logo
Asean increasingly pulled in opposite directions

Asean increasingly pulled in opposite directions

Business Times2 days ago

ALL eyes are on US trade talks, but for the Asean countries, visibility on progress remains poor. This partly reflects the US administration's priority to strike deals with other larger economies including India, Japan, and China. For Asean, only preliminary talks have taken place and formal discussions are yet to happen. In the case of Thailand, it is yet to get a schedule for its first-round talks with high-level officials.
Big ask from the US
There are other fundamental factors at play. Where some preliminary talks have already occurred, it is unclear what the US wants exactly and officials have been trying to figure out the specific demands. Once they have a sense, a framework to pursue formal negotiations will be put together along with possible proposals.
The US has made it unequivocally clear to its trading partners to clamp down on transshipments from China aiming to circumvent US tariffs. This demand is most relevant for Asean countries, but compliance will also likely be challenging.
A few of them, especially Vietnam and Thailand, have benefited from these trade diversion effects since the first round of the US-China trade war and these will be difficult to reverse in the short run. Even in Singapore, where we did not see much re-routing in Trump 1.0, a surge in re-exports boosted its trade surplus to a record high in April.
The concern is that this demand seems to be a hard constraint from the US. In Thailand's case, ahead of talks with the US, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra reportedly ordered a tightening of the issuance of certificates of origin.
But by her own admission, it will take time to resolve, likely longer than the 90-day reprieve period for tariffs which expires in early July.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business
Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The US administration is likely bent on using negotiations with other countries to keep the pressure on China by preventing a re-routing of exports to the US via these third countries.
China's calculated charm offensive
At the same time, China is making its move to strengthen ties with the region, indicated by no less than President Xi Jinping's visit to Vietnam, Malaysia and Cambodia in April.
Greater cooperation is the big buzzword from official statements. Key proposals from China include building an economic community and deepening supply chains with the region via the creation of industrial parks, special economic zones and technological corridors.
Under China's Belt and Road Initiative, it also proposes fast-tracking the construction of infrastructure projects, particularly railways and an 'Air Silk Road' to improve regional connectivity.
While the timeline for implementation of these initiatives remains unclear, the consistent theme across Asean to enhance trade and investment relations with China suggests these have likely been shaped by the desire for a common response to rising US protectionism.
Follow-up action from China has also been swift, sending an even clearer signal to Asean leaders that its larger northern neighbour is serious in its intent. Before the Asean Summit in Kuala Lumpur last week, negotiations had already been completed to implement version 3.0 of the Asean-China Free Trade Area, an initiative that President Xi was encouraging as recently as his visit. This upgrade covers new sectors such as the green and digital economy and puts greater emphasis on developing regional supply chains. The inaugural Asean-China-GCC Summit also took place last week, attended by Premier Li Qiang.
Malaysia can claim the unique distinction of hosting President Xi and Premier Li back-to-back within a month. In contrast, progress among Asean countries on trade talks with the US have been slow.
A pivot adds to the uncertainty
In addition to the complex nature of these trade negotiations with the US and the difficulties that Asean countries face in removing non-tariff barriers and reducing transshipments, being caught in the crossfire between the US and China will likely present more challenges for the region.
The difficulty in coming up with a deal with the US could encourage a pivot by these countries to trade more with China and try to substitute exports to the US. China's share in Asean's total trade is already nearly twice that of the US, so this is not inconceivable, especially with China's initiatives that could bring benefits such as more investment inflows and assistance in infrastructure roll-out.
On the flip side, signs of greater economic cooperation with China could prompt the Trump administration to keep US tariffs high against the Asean countries. The upshot is that uncertainty will likely remain elevated and tariffs may go back up after July, posing more downside risks for the region's growth outlook.
The writer is chief Asean economist at Nomura

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Continuity or reset? Japan, China seek clues to S. Korea President Lee Jae-myung's foreign policy
Continuity or reset? Japan, China seek clues to S. Korea President Lee Jae-myung's foreign policy

Straits Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Continuity or reset? Japan, China seek clues to S. Korea President Lee Jae-myung's foreign policy

