Hinkley Point C owner warns fish row may further delay nuclear plant
The owner of Hinkley Point C in Somerset has warned that the much-delayed construction of Britain's first new nuclear power plant in a generation could face further hold-ups due to a row over its impact on local fish.
The nuclear developer, EDF Energy, warned that the 'lengthy process' to agree to a solution with local communities to protect fish in the River Severn had 'the potential to delay the operation of the power station'.
As a result, the developer, which is owned by the French state, raised the threat of further delays to Hinkley Point – a project already running years late and billions of pounds over budget.
EDF said last year that Hinkley could be delayed to as late as 2031 and cost up to £35bn, in 2015 money. The actual cost including inflation would be far higher. EDF declined to say how long any new delay could be.
The prospect of a fresh delay to the plant, which is expected to generate about 7% of the UK's electricity in the 2030s, comes amid a deepening row between green groups and the government over the chancellor, Rachel Reeves's plan to prioritise economic growth over other considerations, including the environment and net zero.
EDF last week welcomed the government's new reforms to 'stop blockers getting in the way' of new infrastructure projects, including nuclear power plants. It called for the government to establish a framework to manage environmental concerns 'in a more proportionate' manner.
The developer has pressured the government to loosen environmental rules while at loggerheads with local communities over its complex plans to protect local fish populations which are at risk of being sucked up into the nuclear power plant's cooling systems.
The company had planned to install an 'acoustic fish deterrent' to keep fish away from the reactor's water intake system, which is nearly two miles offshore.
The project, which was reportedly informally dubbed 'the fish disco' among former ministers, would require almost 300 underwater speakers to boom noise louder than a jumbo jet 24 hours a day for 60 years.
But the plan was later scrapped by EDF over concerns for the safety of divers who would need to maintain the speakers in dangerous conditions. There are also questions over its effectiveness. Without it an estimated 18 to 46 tonnes of fish could be killed every year.
The company dismayed local farmers and landowners last year by suggesting plans to turn 340 hectares (840 acres) of land along the River Severn into a salt marsh to compensate for the number of fish forecast to be killed by the reactor every year.
After a growing outcry, it said earlier this month it would delay the formal consultation on its salt marsh plan, which it says would provide safe habitats for fish and animals, from the end of this month until later this year.
The Hinkley Point project is seen as an important part of Britain's plan to meet its legally binding target to reduce its carbon emissions to net zero by 2050. But it has already faced lengthy delays and spiralling costs.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
In 2007, EDF had said turkeys would be cooked using electricity generated from Hinkley by Christmas 2017. When the project was finally given the green light in 2016, its completion date was set at June 2027 and the cost was estimated at £18bn.
The company has called on the government to set new planning reforms which ensure that the need for environmental safeguards are determined 'in a proportionate and reasonable way'.
In a statement, EDF said: 'Hinkley Point C is the first power station in the Severn to have fish protection measures in place, with a specially designed low-velocity cooling water intake system and a fish return system.
'However, the current lengthy process to identify and implement acceptable compensation for a small remaining assessed impact on fish has the potential to delay the operation of the power station.'
The cost of Hinkley's sister project, at Sizewell C in Suffolk, has doubled to £40bn since plans were presented in 2020.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's biggest pub company to slash jobs amid debt crunch
Britain's biggest pub company is set to cut a raft of jobs as bosses seek to slim down the debt-laden firm following Rachel Reeves's tax raid. Stonegate Group, which runs more than 4,000 pubs across the UK including the Slug & Lettuce and Craft Union brands, has been working with restructuring specialists at AlixPartners over recent months, The Telegraph has learnt. Up to 150 jobs are expected to be cut across the company's head office and central functions. It is understood no decision has yet been made on the exact number of roles under threat. Jobs in its pubs and bars will not be affected and no pubs will close as a result of the restructuring. It comes after a difficult period for Stonegate, which is owned by TDR Capital, the private equity house which also controls Asda. It has lost hundreds of millions of pounds while straining under the weight of a near-£3bn debt pile while higher taxes levied on employers by the Chancellor this year have added to pressures. Despite a rise in revenues in recent years, it reported pre-tax losses of £257m and £214m in 2023 and 2024 respectively as interest payments on its debts pushed it into the red. A Stonegate spokesman said the planned cuts were partly due to a shift away from managed pubs – which it owns and operates itself – towards leased and tenanted pubs, which are rented out to and operated by publicans. The latter have proved more profitable for Stonegate in recent years. Managed pubs also require more resources and head office staff to oversee, making them less appealing to run at a time when the company is trying to return to profit. The spokesman said: 'This, combined with rising costs, particularly after the recent Budget, means we must reorganise our support functions to reflect the shape of our business today. 'We recognise that this is a difficult time and we are committed to supporting our colleagues with care and fairness as we consult with the business on the proposed changes.' Hospitality firms have been lumbered with extra costs after Ms Reeves raised employers' National Insurance contributions and lowered the threshold at which they are paid this year. Bosses have argued the latter has disproportionately hurt hospitality firms because of the number of lower-paid and part-time workers they employ. It will be the second round of job cuts at Stonegate in two years following more than 250 redundancies in 2023. Stonegate has also been reviewing rents and agreements with suppliers as part of restructuring efforts. Last summer, TDR pumped £250m into the company to avoid defaulting on its debts, after the cost of servicing its borrowings rose from £301m to £450m in 2024. This included refinancing. The refinancing gave Stonegate breathing room, allowing it to push the repayment date for much of its debts to 2029. At the time, Stonegate said the deal would allow it to invest more in its pubs. The agreement saw one of its lenders, AlbaCore Capital Group, take a stake in the firm. Domiciled in the Cayman Islands, Stonegate traces its history back to 2010, when TDR bought 333 pubs from Toby Carvery owner Mitchells & Butlers. Its debts ballooned when it bought rival pub firm Ei Group – formerly Enterprise Inns – in a £3bn deal in 2019. The deal completed just before the pandemic forced the nation's pubs shut for months on end. After the pandemic, soaring interest rates heaped pressure on firms with large debts. Stonegate's troubles echo those of TDR-owned Asda, which too has been battling to bring down costs in the wake of its debt-fuelled buyout by the firm and the billionaire Issa brothers in 2021.
North Wales Live
an hour ago
- North Wales Live
DWP confirm exact date people born by to get 2025 winter fuel payment
The Department for Work and Pensions has confirmed that all individuals born before a specific date will be eligible for the winter fuel payment this year. The website has been updated with preliminary details following Chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement earlier this week that nine million people who lost the £200-300 benefit last winter will receive it this year. Those earning over £35,000 will also receive the payment, but it will subsequently be reclaimed through the tax system. Sir Keir Starmer has maintained that the decision to restore most winter fuel payments was not a reaction to political backlash against the policy. Following the announcement, the DWP has updated its information and for the first time revealed who will be eligible for the payment. DWP officials stated that only those born before a certain date would receive the money. They said: "The Winter Fuel Payment for 2025 to 2026 will be made to everyone in England and Wales born before 22 September 1959, unless you choose not to get it. You could get either £200 or £300 to help you pay your heating bills for winter. "You do not need to do anything - payments will be made automatically.", reports Teesside Live. Officials confirmed that everyone will receive the money, but cautioned those earning above a certain threshold that it would be recouped through HMRC, although they did not provide specifics on how this would occur. The statement read: " If your income is over £35,000, your Winter Fuel Payment will be recovered later through HMRC. Details of the 2025 to 2026 payment will be available by the end of June 2025." This week, warnings were issued that the 'fiscal drag' caused by the £35,000 earnings limit will result in hundreds of thousands of individuals losing their winter fuel payment during this parliament. This is due to Ms Reeves confirming that the £35,000 limit will not increase with inflation, leading to an estimated additional 500,000 people being affected before the end of this parliament. BBC Moneybox expert Paul Lewis stated: "The £35,000 income limit for keeping the winter fuel payment will be frozen Ministers confirm, leading to more pensioners repaying the money year by year it will join frozen bereavement payments, capital limits, child benefit limits, and tax thresholds." The Prime Minister highlighted recent growth figures and decreasing interest rates as evidence that "the economy has stabilised". Ms Reeves admitted that working individuals were not experiencing signs of progress as she attempted to move past the winter fuel controversy by asserting her spending review tomorrow would stimulate growth. "This government is going for growth because that is the best way to create jobs, boost wages, lift people out of poverty and sustainably fund our schools and our hospitals and all the public services we rely on," she addressed the GMB Union Congress conference. While expressing confidence in the government's direction, Ms Reeves commented: "I know that not enough working people are yet feeling that progress, and that's what tomorrow's spending review is all about - making working people better off, investing in our security, investing in our health, investing in our economy." Today, Rachel Reeves did not dismiss the possibility of further tax increases come autumn, following reports that the economy contracted more than anticipated in April. The Chancellor has consistently maintained that the forthcoming spending review's costs are offset by last year's tax hikes, emphasising that departments must now "live within their means". However, with a faltering economy and new obligations such as partially reversing cuts to winter fuel payments, experts caution that taxes might rise again in the autumn. When questioned on LBC about ruling out additional tax hikes, Ms Reeves said: "I think it would be very risky for a Chancellor to try and write future budgets in a world as uncertain as ours." Yet, she reiterated her commitment to avoiding tax increases on the scale seen last year, when they rose by £40 billion.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
How Labour's winter fuel fiasco paves the way for means-testing the state pension
