logo
Industry sees red after Mantashe says no BEE for mining exploration, contradicting draft Bill

Industry sees red after Mantashe says no BEE for mining exploration, contradicting draft Bill

Daily Maverick28-05-2025
A new mist of uncertainty has shrouded mining policy just as progress is being made on other fronts such as the looming rollout of the long-awaited mining cadastre to address the applications backlog for mining and prospecting rights and permits.
The draft Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRDP) has stirred a hornet's nest in the mining industry and with the ANC's GNU political partner the DA, and its ill-conceived nature was on full display on Wednesday when Minister Gwede Mantashe confusingly said the BEE requirements for exploration were not there and would be removed if they were.
'Now, and in the future, there's no provision for BEE on exploration,' Mantashe, the Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MPR), said during a media briefing at the conclusion of the AGM for the Minerals Council SA, the main body representing the country's mining industry.
That's neither the Minerals Council's reading of the draft Bill nor Daily Maverick's interpretation of it.
'We raised this point over and over in our engagements with the department that the amendments must specifically exclude prospecting companies from empowerment requirements … Yet in this draft Bill, none of that is included,' Minerals Council CEO Mzila Mthenjane said in a statement on Tuesday.
The thing about prospecting – or exploration – is that it is an extremely high-risk activity that onerous BEE rules will severely curtail. And without exploration, the South African mining industry has no viable long-term future.
Daily Maverick asked Mantashe to clarify this afterwards and he responded by saying: 'If there is a BEE requirement in the Bill for prospecting, it must be removed.'
So, the industry's complaints on this front are not falling on deaf ears, though it has raised concerns that its inputs were not included in the draft.
And a new mist of uncertainty has shrouded policy just as progress is being made on other fronts such as the looming rollout of the long-awaited mining cadastre to address the applications backlog of mining and prospecting rights and permits.
Overall, the industry is not happy with the Bill, which once again moves the goal posts at a time when investors are crying for certainty for a sector that remains crucial for South Africa's low-growth and high-unemployment economy.
'When we ask ourselves this question, does this Bill promote investment and create jobs, we see it has some serious short-comings,' said Paul Dunne, the CEO of Northam Platinum, who was re-elected as president of the Minerals Council SA.
'They are both substantive in nature and technical … Council is a very considered, professional advocacy group. We represent at least 99% of the mining industry in this country and our submission [on the draft Bill] will be made public when the right time comes, and we will engage very, very robustly with the department and the minister on this issue,' he said.
The good-natured Dunne added: 'The minister knows us very well. We are very tough. And minister, we are coming.'
That raised a chuckle from the audience and Mantashe, but it is no laughing matter – except for lawyers, who are going to giggle all the way to the bank.
The draft Bill raises the almost certain prospect of arduous and time-consuming legal and court battles – another obstacle to the investment that the mining sector and wider South African economy desperately need to reach faster levels of growth and job creation.
It has also raised hackles in the GNU, which is supposed to be the ANC's main governing partner.
One bone of contention is embedding the Mining Charter into the legal framework, which could once again unleash the 'once empowered, always empowered' debate which the industry has already won in court. But fresh legal scraps could loom on this front.
This played out in the courts when Gupta stooge Mosebenzi Zwane was the minister in charge of mining, and the term refers to the industry's contention that once a company reached a required BEE ownership threshold that should be set in stone even if black shareholders decided to sell their stakes – which is the point of owning shares.
The government at the time held that mining companies needed to endlessly keep topping up BEE stakes, a state of affairs that would dilute value and repel foreign as well as domestic investment.
'By expressly including the Mining Charter as law and not simply policy, the Bill allows for the rapid overturning of t'once empowered, always empowered', opening the door to the need for constant injections of new BEE investors, a feature which would on its own make investing a lossmaking prospect,' MP James Lorimer, the DA spokesperson on Minerals and Petroleum Resources, said in a statement.
'The Bill is poorly thought out. It is contradictory and unclear in several places. It grants new powers to the Minister to rule the industry according to his own whim.'
What this means
More policy confusion and uncertainty at a time when South Africa needs both to extract wealth, investment and job creation from its rich minerals endowment. It will also test the GNU and likely trigger a tsunami of legal challenges for South Africa's already stretched court system. The ANC is acting like it has a two-thirds majority in Parliament on this front and has yet to be pulled back to Earth by the laws of political gravity.
Mantashe on Wednesday reminded the industry of its racist past, and that is no bad thing – in an age when US President Donald Trump is parroting fascist-inspired lies about 'white genocide', hard historical truths need to be confronted head-on.
The South African mining industry was the economic bedrock of apartheid, subjecting an overwhelmingly black migrant labour force to ruthless exploitation.
But the times are changing and the industry – partly in response to government regulation and union demands but also wider concerns among investors foreign and domestic – has made strides from the indignities of the apartheid past on a range of fronts, including ownership, wages, communities, health and safety.
BEE as a mantra has not delivered a utopia while enriching a relatively small elite, and it is also starting to look like a fossilised relic in an age when – despite the Trump administration's efforts to turn the tide – capital is largely looking for kinder, gentler returns.
The Bill, for now, is not law and open to public comment. Break out the popcorn for the fireworks. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If BEE goes, how do we address racialised inequality?
If BEE goes, how do we address racialised inequality?