South Korean President Lee Jae-myung speaking during a media conference at the Presidential Office in Seoul on June 4. PHOTO: REUTERS – South Korea's East Asian neighbours Japan and China on June 4 quickly congratulated President Lee Jae-myung on his resounding election win, even as both countries are closely watching for clues to how the liberal leader will approach bilateral relations. This scrutiny stems from perceptions that South Korean diplomacy oscillates wildly depending on the ruling party of the day. Liberals are judged to be hostile towards Japan and friendly towards China and North Korea, while conservatives hold an opposite view. Ties between Tokyo and Seoul plunged into a deep freeze under the previous liberal President Moon Jae-in, only to thaw rapidly under Mr Lee's ousted predecessor, Yoon Suk Yeol, who is now facing insurrection charges for his martial law debacle. Mr Lee had previously described Japan as an 'enemy nation' and gone on a 24-day hunger strike to oppose Yoon's conciliatory policies, which he termed 'humiliating diplomacy'. He has also criticised Yoon for worsening ties with China by moving closer to the United States on positions such as Taiwan, which Beijing regards as part of its territory to be reunited with. But Mr Lee adopted a more centrist agenda on the campaign trail, saying that he wanted to repair fraying ties with China, while also insisting that he held a 'very favourable impression of the Japanese people'. His approach to this diplomatic tightrope will have ramifications from Washington to Tokyo, as the US corrals its Indo-Pacific allies for support in its big-power competition with China. Both Japan and South Korea are US security allies, while China is their largest trading partner. On June 4, Mr Lee said : 'I will strengthen cooperation between South Korea, the US and Japan, based on the solid South Korea-US alliance, and will approach relations with neighbouring countries from the perspective of national interest and practicality.' All eyes will be on Mr Lee's likely diplomatic debut on June 15 at the Group of Seven (G-7) summit in Canada, where South Korea has been invited as an obser ver. There, he could potentially meet bilaterally with US and Japan's leaders. Amid the diplomatic ambiguity, analysts in China were sanguine about Beijing-Seoul ties, while Japanese observers were more circumspect over Tokyo-Seoul relations. In a congratulatory message to Mr Lee, Chinese President Xi Jinping stressed that he attaches 'great importance' to China-South Korea relations. The two countries, he said, are close neighbours and partners that have overcome ideological and social differences in the 33 years since establishing diplomatic ties to develop stable and healthy relations. This partnership 'not only improved the well-being of the citizens in both countries, but also promoted regional peace and stability', Mr Xi added, according to state media reports. 'China is willing to work with South Korea to adhere to the original intention of the establishment of diplomatic ties and firmly follow the rules of good neighbourliness and friendship,' Mr Xi said, noting that this is to the benefit of both countries at a time of growing regional and international uncertainty. Over in Tokyo, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba delivered a similar message of working together as 'partners' and close neighbours to tackle global challenges, as the countries celebrate the 60th anniversary of bilateral ties in 2025. 'The importance of holding summit talks at an early date and engaging in 'shuttle diplomacy' won't change,' Mr Ishiba said, referring to the practice of the leaders regularly visiting each other's countries, while expressing his hopes to 'further invigorate bilateral exchanges' at all levels. Yet, Japanese officials are wary that Mr Lee's election would portend a dramatic shift in bilateral ties, given that he has said he would broach wartime issues over Japan's colonial rule of the Korean peninsula from 1910 to 1945, and the territorial dispute over the Dokdo/Takeshima islets. This is especially since 2025 marks the 80th year since Japan's wartime surrender, an anniversary year that could be weaponised to stoke tensions by raising historical grievances. Japan's position is that all wartime reparations have been 'completely and finally' settled under a 1965 agreement to normalise ties, with Tokyo paying US$500 million (worth about US$5 billion today, or S$6.4 billion) in grants and low-interest long-term loans to South Korea. But past South Korean administrations have repeatedly brought up historical issues, including comfort women and wartime labour, casting a pall over bilateral relations. 'Even if the administration takes a conciliatory stance towards Japan at the start, it could gradually evolve into a hardline stance towards Japan,' a Japanese Foreign Ministry official was quoted as telling the Mainichi newspaper. Another official was cautiously optimistic, saying it would be foolhardy to stoke anti-Japan sentiment at this time, given the positive public opinion. North Korea's military involvement in Russia's invasion of Ukraine also means that geopolitical calculations would have changed, the official was cited as saying. Kobe University's Professor Kan Kimura told The Straits Times that the way forward is unpredictable, given that invoking history would be a non-starter for Japan. 'Lee's language over history and territorial disputes is going to be provocative,' he said. 'The question is whether both countries can delink history with economic and security issues.' He saw it in Seoul's interests to maintain close ties with Tokyo, saying: 'Given that South Korean public opinion towards China is worsening, North Korea is refusing to engage in dialogue with South Korea, and the US is exerting pressure including through tariffs, objectively speaking, South Korea has almost no diplomatic options.' Analysts in China told ST that ties will likely thaw between Beijing and Seoul under Mr Lee, whom they expect will strike a better balance amid US-China competition. Associate Professor Zhang Guangxin at Zhejiang Gongshang University's East Asian Institute in Hangzhou noted that despite Yoon's pivot to the US that had chilled bilateral relations with China, trade between the two countries remains robust. Exports from South Korea to China grew 6.6 per cent in 2024 from a year ago, which underscores the robust trade relations, Prof Zhang noted. 'Mr Lee's clear victory over the People Power Party (which Yoon belonged to) shows the South Korean public's desire for economic stability,' he said. Prof Kim Chang Hyun of the China-Europe International Business School in Shanghai, meanwhile, said business elites in South Korea no longer see China as solely a big market for their products but 'an important partner to learn from', pointing to China's advances in green technology and artificial intelligence. The two experts said that public opinion in South Korea towards the US is likely deteriorating, given US President Donald Trump's demands that Seoul pay more for defence, and the threat of 'reciprocal tariffs' of 25 per cent. Students from South Korea – the third-largest source of foreign students to the US – are also facing heightened uncertainty over Mr Trump's immigration policies. 'There will be some rebalancing in public opinion in South Korea towards the US now,' Prof Kim said. Walter Sim is Japan correspondent at The Straits Times. Based in Tokyo, he writes about political, economic and socio-cultural issues. Aw Cheng Wei is The Straits Times' China correspondent, based in Chongqing. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Thailand vows measures to prevent money laundering at casinos
Thailand vows measures to prevent money laundering at casinos

