Atlantic reporter: Waltz has ‘really lost key authority'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
What to know about the Trump-Putin summit and their previous encounters
President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss the possibility of peace in Ukraine. The big picture: Trump and Putin have met before, but arguably never with so much on the line geopolitically. Trump said Wednesday that Putin must agree to a ceasefire or face "serious consequences." Much, if not all, of the focus will be on the war between Russia and Ukraine. Trump described it as a "feel-out meeting" to see what Putin is prepared to offer, and how serious he is about making peace. But he also told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders that he hopes Putin will agree to a ceasefire, and ideally to a follow-up meeting involving Zelensky. Here's everything you need to know about the upcoming summit. Why are Trump and Putin meeting? Driving the news: The possibility of a presidential summit came up in a meeting last Wednesday between Putin and Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff. On Friday, Trump announced it would take place in Alaska. That announcement came as Trump's ceasefire-or-sanctions deadline for Putin expired, with Trump putting penalties for Putin on hold. "The President feels like, look, I've got to look at this guy across the table. ... I want to look this guy in the eye. I think we're going to know very early in that meeting whether this thing has any chance of success or not," Secretary of State Marco Rubio told radio host Sid Rosenberg on Tuesday. European and Ukrainian officials have been growing nervous that Trump will take Putin's side in the meeting and pressure Zelensky to make major concessions. When is the Trump-Putin meeting? The Trump-Putin summit is scheduled for Friday, Aug. 15. A specific time hasn't been announced yet. Trump has said he will call Zelensky and several European leaders after it's over to brief them. Where is the Trump-Putin meeting? The presidents are expected to meet in Anchorage, Alaska. No precise location has been announced, but CNN reports it will take place at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base. While Trump misspoke twice during a press conference on Monday by saying he was going to Russia, Putin will definitely be visiting U.S. soil. The White House declined to comment on the meeting's specific location. What will Putin and Trump discuss? The leaders will discuss terms for a potential peace deal in Ukraine, though Trump has said only Russia and Ukraine can make any final agreements. Putin has already raised the possibility of claiming two territories in Ukraine (Donetsk and Luhansk), while holding Russia's current positions in Zaporizhia and Kherson. Ukrainian officials have dismissed similar proposals in the past. Their current position is that they may be prepared to make difficult concessions, but only after Russia agrees to a ceasefire. Trump suggested in a Wednesday call that "land swaps" would be needed in any peace deal, but that it would be up to Putin and Zelensky. Yes, but: Trump and Putin have been on particularly unfriendly terms in recent weeks, with Trump growing frustrated as Putin has declined to agree to a ceasefire or negotiate in earnest. "I believe, he wants to get [the war] over with," Trump said of Putin on Monday. "Now, I've said that few times and I've been disappointed." When did Trump and Putin last meet? Flashback: Trump and Putin had several meetings during Trump 1.0, but have only spoken by phone since Trump returned to the White House. They last met in 2019 at the G-20 Summit in Osaka, Japan, where Trump playfully told Putin not to meddle in the 2020 presidential election. Before that, they met in Helsinki in 2018 at a bilateral summit that lasted over two hours. Critics called this a humiliating meeting for Trump because the president accepted Putin's claim that Russia didn't interfere in the 2016 presidential election without any pushback. Trump and Putin were supposed to meet at G-20 Summit in Buenos Aires in 2018, but Trump canceled that meeting two days prior after Russia seized Ukrainian ships. They still reportedly had an informal chat during the summit. When did Trump and Putin meet for the first time? Trump and Putin first met at the G-20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, back in July meeting lasted more than two hours despite being scheduled for 30 minutes.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Washington, DC crime reporter turned victim speaks out, says Trump recognizes ‘major issue' impacting lives
While much of the legacy media has downplayed or dismissed crime in Washington, D.C., on the heels of the Trump administration's crackdown, one journalist decided to speak out about a horrific attack that changed the course of her life. President Donald Trump announced the federalization of Washington, D.C.'s police force on Monday, an unprecedented move taken by no prior U.S. president. D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb condemned the move, insisting there is "no crime emergency" in the nation's capital, and many liberal pundits and mainstream news outlets have suggested Trump is overreaching. New York Times reporter Peter Baker called it a "nonexistent crime crisis," while CNN and MSNBC filled their shows with guests to slam Trump's move. A variety of outlets harped on data that violent crime in D.C. is down by 26% this year, and many others insisted the move is simply a "distraction." In 2020, during the early stages of the COVID pandemic, Anna Giaritelli took a Saturday morning stroll in what she believed was a "really safe part of town" near Union Station, only a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol. At the time, Giaritelli covered crime and civil unrest for the Washington Examiner, but she had no idea she was about to become a victim herself. "I was randomly attacked by a homeless man and fought with him for my life and survived. And that event has had a significant impact on my life, changed the course of my life," Giaritelli told Fox News Digital. Giaritelli was injured and sexually abused during the horrific attack. Police used DNA found on her clothing to determine that the suspect was a repeat offender and already in their system. She said he was finally arrested "months later" and a "judge chose to release him onto the streets" before his trial. Giaritelli planned to live in Washington, D.C., for "decades," but the harrowing ordeal changed her plans. She first moved to another part of town, hoping the distance would allow her to remain in the city, but frustration continued to grow. "Through the year and a half that we waited for our case to go to trial, this man was arrested five more times, including for wielding a machete on Capitol Hill. And the judge chose in all five times to release him from jail back onto the street," Giaritelli said. "I didn't feel protected by the judicial system. I didn't feel safe in Washington, D.C. because of these decisions by the courts," she continued. "And so ultimately, I had to take my own safety into concern, and I left D.C. with nowhere to go really, trying