we avoid conflict and keep the peace," added Chan. [[nid:716881]] khooyihang@