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Thailand vows measures to prevent money laundering at casinos

BANGKOK – Thailand plans to record and monitor financial transactions of visitors to casinos to deter money laundering, officials said as the government sought to win over opponents of a bill to legalise gambling venues as part of new integrated resorts. The South-east Asian nation will enforce rules for responsible gaming, including a ban on casino advertisements and denial of entry for individuals deemed to carry 'financial risks', said Mr Suksit Srichomkhwan, Deputy Secretary-General to Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra. Thailand's gaming regulations will be modelled on Singapore, Japan and the United Arab Emirates, which limit the number of licences and require mega investments, he told a briefing in Bangkok on June 4. Each entertainment complex in Thailand will require a minimum investment of 100 billion baht (S$3.94 billion), he said. Ms Paetongtarn's administration was forced to delay a Bill to legalise casinos earlier in 2025 due to mounting opposition from religious groups, anti-gambling networks and some political parties. The government has pitched it as a way to burnish the appeal of its tourism industry, a key pillar of Thailand's economy. If the Bill is passed, it could pave way for Thailand to capture a slice of the growing global gaming market alongside Macau and Singapore, and tap into another potential growth engine to galvanise its sluggish economy. Wynn Resorts and MGM Resorts International have shown interests in investing in Thai casinos, according to officials. The so-called entertainment complexes can boost foreign tourist arrivals by 5 per cent to 20 per cent and lift average spending per person per trip by about 22,000 baht, Mr Suksit said. But the critics of the casino plan have argued the gaming venues will fuel gambling addiction and benefit big businesses and foreign companies, besides them turning into avenues for money laundering. 'Money laundering will be almost impossible in these premises' due to stringent surveillance, he said. 'Even the operators want to compete in a strictly regulated environment.' The draft legislation proposes that casinos take up only 10 per cent of the spaces within each integrated entertainment complex, which will be required to house at least four other types of businesses. It also moots stringent entry requirements for Thai citizens, including proof that they have 50 million baht in bank deposits. The government is not in a hurry to push through the Bill as it is committed to ensuring the legislation is 'clean and clear', Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat said. The entertainment complexes can be a new engine to drive growth amid rising geopolitical challenges, he said, adding that the aim is to pass the Bill during the remainder of the government's two-year tenure. Bloomberg Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Singapore can leverage trust premium, crisis readiness for new growth opportunities: Chee Hong Tat
Singapore can leverage trust premium, crisis readiness for new growth opportunities: Chee Hong Tat