Daily Maverick

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

If BEE goes, how do we address racialised inequality?

The past few months have seen an unprecedented attack on Black Economic Empowerment. Strangely, the voices that you would expect to defend it have been oddly muted. If we accept that BEE has too many problems to work properly, it is time for a proper national debate on what could replace it. As predicted several months ago, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) is now under intense fire. This is partly because the ANC has been dramatically weakened, partly because the DA is now in government, and partly because of the Trump administration's attacks on it. Last week, even The Economist opined that it was time for our country to stop BEE. On Tuesday, Deputy President Paul Mashatile said in an answer to a parliamentary question that BEE was 'not discriminatory'. While he was trying to defend BEE, he clearly missed the point. BEE is absolutely discriminatory. That is why we have it. To reduce our racialised inequality. But, in a comment by Professor William Gumede that has been widely quoted, BEE has cost around R1-trillion and yet most black people have not benefited from it in any substantive way (this is likely to be hugely contested). BEE is intensely controversial. Not just because a small group of people have been made rich, but because of what it is: A deliberate attempt to empower one group of people at the expense of another group. No matter the moral legitimacy of such an aim, in any society, to take from one group to give to another leads to huge arguments. This is one of the reasons tax policy can be hugely controversial. The cost of scrapping As a starting point, it may be important to ask: if there is no BEE and no other measure of race-based redress, what would happen? The economy would probably grow a little more quickly than it is now. Companies could simply scrap all the measures they take to qualify for BEE points. This might make them, and their owners, richer. But there would be a huge cost. For example, some of the big banks insure the geysers of people they grant mortgages to (this is to protect the value of the property they are lending money against). As a BEE measure, they then use a long list of black-owned suppliers to repair those geysers if they break down. The big banks would probably find it much more efficient to use one big company to fix all these geysers. These suppliers, usually the first in their families to own a small business, would lose out dramatically. Most would probably have to close. The consequence of this is that all these people, and their extended families, who they support, would lose faith in the democratic project. This would be just one example of how inequality, both racialised inequality and general inequality, would be re-entrenched. That would lead to greater demands for political and economic change, and perhaps, more calls for some kind of radical, or even revolutionary change. The impact test The tools that the state has to really make a change for one group, but not for another, are essentially quite limited. And each tool would have to satisfy certain tests. The first is, would it work? In other words, does the policy really make a substantive difference for a large number of people? This is the test that BEE arguably fails. Another test is whether such a tool would be both legitimate and fair. Legitimacy is absolutely vital. It means you essentially have to convince white people that they must be treated differently from black people. It seems unlikely that even Siya Kolisi and Eben Etzebeth could convince most white people to accept this. There are alternatives to BEE, all of which have serious problems. Government could decide to radically change the tax system and essentially try to tax white people more than black people. One of the main arguments against that, apart from the fact that it would lead to intense debates about racial designations, is that there are obvious examples of some white people who were born into poorer homes than some black people. That would fail the fairness test. There could be other strategies. Government could decide that our geography, still defined by apartheid in so many ways, provides a proxy for race. Thus, as a deliberate strategy, the Basic Education Department could decide to spend more money per child in rural and township schools than on children in suburban schools. While this might seem unfair, the argument could be that communities in suburbs can just increase the contribution they already make to the education of their children (through what are often called 'Governing Body Teachers' – teachers paid by the parents, not government). Although that would be staggeringly unfair to black parents who have made huge sacrifices to get their children into these schools, and to keep them there. There are other problems, too. At least one would be that we would not know whether it had been effective for a full generation. Which might defeat the purpose, which is to show that there is a measure of race-based redress that actually works. From BEE to BIG? There are other ways to look at this problem. They could be controversial in themselves. It might be seen as legitimate by the vast majority of voters to remove the idea of race-based redress in favour of a different measure to help improve the lives of millions of the poorest people in our country. So, for example, BEE could be removed at the same time a substantive Basic Income Grant (BIG) is introduced. In other words, there would be a deal (sort of). Businesses would no longer have to comply with BEE, which would allow them to be more efficient and make more profit. Those profits would, in turn, help to fund a BIG that would make a real difference to the lives of millions of people. While there appears to be no public polling on this, it might be worth asking if the millions of people who receive the R370/month Social Relief of Distress Grant would prefer that money in their pockets to retaining the current model of BEE. Considering that these people clearly need more help than most of those who currently benefit from BEE, there may be a compelling moral argument in this direction. But that might be creating a false binary. And it would not satisfy the demand for race-based redress, although it would help to reduce inequality. The attacks on BEE will not stop. But the intensity of our inequality, as racialised as it still is, demands measures to address it. A window is now opening for a proper debate on what might be more effective. It's vital that we grab it. DM

