Keir Starmer urged to use his 'power' to end Birmingham bin strike
The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) called on Sir Keir Starmer and his deputy Angela Rayner to step in to deliver a "decent settlement" to the bitter row over the scrapping of a role which would lead to some workers losing £8,000 a year.
Members of Unite the Union have been on an indefinite strike since March 11, leading to bags of rubbish piling up across the city.
FBU general secretary Steve Wright said unions affiliated to Labour, like the FBU, would not tolerate a 'betrayal' by the party - drawing comparisons to high-profile disputes in the late 1990s that he says Tony Blair's Labour government failed to intervene in.
Steve Wright said: 'The treatment of the bin workers has been outrageous.
'It's a disgrace that a Labour-led council forced these dedicated public servants to go on strike by attempting to cut their pay by thousands of pounds.
'The Prime Minister and his deputy cannot stand by any longer and allow this attack on the jobs and wages of these workers who have lost their family incomes and faced dire poverty for many months.
'Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner could easily resolve this dispute by insisting that Birmingham Council halts the planned pay cuts and compensates the bin workers for all lost earnings.
'The leadership of the Labour government has the power to do this, and there must be no excuses.
'Nearly 30 years ago, Tony Blair's Labour government failed to intervene in favour of the Liverpool dockers, Magnet strikers in Darlington, and Hillingdon hospital workers.
'Unions affiliated to Labour like the FBU that help fund the party's election campaigns will not tolerate a repeat of this betrayal of striking workers.'
The council insists its move is aimed at improving the waste and recycling service, adding that affected workers have been offered other jobs.
A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'The Government has been working intensively with the council to tackle the backlog and clean up the streets in the interests of Birmingham residents and public health.
'The Government remains committed to supporting Birmingham's long-term transformation, for the benefit of local residents, and to a sustainable resolution of the equal pay issues which have been left unresolved for far too long.'
Unite has suspended Ms Rayner's membership of the union and is re-examining its relationship with Labour as a result of the dispute.
The city council said this month all its offers had been rejected by the union, sparking fears of redundancies. But Unite warned bin workers could make unfair dismissal claims.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump backs Israel and rebukes Starmer over Palestinian state recognition
Donald Trump has doubled down on his backing for Israel after having appeared to give a green light to the British prime minister, Keir Starmer, to recognize a Palestinian state. Amid signs of mounting opposition among his Maga base to Israel's military operation in Gaza, Trump criticized Starmer's plan to grant recognition as 'rewarding Hamas' even after having not taken issue with it when the pair met in Scotland this week. Talking to journalists on board Air Force One on his return to Washington, Trump said the US was 'not in that camp', referring to Starmer's pledge, which followed a similar declaration by Emmanuel Macron, the French president, days earlier that France would formally recognize Palestinian statehood. 'We never did discuss it,' Trump said, in reference to Starmer's announcement. He added: 'You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded.' His comments were in line with the US state department, whose spokesperson, Tammy Bruce, called the recognition decision 'a slap in the face' to victims of Hamas's deadly 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the current war. But they contrasted with his restrained stance when he and Starmer met at Turnberry in Scotland on Monday, after the UK premier said Britain would give recognition by September unless Israel met certain conditions, including allowing for a ceasefire in Gaza and allowing UN food aid to enter the territory to feed its population. 'I'm not going to take a position, I don't mind him taking a position,' Trump told reporters when asked if he objected to Starmer's move. The US president's response to Starmer seemed markedly softer than his riposte after Macron's statehood announcement last week, which angered Israel and its supporters. 'What he says doesn't matter,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'He's a very good guy. I like him, but that statement doesn't carry weight.' The initial softer public posture toward Starmer came as Trump publicly contradicted Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, over conditions in Gaza, which numerous international aid agencies have described as famine. Netanyahu had said that, in contrast to the aid group assessments and searing images of hungry children, no one was starving in Gaza. Asked if he agreed, Trump said: 'Based on television, I would say 'not particularly', because those children look pretty hungry to me. There's real starvation, you can't fake that.' Some of Trump's most prominent supporters have become increasingly vocal in their criticism of Israel's conduct, amid polling evidence that Americans generally are losing sympathy for a country that has traditionally been viewed as one of the US's closest allies. Steve Bannon, Trump's former adviser and still one of his leading cheerleaders with his War Room podcast, told Politico that the president's condemnation of the food situation in Gaza would hasten Israel's loss of support among his base. 'It seems that for the under-30-year-old Maga base, Israel has almost no support, and Netanyahu's attempt to save himself politically by dragging America in deeper to another Middle East war has turned off a large swath of older Maga diehards,' Bannon said. 'Now President Trump's public repudiation of one of the central tenets of [Netanyahu's] Gaza strategy – 'starving' Palestinians – will only hasten a collapse of support.' Another Trump supporter, the far-right Georgia representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, became the latest – and perhaps most surprising – public figure to label Israel's actions in Gaza 'genocide'. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' she posted on X. The comments came as a new Gallup poll showed support among Americans for Israel's actions in Gaza down to 32%, the lowest since the organization began asking the question in November 2023 – a month after the murderous Hamas raid that killed 1,200 mostly Israeli civilians and led to another 250 to be taken hostage. Israel's military response has led to around 60,000 Palestinians being killed, according to the Gaza health ministry. While Gallup's poll showed support for Israel's offensive still high, at 71%, among Republicans, Thom Tillis, a GOP senator for North Carolina who plans to step down at the next election, said Gaza could be a political problem for Trump, the Hill reported. 'I think that the American people at the end of the day are a kind people. They don't like seeing suffering, nor do I think the president does,' Tillis said. 'If you see starvation, you try to fix it.' Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, told Fox News that Trump's backing for Netanyahu remained unshaken. 'Let me assure you that there is no break between the prime minister of Israel and the president,' he told Fox News. 'Their relationship, I think, [is] stronger than it's ever been, and I think the relationship between the U.S. and Israel is as strong as it's ever been.'
