logo
What will the Spending Review mean for NI public services?

What will the Spending Review mean for NI public services?

Yahoo4 hours ago

Next week the Chancellor Rachel Reeves will reveal the outcome of her Spending Review.
It will allocate money to day-to-day public services for the next three years.
It will also set infrastructure budgets for the next four years.
The review will directly impact on what Stormont Ministers have to spend on public services in Northern Ireland.
Last year Reeves set what is known as the "spending envelope" – the amount by which total government spending will change in a given period.
Day-to-day spending is planned to grow by an average of 1.2% above the rate of inflation each year for the next three years.
Infrastructure spending is planned to grow by 1.3% above inflation a year over the next four years.
These are much lower growth rates than this year and last year, reflecting the new government's "emergency" injection of cash into the health service and public sector pay deals.
On Wednesday the Chancellor will break it down further, making allocations to each central government department.
The precise allocation of this money matters for Stormont's spending plans.
More than 90% of what Stormont ministers have to spend comes from the Treasury through what is known as "the block grant."
The increase in the block grant is worked out using a calculation known as the Barnett formula, which is based on the annual changes in UK central government departmental budgets.
It gives Stormont an equivalent spending increase for the size of the NI population, adjusted for the extent to which each service is devolved.
Some services, like health, are almost entirely devolved but defence is not devolved.
If the government decides it is going to spend more on defence at the expense of other services that will have an impact on the amount of extra money in the Stormont pot.
In simple terms: If the UK Department of Health sees its budget increase by £100m, then Northern Ireland would get approximately £3m extra.
If the Ministry of Defence budget increases by £100m Stormont does not get anything extra.
When devolution was restored in 2024 the government agreed a financial package which included an automatic top-up of any money awarded by the Barnett formula.
The government was persuaded that the level of need in Northern Ireland means it requires spending of £124 per head for every £100 per head spent in England.
As Northern Ireland was funded below that level, the government said that in future every £1 that comes through the Barnett formula will now come with an extra 24p.
That will apply until the overall level of funding need is reached.
The independent Fiscal Council has estimated that will be worth £815m over five years.
The government said the size of the top up could be reviewed if "independent and credible sources" provide evidence.
To that end the Executive commissioned a study from the economist Prof Gerry Holtham, an expert in the devolution of public finances.
The BBC understands that his work has come back with a range of possible funding need.
The central estimates are £123 per head, for every £100 spent in England, if agricultural spending is excluded and £128 per head if agriculture forms part of the calculation.
If the Treasury is persuaded to accept the higher end of the range it will be worth tens of millions of pounds extra over the next five years.
The devolution financial package also brought a large dollop of one-off UK government funding, largely to pay for public sector pay deals.
However that creates a cliff-edge drop in Stormont funding of about £500m in 2026/27 when that short term money runs out.
The government committed to review "concerns about 2026-27 funding" at the Spending Review.
The Fiscal Council has suggested options to tackle the cliff edge could include more one-off funding or setting a new, higher baseline for Stormont's budget.
However, it is also possible that the normal operation of Spending Review will allocate enough money to largely remove the cliff edge.
The Chancellor will be allocating trillions of pounds in the Spending Review but it is a tiny fraction of that which may have most political impact in Northern Ireland.
There is a growing expectation that the UK government will come up with additional money for the construction of a new GAA stadium at Casement Park in Belfast.
That project has been bogged down in labyrinthine planning and funding issues.
The GAA official leading the project has told the BBC he is cautiously optimistic that the Spending Review will include a new financial contribution for the redevelopment project.
Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce?
Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Funeral director takes over town's only independent service after nearly 60 years
Funeral director takes over town's only independent service after nearly 60 years

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Funeral director takes over town's only independent service after nearly 60 years

A Norfolk funeral director has taken over a town's only independent, family-owned service, which had been in business for nearly 60 years. Adrian Amis of Cromer and District Independent Funeral Services has acquired Gowards Funeral Independent Services in Fakenham. Founded by Claude Goward in 1966, the Fakenham funeral service has been in the town for 58 years. It will now continue to offer compassionate, independent funeral care in Norfolk under the ownership of Mr Amis. Funeral director Paul Cook, who has more than 40 years' experience in the profession, will continue in his role at the Fakenham funeral home. "I am honoured and excited to be taking over Gowards Funeral Services," Mr Amis said. "It is a business with a deeply respected history and an incredible dedication to the families it serves. "My commitment is to uphold the independent ethos and the high standards of care that Heather, Paul and the Goward family have established. "We look forward to continuing to serve the community with dignity and compassion."

Meme Stocks Made Him a Fortune. Now He's Betting on Flying Taxis.
Meme Stocks Made Him a Fortune. Now He's Betting on Flying Taxis.

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Meme Stocks Made Him a Fortune. Now He's Betting on Flying Taxis.

After booking a nine-figure profit by riding the meme-stock craze for old-school bricks-and-mortar businesses, hedge-fund manager Jason Mudrick was looking for his next big bet. He was as surprised as anyone that he settled on flying taxis. Mudrick specializes in distressed companies, often established businesses that have fallen out of favor. But when late last year he became the biggest shareholder of a British aerospace startup and forced out its founder, he was making a long-shot play on a futuristic industry that for years has seemed just around the corner—yet still hasn't arrived.

