Reeves boosts NHS and housing as some budgets squeezed
Rachel Reeves has announced an extra £29bn per year for the NHS in England, along with funding boosts for defence and housing, as she set out the government's spending plans until the end of the decade.
The chancellor also promised more money for artificial intelligence and transport projects, saying "renewing Britain" was at the heart of her plans.
But the Spending Review also saw some departments squeezed in day-to-day spending, including the Foreign Office and the environment department.
Reeves said the review would deliver security, economic growth and "an NHS fit for the future", but Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said it was a "spend now, tax later review".
He predicted "a cruel summer of speculation" ahead of the autumn Budget, when he said the chancellor would announce tax rises.
Ahead of the chancellor's announcement in the Commons, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer told his cabinet the day marked "the end of the first phase of this government, as we move to a new phase that delivers on the promise of change for working people".
The government will hope that, following a bumpy first year, increased spending in health and investment in longer-term projects will reassure voters but many departments will still have to grapple with frugal day-to-day spending allocations.
Live: Follow the latest updates
Seven ways the Spending Review affects you
What has the chancellor has announced? The key points
Watch: Where the money is being spent
The Spending Review marked the culmination of months of discussions between Reeves and her cabinet colleagues.
Negotiations have been particularly drawn out with Housing Secretary Angela Rayner and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, with agreements not being reached until Sunday and Monday respectively.
Rayner's department secured £39bn across 10 years for social and affordable housing in England.
The Home Office's day-to-day budget will go down by 1.7% over the next three years but funding of police forces rises by 2.3% - provided local council taxes also increase.
The National Police Chiefs' Council said the increase would "cover little more than annual inflationary pay increases".
The chancellor also pledged to end the use of hotels to accommodate asylum seekers by the end of the Parliament, expected in 2029.
The BBC has been told that will be achieved by reducing the number arriving by small boats and building new accommodation for asylum seekers. The housing department has been given a pot of money to provide alternatives.
Health was the big winner in the review, with the NHS budget increased by 3% per year across three years for day-to-day running costs.
The government had already said it would be increasing defence spending from 2.3% of national income to 2.6% by 2027, which includes intelligence spending.
This was confirmed in the Spending Review but it did not include progress towards reaching 3%, which the government has said it hopes to hit by 2034.
The chancellor is restricted in how much can she spend as a result of her two self-imposed rules – that day-to-day spending should not be funded through borrowing and that government debt as a share of national income should fall by 2029-30.
Her decision to increase spending on health, means other departments will see their budgets tighten.
The Foreign Office loses 6.9% a year, mainly in aid spending; Transport loses 5% a year over the next three years, and the environment department loses 2.7%.
Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said spending limits would put pressure on public sector pay and budgets for schools would be particularly tight, especially as demand for special education continues to rise.
Other announcements included:
An additional £280m for the Border Security Command, the body tackling small boat crossings
£7bn to help build 14,000 new prison places in England and Wales
An extension of the £3 cap on bus fares in England to March 2027
£2bn for artificial intelligence projects and £750m to fund a supercomputer at Edinburgh University
In the days leading up to the Spending Review, the government announced £86bn for science and technology projects, £15bn for transport links, £11.5bn towards building the Sizewell C nuclear power plant and an expansion of the number of children receiving free school meals at a cost of £1bn.
Additional spending in England will be be matched by an extra £5.7bn per year on average for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Despite the tightening of some budgets, Reeves was keen to insist she was not returning to the austerity policies of the coalition and Conservative governments of 2010 to 2016.
She said austerity had been a "destructive choice for the fabric of our society and a destructive choice for our economy", adding: "My choices are different."
With announcements for investment in the longer term, the government hopes to see the economy growing, while the focus on NHS and defence budgets match government pledges on health and security.
But there is political risk for the government as they hope that voters, who may be drawn to Reform UK, do not get impatient as they wait for services to improve.
The chancellor aimed political jibes not only at the Conservatives, but also Reform, who she said were "itching" to replicate the "disastrous" spending policies of Liz Truss.
Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice said "spending was out of control" and that the government could learn from his party's efforts to cut waste in local councils.
Liberal Democrat Treasury Spokesperson Daisy Cooper called for more money for social care, telling MPs: "Putting more money into the NHS without fixing social care is like pouring water into a leaky bucket."
She said the chancellor could boost growth by pursuing a closer trade deal with the EU.
The SNP's Dave Doogan said the chancellor had mentioned Reform UK and its leader Nigel Farage more than Scotland.
Green Co-Leader Adrian Ramsay accused the chancellor of "balancing her spreadsheet on the backs of some of the worst off in our society" and urged the government should introduce a tax on the "super-rich".