to figure out how to start a life and what that would look like somewhere else." Giaritelli believes the police worked extremely hard to put her attacker behind bars ahead of his trial but the decision by the court "enabled him to victimize more and more people." "I found out at sentencing that he [assaulted] an off-duty police officer, a woman, several weeks, months prior to what he did to me. So, this was an individual that had a clear trajectory and as much as police wanted to keep him off the streets, the courts would not let them do that," Giaritelli said. "He was sentenced to federal prison in 2022," Giaritelli continued. "He has since been released from federal prison and to my knowledge is back in Washington, D.C." Giaritelli, who moved to Texas and began covering homeland security, immigration and border issues for the Washington Examiner, said the attack completely changed the trajectory of her career. "Trying to work in politics and media, you're limited to what you can do if you're not actually in Washington," Giaritelli said. "I don't know where I would be now if I was still living in D.C." Giaritelli was extremely grateful the Examiner allowed her to switch beats and work remotely, but she was in a "bad place for months," and initially found it very difficult to adapt to life in a new city. "I've recovered. I've done a lot of work in therapy… to get to a good place," she said. The journalist was eager to hear other victims speak out, not just about the crime issue and needing more police, but also about "the courts and making sure people who are a danger to the public are not released." But many victims remain silent, so Giaritelli decided to share her own story with an emotional social media post that began, "For people who say they don't know a DC crime victim... Hi, I'm Anna." "I wanted to be part of the solution," she said. "I think the Trump administration recognizes… this isn't a one-off. This is a mass problem that we've seen for years." Giaritelli plans to release a book that answers many questions she had five years ago. "What is it like as a victim? Are the thoughts I'm having, is the anxiety and the depression, is this all normal? Is this what people go through? And so, I wrote a book really aimed at women in particular who've been through sexual assault, been through different crimes, and come out and say, 'Now what? How do I get back the rest of my life?' And that was what I wanted to put forward," Giaritelli said. Giaritelli, who was hesitant to offer her take on the Trump administration's crackdown because of her role as a working journalist, wants Americans to understand that crime remains a serious issue in the nation's capital. "I think President Trump is taking action because the people around him who live in Washington, D.C., have brought this to his attention and know that this is a major issue," she said.
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Israel says it is in talks with several countries about taking in displaced Palestinians
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says talks are underway with several countries about taking in Palestinians displaced by the war in Gaza. The countries involved are South Sudan, Somaliland, Ethiopia, Libya, and Indonesia, a senior Israeli official told CNN. In exchange for taking in some of Gaza's population of more than two million people, the official said the countries are looking for 'significant financial and international compensation.' On Wednesday, South Sudan rejected an Associated Press report that it was in discussions about the resettlement of Palestinians, saying in a statement the reports were 'baseless and do not reflect the official position' of the country. Earlier this year, Somaliland also said there were no such talks. And last week, Indonesia said it was ready to take in 2,000 Palestinians from Gaza for treatment but that they would return to Gaza once they recovered. It's unclear how advanced any of these discussions are and whether they are likely to come to fruition. Netanyahu has never given a detailed vision of what will happen to Gaza after the war but has repeatedly advocated for resettling displaced Palestinians in other countries, particularly after President Donald Trump floated the idea early this year. But even as Trump appears to be cooling on the proposal, Israeli officials have embraced it. In an interview published on Tuesday, Netanyahu said, 'we are talking to several countries' without naming them. Netanyahu claimed in the interview with Israeli network i24 that the plan was 'not pushing out' Palestinians but would instead be 'allowing them to leave.' 'All those who say they're concerned for the Palestinians and want to help Palestinians,' Netanyahu said should 'open their doors.' 'Why are they coming and preaching to us?! Open your doors,' he added. The comments come as international alarm grows over Israel's stated plan to take over Gaza City, home to more than one million Palestinians, including many already displaced by the war. The densely populated city has continued to be hit by Israeli strikes with at least 123 people killed over the last 24 hours across Gaza, according to a tally on Wednesday from the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry. More than 100 humanitarian organisations meanwhile called on Israel to end what they called the weaponization of aid in Gaza, saying vital relief was not being allowed in while the territory is gripped by starvation. Shaina Low, Communications Adviser for the Norwegian Refugee Council, said any plans to relocate Palestinians, whether within Gaza or to foreign countries, was 'a non-starter.' 'They aren't acceptable under international law. They aren't acceptable to Palestinians. And they should not be acceptable to the international community,' Low told CNN. During the interview, Netanyahu was also asked by i24News network anchor Sharon Gal whether the prime minister 'connects' to the vision of a 'Greater Israel,' to which he responded, 'Very much.' The term 'Greater Israel' refers to a state of Israel that is beyond the borders that exist today. It is also often used as a reference to Biblical Israel, which would include parts of today's Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon. The comments were greeted by sharp statements from several Arab states, which condemned the use of the term as provocative and counterproductive to peace. Egypt 'demanded clarifications' on the use of the term, 'given its implications of provoking instability and reflecting a rejection of the pursuit of peace in the region, as well as an insistence on escalation,' according to a foreign ministry statement. Saudi Arabia said it 'expresses its outright rejection of the settlement and expansionist plans adopted by the Israeli occupation authorities.' Qatar said the use of the term is considered 'an extension of the occupation's approach based on arrogance, fuelling crises and conflicts, and blatantly infringing the sovereignty of states.' Gal and Netanyahu's conversation about 'Greater Israel' did not appear on the official channel's full interview, but a longer version with Netanyahu's comments was posted on Gal's account on X.
