Maharashtra gives ‘permanent guest' status to CJI Gavai, lists out protocol
Two days after Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai expressed his disappointment at the absence of senior state officials at a felicitation event held in his honour during his first visit to the state after taking office, the Maharashtra government on Tuesday accorded 'permanent guest' status to the CJI.
In a circular issued by the state government, it chalked out the protocol to be followed by the state administration and officers during CJI's visit to Maharashtra. The circular issued by the General Administration Department headed by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis strictly directs the authorities to follow the instructions in letter and spirit.
The circular has made it mandatory for the chief secretary, the Director General of Police or their representatives to be present during CJI's visit to Mumbai.
The circular reads, 'Henceforth, CJI will be entitled permanent guest status… All the protocols, including presence of senior IAS/ IPS officers of departments concerned, will have to be adhered during CJI's visit in Mumbai and rest of Maharashtra.'
In other districts of Maharashtra, it has made it compulsory for the senior most district administration officers, police commissioner and their representatives to attend to the CJI whenever he/she visits their respective districts. According to the circular, if any VVIP is visiting the districts, it will be mandatory for the departments concerned to depute a coordinating officer as was in practice. A district officer of Class I grade has to be deputed for coordination.
During his first visit after taking over as CJI on May 14 to his home state of Maharashtra on Sunday, CJI Gavai expressed his disappointment about the absence of senior state officials. 'Every organ of the Constitution must… give its due respect to the other,' he said at the event organised by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa.
'We say that there are three pillars of democracy — judiciary, legislature and executive, and that they are equal. Every organ of the Constitution must reciprocate and give its due respect to the other organs. A person from Maharashtra is coming to the state as Chief Justice of India for the first time. If Maharashtra's Chief Secretary, the state's Director General of Police or the Mumbai Commissioner of Police do not feel it necessary to come, it is for them to think about, ' he said.
Later, Chief Secretary Sujata Saunik, DGP Rashmi Shukla and Mumbai Commissioner of Police P Deven Bharti were present when CJI Gavai visited Chaityabhoomi to pay tribute to Dr BR Ambedkar.
Stating he was not particular about protocol and preferred travelling to his hometown Amravati and Nagpur without pilot escort, CJI Gavai said, 'It is a question of respect towards the judiciary by other organs. If the head of an institution is coming to the state for the first time and he is from the state itself, whether their conduct was proper, is something they should think about.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
US court declines Republican request to intervene in Pennsylvania voting dispute
The US Supreme Court passed up a chance to give politicians more power over how federal elections are conducted, declining on Friday to hear a Republican challenge to a Pennsylvania judicial decision requiring the counting of provisional ballots cast by voters who make mistakes on their mail-in justices turned away an appeal by the Republican National Committee and Republican Party of Pennsylvania of a decision by Pennsylvania's top court on provisional ballots that the plaintiffs said ran afoul of legislature-crafted voting rules, violating the US Constitution's election-related dispute returned to the Supreme Court after the justices, on the eve of the November 2024 presidential election, rejected the emergency bid by the Republicans to block tallying the provisional ballots. The Republicans objected to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's October ruling in favour of two Butler County voters who sought to have their provisional ballots counted after their mail-in ballots were rejected during that state's 2024 presidential primary election for lacking secrecy rules in states like Pennsylvania that often play a pivotal role in determining the outcome of US presidential elections are a particularly sensitive President Donald Trump prevailed in Pennsylvania last November, but lost the state in 2020 to his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, who won the presidency that case follows a major 2023 Supreme Court ruling that allows the justices to second-guess state courts if they undermine the power that the Constitution gives state legislatures to craft election 6-3 ruling, which upheld a North Carolina state court's decision that invalidated a Republican-drawn congressional map as unlawfully disadvantaging Democrats, also rejected a more extreme theory advanced by many Republicans and conservatives that would have removed any role of state courts and state constitutions in regulating federal ruling, however, stopped short of announcing a legal test for determining when state courts have ventured too far in "arrogating to themselves" a legislature's the Pennsylvania case, Republicans asked the Supreme Court to answer that question, contending that the state supreme court's ruling violated the Constitution's elections provisions, including that the "times, places and manner" of federal elections "shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof."Provisional ballots generally protect voters from being excluded from the voting process if their