Utah county clerks oppose bill that seeks to make several changes to elections
SALT LAKE CITY () — The Utah Clerks Association, which represents Utah's 29 county clerks, has penned an open letter to Utah's lawmakers opposing a bill that would reform how Utahns cast their ballots.
The bill is the . If passed, this bill would require voters to use the last four digits of their license or state ID on their ballot, change the deadline for when mailed-in ballots must be turned in, and — starting in 2028 — require voters to opt in to receive a ballot by mail.
New bill 'goes too far,' says Utah Chief Justice Matthew Durrant in letter to lawmakers
The Utah Clerks and Auditor Association said that while some concerns were addressed in the substitute version over the original bill, which sought to require mail-in ballots at a polling center, its letter to lawmakers said there are still 'critical' concerns.
In an interview with ABC4's Inside Utah Politics with Lindsay Aerts airing Sunday, Davis County Clerk Brian McKenzie explained that the 2028 runway to implement the opt-in option to vote by mail is not enough time to educate voters on the shift, which will disrupt the voting process.
McKenzie and Salt Lake County Clerk Lannie Chapman also argue that they don't have the equipment to efficiently verify voters' ID numbers, meaning they'll have to verify each number by hand.
'(Requiring ID) does add that level of security (to elections) but with that comes a huge time and resource component,' said Chapman. 'In order to accomplish this successfully, we're going to have to increase the amount of people that work with us.'
The bill also includes a deadline to opt in, currently set at 45 days before an election. McKenzie and Chapman argue that it is too far out and will increase the number of voters shifting to in-person voting because they didn't realize they had to opt in.
In addition, the clerks say they are worried about disenfranchising tribal voters who may not have access to a state ID, which has the potential to get the state sued.
'If the State of Utah is going to be making these significant policy shifts in how people vote, we want to make sure that we are minimizing the negative impacts on our voters,' said McKenzie.
McKenzie said the voters who are less in tune with politics — the ones who vote only during presidential election years — would be the most impacted by the changes proposed by Utah lawmakers.
When asked whether the clerk's concerns give him pause on the bill's impact on voters, its Senate Sponsor Mike McKell (R- Spanish Fork) said, 'It doesn't give me pause, it gives me something to work on this weekend,' he said.
McKell wouldn't specify which provisions he was willing to budge on, only that negotiations were ongoing.
'I think they were disappointed that some of their concerns weren't fully addressed as it came over (from the House), but we are going to continue to work with the clerks,' he said. 'I think they're probably concerns that I share and we're going to continue to work on it,' he said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Republicans reject ranked choice voting nationwide. Why?
The conservative backlash against ranked choice voting grew to over one-third of U.S. states last week as Iowa became the 17th Republican-controlled legislature in less than four years to ban the alternative voting system. Besides Iowa, states prohibiting ranked choice voting this year include Arkansas, Kansas, North Dakota, West Virginia and Wyoming. These states follow on the heels of Florida and Tennessee that turned against the once-popular voting system in 2022. Unlike Utah, none of these 17 states ever implemented ranked choice voting, which is marketed by its cheerleaders as a way to give voters more options, incentivize centrist election outcomes and turn down the temperature of political rhetoric. But the Beehive State, too, may be seeing enthusiasm wane for its experiment with ranked choice voting. Some municipalities that tested the unique process have reported unintuitive election results, voter confusion and decreased turnout. There is also a partisan element. Along with mail-in ballots and voter roll cleanup, ranked choice voting has been thrown into the middle of a nationwide debate over how to increase trust in election results. 'It's gotten caught in the political division that's in our country right now,' said Kelleen Potter, the executive director of Utah Ranked Choice Voting. Now, as the Utah Legislature's seven-year ranked choice voting pilot program comes to a close, Potter hopes lawmakers will allow local governments leaders who like the voting program to continue using it indefinitely. Over the past three municipal election cycles, two dozen Utah cities have used ranked choice voting. But after an initial burst of interest, the craze might be fizzling out. In 2019, two cities utilized ranked choice voting. In 2021, that number shot up to 23. In 2023, it fell to 12. And this year, only four cities plan to have ranked choice elections: Salt Lake City, South Salt Lake, Millcreek and Midvale. Ranked choice voting differs from America's traditional 'first-past-the-post' process, where each voter casts one ballot for one candidate. Instead, voters are asked to arrange candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives a majority of votes in the first round, the lowest vote-getter is eliminated and ballots are redistributed based on subsequent rankings until a candidate receives a majority. Advocates argue the process encourages candidates to seek broad support, opens the door for third parties and removes the pressure to vote for the lesser of two evils. 