RSS's Hosabale calls for ‘review of secularism, socialism' inserted into Preamble during Emergency
This year marks 50 years since then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a nationwide Emergency on 25 June, 1975, citing internal disturbances. The Emergency, which lasted for about 21 months, saw the suspension of civil liberties, censorship of the press, arrests of political opponents under MISA, and sweeping powers handed to the executive.
He also said the Congress must apologise for the Emergency and excesses committed under the Indira Gandhi government, calling it a period when citizens' rights were crushed and institutions weakened.
New Delhi: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale Thursday called for a review of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' inserted into the Preamble to the Constitution by way of the 42nd Amendment, saying they were added during the Emergency and were not part of the original text drafted by B.R. Ambedkar.
Speaking at an event to mark the anniversary in New Delhi, Hosabale said insertion of the two words into the Preamble needs to be revisited. 'Freedom of judiciary was also curtailed … but one more thing, during the Emergency, two words were added to the Preamble to India's Constitution. We all know: secularism and socialism. These were not in the Preamble earlier. They were added later. The Preamble is meant to be eternal.'
'So, from the perspective of ideology, should socialism be considered eternal for India?' he asked.
'The word secularism was not originally in the Indian Constitution. It was added to the Preamble. Yes, the ideas of secularism may have existed, they may have been part of governance and state policy, that's a different matter. But should these two words remain in the Preamble? This is something that deserves reflection,' Hosabale said.
Adding, 'Because I know, and I'm saying this while standing in the building named after Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar, the architect of our Constitution, that these words were not included by him.'
He went on to say, 'When you discuss the Constitution, it is not just about Babasaheb Ambedkar. There are also aspects that were not part of what Ambedkar had framed.'
Hosabale emphasised that the changes were made at a time when democratic institutions were severely weakened. '… when citizens' rights were suspended, when Parliament was ineffective, when the judiciary was crippled, at that time, this was inserted.'
Adding, 'That is why, I believe, many such matters still need to be reviewed even today.'
He also said the Congress must apologise for the Emergency. 'They have not apologised to the people of the country till today. They haven't sought forgiveness. One lakh people were jailed, 60 lakh forcibly sterilised, 250 journalists were sent to jail, the judiciary was crippled but still, no apology was made. They will have to apologise to the nation. If your ancestors committed the mistake, then apologise in their name. What's the issue with that?'
'Those who did such things are today moving around with the Constitution's copy. They have still not apologised … Apologise,' he said. 'Your ancestors did it… You must apologise for this to the country.'
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: Ex-BJP MLA's 'second marriage' puts Uttarakhand BJP on back foot, Congress calls out UCC hypocrisy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mamata leads Oppn charge on ECI drive
The article reflects on the Emergency declared in India on June 25, 1975, highlighting the initial concerns of CPI(M) about authoritarianism. It recounts the rise of student activism against Indira Gandhi's regime, the repression faced, and the personal impacts on leaders like Sudhir and his peers. Ultimately, it contrasts the past Emergency with today's perceived institutionalized authoritarianism, emphasizing the fragility of democracy.
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
A generation of activists in their formative years faced Emergency onslaught head-on
When the Emergency was declared on June 25, 1975 the CPI(M) leadership, at first, viewed it as a draconian measure to permanently enforce an authoritarian set-up. It was felt that parliamentary democracy would remain truncated for a long period of time. However, after the first few weeks, it became clear that the Emergency was a manoeuvre resorted to by a beleaguered Indira Gandhi to outwit and thwart the opposition. PREMIUM Students of JNU demonstrating and demanding for the removal of former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi as the Chancellor of Jawaharlal Nehru University (HT Archives) Soon after the big 'Garibi Hatao' victory in the Lok Sabha elections of 1971, popular discontent grew due to the failure of the government to fulfil the promises made during the elections. The JP movement and the historic railway strike of 1974 marked the growing opposition. The Allahabad high court judgment disqualifying Indira Gandhi's election was the catalyst for this extraordinary anti-democratic step to somehow survive in power. This move for petty political gain could be fought by mobilising the people in defence of democracy. When Emergency was declared, I happened to be the President of the Students Federation of India (SFI). I was also a CPI(M) cadre and a doctoral student at the Jawaharlal Nehru University. The SFI, which was founded in late 1970, had in a few years emerged as a militant student organisation active in the fight for students' rights and against the increasing authoritarianism of the Indira regime. As such, it came under attack during the Emergency. Nine of the key office bearers and leaders of the organisation were arrested and detained under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) across the country. Another 60 cadres were detained under MISA over time. Hundreds of student activists were arrested under the Defence of India Rules (DIR). In such a situation, I was instructed by the party to function underground to avoid any possible arrest. My first responsibility was to ensure the minimum organisational functioning of the SFI at