The Gathering 2025: Changemakers
The Gathering 2025: Changemakers

Daily Maverick

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

The Gathering 2025: Changemakers

This year's programme promises a powerful mix of political insight, economic foresight, social justice conversations and bold conversations about South Africa's future. In just eight days, Daily Maverick's flagship event, The Gathering 2025: Changemakers | Impact Edition returns to the Cape Town International Convention Centre (and online) on Thursday, 28 August 2025. Back by popular demand (and because she point-blank refused to give back the mic!), award-winning journalist and sharp political commentator Rebecca Davis will once again host one of the country's most powerful forums for ideas, fearless debate and visionary leadership. This year's programme promises a powerful mix of political insight, economic foresight, social justice conversations and bold conversations about South Africa's future. Event details: Cape Town International Convention Centre & Online Thursday, 28 August 2025 09:00-18:00 Book your tickets Programme highlights Morning sessions (09:00-13:00): State of Repair: Fixing government, one institution at a time with Ferial Haffajee, Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber, SARS commissioner Edward Kieswetter and Deputy National Director of Public Prosecutions Ouma Rabaji-Rasethaba; Rapid Fire with National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi and Caryn Dolley; Striking the Rock: Where courage sparks justice hosted by Judith February with Zingiswa Losi, president of Cosatu, Lisa Vetten, gender-based violence researcher and advocate, and Brigadier Sonja Harri, South African Police Service; The new rules of money and machines: The price of progress led by Lindsey Schutters, in a conversation with Larry Cooke, GM for Binance South Africa, Khadeeja Bassier, global COO, Ninety One South Africa, and Bronwyn Williams, futurist and author; Rapid Fire with Alan Knott-Craig, entrepreneur and author, in conversation with Lindsey Schutters; and Creation of new urban identity: Fresh visions and bold politics with Stephen Grootes, Bosa leader Mmusi Maimane, Songezo Zibi, leader of Rise Mzansi, and Herman Mashaba, president of ActionSA. Afternoon sessions (14:00-18:00): 'Round of applause' Freshly Squeezed for Daily Maverick, a one-woman 'performance journalism' show by veteran journalist Marianne Thamm, described as is a mix of storytelling, wit and insightful commentary on South African society and politics; Education on the edge: Innovation, equity and unlocking every child's potential with Zukiswa Pikoli, Kentse Radebe, head of research at DGMT, Grace Matlhape, CEO, SmartStart, and Rachel Kolisi, co-founder and CEO of the Kolisi Foundation; The readiness report hosted by Redi Tlhabi, broadcaster and author, with Zane Dangor, director-general, Department of International Relations and Cooperation; The cost of an empty stomach: Why we must act now with Mark Heywood, social justice activist; Viral or verified: Source code for truth with Kyle Findley, media researcher and disinformation specialist; and Behind the story: Investigative journalism as a powerful catalyst for change with Pieter-Louis Myburgh, investigative journalist Daily Maverick, Estelle Ellis, journalist Daily Maverick, and Micah Reddy, journalist and Africa coordinator at the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. Beyond the stage Attendees can also look forward