
Police used drone to surveil thousands at Chch's Electric Ave festival
The drone operated as an 'eye in the sky', hovering at a fixed point a few hundred metres away from the festival.
A live feed was sent to police on the ground and – thanks to a powerful camera lens – officers were able to zoom in on the crowd, monitoring any potential criminal activity.
The public were not warned in advance. News of its use is only being revealed now through an Official Information Act (OIA) request, sent by 1News to police, seeking details of the deployment.
In response to the OIA request, police have released footage its officers recorded on the day, including several examples of revellers being apprehended by security and police. In one of the clips, security guards can be seen pinning a man to the ground, and throwing him out of the event.
ADVERTISEMENT
Further surveillance continued at night, with police using the thermal capabilities on the camera to track where people were.
Police have said it was primarily used to track potential disorder and assaults. However emails and documents obtained through the OIA show they were also keeping an eye on 'fence jumpers', as well as potential drug activity, with the drone team 'monitoring the sale and supply of controlled drugs'.
The deployment was carried out without a warrant, because one is not needed at large gatherings. Police instead relied on public filming rules.
It initially caused concern for the festival organiser, Callam Mitchell, who emailed police flagging that attendees had not been warned about the drone, the emails show.
Electric Ave festival organiser Callam Mitchell. (Source: 1News)
'We can't agree to it for privacy reasons, but we nonetheless respect and appreciate it will be happening,' he said.
'In future years we will need to make sure it is included in our terms and conditions prior to tickets going on sale.'
ADVERTISEMENT
However, Mitchell has since had a change of heart after seeing how the drone operated at the event, and described it as a 'great thing' in an interview with 1News.
'Don't view a drone in the sky as big brother watching,' he said.
'They're not there to pick on the end user having a good time and partying with their mates, they're there to make sure everyone's safe.'
That was echoed by inspector Darren Russell at Police National Headquarters, who described drones as a 'game changing' tool for police.
Police inspector Darren Russell. (Source: 1News)
'We don't do that in a secretive way, it's really clear where we're launching from and landing to, and certainly people will be aware that we are using them', he said.
Most of the time the drone was only streaming the video back to officers on the ground. Footage was only recorded and kept if police suspected an offence may be about to take place.
ADVERTISEMENT
'It's very hard for police to be everywhere, so it does enable our teams on the ground to be able to respond directly to anything that may be occurring,' Russell said.
'Likely to become more commonplace'
Emails obtained through the OIA indicate police are planning to expand their use of drones into even more scenarios – including protests.
An email sent by Sergeant Dave Robertson, of the Canterbury Alcohol Harm Reduction Unit, shows just how quickly police are adopting the tool.
'As the technology improves, and Police resources in that regard grow, it is likely to become more commonplace,' Sgt Robertson said in January.
'We are hopeful that the practical use of drones at events may lead to a reduction in the number of Police staff we need to roster/commit to large scale public events.'
Sgt Robertson also confirmed that drones can be used in several other settings, including 'protest activity, gang events, or outdoor concerts / festivals'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Two other examples of where drones were had been used in Canterbury were redacted under the OIA.
Police can also use drones to surveil people's property but this typically requires a specific warrant, known as a Surveillance Device Warrant.
However, they are regularly being used at short notice, and without a warrant, to help police in dangerous high-risk situations according to Inspector Russell.
He provided a demonstration of a smaller tactical drone being used inside a house, showing off its ability to fly in through a window and film under beds, inside closets and enter every room of the property.
This smaller tactical drone was primarily used to respond to high-risk offending, such as someone wielding a gun or in a hostage situation.
'The public seem to accept that and would expect us to use these tools where they are available to us, because it is about keeping them safe,' Inspector Russell said.
'We've got to be careful'
ADVERTISEMENT
The use of the drone at Electric Avenue didn't cause too much worry for citizen's rights expert Thomas Beagle, but concern is being raised about where the technology might go in future.
Beagle, of the New Zealand Council for Civil Liberties, believes 'the cat's out of the bag' to some extent on surveillance of this kind, as people are already used to security cameras.
New Zealand Council of Civil Liberties chairperson Thomas Beagle. (Source: 1News)
He said there wasn't a 'strong negative' about the drone filming from one fixed point at the festival in this way, and the rules police were following were reasonable.
But he felt it added to the feeling of 'being watched'.
'What I don't like about it is it's partly just increasing the idea that there's always cameras watching us, we're always being watched and tracked and monitored, and it's just another brick in that wall I guess, of that surveillance society,' he said.
The issue was not what police were doing with drones today, but what they would do in future, he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
'The problem is that a surveillance society comes on us step by step, it's not like we're just going to implement it one day and there it is,' he said.
It raised the question of what would happen if the Government changed and wanted to start 'suppressing things', he said – pointing out this had happened overseas.