eligibility is uncertain on Election Day. The vote is counted once officials confirm intervened to defend Butler County's decision not to count the ballots from these voters, saying Pennsylvania's election law does not allow provisional ballots to be counted if a mail-in ballot was received on time by a county board of intervened on the side of the voters, contending that if a mail-in ballot is defective and cannot be counted, that person has not yet voted and a provisional ballot must be divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court last October sided with the voters, saying that provisional ballots prevent double voting while protecting voters' right to have one vote action by the court was unexpected. The court had planned to release it on Monday along with its other regularly scheduled orders, but a software glitch on Friday prematurely sent email notifications concerning the court's decision in the case. "As a result, the court is issuing that order list now," said court spokesperson Patricia is not the first time the court has inadvertently disclosed action in sensitive cases. Last year, an apparent draft of a ruling in a case involving emergency abortion access in Idaho was briefly uploaded to the court's website before being taken down. That disclosure represented an embarrassment for the top US judicial body, coming two years after the draft of a blockbuster ruling rolling back abortion rights was leaked in InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#United States of America
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
North Korea internet hit by a major outage, analyst says
North Korea is grappling with a significant internet outage, impacting key websites like its main news outlets and the Foreign Ministry. A UK-based researcher suggests the disruption, affecting all internet routes, appears to be internal rather than a cyberattack. The country's entire internet infrastructure is currently undetectable by monitoring systems, raising questions about the cause. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads North Korea's internet is experiencing a major outage on Saturday, said a UK-based researcher, adding that the cause may be may be internal rather than a cyberattack North Korea's main news web sites and its Foreign Ministry internet site were inaccessible on Saturday morning, according to checks by Reuters."A major outage is currently occurring on North Korea's internet - affecting all routes whether they come in via China or Russia," said Junade Ali, a U.K.-based researcher who monitors the North Korean Korea's entire internet infrastructure is not showing up on systems that can monitor internet activities, he said."Hard to say if this is intentional or accidental - but seems like this is internal rather than an attack," he at South Korea 's Police cyber terror response centre which monitors North Korea's cyber activities could not be reached for comment.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Cash controversy: SC should allow filing of FIR against justice Varma, says Dhankhar
Vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar on Friday asserted that in the backdrop of the indictment of justice Yashwant Varma by a panel appointed by the Supreme Court in the 'cash' seizure case, the judiciary should have given permission for launching criminal proceedings against him. Dhankhar, during a meeting with the executive committee members of Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association led by president, Sartej Narula at Punjab Raj Bhawan in Chandigarh on Friday morning, also said that the present government at the Centre is 'handicapped' in the given scenario and can't register an FIR due to a Supreme Court judgment, passed three decades ago. 'It (judgment) provides virtually impregnable cover. Unless permission is accorded by a functionary at the highest level in the judiciary, an FIR can't be registered,' Dhankhar remarked. 'The permission (to register FIR) should have been given on the very first day. …A compulsive, expedient situation should have been there because the mechanism evolved is the same. Second, it could have been given at least after the report,' added Dhankhar, who arrived in Chandigarh on Thursday. After spending a day at the Punjab Raj Bhawan, he headed to Himachal Pradesh. Dhankhar emphasised that judges need protection because they make 'tough decisions and cannot be subjected to investigation in a routine way. 'But the facts of this case warranted a proper probe,' he stated. While referring to the panel of three judges set up by the Supreme Court, Dhankhar, questioned the sanctity of the committee and said, whether the report submitted is 'actionable' and whether this committee can substitute for an FIR investigation. Dhankhar equated those indulging in corruption with 'sharks' and said that they must not be spared. He underlined that no other constitutional office has immunity from facing criminal action while in office. The President and the governors have immunity from prosecution only till they are in office, he further remarked. Dhankhar appreciated the role of Bar associations in the country in picking up this issue and said that lawyers are 'watchdogs' of democracy. On May 5, a three-member in-house enquiry committee submitted its report to the then CJI confirming that cash was indeed found at the residence of justice Varma in March, then a sitting Delhi high court judge. Acting on the same, then CJI Sanjiv Khanna initiated the process for the removal of justice Varma by writing to the government. Reports suggest that the government might move an impeachment motion against justice Varma in the Monsoon session.
