Carney's firm Brookfield has been accused of breaching Indigenous rights in 4 countries
Carney, who is running for prime minister as Liberal leader, spent more than four years as vice chair and then chair at Brookfield Asset Management, where he focused on green investing and renewable energy.
During that period from 2020 to 2024, Brookfield businesses faced reports of serious human rights abuses in Brazil, Indigenous resistance in Colombia, a First Nation's $100-million lawsuit in Ontario and an environmental dispute in Maine.
In Ontario, Maine and Colombia, Brookfield-owned hydroelectric dams and one wind farm allegedly threatened Indigenous rights or damaged the environment. In Brazil, international NGO Global Witness accused Brookfield and subsidiaries of deforestation and human rights violations, including the attempted eviction of an Indigenous group and breach of anti-slave labour law in 2021.
While the multinational conglomerate denied any wrongdoing, the disputes have raised questions about the former central banker and UN climate action envoy's track record.
"I'm not trying to point a finger at him personally, but the company of Brookfield, no, is not measuring up to what they could do and should do, and now we're saying must do, legally," said Toronto lawyer Kate Kempton.
Lawyer Kate Kempton at a news conference at Queen's Park in Toronto in April 2023. (Heather Waldron/CBC )
Kempton represents Mississauga First Nation in a lawsuit against Ontario and Brookfield Renewable. It was filed in 2022 over four dams on the Mississagi River on Lake Huron's north shore.
It was filed as a last resort after "Brookfield shut the door in our face" when approached about a benefits-sharing agreement, said Kempton.
Carney advocates for more economic benefits-sharing agreements and economic reconciliation in his book, Values, but Mississauga First Nation's chief says they didn't experience that at all from Brookfield Renewable's Canadian firm, Evolugen.
"If anything, we've been ignored," Brent Niganobe told CBC Indigenous last month.
Brent Niganobe is the chief of Mississauga First Nation. (Erik White/CBC)
The chief said the dams in question devastated the community by destroying fishing sites, flooding territory and displacing people. While that was decades before Brookfield bought the dams in 2002, the First Nation alleges Brookfield benefited from prejudicial regulatory changes in 2019.
Meanwhile, the dams continue to impact the land, said Niganobe.
"There's still impacts with the fish. There was a spill at one of them that we didn't find out about till later, so it continues to create havoc on the environment."
From Maine to Colombia
In Maine, conservation groups sued Brookfield Renewable in 2021.
The groups alleged four dams on the Kennebec River were violating American federal law by repeatedly killing Atlantic salmon from an endangered population. The groups withdrew the claim in 2023, vowing to focus on the relicensing process instead, but they and local Wabanaki nations continue to advocate for the dams' removal.
The Shawmut Dam spans the Kennebec River, on Sept. 15, 2021, between Fairfield and Benton, Maine. The dam has been in the centre of a decades-long debate over how to restore habitat for Atlantic salmon while preserving paper mill jobs. (Robert F. Bukaty/Associated Press)
Failure to do so will "jeopardize the future of our sustenance fishing heritage," said Chief Kirk Francis of the Penobscot Nation and Chief Clarissa Sabattis of the Houlton Band of Maliseet in a March 5 news release.
More than 4,000 kilometres away in northern Colombia, the Sogamoso Dam, owned by Brookfield's Colombian business Isagen, caused significant damage to ecosystems and local communities, according to a 2023 collaborative report by some 50 civil society groups.
Meanwhile, the Wayuu people are resisting an Isagen wind farm in La Guajira, Colombia's northernmost peninsula. Nacion Wayuu, a local NGO, accuses Isagen of invading their ancestral territories and advancing the project without consent.
Company has denied allegations
In a statement, the Carney campaign declined to address the reports directly.
"Mr. Carney left his career in business and finance to run for office and is focused exclusively on serving the people of Canada," wrote Liberal spokesperson Jenna Ghassabeh.
"He is deeply committed to advancing reconciliation and upholding the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples."
Questions about Brookfield should be sent directly to the firm, she added.
Brookfield didn't respond to media requests but it has previously denied the allegations.
In Ontario, Brookfield is mounting a court defence against Mississauga First Nation, while the U.S. federal energy regulator last month recommended the dams in Maine keep operating, provided Brookfield makes changes to allow endangered fish to pass through.