The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tory councillor's wife jailed for racist Southport tweet will be released from prison within WEEKS
A CHILDMINDER jailed for calling for migrant hotels to be set on fire on the day of the Southport attack will be released in weeks. Lucy Connolly, 41, was sent to prison for 31 months in October after being found guilty of inciting racial hatred. She will go free from HMP Peterborough in August having served 40 per cent of her term, The Sun understands. Her tweet, which was viewed more than 300,000 times before she deleted it, said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f* hotels full of the b** for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.' It had been prompted by false rumours that the suspect behind the murder of three girls at a dance class in Southport was an illegal immigrant. Connolly, from Northampton, the wife of a former Tory councillor, lost an appeal to reduce her sentence in May. Nigel Farage has previously called for her release and called her jail term 'absolutely excessive'. Speaking at an event in May he said: 'I want to make it absolutely clear: Lucy Connolly should not be in prison. "While she should not have said what she said, understand there were millions of mothers at that moment in time after Southport feeling exactly the same way.' And Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'People have received less time in jail — or no time — for actual physical and sexual assaults.' Kemi Badenoch has called the punishment 'disproportionately severe'. Sir Keir Starmer has defended the sentence, saying he would 'always support' the UK court system. I couldn't breathe & felt I was dying after Southport killer knifed me in spine… I knew from his eyes he wanted to kill us 1
The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump was absolutely right to trash UK's energy policy – here's how your bills will FALL if Miliband listens
I CAN only imagine that Ed Miliband has been locked in a cupboard for the past four days, lest he spoil Sir Keir Starmer's somewhat forced friendship with Donald Trump. How else to explain his remarkable silence in the face of the US President trashing Britain's energy policy on his golfing trip to Turnberry? 4 4 Trump made several statements which would normally be a red rag to Miliband. He called wind energy a 'con job' and complained that turbines are spoiling the view from his golf course. The following day he doubled down by attacking the Government's policy of denying licences for new gas and oil extraction. Reversing the policy, he asserted on his Truth Social account, would mean 'a vast fortune to be made for the UK' and would lower bills for UK energy consumers. But where was Ed to tell us that wind and solar energy is going to help save us £300 a year on our bills? Low wind speeds Nor did Starmer enter the fray. He sat next to Trump expressionless as the President tore into UK policy on Net Zero and other policies, too. It is too much to hope Starmer and Miliband might have come round to thinking Trump may actually have a point? Trump might not always be the best-informed person on UK politics but on this he is absolutely right. The Scottish government has compromised one of its greatest assets — its landscape — by embracing wind power so enthusiastically, onshore and offshore. But it is simply not providing us with affordable, reliable energy. Subsidised investment in wind turbines has run well ahead of what the national grid can cope with. Last year, UK energy consumers were forced to cough up £1.5BILLION in 'constraint payments' to compensate wind farm owners when they have to turn off their turbines when they are generating too much power to be fed into the grid. At other times — often in winter when the demand for power is greatest — the output from wind turbines falls to less than one per cent of UK energy demand. Three years ago, Miliband and others started trying to tell us that wind energy was 'nine times cheaper than electricity generated by gas'. It wasn't true then. The comparison was arrived at by comparing the long-term, guaranteed prices offered to wind farms with the rates which have to be paid to the owners of gas plants to turn them on for a few hours to fill in gaps when the wind isn't blowing. 4 4 But it is even less true now. For years, the price of wind energy seemed to fall and fall, but that was sharply reversed as soon as interest rates began to rise and the cost of raw materials shot up. Miliband is so desperate to get his turbines built that in the latest round of wind power auctions he has offered investors a guaranteed price of £113 per megawatt-hour of electricity they generate. That is half as much again as we are currently paying for electricity generated by gas. The UK's energy policy ignores another problem. As confirmed in the latest State of the Climate Policy published by the Met Office and Royal Meteorological Society earlier this month, Britain is steadily becoming less windy — a climatic trend which we tend to hear little about. Yesterday, investment trust Greencoat UK Wind warned that its turbines generated 14 per cent less power than it had predicted in the past six months thanks to low wind speeds. If Britain's Net Zero policy really is saving us money, then how come we have the highest electricity prices in the world, according to the International Energy Agency? In 2023, UK consumers paid an average of 36.4 pence for their electricity and 10.2 pence for their gas. US consumers paid the equivalent of 12.9 pence and four pence respectively. And, no, it is not because we are over-reliant on gas. Last year, we generated 29.2 per cent of our electricity from gas and 30 per cent from wind. In the US the corresponding figures were 42.5 per cent and 10.3 per cent. Trump might be exaggerating a little when he says there are 'vast fortunes' to be made in the North Sea. The industry has been in decline for the past two decades as fields are worked out. Driving up bills Nevertheless, the trade body Offshore Energies UK still estimates there are 7.5BILLION barrels-worth to be recovered off Britain's coast — about a fifth as much as has been extracted since the 1960s. Moreover, there are enough shale gas reserves beneath Britain to power the country, at the current rate of consumption, for 47 years, according to one estimate. Banning fracking, and refusing licences for new production, is certainly making us more reliant on imports — and on the 'fossil fuel dictators' Miliband keeps talking about. It is driving up bills, too. It costs money to transport oil and gas long distances, especially the latter in the form of liquefied natural gas, on which we have come to rely more and more since the Ukraine invasion. Sometimes it takes an outsider to tell you where you are going wrong. Enthusiasts for Net Zero policies will damn Trump for his remarks but, sorry, he was right to say what he did — even if he broke diplomatic conventions to do so.