the all India level. In Delhi, the authorities launched an attack on JNU students and the Students' Union. On the night of July 7, hundreds of armed police raided the hostels in the campus and took away scores of students for interrogation to the police station. Ten of them were detained while the rest were let off. The JNU campus stood out for organising resistance to the Emergency under the leadership of the Students' Union. The police were searching for the President of the Union, DP Tripathi, to arrest him. A dramatic incident occurred when the police in plain clothes led by the notorious DIG, (PS) Bhinder, entered the campus and kidnapped an SFI activist, Prabir Purkayastha, mistaking him for DP Tripathi. In order to cover up their mistake Purkayastha was put in jail under MISA for the rest of the Emergency. The campus saw a three-day strike by students against the expulsion of a student union leader. All around the country students of different persuasions unitedly organised protest activities. I was able to visit different states in order to keep the organisation afloat and many places to conduct covert activities. For the opposition, Chennai, the capital of Tamil Nadu was a hospitable place to organise meetings and discussions because the then DMK government under chief minister Karunanidhi was opposed to the Emergency. However, that sanctuary did not last long. The DMK government was dismissed by the Centre in January 1976. The Emergency, though it lasted only 21 months, was also a period which was eventful in my personal life. I got married to Brinda, a fellow CPI(M) cadre. Since we were both functioning in a semi-underground manner, a marriage function was held quietly in a comrade's house. She went by the name of Rita, while I was Sudhir. A painful event was the death of my mother who had single-handedly brought me up facing many odds. She passed away at the age of 54. She had been separated from me when I went underground. Fortunately, she was able to live with us for the last four months of her life after we got married and rented a small flat. For a generation of activists who were in their politically formative years, the experience of the Emergency was enlightening. It taught us about the fragility of democracy and democratic institutions and the need not to take democratic rights for granted. At the same time, working amongst people, particularly students, gave us the confidence that it is ultimately the people who would come out in defence of their hard won rights. Quite a few of the leaders of the SFI who were active in that period and experienced repression during the emergency went on later to become part of the top leadership of the CPI(M). Manik Sarkar, Kodiyeri Balakrishnan, Sitaram Yechury and MA Baby were among them. Many of the 'Emergency generation' of student and youth leaders of the JP movement and other opposition parties also emerged as top leaders of their parties. Looking back fifty years later, one can see the Emergency as the first major onslaught on the democratic system of the country. This drastic action was preceded by a series of smaller actions from the 1950s which whittled down democratic rights and civil liberties. However, it is a mistake, as many do, to compare the present situation in the country with the Emergency of yore. The past decade is often termed as an 'undeclared Emergency'. This is a misnomer. The present onslaught on democracy and the constitutional principles is much more insidious and has brought about an institutionalised authoritarianism. The 1975 Emergency gambit seems a pale shadow in comparison to the full-fledged authoritarianism that we are experiencing today.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Revision of Bihar poll rolls: Oppn fears many will be left out, questions timing
The Congress on Thursday said the Election Commission's announcement of a special intensive revision (SIR) of the voting lists in poll-bound Bihar is a 'clear and explicit admission… that all is not well with India's electoral rolls'. Other Opposition parties, too, objected to the move, arguing that the exercise, meant to be completed in just a month, will disenfranchise lakhs of vulnerable voters ahead of the state elections this year. The EC had said Tuesday that all existing electors in Bihar who were not on the rolls in 2003 would have to again provide documentation proving their eligibility. This was to be the beginning of a nationwide exercise. A Congress committee tasked with looking into elections said in a statement Thursday: 'In simple terms, the EC wants to discard the current electoral rolls entirely and create a fresh new electoral roll for the state… This is a clear and explicit admission by the EC that all is not well with India's electoral rolls. Exactly what the Congress party and the Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi have been repeatedly pointing out with evidence from Maharashtra.' The eight-member EAGLE committee said: 'Lakhs of union and state government officials will now control and dictate who has correct documents and who doesn't, who gets to vote in the upcoming Bihar elections etc. This carries a huge risk of willful exclusion of voters using the power of the state machinery.' At a meeting of political parties with Bihar's Chief Electoral Officer on Wednesday in Patna, representatives from the INDIA bloc — including the RJD, Congress, CPI(ML) Liberation and CPI(M) — unanimously rejected the SIR, calling it a ploy to exclude poor, rural and minority electors. RJD Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Kumar Jha told The Indian Express that the party would go to the EC. 'This is a massive exercise, and with the Bihar election notification expected in just two-and-a-half months, the timing is questionable. This process could have started much earlier. We feel very strongly that this entire exercise, is it a kind of cover? Cover to make sure that people from subaltern classes and minorities, backward and Dalits, are you going to invisibilise them?' he said. Opposition parties flagged concerns on the commission's stringent documentation requirements. The new rules set different proof thresholds by birth cohort. Voters born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, are required to provide proof of either parent's Indian citizenship, while those born after December 2, 2004, need documentation for both parents West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said the EC was 'acting like a stooge of the BJP' and asked whether the move was a backdoor attempt to implement the NRC. 