UN criticises failure to appoint language commissioners
A failure by the executive to appoint commissioners for the Irish language and Ulster-Scots has been criticised by a United Nations (UN) committee.
The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) also criticised "inadequate funding" for cultural and language rights.
New language laws for Northern Ireland were passed in the Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Act 2022.
But an Irish language commissioner and a commissioner for the Ulster-Scots and Ulster British tradition have not yet been appointed.
The roles, along with an Office of Identity and Cultural Expression, were originally promised in the New Decade, New Approach deal in 2020.
But the office has not been set up, and there are no commissioners yet in place.
The president of the Irish language and culture group Conradh na Gaeilge, Ciarán Mac Giolla Bhéin, welcomed the UN report.
He said he hoped commitments previously agreed by the Democratic Unionist Party and Sinn Féin to appoint an Irish language commissioner would soon be delivered.
"I hope we'll have them in place before the end of this [Stormont] mandate, I do not for the life of me understand what the delay is," he told BBC News NI.
Mr Mac Giolla Bhéin said Irish language campaigners were deeply disappointed that a timetable for the appointment was not spelled out in the executive's programme for government but insisted that organisations would continue to put pressure on politicians to appoint someone to the role.
The commissioners are meant to monitor the services public bodies deliver to Irish and Ulster-Scots speakers.
Proposals from the language commissioners have to be approved by the first minister and deputy first minister before taking effect.
CESCR is a body of 18 independent experts that monitors how states are implementing international agreements on social and cultural rights.
Its latest report, which has just been published, monitors the UK government's actions and those of the devolved governments, including Northern Ireland.
"The committee regrets that the institutions created to protect and promote the Irish language and to promote and develop the Ulster-Scot tradition have not yet been established," the committee's report said.
It recommends that the executive "expedite the establishment of the institutions and policies envisaged for the protection and promotion of the Irish language and Ulster-Scots culture and heritage."
A penal law dating from 1737, which prohibited the use of languages other than English in court, was recently repealed.
It cleared the way for Irish to be used in legal proceedings in Northern Ireland.
But there has been political disagreement over cuts to cross-border funding for the Irish language.
That led to a recent strike by some Irish language organisations and activists.
"The committee is concerned at the inadequate funding for culture and culture-related activities, which hampers the right of all to participate in cultural life, to express one's own identity, values and way of life without fear of discrimination," the UN report said.
Mr Mac Giolla Bhéin said the UN committee was "echoing what we have been saying, not just with recent announcements around cuts to Foras na Gaeilge, but this something that's been 20 years in the making."
"We have way more kids now enrolled in Irish medium education, we've much deeper demand for services across the whole strata of society, yet groups are expected to do more and more with less and less," he said.
"That isn't sustainable, groups are really staring into the abyss as things stand.
"We welcome that the report has highlighted this but more importantly it needs to be on the radar of Stormont to ensure a solution is found urgently to address this crisis."
The UN Committee also highlighted other rights in its report, including expressing concern about the controversial Troubles Legacy Act and recommending "access to safe abortion services".
It also called for more schemes to help women, people with disabilities, young people, ethnic minorities and migrants into employment.