'It's done exactly what it was supposed to do,' Potter said of the pilot program. 'Consistently in all the surveys that have been done, the majority of voters have liked using it.' A Utah Ranked Choice Voting poll in 2021 found that over 85% of voters who used ranked choice voting liked it. A Millcreek poll found that around 70% of voters also liked it. And a UVU analysis found support among around 60% of Utahns who had used ranked choice voting. But critics counter that in crowded contests, the process relies on an opaque algorithm that can be hard to understand, throws out incomplete ballots and fosters skepticism. Several years after Republicans brought ranked choice voting to Utah — former state GOP chair Stan Lockhart is a prominent proponent of the system — GOP lawmakers appear ready to ditch it. A 2025 bill that would have extended the voting program for another decade was killed before it ever came up for a vote. When bill sponsor Sen. Todd Weiler, R-Woods Cross, was asked whether he thought there was a desire among lawmakers to let cities continue using ranked choice voting, he said his last attempt showed the answer is 'a resounding 'NO.'' Even though some of this reaction is surely partisan — Trump has called ranked choice voting 'one of the greatest threats to democracy' — much of it is driven by legitimate concerns about introducing a novel election system during such a fraught political environment, according to Lisa Dixon, the executive director of the right-leaning Center for Election Confidence. 'People are seeing that, on the one hand, it introduces some new problems,' Dixon said. 'And then, on the flip side, we've also seen that it doesn't always deliver its promises of creating consensus candidates that are more in the middle.' Where it has been implemented statewide, it has sometimes produced 'unpredictable' outcomes, Dixon said, as in the case of Republican Sarah Palin's loss to Democrat Mary Peltola in Alaska's 2022 special at-large House race, where a large majority of voters preferred Republican representation. That same year, a ranked choice election for a school board seat in Oakland, California, declared the wrong candidate as the winner because of a programming glitch. But the wrong candidate was certified before a recount identified the error. And while the 2021 New York City mayoral race has been touted as an example of ranked choice voting electing a more moderate candidate — Mayor Eric Adams — this year, it appears that multiple progressive groups are attempting to game the system to elect a self-described socialist. 'Whatever the problem that we're trying to fix in our country, we shouldn't be abandoning what we currently do, and turning to a system that's going to introduce more problems,' Dixon said.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Cenovus CEO Defends Canada-US Energy Ties Amid Tariff Threats
Cenovus Energy Inc. CVE CEO Jon McKenzie pushed back against recent anti-import rhetoric from U.S. President Donald Trump, asserting that the United States remains heavily dependent on Canadian oil despite political tensions. Speaking at an energy conference in Calgary, McKenzie emphasized the deep integration between the two countries' energy systems, even as Canada explores diversification options. Nearly 4 million barrels per day of Canadian oil are exported to the United States — a fact McKenzie used to counter Trump's repeated claims that the United States doesn't need to import oil and gas from Canada. McKenzie emphasized that Canada's oil industry is deeply integrated with the U.S. system, highlighting the geographic and logistical ties that make Canadian crude essential, especially for landlocked Midwest refineries designed to process heavier grades. McKenzie, who also chairs the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, stated that despite growing political friction, energy economics and infrastructure remain unchanged. Amid the backdrop of Trump's revived tariff threats and prime minister Mark Carney's new energy policy direction, McKenzie warned against retaliatory or short-sighted actions. He urged Ottawa to act in Canada's long-term interest, advocating for broad regulatory reform rather than government favoritism in project selection. McKenzie stressed the importance of avoiding reactive decisions in response to threats, noting that the energy sector prefers broad regulatory reform over government favoritism in selecting which projects to fast-track. Carney's administration, elected in April on a platform marked by anti-Trump sentiment, has pledged to fast-track nationally significant energy projects and elevate Canada's role as a "conventional and clean energy superpower." McKenzie agreed on the need to boost output but insisted policy support should come through improved regulatory clarity and investor confidence rather than selective subsidies. With OPEC+ shifting its focus from price control to market share, McKenzie sees an opportunity for Canadian producers to increase their global footprint — but only if domestic policy enables rather than hinders investment. The comments from Cenovus's chief highlight a broader challenge facing Canada's energy sector — balancing geopolitical tensions, internal policy shifts and long-term market realities. While diversification remains a priority, U.S. demand continues to anchor the Canadian oil export market, a fact unlikely to change soon, regardless of rhetoric from Washington. CVE currently carries a Zack Rank #5 (Strong Sell). Investors interested in the energy sector may look at some better-ranked stocks like Subsea 7 S.A. SUBCY, Energy Transfer LP ET and RPC Inc. RES. Subsea 7 presently sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), while Energy Transfer and RPC carry a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) each. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Subsea 7 helps build underwater oil and gas fields. It is a top player in the Oil and Gas Equipment and Services market, which is expected to grow as oil and gas production moves further offshore. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for SUBCY's 2025 EPS is pegged at $1.31. The company has a Value Score of A. Energy Transfer is poised to benefit from long-term fee-based commitments. It is also focused on expanding operations through organic and inorganic initiatives. The firm is looking for solutions to meet growing energy demands from additional demand centers through its pipeline network. Energy Transfer's systematic investments should boost its total fractionation capacity at Mont Belvieu and raise its top line. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ET's 2025 EPS is pegged at $1.44. The company has a Value Score of A. RPC generates strong and stable revenues through a diverse range of oilfield services, including pressure pumping, coiled tubing and rental tools. The company is strongly committed to returning value to shareholders through consistent dividends and share buybacks. RPC's current dividend yield is higher than that of the composite stocks in the industry. Its new Tier IV dual-fuel fleet has boosted profits, with plans to further expand high-efficiency equipment to enhance operational capabilities. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for RES' 2025 EPS is pegged at 38 cents. The company has a Value Score of A. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Cenovus Energy Inc (CVE) : Free Stock Analysis Report Energy Transfer LP (ET) : Free Stock Analysis Report RPC, Inc. (RES) : Free Stock Analysis Report Subsea 7 SA (SUBCY) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
As Cox advances nuclear agreements, he says the cost to develop technology is nothing so far
Gov. Spencer Cox answers questions from the media during his monthly PBS news conference in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (Pool photo by Bethany Baker/The Salt Lake Tribune) When thinking about Utah's nuclear future, Gov. Spencer Cox said he wants people to think less of the giant nuclear plant where Homer Simpson works, and visualize more a picture of dozens of small modular reactors, stacking in the state over time. While many Utahns are still trying to wrap their heads around the idea Cox is envisioning, he has already signed a couple of memorandums of understanding with companies to help it materialize — and, he said, he wants to go big. On May 23, Cox joined the founder of Valar Atomics, a California nuclear developer, in announcing their partnership to meet President Donald Trump's goal to have an operational advanced reactor on American soil by July 4, 2026, at the San Rafael Energy Research Center in Emery County. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX On Monday, he signed another agreement with another company for the nuclear efforts, Cox said during his monthly news conference broadcast by PBS Utah. A plan for Utah nuclear energy industry's foundation is taking shape 'We're going to be working with all of these companies. We want to find the best technology. We're not betting on any one technology or any one company. That doesn't make sense,' Cox said on Tuesday. 'We're betting on the idea that there is going to be a nuclear renaissance.' While research shows that nuclear developments usually go for a hefty price tag, Cox said that currently the initial plans won't cost anything to the state, since the state already acquired the San Rafael Energy Lab during the 2024 legislative session and that will be one of the state's main contributions in the agreement. 'We're just providing space for these companies to come in and run their new technology there to see if it actually works,' Cox said. 'And so that's not going to cost us anything. The hope is it will save us down the road.' Lawmakers did agree to fund $10 million for Cox's Operation Gigawatt nuclear initiative; the governor said that money is for siting. Utah has also sought to ease the regulations to make nuclear energy production a reality. First by suing the federal government in January — then still under the Biden administration — over its strict rules to permit the resource. Then, by passing big legislation to set the foundation for the state's nuclear energy future. Glowing pains: Developing nuclear power could cost Utah tens of billions The U.S. is lagging behind countries like China in the development of nuclear plants, Cox said. Now, with a new White House administration prioritizing a quicker licensing process for nuclear reactors and ordering a plan to add 300 gigawatts of nuclear energy capacity in the country by 2050, Cox believes Utah can lead the way. 'The market will decide how big that is,' Cox said, 'government is not going to decide that, but we're going to present opportunities.' Other agreements happening across the state have centered around the construction of power-hungry data and AI centers. While Cox says he remains 'fairly agnostic' on them, he believes they'll be built in many areas of the country either way, drawing a substantial amount of energy from states' shared grid. 'Even if we didn't have a single data center here, we would still need to significantly increase our power production,' Cox said. 'If we're going to significantly increase our power production, we might as well put them here.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE