Protesters urge Wimbledon to cut ties with Barclays over Israel business deals
LONDON (AP) — Pro-Palestinian protesters urged Wimbledon to drop Barclays as a sponsor Monday because of the British bank's business dealings with Israel.
About two dozen protesters from Palestine Solidarity Campaign demonstrated by the main entrance of the All England Club as thousands of fans arrived for Day 1 of the tournament.
'They're the bank for the arms companies that are obviously supplying weapons to Israel,' protester Khalid Zalmay told The Associated Press. 'We should not be arming Israel, we should not be allowing anybody to facilitate arming them, and I think ties should be cut with Israel, the same way that ties were cut with Russia.'
One protester held a sign that said Barclays is a 'sponsor of Wimbledon and genocide.'
Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 people in the Oct. 7, 2023 attack that sparked the Israel-Hamas war.
Israel's military response has led to the death of 56,000 Palestinians, according to the Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. It says more than half of the dead were women and children.
'We provide a range of financial services and products to companies supplying defense products to the UK, NATO and its allies,' the company statement said. 'As NATO, the EU and UK seek to increase their defense capabilities in response to increasing geopolitical threats, the provision of financial products and services to the defense sector is becoming increasingly important.'
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
16 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
How to Watch Wimbledon 2025 Live Outside the UK
Wimbledon is on, and you're outside the UK — oh no! Well, you won't have to worry about traveling back home this time. The good news? You can now watch Wimbledon 2025 from anywhere. This tennis spectacle begins soon, and being prepared in advance is always smart. Luckily, you can enjoy live Wimbledon coverage abroad — virtually for free. Here's a simple workaround for Brits abroad. Wimbledon is a UK Grand Slam, so naturally, the BBC will broadcast it. BBC iPlayer, as you know, broadcasts many relevant sports events. It'll broadcast the entire Wimbledon from start to finish. Moreover, this free-to-access channel live-streams the event in Full HD, with well-known, witty English commentary. The problem for Brits abroad is that BBC iPlayer works exclusively in the United Kingdom. You can try to log in, but despite your British heritage, you will still be blocked. You will not be able to watch an episode of a show, let alone this grandiose event. So, how can you watch this year's Wimbledon live abroad? Watch Wimbledon with NordVPN According to many people online, the best way is to use a VPN. NordVPN tips the scale in its favour as the most popular UK VPN. It offers over 440 servers in this country. Moreover, it's highly reliable for streaming and is among the rare VPNs that work with BBC iPlayer overseas. NordVPN isn't a free VPN, and many people find that problematic. However, it has a 30-day money-back guarantee. This lets users enjoy Wimbledon live outside the UK and get a full refund immediately. We'll remind you that the Grand Slam lasts about two weeks, giving you ample time to request a reimbursement. The VPN works simply: It lets you connect to a remote server in the United Kingdom. This, in turn, grants you a UK IP address, making you appear in this country. BBC iPlayer detects your new IP, 'thinks' that you're in London or any other British city, and allows you to use it normally. Unlike many specky VPNs, NordVPN doesn't restrict bandwidth and speed. To translate, you can watch Wimbledon live outside the United Kingdom and not worry about the limit. All you'll do is cheer for your favourite player. If you're off to Australia, you can stream Wimbledon outside the UK on 9Now. 9Now is another English-speaking channel with complete coverage of this Grand Slam. However, it works only in Australia. If you're already there, no need to use a VPN. Instead, go to 9Now, sign in with a free account, and enjoy the Grand Slam when it starts. Conversely, you'll need NordVPN to watch 9Now outside Australia, similarly to BBC iPlayer. If you travel to New Zealand, TVNZ+ broadcasts the Grand Slam live. Again, it's usable without a VPN in this country, so it's another way to watch Wimbledon in English and high resolution outside the UK. Such a spectacle is bound to be broadcast across various channels and streaming services. However, we'll explain why BBC iPlayer is the best; no, it's not because it's British—that would be silly, would it? All jokes aside, Wimbledon is broadcast worldwide, but few free channels offer English commentary and notable footage quality. Premium channels and streaming services are always an option. Sadly, they're expensive. Depending on your location, you can use: The exorbitant prices of these streaming services make them unsuitable for people on a budget. If you're a native Brit, you won't have a US or Canada-based credit card to purchase a subscription. More importantly, these platforms don't have lengthy free trials or money-back guarantees. This means you'll have to splurge a massive amount of money on a two-week Wimbledon live stream. Sounds a bit crazy, right? That's why most people opt for NordVPN and its extended money-back guarantee. It's a risk-free procedure that works without fail. Are you ready for the show? Let's see who takes the title of champion on July 13th. Try NordVPN Risk-Free Today
24 minutes ago
Iowa's civil rights protections no longer include gender identity