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Badenoch to call for end to oil and gas windfall tax and ban on new licences
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is set to call for an end to the windfall tax on oil and gas companies and the ban on new licences. The energy profits levy was put in place under the previous Conservative government but extended when Labour entered power. Designed to fund interventions to bring down household bills, the policy has been criticised by those in the industry. Speaking at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh on Friday, Mrs Badenoch is expected to tout the oil and gas sector, accusing the UK Government of 'killing' it, claiming 'renewing our party and our country means standing up for our oil and gas industry'. She will add: 'When the oil and gas windfall tax, the energy profits levy, was brought in, the oil price was near a historic high, at the exact time as energy bills for the British people were sky-rocketing. 'But there is no longer a windfall to tax. It has long gone. And the longer this regressive tax on one of our most successful industries remains, the more damaging it becomes. 'Labour have extended and increased this tax. They are killing this industry.' If the measure remains in place to 2030 as intended, Mrs Badenoch will say 'there will be no industry left to tax'. She will add: 'So, today, I say enough. Labour must remove the energy profits levy. Labour must speed up the process of replacing it with a system that rewards success and incentivises investment. 'Because we shouldn't have this energy profits levy at all. 'We must scrap the ban on new licences. 'We must overturn the ban on supporting oil and gas technology exports. 'And we must champion our own industry. 'We must let this great British, great Scottish industry thrive, grow and create jobs – ensuring our energy security for generations to come, driving growth and making this country richer in the process.' Mrs Badenoch will address her first Scottish party conference as leader on Friday while her counterpart north of the border Russell Findlay will deliver his inaugural address on Saturday. Responding to Mrs Badenoch, Simon Francis of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition said her comments were 'out of touch', adding: 'Even with the windfall tax in place, the energy industry made over £115 billion in profits in 2024 alone. 'Meanwhile, average household energy bills remain hundreds and hundreds of pounds higher than they were before the energy crisis started. 'While the Government is right to be consulting on reform of the windfall tax, maintaining a profits levy could help fund home upgrades and a social tariff which would bring down energy bills for the most vulnerable in society.' SNP MSP Kevin Stewart said: 'The Tories wrecked our economy, presided over soaring household bills and ripped Scotland from the EU against our will. 'And now they're lurching further to the right as they haemorrhage votes to Nigel Farage. 'This weekend will be an important reminder of how Westminster has failed Scotland. Only the SNP is offering hope and a brighter future as an independent nation.' Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: 'While the Tories and SNP let energy workers down by failing to plan for the future, Scottish Labour is committed to taking action towards reaching net zero, creating jobs and cutting energy bills. 'The Tories are on the side of oil and gas giants rather than working Scots, but Scottish Labour will work with the UK Government and use devolved powers to deliver a just transition for the industry. 'With Kemi Badenoch desperately attempting to rally the few remaining Scottish Tories, it seems like it won't be long until they can fit all of their MSPs in a single taxi.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Crime will be the next immigration. Politicians will be punished for it
It's hard to shake off the sense that Britain is creeping towards lawlessness. Low-level crime is on its way to becoming legalised, whether officially – in the case of cannabis – or not – as with shoplifting. Public faith in the police is collapsing as many serious crimes like burglary and assault routinely fail to be solved, and sometimes even go uninvestigated, while 'speech crimes' trigger the full wrath of the law. Too many neighbourhoods are becoming hotbeds of anti-social behaviour, with begging prolific and buildings defaced by graffiti. True, Britain is cash-strapped. But it's the fusion of chronic underinvestment with liberal idealism which is so toxic. Disorder is being normalised, criminals treated as victims, the rule of law eroded. Though politicians remain convinced that crime is a second-order issue, it could eventually prove the Labour Government's undoing. My own local area in west London is disintegrating. It started with a clutch of beggars congregating outside the Tesco after Covid. Now they are joined by dishevelled women selling 'washing powder' and bare-footed addicts. For the most part, they are a nuisance rather than dangerous. Like many women in the city, when I walk the streets, I get the surreal feeling of being neither safe nor unsafe. With the crime rate in my area surging by a third since 2019, and several of my neighbours recently burgled, that may soon change. When I expressed my concerns to police and crime commissioners this week, they echoed Mark Rowley's complaint about a lack of funds. Some say they find Rachel Reeves's claim that she is hiking police spending by 2.3 per cent each year exasperating. A view prevails in Westminster that crime is a non-issue. Its proponents point to statistics that suggest it is at its lowest level on record. They think that technology is rendering crime a relic of the past, with their favourite example, carjacking, now largely a fool's errand thanks to security device innovation. They think that any ongoing problems pertain to a tiny number of chronic offenders. Meanwhile, Left-leaning criminologists insist that conservatives' fears that 'soft' policing could drive up crime are prejudiced. Crackdowns are said to be 'counterproductive', alienating 'disproportionately-targeted' minority groups. Such framing overlooks the risk that unrecorded crime is quietly climbing, as law-breaking becomes such a regular occurrence that some victims don't bother to report it. Other kinds are probably