While it cannot force the UK government or the Northern Ireland Executive to act, the governments will have to report to the UN committee on what steps they are taking to implement its recommendations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stormont strategy to tackle poverty 'not fit for purpose,' says charity
The first draft strategy agreed by the Northern Ireland Executive to tackle poverty is "not fit for purpose", according to a children's charity. An anti-poverty strategy was first proposed in 2006, with the aim of reducing social exclusion and deprivation. In March, Stormont's Executive Committee was found by a court ruling to be in breach of its legal obligation to adopt the strategy. BBC News NI has now seen a leaked copy of the document, which was agreed by executive ministers earlier in May, but has yet to be made public. Trása Canavan of Barnardo's NI, who is also chair of the Anti- Poverty Strategy Group, was among groups who met Communities Minister Gordon Lyons earlier this week about the document. She said she had "serious concerns that it will not make any difference to the lives of the children, families and communities that our organisations support every day, and we raised this with minister Lyons this week". "The current draft of the Anti-Poverty Strategy is not fit for purpose. "It clearly shows that the government has committed no new actions or funding to tackle poverty in Northern Ireland." The 28-page paper sets out the executive's approach to tackling poverty over the next 10 years. It outlines efforts already being taken by various departments to help minimise the risks of people falling into poverty in Northern Ireland, as well as reducing its impacts and ways to help people get out of poverty. The document states that poverty is "not a problem which the executive can solve in isolation", but one that requires community groups, business, councils and voluntary groups to help. It adds that the strategy will be accompanied by a programme of delivery to be updated on an ongoing basis. Ms Canavan added that earlier this year her group had outlined what it wanted to see in the document in order for it to be effective. "This included clear and time-bound targets, a lifecycle approach, new actions and clear funding commitments, rather than counting work that is already under way. "Unfortunately, the draft strategy does not meet any of these key principles. "It is quite simply not good enough for the people of Northern Ireland. "Our group remains committed to working constructively with the government to eradicating poverty in Northern Ireland." The SDLP, Stormont's official opposition, said it is "impossible to be anything other than deeply underwhelmed" by the strategy. Mark H Durkan said the executive should be "embarrassed to present a document that reads more like a list of vague hopes than a plan of action". The paper sets out measures already being taken by the executive and says it will "continue to deliver a package of welfare mitigations" while lobbying Westminster on reforms and to maintain the triple lock on pensions. It adds that legislation being brought by Education Minister Paul Givan will ensure all school uniforms are affordable, and that strategies on fuel poverty will be developed. It also promises that "everyone, including those in or at risk of poverty, has access to good quality, affordable and sustainable homes". But Durkan said: "This document acknowledges the direct link between housing and poverty and yet the Executive have confirmed they will only build half of the homes intended this year. "The strategy also fails to confront one of the most damaging policies hitting low-income families: the two-child limit. Ministers have the power to address these issues, but once again they've chosen not to." When it was agreed last month by the executive, First Minister Michelle O'Neill said the plan probably could "go further" but denied there was a row between Sinn Fein and the DUP over it. Communities Minister, Gordon Lyons, whose department oversaw the design of the draft strategy, said it had "drawn heavily on the work that has already been carried out". The DUP minister succeeded Sinn Féín's Deirdre Hargey in the role when Stormont was restored in 2024 after a two-year hiatus. The Department for Communities said: "The draft Strategy reflects the Executive's priorities in the context of the ongoing fiscal and other challenges we face. "The minister has listened to a wide range of views ahead of the consultation launch, which will give people from all communities a chance to have their say on how we tackle poverty and transform lives in Northern Ireland. "Minister Lyons would encourage all stakeholders in this area to provide their feedback when the consultation formally opens." It added that officials were working to launch the consultation as soon as possible. Alliance assembly member Sian Mulholland told BBC NI's Sunday Politics programme that she had been "a bit disappointed" by the draft document. "After the anticipation and the waiting, we had a closed briefing session with our committee to talk through it," she said. She said she believed it showed a "lack of ambition". "We have been waiting so long for it and in the context of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report, the NI Audit's report on poverty and child poverty in Northern Ireland we aren't seeing the recommendations and the lessons that should have been learned from the child poverty strategy making its way into this document," she added. You can watch Sunday Politics on BBC iPlayer. Stormont found in breach of duty on anti-poverty Anti-poverty strategy could 'go further' says first minister
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spending Review to include £86bn science and tech package
An £86bn package for the science and technology sector will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, the government has said ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review. The package also includes up to £500m for regions across the UK with local leaders having a say on how it is spent, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose review will outline day-to-day departmental and investment budgets over the next few years, said investing in the sector would create jobs and boost security. But research backers have warned that the government needs to do more to secure the UK's reputation for science on the world stage. Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves will set out departmental spending plans on Wednesday, with the package for science and technology expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by 2029. DSIT said "every corner of the country" would benefit, with communities able to direct funding to expertise specific to their areas. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery. Northern Ireland will receive money to develop defence equipment, while south Wales will use the money to design microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the plan for change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the Institute of Physics, welcomed the funding but said the government would need to commit to a decade-long plan to train workers. "This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy," he said. John-Arne Rottingen, chief executive of Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder Wellcome, warned that visa costs for scientists from overseas, financial challenges at universities and a budget that was not adjusted for inflation could hamper the government's ambitions. "The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all." The shadow technology secretary, Alan Mak, said the investment for the sector seemed to be a "copy and paste" of Conservative plans set out in its manifesto last year. "As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back," he added. Earlier this week, Reeves admitted that not every government department would "get everything they want" in Wednesday's review, saying she had turned down requests from ministers and argued a squeeze on funding was a "product of economic reality". Reeves said her fiscal rules on borrowing to pay for public services were "non-negotiable" and insisted they were necessary because of "Conservative maltreatment" of the economy. The Treasury said earlier this year that the chancellor's fiscal rules would ensure day-to-day spending was matched by tax revenues, meaning the government would only borrow to invest. Big chunks will go to favoured departments, with suggestions of an extra £30 billion for the NHS over three years. Whitehall insiders have told the BBC they expect the spending review will be "ugly", and that ministers have been fighting over winning small amounts of cash for their respective departments.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
What will the Spending Review mean for NI public services?
