'Harsh, ugly, criminal act': Yair Netanyahu files defense against defamation lawsuit by Ya'alon
Yair Netanyahu filed a statement this week in his defense against a defamation lawsuit brought against him by former IDF chief of staff and defense minister Moshe Ya'alon.
In the statement, Yair Netanyahu argues that Ya'alon delayed the lawsuit for five years, filing it only after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his father, initiated his own defamation lawsuit against Ya'alon.
Yair Netanyahu described the lawsuit as "a harsh and ugly act typical of criminal organizations, where the criminal attempts to harm the children of his adversary to influence them."
Ya'alon filed the lawsuit in April, citing tweets from 2020 in which Netanyahu wrote to Ya'alon: 'Give your monthly pension, worth tens of thousands of shekels, funded by taxpayers, and go to Abarbanel.'
This tweet was one of several that led to Yair Netanyahu being sued for defamation in a case filed this week at the Tel Aviv Magistrates' Court, which seeks 318,000 shekels in damages. The plaintiff in the case is Ya'alon.
The X posts in question were posted in 2020 after Ya'alon criticized the prime minister. Yair Netanyahu responded by sharing a link to the Abarbanel Mental Health Center's website.
Yair claims lawsuit was 'deliberately delayed'
In his statement, Yair Netanyahu calls the lawsuit 'vexatious and harassing, fundamentally flawed, and deliberately delayed.'
He adds that 'if the lawsuit had any merit, it would have been filed at the time of the publication in 2020, not now, alongside the defense statement in a case where the father of the defendant is suing the plaintiff here. The timing is ugly and reminiscent of the behavior of violent criminal organizations that harm the children of their adversaries.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
A Defiant Israel Eyes a Full Gaza Takeover Despite Global Isolation
As pictures of malnourished Gazans flood world media, pressure on Israel is intensifying not only to dramatically increase the supply of food and end the fighting but to accept a Palestinian state. More than 61,000 Gazans have been killed in nearly two years; Hamas isn't destroyed; hostages are still held: the Jewish state is turning into a global pariah. But as international condemnation intensifies — arms embargoes, arrest warrants, cultural boycotts — Israel is not merely defying the pressure, it is redefining itself. Once a besieged secular outpost with an agrarian economy, it has evolved into a Middle East superpower: an aggressive military and intelligence juggernaut with a GDP per capita higher than the UK, an increasingly populist ethno-religious government with an unflinching security ethos.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Man denied a ballot spot in Ocala mayoral election files federal lawsuit
A man who tried to run for mayor in the upcoming city of Ocala election but was denied because of a residency issue and because officials said he failed to get enough valid petition signatures has filed a federal lawsuit against Marion County Supervisor of Elections Wesley Wilcox. Neil Joseph Gillespie, representing himself in this civil action, filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Gillespie, 69, seeks $1 million in damages plus legal fees, costs and "other relief this Court deems necessary in the interest of justice." Contacted by a Star-Banner reporter, Wilcox declined comment, saying he wants to wait until he has completely read the paperwork. In July, Gillespie was among the candidates seeking to run in the city's Sept. 16 election. Candidates submitted their paperwork during the qualifying period, which ran July 7-11. At the conclusion of the qualifying period, elections officials said no candidate had fulfilled all the requirements to qualify for a ballot spot. A new qualifying period was set for July 16-18. This time, only Gillespie failed to qualify for a ballot spot. The reasons: a residency issue and he did not have enough valid petition signatures. Petition signatures Gillespie submitted 41 signatures for review, but only 12 were accepted. The reasons for rejection: one petition signature was illegible; one petition had a bad signature; 18 signers were deemed "wrong district," meaning they did not live within the city limits; and nine were misfiled/not registered. Elections officials said they could not find those persons as registered voters. Only those living within the Ocala city limits can vote in the election. The Supervisor of Elections Office website shows that of the 255,521 eligible Marion County voters, 33,232 are Ocala residents. To qualify for a ballot spot, candidates had to get 25 valid petition signatures and pay a fee: $66 for mayor and $24 for city council. The fee is equivalent to 1 percent of the salary. The mayor serves a two-year term with a salary of $550 per month. Council members serve four-year terms and are paid $200 per month. All races are nonpartisan. In his lawsuit, Gillespie said the number of valid petition signatures should not matter. His reading of Florida law says the petition requirement is unconstitutional; all that matters is that he paid the filing fee. Residency But signatures were not Gillespie's only problem. In his lawsuit, Gillespie said he is registered to vote in Marion County, but not in a way that allows him to run for mayor. Gillespie has lived in Marion County for 20 years. He said he was evicted at gunpoint after a foreclosure in May 2022. He said he was homeless from May 2022 to January 2023, when he rented a place in the Starting Gate Executive Office complex off State Road 200. Gillespie said the suite is home to Justice Network, described as a group "engaged in advocacy, education, news gathering and dissemination, and helping people fight injustice." Gillespie said he relies on Social Security and is unable to obtain other adequate housing. The complaint states that although Gillespie is registered to vote, Wilcox "has repeatedly refused to register" him at that address, since the U.S. Post Office does not recognize it as a residential address. For voter registration purposes, Gillespie's address is simply listed as the elections office address. Thus, Gillespie cannot participate in city of Ocala elections or qualify for a ballot spot in a city election. Gillespie said he filed a complaint with the Florida Department of State/Division of Elections in late July alleging Wilcox "has willfully refused or willfully neglected to perform his duty to register Gillespie to vote in the City of Ocala, Florida, in violation of Fla. Stat. s. 104.51." He said the department has not responded to, or acknowledged, his complaint. In the lawsuit, Gillespie said he dropped off a voter registration application to Wilcox on Aug. 1 and he received an email response on Aug. 4. Gillespie said his voter registration online record shows his voting address as the elections center. Let's do it again: City of Ocala election back on after all candidates fail to initially qualify Contact Austin L. Miller at This article originally appeared on Ocala Star-Banner: Man who wishes to run for mayor in Ocala, Florida challenges election ruling Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Antisemitism's newest safe space: Teachers' unions