DES MOINES, Iowa -- Iowa became the first state to remove gender identity from its civil rights code under a law that took effect Tuesday, meaning transgender and nonbinary residents are no longer protected from discrimination in their job, housing and other aspects of life. The law also explicitly defines female and male based on reproductive organs at birth and removes the ability for people to change the sex designation on their birth certificate. An unprecedented take-back of legal rights after nearly two decades in Iowa code leaves transgender, nonbinary and potentially even intersex Iowans more vulnerable now than they were before. It's a governing doctrine now widely adopted by President Donald Trump and Republican-led states despite the mainstream medical view that sex and gender are better understood as a spectrum than as an either-or definition. When Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed Iowa's new law, she said the state's previous civil rights code 'blurred the biological line between the sexes.' 'It's common sense to acknowledge the obvious biological differences between men and women. In fact, it's necessary to secure genuine equal protection for women and girls,' she said in a video statement. Also taking effect Tuesday are provisions in the state's health and human services budget that say Medicaid recipients are no longer covered for gender-affirming surgery or hormone therapy. Iowa's state Capitol filled with protesters as the law went through the Republican-controlled Legislature and to Reynolds' desk in just one week in February. Iowa Republicans said laws passed in recent years to restrict transgender students' use of bathrooms and locker rooms, and their participation on sports teams, could not coexist with a civil rights code that includes gender identity protections. About two dozen other states and the Trump administration have advanced restrictions on transgender people. Republicans say such laws and executive actions protect spaces for women, rejecting the idea that people can transition to another gender. Many face court challenges. About two-thirds of U.S. adults believe that whether a person is a man or woman is determined by biological characteristics at birth, an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in May found. But there's less consensus on policies that target transgender and nonbinary people. Transgender people say those kinds of policies deny their existence and capitalize on prejudice for political gain. In a major setback for transgender rights nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court last month upheld Tennessee's ban on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors. The court's conservative majority said it doesn't violate the Constitution's equal protection clause, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same. Not every state includes gender identity in their civil rights code, but Iowa was the first to remove nondiscrimination protections based on gender identity, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ+ rights think tank. Iowans will still have time to file a complaint with the state Office of Civil Rights about discrimination based on gender identity that occurred before the law took effect. State law requires a complaint to be submitted within 300 days after the most recent incident of alleged discrimination. That means people have until April 27 to file a complaint about discrimination based on gender identity, according to Kristen Stiffler, the office's executive director. Sixty-five such complaints were filed and accepted for investigation from July 2023 through the end of June 2024, according to Stiffler. Forty-three were filed and accepted from July 1, 2024, through June 19 of this year. Iowa state Rep. Aime Wichtendahl, a Democrat and the state's first openly transgender lawmaker, fears the law will lead to an increase in discrimination for transgender Iowans. 'Anytime someone has to check your ID and they see that the gender marker doesn't match the appearance, then that opens up hostility, discrimination as possibilities,' Wichtendahl said, naming examples such as applying for a job, going through the airport, buying beer or getting pulled over in a traffic stop. 'That instantly outs you. That instantly puts you on the spot.' About half of U.S. states include gender identity in their civil rights code to protect against discrimination in housing and public places, such as stores or restaurants, according to the Movement Advancement Project. Some additional states do not explicitly protect against such discrimination, but it is included in legal interpretations of statutes. Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled LGBTQ people are protected by a landmark federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. But Iowa's Supreme Court has expressly rejected the argument that discrimination based on sex includes discrimination based on gender identity. The months between when the bill was signed into law and when it took effect gave transgender Iowans time to pursue amended birth certificates before that option was eliminated. Keenan Crow, with LGBTQ+ advocacy group One Iowa, said the group has long cosponsored legal clinics to assist with that process. 'The last one that we had was by far the biggest,' Crow said. Iowa's Department of Transportation still has a process by which people can change the gender designation on their license or identification card but has proposed administrative rules to eliminate that option. Wichtendahl also said she has talked to some families who are looking to move out of state as a result of the new law. 'It's heartbreaking because this is people's lives we're talking about," Wichtendahl added. 'These are families that have trans loved ones and it's keeping their loved ones away, it's putting their loved ones into uncertain future, putting their health and safety at risk.'