As Rachel Reeves announced an about-turn on her winter fuel policy this week, she opened a whole new can of worms for pensioners. The Chancellor's decision to return the payments to those with an income of under £35,000 has created a complicated means-test and reignited calls from some commentators to claw back other benefits, such as the state pension, from those deemed 'wealthy'. Means-testing the state pension system would be a radical move that no British chancellor has dared attempt before. But Labour is desperate for cash and has shown it is not afraid to anger older voters. Could Ms Reeves possibly get away with it? Introduced in 1909 and originally worth five shillings a week, the state pension is a cornerstone of the welfare state. Today, workers pay National Insurance contributions for 35 years to receive its full benefit. The full new state pension is £230.25 a week, while the old 'basic' pension – for those who reached state pension age before April 2016 – is £176.45 a week. However, the benefit has become increasingly unaffordable to administer. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicts the country's spending on pensioners will reach £180bn by 2029. The idea of reserving the payment for those who need it most has therefore become increasingly attractive. Both Labour and the Tories pledged to keep the 'triple lock' that means pensions are increased each April by the highest of wage growth, inflation or 2.5pc. Means-testing could be one way to dramatically cut costs, without breaking that pledge. In January, Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, caused uproar when she said her party would 'look at means-testing' the state pension. Key Labour advisers, think tanks and academics have also voiced support for the plan. Means-testing would completely upend the system. But this week's winter fuel policy reversal could make it slightly easier. Under the latest changes, all pensioners will receive the winter fuel payment, worth up to £300 a year. However, those who earn more than £35,000 will be expected to return it to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). To administer the new system, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will tell HMRC who they've paid the winter fuel payment to. HMRC will then apply the income test to determine who will need to repay the money. Government departments have long shared data about taxpayers, including doing so specifically to pay or not pay a pensioner benefit, such as free TV licences. But is this Whitehall bureaucracy really a slow slide towards a means-tested state pension? Telegraph Money reader Jim Humphrey fears so. The 69-year-old, a part-time financial adviser from St Albans, is one of the estimated two million pensioners who will still not receive the winter fuel payment. This is because his income exceeds the £35,000 threshold. He is worried Labour is on a 'slippery slope' to means-testing the state pension. He said: 'I don't need the money, but it is a question of principle... I have paid tax for many, many years.' Other state benefits have been means-tested in recent years. Free TV licences for all over-75s were scrapped in August 2020 and restricted to those who qualify for pension credit. Last year's restriction of the winter fuel payment to those on pension credit was also a form of means-testing – as is the payment of pension credit to those on the lowest incomes. Campaigners and economists have also pushed for free prescriptions for the over-60s to be similarly restricted. Last October, Dr Kristian Niemietz, of the Institute for Economic Affairs think tank, said: 'Means-testing old-age benefits is a way to make fiscal savings while insulating the poorest from cuts.' Labour is also gearing up to ban over-60s from taking student loans from 2027, as it introduces a 'Lifetime Learning Entitlement'. Ben Ramanauskas, of think tank Policy Exchange, said: 'The Government's approach to cutting spending through means-testing is the right one. 'However, this alone will not significantly lower the cost of the UK's unsustainable welfare bill, improve public finances, or give younger taxpayers a fair deal.' Other countries already operate means-testing on their state pension payouts. In Canada, which operates a flat-rate benefit system, a maximum of $1,433 (£773.30) is paid each month, and is topped up for those on low incomes. In Chile, a pension is paid to those over 65, unless your family's wealth is deemed to be in the top 10pc of the population. Those with an income of less than $1,210,828 (£955.30) a month are eligible, whether they are still working or not. In Australia, the state pension – or 'age pension' – has no reference to how long a person has worked. Instead, it is granted as an age-based means-tested benefit. About a third of pensioners have their pension cut because they have other sources of income. Moving to an Australian-style system would be highly controversial, angering those who say if you have 'paid in' you should get the full amount irrespective of your income. Mike Ambery, of pension provider Standard Life, said: 'There would need to be a change in applying for state pension as well as the detail to replicate means-testing in other countries. The practicality and change to a universal system now would be operationally significant.' There would be other barriers to overcome. The Government could only make significant savings if people are able to generate big enough private pension savings. But despite the 'automatic enrolment' reforms that made workplace pensions compulsory, millions of people are on course for meagre retirement incomes. Research by the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) found that the cost of all but the most basic retirement has increased over the past year. Two retirees running one small car, eating out weekly and taking a four-star foreign holiday each year would now need an income of almost £35,000 each before tax to retire comfortably, rising to £52,000 if they live alone. Meanwhile, anyone living alone on the state pension would even fall short of a basic retirement, which now requires an income of £13,400 a year, the PLSA said.