Got $1,000? Here's 1 More Reason to Buy XRP and Hold It for at Least 3 Years
Got $1,000? Here's 1 More Reason to Buy XRP and Hold It for at Least 3 Years

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Got $1,000? Here's 1 More Reason to Buy XRP and Hold It for at Least 3 Years

XRP treasury companies are emerging and already absorbing millions of tokens, adding steady demand. Even a few new treasury companies can materially tighten the supply. There are other bullish factors in play right now too. 10 stocks we like better than XRP › XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) is about to experience an interesting tug of war over its supply. On one side are the predictable monthly coin supply releases from escrow by XRP's issuer, a company called Ripple. On the other side are the world's first XRP treasury companies, which are start-ups whose sole purpose is to stockpile the coin and sit on it to capture its price appreciation over time. That second force is small today. But the very fact it now exists when it didn't before creates incremental, structural demand for a coin whose floating supply is otherwise set to expand. If you can handle a three-year holding window and an investment as small as $1,000, the odds are thus very favorable that demand will win out in your favor if you buy the coin. Let's explore why. A crypto treasury company is a publicly traded business that raises capital, buys a digital asset like XRP, and thereby offers its shareholders levered exposure to the underlying asset's price. This approach was first used by Strategy with Bitcoin, and now the same model is being attempted by a few enterprising companies with XRP. In late May, the solar power and storage business VivoPower pivoted to become the world's first XRP-focused treasury company, closing a $121 million private placement-funding round and then in early June specifically allocating $100 million to purchase XRP in an over-the-counter (OTC) deal. And it isn't alone in picking XRP as its treasury asset, at least not any more. Within 24 hours of VivoPower's announcement, two other small companies, Ault Capital Group and an Asia-based logistics holding business, disclosed plans to buy XRP as a strategic reserve asset. Why bother with holding coins when there are other ways to make money that don't rely on the vagaries of the market to generate a return? Although it's yet to be proven successful, except in the case of Strategy, generally crypto treasury companies argue they can outperform just holding their underlying assets directly by issuing equity or convertible debt, buying coins, and capturing any upside on behalf of shareholders. Those shareholders are effectively making a leveraged bet on the crypto by buying the company's stock, so it's true that their returns could be higher than just holding the coins directly. How much impact will these new treasury companies have on XRP's supply relative to what's being released from escrow each month? If the answer is "close to zero," then the coin's critics can retain one of their arguments against buying it. On the other hand, if the treasurers are taking a large amount of supply off the table, it would be another argument in favor of buying and holding the coin. Ripple still controls about 36.5 billion XRP in escrow and, by design, unlocks about 1 billion tokens on the first day of each month. Historically, roughly 800 million of that haul are relocked, leaving a net 200 million XRP that can hit the market and boost supply and depress prices. So there's an inflationary element of XRP that is relatively minor in the big scheme of things. Compare that with VivoPower's initial $100 million purchasing goal for the asset. At today's XRP price of about $2.25, it can buy roughly 44 million XRP. In other words, a single new treasury entrant can sop up roughly 20% of a typical month's net supply increase. Layer in similar moves telegraphed by other aspiring crypto treasury companies, and supply can start to tighten rather quickly, at least for as long as there's a steady drumbeat of new entrants making big purchases. Critics counter that treasury companies are leveraged, thinly capitalized, and prone to dumping if XRP's price plunges, which is a fair point. It's also the case that Ripple could decide to sell more of each month's escrow if prices surge. Nonetheless, the key is that demand pressure from buyers now has a persistent, deep-pocketed corporate source instead of relying solely on retail traders and banks. And that's bullish. Assuming the XRP treasury club grows, three tailwinds could reinforce the thesis for buying $1,000 of the coin and holding it for at least three years. First, the approval of a U.S. exchange-traded fund (ETF) application is widely expected sometime in 2025. An approval would ignite institutional demand the way Bitcoin ETFs did. It's not guaranteed, but it's no secret that the new administration's leaders are very friendly toward crypto. Second, the supply unlock schedule itself is finite and not very scary at all. If the unlocking pace persists as it has, Ripple's remaining stash of XRP will eventually run dry. The monthly supply drip could then end entirely, leaving crypto treasurers, remittance banks, and everyone else to fight over a fixed supply. That would drive prices up. Finally, competition among treasurers is now accelerating. Corporate executives hunting for their own version of Strategy's moment of popularity may decide XRP's utility for making payments are safer than an all-Bitcoin bet. Of course, none of this insulates investors from volatility. That's why a $1,000 starting stake is worthwhile; it keeps your exposure modest while still letting you participate in the upside if demand outruns new supply. Patience is the key here. Give the tug-of-war three years to play out, and the coin's price will likely be a lot higher than it is right now. Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin and XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Got $1,000? Here's 1 More Reason to Buy XRP and Hold It for at Least 3 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store