"We've got to be careful about where we go, and we should be setting limits."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Inside the drop in serious youth offenders, and where numbers remain stubbornly high
Documents released to the Herald under the Official Information Act reveal this number was actually lower in January (934, or a 14% reduction) before rising slightly in February. This was the first monthly increase since the middle of last year, but by such a tiny amount (less than 1%) that there's no suggestion of a trend reversal. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has repeatedly trumpeted these law and order successes, though youth experts have questioned how much it has to do with the Government, given most of its flagship policies to reduce youth crime were yet to bite. The exception regarding youth crime was the boot camp pilot, which was recently completed, with seven of 10 participants allegedly reoffending. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has trumpeted the drop in victims of violent crime and the falling number of serious young offenders, though experts and officials have questioned how much this has to do with his Government. Photo / Mark Mitchell The post-Covid spike, then the post-post-Covid fall After the Herald revealed the trend reversal in serious youth offenders last year, children and youth experts suggested it was a return to pre-Covid trends. The number of serious young offenders started spiking in mid-2022, peaked towards the end of 2023, and then fluctuated before starting to drop in June last year. A post-Covid increase in youth offending was observed not only in New Zealand but in several western nations, with several contributing factors such as increased isolation and loneliness during Covid restrictions, increasingly worsening truancy over this period, and a cost-of-living crisis in the aftermath, fuelled by high inflation. February 2025 figures show the number of serious youth offenders falling to pre-Covid levels, at the start of 2020. The annual number of serious and persistent youth offenders dropped every month from June 2024 to January 2025, before rising slightly in February. Graphic / DPMC Several other indicators reinforce this downward trend: First-time entries into the cohort of serious and persistent young offenders fell to 43 in January 2025, the lowest monthly number for two years, and down from 94 first-time entries for July 2023. A 16% drop in the annual number of serious and persistent young offenders heading to court. A 6% drop in police proceedings against children and young people for the year to January 2025, compared to the previous year. There have also been drops across all age groups, though the biggest reductions have been among those aged between 14 and 17: A 16% drop in the number of 14 to 16-year-old serious offenders. A 21% drop in the number of 17-year-old serious offenders. A 9% drop in the number of 10 to 13-year-old serious offenders. The number of serious and persistent youth offenders in the Bay of Plenty, Central and Eastern districts remain higher than the baseline June 2023 figures, in contrast to Tamaki Makaurau, where there's been a 20% drop in the year to January 2025. Graphic / Oranga Tamariki Regionally, there's been a 20% fall in the number of serious and persistent youth offenders in Auckland for the year to January, compared to the previous year. Bay of Plenty, Central and Eastern are the only areas where the numbers have gone up compared to the baseline data (June 2023), though the downward trend in recent months mirrors what's been happening nationwide. The baseline figure for Bay of Plenty is 126 serious and persistent young offenders. The number jumped to 159 in August 2024, before dropping to 143 in January this year - an 11% drop compared to the previous year. 'Most of the increase in Bay of Plenty is due to increases in all offence types in Rotorua,' an April briefing from Oranga Tamariki said. Rotorua Mayor Tania Tapsell. Photo / Laura Smith Several initiatives have been rolled out in Rotorua to combat crime - more police foot patrols in the CBD, and an inner city community safety hub - while there's been a huge reduction in the use of emergency housing. 'Lots of locals are loving that we've secured more police in town, and the feedback from businesses who are feeling more confident has been great,' Rotorua Mayor Tania Tapsell said. 'Rotorua is significantly better now that we're stopping emergency housing motels with support from Government. 'There was a strong connection between a proliferation of emergency housing and crime, so it's a relief to locals to see the end of this.' The region that has not mirrored the declining national trend is Canterbury, where the number of serious and persistent young offenders has been relatively steady since the post-Covid spike levelled out in mid-2023. Since this is where the baseline is drawn, the Government remains on target to meet its goal in Canterbury, even though the baseline figure is much higher than the pre-Covid one. Intensive case management teams have been established in Christchurch and Rotorua, with recruitment underway for such a team in Hamilton 'due to need', an April briefing from Oranga Tamariki said. The biggest fall in the number of serious and persistent youth offenders has been in the 14-16-year-old age group, but the percentage drop for 17-year-olds has been sharper (21% versus 16%). Graphic /Oranga Tamariki Fall in violent crime generally The Government has also been trumpeting the fall in violent crime and the positive movement towards its other law and order public service target: 20,000 fewer victims of violent crime (assault, robbery or sexual assault) compared to 185,000 such victims in the year to October 2023. The latest quarterly figure shows this target has already been surpassed, with 157,000 such victims in the year to February 2025. An April Oranga Tamariki briefing for justice sector ministers revealed other statistical trends to corroborate this trend: The rate of assault claims to ACC decreased by 4% for the year ending February 2024, compared to the previous year. The number of fatal and serious injury-related ACC claims decreased by 8% in the 12 months to April. The national rate of hospitalisations for assault decreased by 3% in 2023/24, after an increase the previous year. The number of family violence victimisations reported to police fell by 2% in the last year. The share of these involving children also fell, from about half of all family harm investigations to 39% in February 2025. As the Herald reported in May, officials speculated whether the drop in violent crime was a return to crime trends between 2018 and 2022. 'If you fit a linear trend to the number of victims of violent crime between 2018-2022 and then project that line forward to 2029, the February 2025 estimate falls very close to that line,' said a Justice Ministry briefing released to the Herald. 'This is consistent with [the] possibility there was a transitory increase in violent crime between 2022-2024 and violent crime rates are now returning to pre-2022.' More data would be needed to confirm this, the briefing said. Other advice from the Justice Ministry said the Government's tougher law and order message - including policies that were yet to be implemented at the time - might also be contributing. Officials also noted more police on the beat, which might have helped the number of violent crime victims fall in Auckland and Christchurch. But the number of victims rose in Wellington, where the police presence had also increased. Derek Cheng is a senior journalist who started at the Herald in 2004. He has worked several stints in the press gallery team and is a former deputy political editor.


Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
High Court case and contentious letterbox drop: Who is Andrew Clark?
An Invercargill mayoral candidate says he is still fit for office despite past events landing him in the headlines and court. Andrew Clark is contesting the position currently held by his brother Nobby, in a move which has surprised and irked his older sibling. In Tasman, where Clark currently lives, he is also running for mayor under the first name Maxwell. The business owner made headlines for a range of incidents following the early 2000s including a land dispute, receiving money from a gang-affiliated event and spreading misinformation through pamphlets. Clark said he gave a lot of voluntary help to people and the issues were 'out of perspective' compared to what normal life had been for a long time. 'We've dealt with everything that comes up in a fair and reasonable basis, and I don't see any issue there whatsoever." In 2004, Clark faced legal action after the purchase of a neighbouring estate went awry. Problems arose when Clark and his partner presented a written agreement which was signed by all parties, only to be later contested for not reflecting the verbal agreement. The elderly neighbour - a trustee - said it was clear they were retaining the house and a parcel of land, but Clark and his partner maintained the $300,000 price tag included everything. Judge Ronald Young said in his judgement he did not find Clark to be 'a credible witness at all'. 'I had the distinct impression throughout his evidence that if he had no recollection of a proposition he was prepared to construct the happening and timing of it to suit himself,' Young wrote. He believed Clark knew he was getting a 'remarkable bargain' at $300,000 - a figure which was at least 50% under market value - and ordered the written contract be corrected. Clark told Local Democracy Reporting the neighbour "begged" them to buy the property with the sale only falling through after the other party pulled out thinking they could get more. He said the judge did not like him and he would have challenged the court ruling if he had money at the time. 'Very unfortunate. I'm very saddened by it all... I wish I could undo what had happened, but that's not possible.' Between 2012 and 2018, Clark was linked in media reports to a controversial Nelson biking event called Poker Run. Stuff reported the event was traditionally run by motorcycle gang associates with money raised going towards Clark's ambulance business Medimax. The events were monitored by police. Clark is still running Medimax and confirmed it operates as a business, not a charity. There were never any problems with the motorcycle group, which was charged like any other organisation, he said. 'These people, whether it's liked or not liked, they live in the community, they work in the community. 'For us it was just a professional role, do a professional job. That's all that was.' In 2018, Clark featured in a 1News bulletin as the man behind a pamphlet drop warning of a potential 8-metre tidal wave if the proposed Waimea Dam failed. Two thousand leaflets were distributed in Brightwater - a move labelled 'dirty and sneaky' by then-Nelson MP Nick Smith. Former Tasman mayor Richard Kempthorne said a catastrophic failure would see water going through houses at levels between 50cm and 100cm. Clark confirmed to Local Democracy Reporting he personally delivered the brochures and said he was just trying to share a risk which he thought hadn't been fully considered. The information included contact details for elected representatives. Clark is one of eight candidates contesting the Invercargill mayoralty this year and said he would move south, if elected. He will be in attendance the Southland Business Chamber mayoral debate on Tuesday. • LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

1News
14 hours ago
- 1News
US tax adviser conned small town locals of $160m in ponzi scheme
For decades in a stretch of upstate New York, Miles "Burt" Marshall was the man you went to see if you had some money to invest but wanted to keep it local. Working from an office in the charming village of Hamilton, down the road from Colgate University, Marshall prepared taxes and sold insurance. He also took money for what was sometimes called the '8% Fund,' which guaranteed that much in annual interest no matter what happened with the financial markets. His clients spread the word to family and friends. Have a retirement nest egg? Let Burt handle it. He'll invest it in local rental properties and your money will grow faster than in a bank. Marshall was friendly and folksy. He gave away gift bags with maple syrup, pickles and local honey in jars labelled with cute sayings like, 'Don't be a sap. For proper insurance coverage call Miles B. Marshall." ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including our first ever espionage trial, the end of an era for Cook Strait crossings, and a surprising survival story. (Source: 1News) 'He would tell you about all the other people that invest. Churches invest. Fire companies invest. Doctors invest,' said one client, Christine Corrigan. 