Trump vs. TV: A play-by-play of a wild week taking on the U.S. president's naysayers
First he came for late-night TV, then a daytime talk show and a crude cartoon.
U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration are fighting battles on all fronts when it comes to mockery and criticism of the 47th commander-in-chief.
As speculation swirls that CBS might have turfed The Late Show with Stephen Colbert because of his recent criticism of parent company Paramount Global agreeing to a $16-million US settlement with the president over a 60 Minutes interview, the White House has also come out swinging this week against the animated series South Park and ABC's The View.
South Park 's 27th season premiere episode, which aired on Wednesday, lampooned the president and the CBS-Colbert drama and depicted a naked Trump climbing into bed with Satan. That same day, a co-host of The View accused Trump of being "jealous" of former president Barack Obama's looks and marriage.
Even though he's known for mocking a range of people he doesn't like, Trump's image, persona and brand are what made him a household name, and he doesn't take it well when he senses attacks on any of them.
While he would largely take out his anger in a Twitter tirade during his first administration (what X was known as back then), there are concerns that Trump is using his power in his second term to influence corporate decision-making and settle grievances — especially when it comes to the news and entertainment industry.
But freedom of expression groups say the political satire and parody that are now under fire are art forms that are not only constitutionally protected but vital to public discourse.
"We have mocked presidents and leaders in this country since before this was a country," Will Creeley, legal director of the Philadelphia-based advocacy group Foundation for Individual Rights in Expression (FIRE), told CBC News.
"If you can't make fun of who's running the country, then the First Amendment doesn't mean a damn thing."
WATCH | Questions swirl around cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert:
Why CBS axed The Late Show: Ratings or politics?
7 days ago
A 'chill' setting in
Earlier this week, Trump seemed to take credit for the cancellation of The Late Show and putting Colbert, a vocal critic of the president, out of work.
Although CBS, when it made the announcement last week, said the decision to end the show in 2026 was "purely financial," Colbert and others have suggested it may have something to do with the settlement and Paramount's merger with Skydance Media that the Trump administration approved this week.
As a storm of backlash brewed, including from Colbert's late-night compatriots, Jon Stewart and Jimmy Kimmel, Trump appeared emboldened and even claimed in a post on his Truth Social platform that ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live! could suffer a similar fate.
Creeley said no matter the reason for The Late Show 's cancellation, both the timing of it and Trump's "glee" contribute to what he sees as a "deeply depressing chill" setting in when it comes to satirizing and criticizing the president and his administration.
"This is ugly, strongman authoritarian territory we're entering, and it should chill all Americans, regardless of your partisan commitments," he said, comparing Trump to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who has been accused by such groups as Human Rights Watch of limiting press freedom and freedom of expression.
Creeley pointed to another White House clapback this week as further indication of how the political climate has changed.
Spokesperson Taylor Rogers lambasted Wednesday's episode of South Park, which coincidentally airs on Paramount-owned Comedy Central, saying the show "hasn't been relevant for over 20 years" and that no "fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak."
Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone brushed off the rebuke while speaking at Comic-Con in San Diego on Thursday, but Creeley said the mere fact that this episode has gotten so much attention speaks to the current state of affairs.
"It used to be that South Park making fun of people wasn't front-page news, but it shows you how far we've slipped, that all of a sudden it feels like this extremely important, extremely righteous act," he said.
WATCH | Trump in bed with the devil in South Park premiere (contains profanity, cartoon nudity):
The View in Trump's sights
But it's not just comedy shows that are in the Trump administration's sights — it's criticism in any form.
Joy Behar, a longtime co-host of ABC's top-rated daytime talk show The View, appeared to hit enough of a nerve that both the White House press office and the head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reacted.
Responding to Trump calling for an investigation into former president Barack Obama over unsubstantiated allegations that he tried to "lead a coup," Behar, a former standup comedian, called out Trump for his alleged role in the Jan. 6, 2020, riots at the U.S. Capitol and said that the sitting president was jealous of his predecessor.
"The thing about him is he's so jealous of Obama, because Obama is everything that he is not: trim, smart, handsome, happily married ... and Trump cannot stand it. It's driving him crazy," she said.
White House spokesperson Rogers called her "an irrelevant loser suffering from a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome" and warned in a statement to media outlets that The View could be "next to be off the air."
FCC chair Brendan Carr, in a later interview with Fox News, also said The View may face "consequences" but didn't elaborate.
