Justin Mohn, accused of beheading father and posting video of his severed head, to stand trial Monday
Mohn, 33, faces charges of murder, abuse of a corpse, terrorism related crimes and other offenses for the 2024 killing of Michael F. Mohn at the Levittown home where they lived with the defendant's mother. She found her husband's body in a bathroom.
Prosecutors have said Justin Mohn shot his father with a newly purchased pistol, then decapitated him with a kitchen knife and machete. The 14-minute YouTube video was live for several hours before it was removed.
Mohn was armed with a handgun when arrested later that day after allegedly climbing a 20-foot (6-meter) fence at Fort Indiantown Gap, the state's National Guard headquarters. He had hoped to get the soldiers to "mobilize the Pennsylvania National Guard to raise arms against the federal government," Bucks County District Attorney Jennifer Schorn said at a news conference last year.
Mohn had a USB device containing photos of federal buildings and apparent instructions for making explosives when arrested, authorities have said.
He also had expressed violent anti-government rhetoric in writings he published online, and the YouTube video included rants about the government, immigration and the border, fiscal policy, urban crime and the war in Ukraine.
Mohn's defense attorney, Steven M. Jones, said last week he did not anticipate the case being resolved with a plea deal.
Michael Mohn, who was 68, had been an engineer with the geoenvironmental section of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In the video, Justin Mohn described his father as a 20-year federal employee and called him a traitor.
During a competency hearing last year, a defense expert said Mohn wrote a letter to Russia's ambassador to the United States seeking a deal to give Mohn refuge and apologizing to President Vladimir Putin for claiming to be the czar of Russia. A judge ruled that Mohn was competent to stand trial.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump threatens to escalate trade war amid confusion over new tariff rates
Donald Trump vowed to further escalate his trade wars on Tuesday, threatening US tariffs of up to 200% on foreign drugs and 50% on copper, amid widespread confusion around his shifting plans. Hours after saying his latest deadline for a new wave of steep duties was 'not 100% firm', the US president declared that 'no extensions will be granted' beyond 1 August. 'There has been no change to this date, and there will be no change,' Trump wrote on social media, a day after signing an executive order that changed the date from 9 July. Related: Trump tariffs explained: what's changed and why have Asian countries been hit so hard? On Monday, he announced plans to impose US tariffs of up to 40% on goods imported from 14 countries, including Bangladesh, Japan and South Korea. But he extended a pause on the duties' introduction, allowing three more weeks for negotiations. More letters will be sent to countries, informing them of new tariff rates 'today, tomorrow, and for the next short period of time', according to Trump. Global stock markets have largely shrugged off the latest threats. On Wall Street, the benchmark S&P 500 was up just 0.03% and the Dow Jones industrial average was down 0.3%. In recent weeks, some investors appear to have embraced the Taco – or Trump Always Chickens Out – trade. Speaking on Tuesday at the White House, Trump laid out plans to step up his controversial trade strategy, which economists have warned risks exacerbating inflation. Imported copper will face a US tariff of 50% in a bid to bolster US production of the metal, the administration announced. US copper prices rose 12% to hit record levels. After providing manufacturers with around a year or a year and a half's notice, pharmaceutical imports are also 'going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate', the president said. 'Like 200%.' 'We're going to be announcing pharmaceuticals, chips and various couple of other things – you know, big ones,' he added, of the administration's tariff plans.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ruling settles debate on Albuquerque Fire Rescue staffing requirements
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – It's been around for nearly two decades, but an obscure Albuquerque Committee designed to break up fights between the mayor and Albuquerque City Council has now made its first-ever ruling, stepping into a debate over who holds power over staffing Albuquerque firefighters. Story continues below Trending: VIDEO: ICE agents use taser to detain man at Albuquerque Walmart Strange: New Mexico paranormal enthusiast shares experiences with otherworldly entities Events: What's happening in New Mexico July 11-17? NM Tattoo Fiesta and more News: New Mexico resident speaks out after his father was killed in Ruidoso flood It was met with controversy back in March, a rushed new rule from Albuquerque City Councilors requiring two firefighter-paramedics per every rescue vehicle in AFR's fleet. It's something Fire Chief Emily Jaramillo did not support. 'Our administration is really the subject matter expert here, and the fact that we weren't able to provide input is very concerning,' said Jaramillo. Now, the chief said she's relieved after a little-known city committee stepped in. 'I appreciate the ICC for evaluating this,' said Jaramillo. The 'ICC' is Albuquerque's Intragovernmental Conference Committee, a three-person board meant to settle disputes between council and the mayor. That group just shot down the council's newer rule setting AFR staffing requirements. 'We're pleased that the ICC has confirmed that staffing decisions lie with the administration. You know, this is a confirmation of what Mayor's past and Mayor's future obviously need to have as their authority for staffing at the City of Albuquerque,' said CABQ Chief Administrative Officer Samantha Sengel. Reacting to the decision, Councilor Dan Lewis called it a failure, saying in part, 'The city council simply approved a staffing amendment based on recommendations from medics in the field and supported by real data showing it will improve public safety.' The Mayor's Office said they are ready to move forward. 'This decision is bigger than this one question being asked; this is about the opportunity for us to be clear that every department in the city staffing decision lies within the authority of the administration,' said Sengel. For now, Chief Jaramillo said her department is going back to the drawing board. The original intent of their staffing change was to allow certain crews to respond to medical and fire calls quicker. 'We are always re-evaluating that, so now that we know that we have that authority back to make those decisions, we're kinda re-evaluating the data, which really hasn't changed that much,' said Jaramillo. The fight linked to these staffing rule changes isn't over. There's still a district court lawsuit pending over the separation of powers between the mayor and city council. There's also a labor board complaint alleging violations of the fire union's collective bargaining agreement. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Butler by Salena Zito review – how Trump won America's heartland