'I don't understand the reason behind the ECI move or the rationale behind selecting these dates. This is nothing short of a scam. I seek clarification from the Commission on whether they are trying to implement the NRC through backdoors. In fact, this looks to be more dangerous than the NRC which every political party in opposition must resist,' she told reporters. The Congress statement said the EC rules on birth certificates are 'arbitrary, whimsical and onerous on the estimated 8.1 crore eligible voters in Bihar in 2025'. CPI(ML) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya, too, drew parallels with Assam's NRC exercise and argued in a letter to the Chief Election Commissioner that completing the verification of '78 million voters' in one month was 'logically absurd and a logistical nightmare'. RJD also questioned the timing of the SIR being made mandatory just before the Bihar elections. The 243-member Assembly's term ends on November 22. Elections are expected between October and November. For Bihar, even marginal shifts in the roll could decide outcomes in closely fought seats. Parties fear that minorities including Muslim voters that are concentrated in constituencies along the Nepal border, like areas in Kishanganj, Araria, and Supaul, could be disproportionately affected by stringent documentation requirements. Critics of the EC decision also argue that Bihar's birth registration rate hovers around 75%, and many rural families lack formal records. They said that such hurdles in monsoon-bound, agrarian communities will inevitably exclude large voter groups. The Election Commission insists the SIR is a constitutional imperative under Article 326 and Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. In a press note, the EC cited rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths and 'inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants' as reasons to cleanse and modernise the rolls. This marks the first time the ECI has officially acknowledged the presence of illegal immigrants in electoral rolls, lending weight to the exercise's stated objective of ensuring 'integrity and preparation of error-free electoral rolls'. Officials said the 2003 electoral roll, containing around five crore voters, will serve as the base document, with the Commission treating names from that list as having 'probative evidence of eligibility, including presumption of citizenship'. This means voters added subsequently, estimated at nearly 2.8 crore, must furnish fresh identity proofs through the house-to-house enumeration process. The Commission has outlined an ambitious timeline beginning June 25, with Booth Level Officers (BLOs) distributing pre-filled enumeration forms door-to-door across Bihar's rural and urban landscape. The process requires collecting these forms with supporting documents by July 26, eventually leading to publication of draft rolls on August 1. Officials said eligible voters have been provided multiple submission options, including uploading documents via the ECINET app or ECI website. The Commission has also promised safeguards for vulnerable electors, directing officials to ensure 'genuine electors, particularly old, sick, Persons with Disabilities (PwD), poor and other vulnerable groups are not harassed'. Officials further said that to address transparency concerns, all documents will be uploaded to ECINET, accessible only to authorised election officials. 'To ensure fairness, every BLO will be accompanied by party-nominated agents, and citizens omitted in the draft list may file claims or objections before the Assistant ERO or appeal to the District Magistrate and Chief Electoral Officer,' an ECI source said. Officials have indicated that Bihar's SIR will serve as a pilot for similar drives in Assam, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and Puducherry, whose assemblies expire in 2026. If executed smoothly, the EC is expected to announce a nationwide clean-up of voter lists. Meanwhile, the JD(U) and the BJP, which are in power in Bihar, have welcomed the EC decision. JD(U) spokesperson Neeraj Kumar said: 'This is routine work for the Election Commission, and opposition parties making political statements about it is very irresponsible. The people of Bihar are very aware and vigilant about their voting rights. The revision of the electoral roll is beneficial for everyone, it's an opportunity to include more people in the democratic process. The opposition should also use this chance by getting more of their workers actively involved in enrolling their vote base.' BJP spokesperson Manoj Sharma said: 'The Election Commission has demonstrated its capability by successfully conducting elections in such a vast country, setting a global example for large-scale democratic processes. Bihar is just one state among many, and there is still time for completion of electoral revision. Regular meetings of all political parties are being held with BLOs and ROs, there are no issues. However, for those parties that have so far depended on fake voters and bogus voting, this is a cause for concern. In Bihar, the Election Commission has already put a stop to incidents of booth capturing, and now it is working to clamp down on bogus voting. So, raising questions about the Election Commission's credibility is completely unwarranted.' With ENS inputs from New Delhi, Kolkata Santosh Singh is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express since June 2008. He covers Bihar with main focus on politics, society and governance. Investigative and explanatory stories are also his forte. Singh has 25 years of experience in print journalism covering Bihar, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka. ... Read More