Next week the Chancellor Rachel Reeves will reveal the outcome of her Spending Review. It will allocate money to day-to-day public services for the next three years. It will also set infrastructure budgets for the next four years. The review will directly impact on what Stormont Ministers have to spend on public services in Northern Ireland. Last year Reeves set what is known as the "spending envelope" – the amount by which total government spending will change in a given period. Day-to-day spending is planned to grow by an average of 1.2% above the rate of inflation each year for the next three years. Infrastructure spending is planned to grow by 1.3% above inflation a year over the next four years. These are much lower growth rates than this year and last year, reflecting the new government's "emergency" injection of cash into the health service and public sector pay deals. On Wednesday the Chancellor will break it down further, making allocations to each central government department. The precise allocation of this money matters for Stormont's spending plans. More than 90% of what Stormont ministers have to spend comes from the Treasury through what is known as "the block grant." The increase in the block grant is worked out using a calculation known as the Barnett formula, which is based on the annual changes in UK central government departmental budgets. It gives Stormont an equivalent spending increase for the size of the NI population, adjusted for the extent to which each service is devolved. Some services, like health, are almost entirely devolved but defence is not devolved. If the government decides it is going to spend more on defence at the expense of other services that will have an impact on the amount of extra money in the Stormont pot. In simple terms: If the UK Department of Health sees its budget increase by £100m, then Northern Ireland would get approximately £3m extra. If the Ministry of Defence budget increases by £100m Stormont does not get anything extra. When devolution was restored in 2024 the government agreed a financial package which included an automatic top-up of any money awarded by the Barnett formula. The government was persuaded that the level of need in Northern Ireland means it requires spending of £124 per head for every £100 per head spent in England. As Northern Ireland was funded below that level, the government said that in future every £1 that comes through the Barnett formula will now come with an extra 24p. That will apply until the overall level of funding need is reached. The independent Fiscal Council has estimated that will be worth £815m over five years. The government said the size of the top up could be reviewed if "independent and credible sources" provide evidence. To that end the Executive commissioned a study from the economist Prof Gerry Holtham, an expert in the devolution of public finances. The BBC understands that his work has come back with a range of possible funding need. The central estimates are £123 per head, for every £100 spent in England, if agricultural spending is excluded and £128 per head if agriculture forms part of the calculation. If the Treasury is persuaded to accept the higher end of the range it will be worth tens of millions of pounds extra over the next five years. The devolution financial package also brought a large dollop of one-off UK government funding, largely to pay for public sector pay deals. However that creates a cliff-edge drop in Stormont funding of about £500m in 2026/27 when that short term money runs out. The government committed to review "concerns about 2026-27 funding" at the Spending Review. The Fiscal Council has suggested options to tackle the cliff edge could include more one-off funding or setting a new, higher baseline for Stormont's budget. However, it is also possible that the normal operation of Spending Review will allocate enough money to largely remove the cliff edge. The Chancellor will be allocating trillions of pounds in the Spending Review but it is a tiny fraction of that which may have most political impact in Northern Ireland. There is a growing expectation that the UK government will come up with additional money for the construction of a new GAA stadium at Casement Park in Belfast. That project has been bogged down in labyrinthine planning and funding issues. The GAA official leading the project has told the BBC he is cautiously optimistic that the Spending Review will include a new financial contribution for the redevelopment project. Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review