At Nysmith School in Virginia, three Jewish siblings were expelled after their parents notified the headmaster about the relentless antisemitic bullying faced by one of the daughters. At Concord-Carlisle High School in Massachusetts, students gave Nazi salutes in school hallways, divided themselves into teams called 'Team Auschwitz' and 'Team Hamas' during athletic games, drew swastikas in notebooks and on school property and told Jewish students to 'go to the gas chamber.' At Etiwanda School District in California, a 12-year-old Jewish student was beaten by another student, and when she called for help, she was told to 'shut [her] stupid Jewish ass up.' You have likely seen the recent onslaught of antisemitism in K-12 schools. But is it surprising that Jewish and Israeli K-12 students are experiencing antisemitism in schools, when so many teachers unions are promoting antisemitic curricula and engaging in anti-Israel political advocacy? Nor should it be surprising that, across the country, Jewish teachers are facing the same antisemitism, only from their own peers, employers and the very people who are supposed to be protecting them from this kind of harassment in the first place — their unions. In many instances, teachers unions play a role in curriculum development, resolve disputes between teachers and administrators and address issues related to school resources. Unions are also the bargaining representative of teachers. As such, federal labor law imposes on a union the legal duty to fairly represent all its employees. Unions cannot choose to favor one protected identity over another or facilitate discrimination against a group of its members. By developing antisemitic curricula and encouraging teachers to include discriminatory materials and propaganda in the classroom, the bias is clear. The Massachusetts Teachers Association, the state's largest teacher union, released a curriculum resource list earlier this year whose materials on the Israel-Palestine conflict not only heavily favored the anti-Israel narrative, but were also outwardly antisemitic. They included, for example, a poster that read, 'Zionists f— off' and a replica of the Star of David made out of folded dollar bills. When some union members pushed back against this, the union's board of directors claimed that the protesters were 'weaponizing' antisemitism to 'suppress learning about the Palestinians.' Three thousand miles away in California, unions have come under fire for similar actions. Last year, the United Teachers of Los Angeles union tried to implement a vehemently antisemitic and one-sided 'liberated ethnic studies curriculum' that identifies Israel as a 'colonialist,' and 'settler state,' created through 'genocide,' 'ethnic cleansing' and 'apartheid.' The Oakland Teachers Association encouraged teachers to bring unauthorized materials — including a book for elementary students with the lesson, 'I is for Intifada, Intifada is Arabic for rising up for what is right, if you are a kid or a grown-up!' — into the classroom, and vowed to protect teachers who faced discipline for doing so. Following in their neighbor's footsteps, the California Teachers Association recently opposed a bill that would strengthen the state's capacity to prevent and respond to antisemitism. The bill, which passed the state assembly unanimously, would strengthen anti-discrimination protections, increase accountability for schools and districts, establish California's first-ever State Antisemitism Coordinator to lead statewide efforts, and more. Opponents of the bill claim that it would be 'weaponized to silence critical perspectives on Palestine and global injustice and sets a troubling precedent for censorship in our state.' This kind of underhandedness isn't just happening at the state level. The most prominent national teachers union — in fact, the largest labor union in the country — is the National Education Association. Its annual Representative Assembly debated last month whether Jewish American Heritage Month was worth recognizing. Attendees discredited rates of antisemitism in schools. Members also endorsed a proposal to cut ties with the Anti-Defamation League, which was ultimately unsuccessful. According to a joint letter from numerous Jewish organizations to National Education Association leadership, Jewish attendees who spoke out against the resolution were harassed and ostracized, left fearing for their safety, and felt abandoned by their union. Through these actions, teachers unions are putting all other identities above 'Jewish.' They are saying that discrimination and harassment is okay, as long as it's against one of the Jewish members. Not only are actions such as these — actions by the group that is tasked with protecting its members — morally reprehensible, they are illegal. When a union violates its duty to fairly represent the interests of its Jewish employees, it also violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Unfortunately, teachers unions are not unique cases. Jewish union members in every sector are feeling isolated as labor unions continue to adopt more anti-Zionist approaches in their workplace, as evidenced in Brandeis Center's recent legal claims brought against the unions of New York Legal Assistance Group and the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys. From posters that supported Hamas's Oct. 7 massacre to retaliatory expulsions, Jewish union members are being shunned or outwardly harassed, their concerns silenced and their heritage spat on. They are being told that they are not worthy of protection because of where they are from and who they are. Teachers unions have extraordinary power to make positive change, including the power to fight antisemitism now and in future generations. They must acknowledge their role in molding young minds and take responsibility for protecting children from bigotry in the classroom. Without action by union leaders to discourage the use of antisemitic materials and language, Jewish teachers feel ostracized in union spaces, and Jewish children will feel unsafe in their own classrooms. But it's not just the unions: Parents, educators, policymakers and community leaders must insist on zero tolerance for antisemitism in our schools and unions alike, including ensuring curricula are free from bias and propaganda. If we fail to act now, we allow hatred to shape our children's education and their future. Kenneth L. Marcus is the chairman and CEO of The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law and the former assistant secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education under two administrations. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