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Singapore can leverage trust premium, crisis readiness for new growth opportunities: Chee Hong Tat

Minister for National Development Chee Hong Tat (right) and Nomura Asia-Pacific chief executive Nags Sankaranarayanan taking part in a fireside chat at the Nomura Investment Forum Singapore on June 4. PHOTO: NOMURA SINGAPORE - Concerns are mounting that hiring in Singapore – especially of fresh graduates – may slow as investors and companies delay investment decisions amid ongoing uncertainty over US President Donald Trump's fluctuating tariff policies. However, Singapore's reputation as a trusted financial hub will enable it to continue attracting global investments, talent and technologies, while a new task force to prepare companies and workers for volatility has positioned the Republic well to navigate the uncertainty, said Minister for National Development Chee Hong Tat on June 4. Speaking at Nomura's annual investor forum at the Ritz-Carlton, Mr Chee, who is also deputy chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), said that while it is understandable for companies to adopt a wait-and-see approach in the current environment, this could affect jobs if adopted on a broader scale. 'We are worried,' Mr Chee said, noting that a persistent slowdown could impact job opportunities for workers as well as students who are about to graduate. Access to financing is also an emerging concern. 'There are companies who actually have viable businesses, products and services but, because of the uncertainty, may face more difficulties in drawing financing,' he said. Mr Chee was responding to a question from Nomura Asia-Pacific chief executive Nags Sankaranarayanan on the impact of the US-China trade war on Singapore, and the Government's assessment of the situation. He noted that Singapore's overall factory activity is now at its lowest levels in months, reflecting the concerns businesses have with regard to the more uncertain environment. While there's still a need to provide support in weathering the current volatility, particularly in areas like financing and hiring, that alone isn't enough, Mr Chee said. There is also a need for companies and workers to look ahead and be ready for a landscape with new challenges and opportunities. The Singapore Economic Resilience Taskforce (Sert), announced in April, was set up for this purpose. 'We have a team that's looking at how to help companies and workers, how to provide some interventions on top of what we have already announced in the Budget earlier this year,' Mr Chee said. Sert is also helping companies adapt to a shifting landscape by identifying emerging opportunities and potential challenges, as well as equipping workers with the skills required to stay relevant, he added. Meanwhile, MAS has been consistently reviewing Singapore's rules and processes to identify the barriers to business, and improve the Republic's attractiveness to businesses and investors. 'We have new services, new business models, new requirements, and it's important for us to be able to keep up with these new changes and in doing so, improve our efficiency and reduce business costs,' Mr Chee said. In wealth management, for example, the time taken for tax incentive applications by family offices has been 'significantly shortened', in response to industry feedback on the long processing time in the past, he said. Efforts are also being made to deepen Singapore's capital markets, with MAS now seeking feedback on proposals to streamline disclosure requirements and broaden investor outreach channels during initial public offerings. Asked further about how Singapore can maintain its competitiveness and resilience as a financial centre, Mr Chee noted that the Republic remains a stable, well-regulated and trusted hub for financial services and is more conservative than other economies. However, he added that being overly conservative may mean missing out pockets of opportunities in new technologies, business models, products and services – areas that Singapore should be prepared to explore with the appropriate safeguards in place. 'This is is where balance needs to be struck, and for us, moving from where we are to where we want to be, my view is we can probably afford to take a little bit more risk, but not all the way, because we don't want to affect our overall reputation as a trusted, stable financial centre.' Kang Wan Chern is deputy business editor at The Straits Times. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store