Tough to snuff out satire
Attempting to silence political satire, parody and criticism isn't a winning strategy, said Sophia McClennen, a professor of international affairs at Pennsylvania State University and author of the book Trump Was a Joke: How Satire Made Sense of a President Who Didn't.
Speaking with CBC Vancouver's On The Coast on Thursday, she said satire helps people develop their resilience to consume news and information that is interspersed with "lies, misinformation and B.S."
"Having that sort of more playful source of information is really the heart of what makes satire such a really powerful remedy," she told guest host Amy Bell.
But McClennen said that's also why "satirists are some of the most attacked entertainers in the world."
Still, she said, it's important to remember that satire "doesn't die" when people in power try to muzzle them. Instead, it continues to evolve and show up in other forms.
Another example of limiting free expression
Trump butted heads with network television stars and comedians during his first administration, but Creeley, of the group FIRE, said the president now appears to have more of a "willingness to use extra legal means or abuse the power of the federal government to intimidate critics."
He said what has happened in recent days is part and parcel of Trump cracking down on freedom of expression in other venues, which includes cutting funding for public media, threatening companies over diversity, equity and inclusion policies and putting legal and financial pressure on Ivy League universities.
Creeley said the "hypocrisy" of Trump and his Republican Party is "staggering," having once sold themselves as champions of free speech, in the face of Democrats and left-wing groups and institutions, but are now the ones trying to put limits on political discourse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Donald Trump's next target could be deal that shields most Canadian imports from tariffs, experts warn
Canada's biggest shield against U.S. tariffs is still intact after Donald Trump's latest trade deadline, but that could change by next year, experts warn, as Prime Minister Mark Carney prepares for a new round of talks with the mercurial American president. While Trump raised the tariff on Canadian goods to 35 per cent in an executive order Thursday night, an exemption for goods which comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) was maintained. The order was signed after Ottawa and Washington failed to reach an economic and security deal.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Trump's tariffs are delivering a crushing blow to our steel industry. Here's how we turn that around
The best hope of rescuing the Canadian steel industry might be Canada's strong interest in nation-building projects. U.S. President Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariffs on steel from all sources, not just Canada, has effectively closed the U.S. market to Canadian steelmakers, according to the Canadian Steel Producers Association. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Terry Glavin: Is Trump's lionization of James Polk an ominous sign of things to come?
Shortly after his January inauguration, U.S. President Donald Trump made the peculiar decision to remove a portrait of the great Thomas Jefferson from the Oval Office and replace it with a portrait of James Polk. Article content Jefferson was the primary author of the Declaration of Independence and the third American president. Polk, the eleventh president, launched the Mexican-American War and expanded the reach of American sovereignty from what is now Texas to Washington State, and from Wyoming to California. Article content Article content Article content This history is directly relevant to the origins of British Columbia's August holiday weekend, which uniquely intertwines the August 1 celebration of Emancipation Day, commemorating the end of slavery in the British Empire in 1834, and the establishment of the Crown Colony of British Columbia, on August 2, 1858. Article content Article content The story is about how Canada very nearly lost the opportunity to extend its dominion from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. It was a very close call, and it's an instructive lesson in the radical differences between Canada and the United States — differences that tend to get completely papered over by the current fashion for historical revisionism and the stupidity of the 'settler colonialism' paradigm. Article content The thing about Trump is that, in his persistent expressions of territorial covetousness — most exuberantly in his public meditations on taking Greenland by military force and annexing Canada as the 51st state by economic coercion — you never really know if he's being serious or if he's just being a jackass. Article content Article content In determining Trump's preference for Polk over Jefferson, for instance, there are a couple of explanations. Article content Article content The first is his admiration for Polk as 'sort of a real estate guy,' and his esteem for Polk because ' he got a lot of land.' It could also be because he found the frame around Polk's portrait more pleasing than the frame around Jefferson's. 'I'm a frame person,' Trump told a cabinet meeting in early July. 