not being picked up properly by polling. Even more worrying is the Leftist view that, if there is a specific issue with chronic offenders, it's the consequence of too much law and order rather than too little. Keir Starmer's prison guru, James Timpson, thinks Britain is 'addicted' to sentencing. Sadiq Khan has backed 'partial' cannabis decriminalisation, amid claims that policing the drug harms more than the substance itself. The way in which the Left tries to romanticise these criminals is if anything becoming more strident – we are told that in the wake of austerity and Covid, certain law-breakers are, deep down, troubled souls. Shoplifters and fare dodgers who are allegedly 'struggling with the cost of living' are the latest group to which any 'compassionate' society should turn a blind eye, the Left insist. This myth threatens to shake the foundations of our society by undermining the sacred principle that we are all equal under the law. There is only so far we can fall down this rehabilitation rabbit hole before triggering a crime surge. Labour is adamant that the Michael Howard school of tough sentencing has failed. It has opted to release offenders early and ignore our rotting prison estate. This is a terrible mistake. Even if prison isn't working in the sense that it isn't preventing ex-convicts from reoffending, policymakers should not use this as an excuse to avoid punishing those who break our laws. The answer to our failure to rehabilitate is not to allow criminals to escape punishment. In the most important sense, prison almost always 'works' by preventing somebody who is locked up from stealing or assaulting other people. True, rehabilitation can sometimes work wonders. I have spoken with ex offenders who have been transformed by such programmes. One woman, Sonia, told me of how the support of one charity helped her evade the 'revolving door back to prison'. But resource-intensive, bespoke rehabilitation is tricky to scale. In austere times, the temptation to roll out rehab on the cheap could prove overwhelming, and will end in failure. As veteran probation expert Mark Leech told me: 'There are prisoners that have done the courses so many times they could deliver them better than the tutors who deliver them.' Chasing a utopian ideal, with no idea how to make it work, let alone on a tight budget, is flirting with disaster. Efforts by some criminologists to discredit the policing approach known as 'broken windows' could also end badly. This concept, which clamps down on low-level crime such as graffiti and drug-taking on the basis that tolerating 'minor' disorder leads to a culture that promotes much more serious crime, helped flatten a vicious crime wave in 1990s New York. It has been trashed in recent years, amid complaints it is racist and based on 'bogus' evidence. I disagree. Broken windows could once again be a vital weapon against certain serious crimes, such as sexual offences. Police officers on the front line certainly seem to think so: as Matthew Barber, PCC for Thames Valley, says: 'You won't find many hardened criminals who didn't start doing things at a young age before getting steadily out of control. Fix those basics and you'll prevent an awful lot more serious crime down the road.' Though Labour politicians may be in denial, a slow-burning crisis is unfolding. There is a widespread sense of malaise, that law is breaking down. In Red Wall towns, Labour's 'levelling up' projects are being undermined by anti-social behaviour. In the cities, alarm at gang violence, as well as muggings and burglary, may yet nudge professionals to the Right. Labour's inability to tackle crime could cost it dear. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves 'a gnat's whisker' from having to raise taxes, says IFS
Rachel Reeves is a "gnat's whisker" away from having to raise taxes in the autumn budget, a leading economist has warned - despite the chancellor insisting her plans are "fully funded". Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said "any move in the wrong direction" for the economy before the next fiscal event would "almost certainly spark more tax rises". 'Sting in the tail' in chancellor's plans - politics latest Speaking the morning after she delivered her spending review, which sets government budgets until 2029, Ms Reeves told Wilfred Frost hiking taxes wasn't inevitable. "Everything I set out yesterday was fully costed and fully funded," she told Sky News Breakfast. Her plans - which include £29bn for day-to-day NHS spending, £39bn for affordable and social housing, and boosts for defence and transport - are based on what she set out in October's budget. That budget, her first as chancellor, included controversial tax hikes on employers and increased borrowing to help public services. Chancellor won't rule out tax rises The Labour government has long vowed not to raise taxes on "working people" - specifically income tax, national insurance for employees, and VAT. Ms Reeves refused to completely rule out tax rises in her next budget, saying the world is "very uncertain". The Conservatives have claimed she will almost certainly have to put taxes up, with shadow chancellor Mel Stride accusing her of mismanaging the economy. Taxes on businesses had "destroyed growth" and increased spending had been "inflationary", he told Sky News. New official figures showed the economy contracted in April by 0.3% - more than expected. It coincided with Donald Trump imposing tariffs across the world. Ms Reeves admitted the figures were "disappointing" but pointed to more positive figures from previous months. Read more:Chancellor running out of levers to pullGrowth stats make for unpleasant readingYour spending review questions answered 'Sting in the tail' She is hoping Labour's plans will provide more jobs and boost growth, with major infrastructure projects "spread" across the country - from the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, to a rail line connecting Liverpool and Manchester. But the IFS said further contractions in the economy, and poor forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility, would likely require the chancellor to increase the national tax take once again. It said her spending review already accounted for a 5% rise in council tax to help local authorities, labelling it a "sting in the tail" after she told Sky's Beth Rigby that it wouldn't have to go up.