The Sogamoso hydroelectric project sits across the Sogamoso Dam in northern Colombia. Brookfield acquired Isagen in 2016. (Isagen)
In Colombia, Brookfield called the allegation that its dam was damaging the environment and local communities "unfounded." The company denied the allegations about Brazil, telling Global Witness it "unequivocally refute[s] the specific allegations of human rights abuses towards Indigenous tribes."
There are positive stories, too.
In Australia, Brookfield Properties released "Reconciliation Action Plans" in 2022 and 2024. The firm reportedly pulled out of a controversial Australian gas project in 2021, amid local concerns about damage to culturally important ancient Indigenous petroglyphs.
Evolugen gave 4.4 hectares of land back to Michipicoten First Nation in Ontario in 2018, after elders raised concerns it would threaten an important spiritual and healing site, and in 2012, Brookfield Renewable gave about 40 hectares of land to the Hiawatha Institute for Indigenous Knowledge in New York state.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
40 minutes ago
- New York Post
Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?
'Destroying democracy' — the latest theme of the left — can be defined in many ways. How about attempting to destroy constitutional, ancient and hallowed institutions simply to suit short-term political gains? So, who in 2020, and now once again, has boasted about packing the 156-year-old, nine-justice Supreme Court? Who talks frequently about destroying the 187-year-old Senate filibuster — though only when they hold a Senate majority? Who wants to bring in an insolvent left-wing Puerto Rico and redefine the 235-year-old District of Columbia — by altering the Constitution — as two new states solely to obtain four additional liberal senators? Who is trying to destroy the constitutionally mandated 235-year Electoral College by circumventing it with the surrogate 'The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?' Does destroying democracy also entail weaponizing federal bureaucracies, turning them into rogue partisan arms of a president? So who ordered the CIA to concoct bogus charges of 'collusion' to sabotage Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, the 2016-2017 transition, and the first 22 months of Trump's first term? Who prompted a cabal of '51 former intelligence officials' to lie to the American people on the eve of the last debate of the 2020 election that the FBI-authenticated Hunter Biden laptop was instead the work of a 'Russian intelligence operation?' Who ordered the FBI to connive and partner with social-media conglomerates to censor accurate news deemed unhelpful to the 2020 Biden campaign? Who pulled off the greatest presidential coup in history by using surrogates in the shadows to run the cognitively debilitated Biden presidency, then by fiat canceled his reelection effort and finally anointed as his replacement the new nominee Kamala Harris, who had never won a single primary delegate? Who ordered FBI SWAT teams to invade the home of a former president because of a classification dispute over 102 files out of some 13,000 stored there? Who tried to remove an ex-president and leader of his party from at least 25 state ballots to deprive millions of Americans of the opportunity to vote for or against him? Who coordinated four local, state and federal prosecutors to destroy a former and future president by charging him with fantasy crimes that were never before, and will never again be, lodged against anyone else? Who appointed a federal prosecutor to go after the ex-president, who arranged for a high-ranking Justice Department official to step down to join a New York prosecutor's efforts to destroy an ex-president, and who met in the White House with a Georgia county prosecutor seeking to destroy an ex-president — all on the same day — a mere 72 hours after Trump announced his 2024 reelection bid? Who but the current Democrats ever impeached a president twice? Has any party ever tried an ex-president in the Senate when he was out of office and a mere private citizen? When have there ever been two near-miss assassination attempts on a major party presidential candidate during a single presidential campaign? Who destroyed the southern border and broke federal law to allow in, without criminal or health background audits, some 10 million to 12 million illegal aliens? Who created 600 'sanctuary jurisdictions' for the sole purpose of nullifying federal immigration law, in the eerie spirit of the renegade old Confederacy? Who allowed tens of thousands of rioters, arsonists and violent protesters over four months in 2020 to destroy over $2 billion in property, kill some 35 people, injure 1,500 police officers and torch a federal courthouse, a police precinct and a historic church — all with de facto legal impunity? How do the purported destroyers of democracy find themselves winning 60% to 70% approval on most of the key issues of our times, while the supposed saviors of democracy are on the losing side of popular opinion? How does a president 'destroy democracy' by his party winning the White House by both the popular and Electoral College vote, winning majorities in both the Senate and House by popular votes and enjoying a 6-3 edge in the Supreme Court through judges appointed by popularly elected presidents? So what is behind these absurd charges? Three catalysts: One, the new anguished elitist Democratic Party alienated the middle classes through its Jacobin agenda and therefore lost the Congress, the presidency and the Supreme Court, and now has no federal political power. Two, the Democratic Party is polling at record lows and yet remains hellbent on alienating the traditional sources of its power — minorities, youth and Independents. Three, Democrats cannot find any issues that the people support, nor any leaders to convince the people to embrace them. So it is no surprise that the panicked Democrats bark at the shadows — given that they know their revolutionary, neo-socialist agenda is destroying them. And yet, like all addicts, they choose destruction over abandoning their self-destructive fixations. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.