'Sometimes I like frames more than I like the pictures.' Article content It has become commonplace to frame British Columbia's colonial origin as an unwelcome intrusion of a foreign power to force the displacement of Indigenous peoples in a process of ongoing, systemic genocide. This is an interpretive paradigm that has the disadvantage of being untrue, masochistic, and fatally corrosive to the persistence of distinctly Canadian comprehensions of sovereignty and nationhood. It also deliberately elides the profound differences between Canada's westward expansion and the way Americans behaved themselves south of the 49th parallel. Article content How British Columbia comes into this story is in Polk's covetousness of the Pacific Northwest, which was known then as the Columbia Territory. Article content An ardent disciple of the American notion of 'manifest destiny,' Polk had campaigned on the slogan ' 54-40 or Fight,' which declared an intention to displace British sovereignty West of the Rockies as far North as the Russian possessions in Alaska, at 54 degrees, forty minutes of latitude. Article content Polk very nearly succeeded. Coupled with American encroachment into the British fur trade realms of what is now Montana, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, Polk's belligerence induced the British colonial office to capitulate with the Oregon Treaty of 1846. The treaty sliced the old Columbia Territory in half by extending the 49th parallel from the Rockies to the Pacific. Article content The treaty forced the Northward migration of thousands of settlers, traders and adventurers under British dominion. They were Orkney Islanders, Scotsmen and Englishmen, Iroquois freemen, Quebecois voltigeurs, 'King George Indians' from a variety of western tribes, and Kanakas, as the Hudson's Bay Company's Hawaiian workers were then known. They would go on to become the first British Columbians. Article content Article content Led by the HBC's James Douglas, who would end up the governor of both the colonies of Vancouver Island and British Columbia, a new and thriving multicultural society sprung up around Fort Camosun, now Victoria, where they'd been welcomed by the local Saanich ad Songhees tribes. Article content Below the 49th parallel, the British and Canadian exodus opened the gates to genocide and anarchy: The Cayuse War, the Klamath War, the Salmon River War, the Yakima War and the Nisqually War. Article content Absolutely nothing remotely like this occurred in the settlement of the Canadian West. For all the injustices and travesties of marginalization, and taking into account the Red River Rebellion and the Northwest Rebellion, it was mostly a collaborative affair between Euro-Canadians, Métis and Indigenous people. Article content The Vancouver Island colony bore absolutely no resemblance to the settlements in the American West. Douglas was a West Indian, as the HBC called him, or an 'octoroon' owing to his mixed Scots and Creole ancestry. His wife, Amelia, was the daughter of a Cree woman and the Irish HBC official William Connolly. South of the 49th parallel, Black people were denied American citizenship. Douglas invited hundreds of Black people North. Article content Meanwhile, wholeheartedly supported by the American slave states, Polk decided to take by force all the Mexican territories North of the Rio Grande in a war that unfolded in unspeakable cruelty. The abolitionist Abraham Lincoln was against the war, and General Ulysses S. Grant, who would go on to succeed the assassinated Lincoln, said he was ashamed of his role as a young soldier on the Mexican frontier. 'I had not moral courage enough to resign,' he once confessed. Article content Two years after the Oregon Treaty of 1846, the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe, which ended the Mexican war, ushered in the same ghastly progression of mass murders and shooting sprees: The Yavapai slaughter, the Sand Creek Massacre, the Mendocino War, the Yuki genocide, the Snake River War, the Colorado War, and on and on. It was a tidal wave of hideous crimes against humanity that lasted decades. That's how the American West was 'won.' It's also how the territory that came to be called British Columbia was very nearly lost. Article content By the late 1850s, American miners were streaming North across the 49th parallel, headed to the Fraser Canyon in a mania for gold. Upon arriving by ship at Victoria, they were greeted by the First African Rifles — a regiment of armed Black men. In Victoria, Emancipation Day was already a civic holiday, although it was more than a century before either B.C. or Canada formally celebrated it. Article content In the Fraser Canyon, the Americans had formed themselves into militias, and scores of dead began to pile up in their encounters with local Indigenous miners. So, Douglas took matters into his own hands, and at Fort Langley, on August 2, 1858, Douglas unilaterally declared the establishment of the Crown Colony of British Columbia. Article content The following year, 1859, an American insurrection very nearly broke out in Yale, in the Canyon, when a Black man filed assault charges against an American. Governor Douglas put down the revolt, but was immediately seized of another crisis, on San Juan Island. Article content In a petty dispute over the shooting of a pig, American troops commanded by the notorious General William Harney invaded the island and settled in for a siege, awaiting orders. Harney was one of the worst war criminals in the US military at the time. His instructions to his troops as they were exterminating the Lipan and Caddo tribes were to 'exterminate all the men and make the women and children prisoners.' Their villages were to be looted and burned. Article content Fortunately, however, by 1859, the presidency had gone to James Buchanan, who was preoccupied by tensions that would soon erupt in the war to free the slaves. The dispute on San Juan Island, ostensibly about the trajectory of the border between the islands, was given over to arbitration. Article content