The Democrats' famed blue wall is more the stuff of nostalgia than reality. On election day 2024, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin voted for Donald Trump for the second time in three elections. Barack Obama's upstairs-downstairs coalition lies in ruins, as Democrats struggle to connect with working-class voters across racial and ethnic lines. Last November, Trump came within just three points of winning a majority of Latino voters. Such Americans walked away from their presumed political home – in droves. A Trump endorsement by Roberto Clemente Jr, son of the late Pittsburgh Pirates baseball star, was a harbinger. Likewise, Trump posted double-digit gains among Catholics and Jews, once core constituencies in the Democratic party of FDR. To quote Bob Dylan, 'The times, they are a changin'.' Into the fray jumps Salena Zito with her latest book, Butler, and its dramatic subtitle, The Untold Story of the Near Assassination of Donald Trump and the Fight for America's Heartland. Zito is definitely a Trump fan, living in western Pennsylvania, a place that's become part of Trumplandia. No wonder: her analysis is sharp-eyed and her anecdotes revealing – she walks among Them. Beyond that, she possesses roots and an affinity for her 'Yinzers'. These days, she writes for the Washington Examiner and is a contributor to the Washington Post. Last time out, with The Great Revolt, co-authored with Brad Todd in 2018, she painted a portrait of Trump's base that was not standard GOP-issue and a Democratic party overly reliant on coastal elites. That take remains valid. Other than in faculty meetings, you can't win elections solely with the votes of JDs, MDs and PhDs. More voters lack four year-degrees than those who have them. Butler, turns to Butler, Pennsylvania, the site of the failed July 2024 assassination attempt on Trump, as a serendipitously fitting backdrop and fulcrum of the events that preceded and followed. She had access to the Trump, JD Vance and the senior staff of the campaign. Trump delivers bouquets of compliments. Zito is flattered, even enthusiastic. She enjoys the rapport, admires her subject. Trump is not a lab specimen or patient. She is not his psychologist. Rather, he talks to her, expresses concern about her grandchildren, and offers a lesson in politics 101: empathy goes far. On the page, Trump takes Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to task for waiting a year before appearing at the village of East Palestine, Ohio, the site of a major railcar disaster, 42 miles from Butler. 'They never showed up to see them,' Trump tells Zito. 'Never. It's a shame. I did, I came, I told them I would not forget them and I won't.' Ohio, Vance's state, went Republican by better than 10 points. All of Ohio's top elected officials are now Republicans. In polarized times, ticket-splitting grows rare. Elon Musk talked to Zito too. There's nothing like the zeal of a 12-figure convert, the world's richest person. Given the current fallout between Musk and Trump, it is memorable stuff, a bromance before it went off the rails. Butler unintentionally delivers a packet of receipts. 'I asked Musk if I could interview him, and he said: sure,' Zito recalls. ''Who are the ones that are trying to silence free speech? That's the Democrats,'' Musk advises. 'They're the ones trying to silence free speech,' he continues. 'You know who the bad guys are – the ones who want to stop you from speaking. Those are the bad guys. It's a no-brainer.' To put it mildly, irony abounds. Never mind what Musk did to X, formerly Twitter, in terms of promoting one sort of view and quashing another. Since their relationship turned to dust, Trump has threatened to deport Musk and cancel his government contracts. In hindsight, that the Trump-Musk relationship would last long would have been a bad bet. Musk vows to support primary challenges against Republicans who stuck with the president on his sweeping bill of cuts to taxes and spending. But whatever you think of the legislation or Musk, Trump holds a decisive advantage. Beyond the obvious, regarding simple power, Trump is a far better showman. Startling to say it, he is way less weird. Musk is the nerd who always wanted to hang with the cool kids. Zito devotes attention to the dichotomy between the 'placed' and the 'placeless' – 'people who are rooted in their places versus people who are essentially nomads' – and its relationship to politics and Trump. The placed are with him; the placeless, not so much. Such demographic faultlines are global. They played an outsized role in the fight over Brexit. Populism is not restricted to the US. In 2017, David Goodhart wrote Road to Somewhere, which examined the forces that drove Brexit. He placed a premium on describing how a sense of belonging has come to shape politics, in an uncertain world. His typology divided society between 'anywheres' and 'somewheres', with the archetypal anywhere possessing a degree or two from Oxbridge or the Ivy League, a portable skill set, and a spouse who shares similar credentials. By contrast, somewheres lack those markers, and find the world a less welcoming place. GDP figures and personal income statistics alone do not convey the entire story. In 2016, 'fuck your feelings' was a Trumpian battle cry – though those shouting it did not take kindly to being called deplorable by Hillary Clinton or, eight years later, being called 'garbage' by Biden. As expected, Zito calls out Clinton and Biden for their missteps. Trump or his base, not so much. Yeah, there's asymmetry. But if you're a Democrat, punching down is seldom a winning strategy. Butler is published in the US by Hachette