29 minutes ago
Starmer faces down a revolt over welfare reform after a troubled first year in office
LONDON -- British Prime Minister Keir Starmer marks a year in office this week, fighting a rebellion from his own party over welfare reform and reckoning with a sluggish economy and rock-bottom approval ratings. It's a long way from the landslide election victory he won on July 4, 2024, when Starmer's center-left Labour Party took 412 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons to end 14 years of Conservative government. In the last 12 months Starmer has navigated the rapids of a turbulent world, winning praise for rallying international support for Ukraine and persuading U.S. President Donald Trump to sign a trade deal easing tariffs on U.K. goods. But at home his agenda has run onto the rocks as he struggles to convince British voters — and his own party — that his government is delivering the change that it promised. Inflation remains stubbornly high and economic growth low, frustrating efforts to ease the cost of living. Starmer's personal approval ratings are approaching those of Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss, who lasted just 49 days in office in 2022 after her tax-cutting budget roiled the economy. John Curtice, a political scientist at the University of Strathclyde, said Starmer has had 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister.' On Tuesday, Starmer faces a vote in Parliament on welfare spending after watering down planned cuts to disability benefits that caused consternation from Labour lawmakers. Many balked at plans to raise the threshold for the payments by requiring a more severe physical or mental disability, a move the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimated would cut the income of 3.2 million people by 2030. After more than 120 Labour lawmakers said they would vote against the bill, the government offered concessions, including a guarantee that no one currently getting benefits will be affected by the change. It pledged to consult with disability groups about the changes, and do more to help sick and disabled people find jobs. Some rebels said they would back the bill after the concessions, but others maintained their opposition. The welfare U-turn is the third time in a few weeks that the government has reversed course on a policy under pressure. In May, it dropped a plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. Last week, Starmer announced a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something he was pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk. 'It's a failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority to not be able to get their agenda through,' said Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester. 'I can't think of many examples of a prime minister in postwar politics suffering such a big setback when presiding over such a strong position in the Commons.' It also makes it harder for the government to find money to invest in public services without raising taxes. The government estimated the welfare reforms would save 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) a year from a welfare bill that has ballooned since the COVID-19 pandemic. After the concessions, it's only likely to save about half that amount. The government argues that it has achieved much in its first year: It has raised the minimum wage, strengthened workers' rights, launched new social housing projects and pumped money into the state-funded health system. But it has also raised taxes for employers and farmers, as well as squeezing benefits, blaming previous Conservative governments for the need to make tough choices. That downbeat argument has done little to make Starmer popular. In recent days Starmer has acknowledged mistakes. He told the Sunday Times that he was 'heavily focused on what was happening with NATO and the Middle East' while the welfare rebellion was brewing at home. 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that's for sure,' he said. Starmer's struggles are all the more ignominious because the opposition Conservative Party had its worst-ever election result in 2024, reduced to only 121 lawmakers. But British politics is in unpredictable flux. A big chunk of Conservative support – and some of Labour's – shifted in this year's local elections to Reform U.K., a hard-right party led by veteran political pressure-cooker Nigel Farage. Reform has just five legislators in the House of Commons but regularly comes out on top in opinion polls, ahead of Labour and pushing the right-of-center Conservatives into third place. If the shift continues it could end a century of dominance by the two big parties. Starmer's key asset at the moment is time. He does not have to call an election until 2029. 'There's still plenty of time to turn things around,' Ford said. But he said the Labour lawmakers' rebellion 'will make things harder going forward, because it's not like this is the end of difficult decisions that he's going to have to make in government. 'Barring some magical unexpected economic boom … there's going to be a hell of a lot more fights to come,' he said.