to: Complimentary snacks and beverages with your ticket; Coffee and crypto in the morning, followed by cocktails and crypto in the evening, thanks to our premium sponsor, Binance; A special exhibition from the Friedrich Naumann Foundation; Post-event networking sessions with live music and complimentary wine courtesy of Radford Dale; Experience our brand-new premium lounge (with limited tickets still available!) offering complimentary food and beverages throughout the day and exclusive opportunities to mingle with VIP guests; Shopping for merch and books at the Daily Maverick Shop; A legit excuse to work remotely with our event working stations; and First-time DM168 subscribers could score a R500 PnP voucher. Ticket information With 92% of tickets already booked, this is the last call to secure a seat at one of South Africa's most powerful forums for change. Can't make it to Cape Town? Join us virtually with exclusive behind-the-scenes access and live-streamed sessions. Register for the virtual event here. Get ready to network and be inspired by South Africa's changemakers. DM For media inquiries, please contact: Fran Beighton/Nicole Williamson

New Tebogo Malaka bribe footage verifies IDT CEO said there's ‘sixty' in Dior bag
New Tebogo Malaka bribe footage verifies IDT CEO said there's ‘sixty' in Dior bag

Daily Maverick

timea day ago

  • Daily Maverick

New Tebogo Malaka bribe footage verifies IDT CEO said there's ‘sixty' in Dior bag

Newly released video footage of this journalist's infamous meeting with Tebogo Malaka pours cold water on the suspended IDT CEO's denials of her role in a highly publicised bribe attempt. Daily Maverick has decided to release fuller clips from secret recordings of a meeting between this journalist and Tebogo Malaka, suspended CEO of the Independent Development Trust (IDT). Malaka can clearly be heard saying the word 'sixty', after she was asked how much money she and IDT spokesperson Phasha Makgolane had brought with them. Makgolane can also be heard confirming that the sum of money in the Dior shopping bag amounted to R60,000. The meeting at a wine farm near Stellenbosch took place on Sunday, 3 August. Daily Maverick's subsequent video and a related exposé into Malaka's Waterfall property has sent shockwaves through South Africa. The story that Malaka wanted to bury delves into a botched IDT EPWP scheme and prominent businessman Collen Mashawana's involvement in a property currently being built for Malaka inside Gauteng's Waterfall Country Estate. Mashawana funnelled at least R200,000 into House Malaka. This while his eponymous charitable foundation secured a R60-million contract from Malaka's IDT to run employment schemes for nearly 2000 people across five provinces. Scores of the EPWP workers were ripped off by the Collen Mashawana Foundation, with some of them receiving only fractions of the salaries that were due to them. Despite the video evidence, Malaka and her family trust have gone on the offensive, claiming that she had no knowledge of the money Makgolane placed on the table. She also claimed that she was somehow being 'set up' by unnamed forces. In the extended footage we can now release, Malaka can be clearly heard discussing a cash bribe and further lucrative tenders in exchange for this journalist's silence. Malaka can also be heard admitting that Makgolane had briefed her on earlier discussions over possible payments to this journalist. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store