The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pence: ‘I fully support' Trump's deployment of National Guard to DC
Former Vice President Pence said on Sunday he 'fully' supports President Trump's approach to combating crime in Washington, D.C., through his recent crackdown on the nation's capital. 'I welcome his decision to deploy the National Guard and essentially federalize the D.C. Police Department. I know that it's all now working in a very cooperative way,' Pence said in an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union.' 'I think it's important what the president is doing. I fully support it. And I think the American people welcome the president taking decisive action to ensure the streets of our nation's capital are safe and also continues to provide resources across the country to make all of our cities and towns and communities safe,' Pence added. The National Guard started ramping up its presence in Washington on Thursday, deploying troops to the National Mall and Metro stations after the president announced the move earlier in the week in what he portrayed as a crackdown on crime in the nation's capital. The White House said more than 1,600 personnel were involved in operations across the city on Wednesday, making 45 arrests, mostly targeting immigrants who lacked permanent legal status. While the Guard had a relatively small footprint in the city earlier this week, by Thursday, all of the roughly 800 Army and Air National Guard troops Trump ordered to the streets had mobilized for duty, the Pentagon confirmed. On Saturday, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster (R) announced the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to Washington, just hours after West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (R) announced between 300 and 400 National Guard troops would be traveling to the nation's capital.

an hour ago
Draft of new 'MAHA' report suggests RFK Jr. won't target pesticides
The draft of an upcoming government report suggesting ways to improve the health of American children does not recommend severe restrictions on pesticides and ultra-processed foods, according to a copy of the document obtained by ABC News. The draft's language, if left unchanged, would constitute a win for the agriculture industry and a potential setback for Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) allies, who have railed against the use of chemical additives in America's food supply, arguing that they harm children. A person familiar with the draft cautioned that the language could still change before it's released to the public. "Unless officially released by the administration, any document purporting to be the MAHA report should be dismissed as speculative literature," White House deputy press secretary Kush Desai said in response to ABC News' request for comment. An HHS spokesperson declined to verify the document's authenticity. The New York Times first reported details of the new draft report. The report will be the second "MAHA" report released by the Trump administration following one published in May. Both were composed by officials in the White House and across different federal agencies, including Kennedy's HHS. The May report detailed the factors officials said were worsening the health of American children and called for a second report, within 100 days, to recommend policies to address those factors. The earlier report -- which was dogged by the revelation that some studies it cited were nonexistent -- cited damning statistics about the effect of chemical food additives, tying them to cancer and developmental disorders. The draft of the new report does not signal any intention to eliminate pesticides from America's food. Instead, the draft calls for "more targeted and precise pesticide applications" and research programs that would "help to decrease pesticide volumes." The report also stated the Environmental Protection Agency "will work to ensure that the public has awareness and confidence in EPA's robust pesticide review procedures and how that relates to the limiting of risk for users and the general public." Regarding ultra-processed foods, the new report states only that HHS, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration would work to develop a "government-wide definition for 'ultra-processed food.'" In his January confirmation hearing, Kennedy declared that "something is poisoning the American people, and we know that the primary culprits are changing food supply, a switch to highly chemical intensive processed foods." Meanwhile, some "MAHA" influencers have loudly demanded changes to the country's food supply, putting their faith in Kennedy to leverage his position of power to uproot the agriculture industry. But this summer, agriculture groups lobbied intensely against the inclusion of anti-pesticide recommendations in the new report. They appeared to find an ally in Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, who indicated to reporters this month that the upcoming report would spare pesticides. "There is no chance that our current system of agriculture can survive without those crop protection tools," she said at a press conference in a Washington. "I feel very confident that his, and our, commitment to make sure that farmers are at the table remains paramount, and that the report will reflect that."