'So you'd think, 'Well, they're smart people. They wouldn't be doing this if it wasn't okay to do ... Why are you going to be the suspicious one?' Then it all came crashing down. Marshall owed almost 1000 people and organisations about US$95 million (NZ$160 million) in principal and interest when he filed for bankruptcy protection two years ago, according to the trustee's filings. This summer, the 73-year-old businessman was indicted on charges that his investment business was a Ponzi scheme. He could face prison time if convicted. Marshall's lawyers declined to comment. ADVERTISEMENT Total losses by Marshall's investors fall short of the multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme masterminded by Bernie Madoff. But they loom large in the small, college town of about 6400 people and its largely rural surrounding area. Many investors were Colgate professors, labourers, office workers or retirees. Some lost their life savings of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. Corrigan and her husband, who own a restaurant 48 kilometres east, were owed about US$1.5 million (NZ$2.5 million). Now they're wondering how someone who seemed so reliable, who held annual parties for his clients and even called them on their birthdays could betray their trust. 'You look at life differently after this happens. It's like, 'Who do you trust?'' said Dennis Sullivan, who was owed about $40,000. 'It's sad because of what he's done to the area.' A reliable local businessman Marshall and his wife lived in a brick Victorian, blocks from his office. ADVERTISEMENT Aside from insurance and tax preparation, he rented more than 100 properties and ran a self-storage business and a print shop. His parents had run an insurance and realty business in the area and the Marshall name was respected locally. Though he quit college, he was a federally enrolled tax professional. To many in the area, he seemed knowledgeable about money and kept a neat office. 'He had French doors and a beautiful carpet and a big desk and he just looked like he was prosperous and reliable," Corrigan said. Marshall began taking money from people to buy and maintain rental properties in the 1980s. People got back promissory notes — slips of paper with the dollar amount written in. Withdrawals could be made with 30 days' notice. People could choose to receive regular interest payments. Participants saw the transactions as investments. Marshall has called them loans. For many years, Marshall made good on his promises to pay interest and process withdrawals. More people took part as word spread. ADVERTISEMENT Sullivan recalls how his parents gave Marshall money, then he did, then his fiancee, then his fiancee's daughter, then his son, and even his snowmobile club. 'Everybody gets snowballed into it,' Sullivan said. A number of investors lived in other states, but had connections to the area. The promise of 8% returns was unremarkable in the '80s, a time of higher interest rates. But it stood out later as rates dropped. Marshall told a bankruptcy proceeding that he assumed appreciation on his real estate would more than cover the debts. 'That's obviously false now," he said, according to filings, "but that's what I always thought.' Reckoning with more than US$90 million in debt ADVERTISEMENT The money stopped flowing by 2023. Marshall filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection that April, declaring more than US$90 million in liabilities and US$21.5 million in assets, most of it in real estate. He explained in a filing that he had been hospitalised for a 'serious heart condition' that required two surgeries, costing him US$600,000. As news of his illness spread, there was a run on note holders asking for their money back. The bankruptcy trustee, Fred Stevens, blamed Marshall's insolvency on incompetent business practices and borrowing from people at above-market rates. The trustee contended that by 2011, Marshall was using new investment money to pay off previous investors, the hallmark of a Ponzi scheme. Prosecutors claim Marshall falsely represented the profitability of his real estate business and had his staff generate "transaction summaries' with bogus information about account balances and earned interest. Money was funnelled into his other businesses, and he spent hundreds of thousands of investors' dollars on personal expenses, including airline travel, meals out, groceries and yoga studios, according to prosecutors. ADVERTISEMENT Marshall's clients feel betrayed. 'We left it there so that it would accumulate. Well, it accumulated in his pocket,' Barbara Baltusnik said of her investment. The ripple effects of multimillion-dollar losses Marshall pleaded not guilty in June to charges of grand larceny and securities fraud. He's accused of stealing more than US$50 million. Marshall's home and properties were sold as part of bankruptcy proceedings, which continue. People who gave Marshall their money stand to recoup around 5.4 cents on the dollar from the asset sales. Potential claims against financial institutions are being pursued, according to the trustee. Baltusnik said she and her husband were owed hundreds of thousands of dollars and now she wonders how she will pay doctors' bills. Sullivan's mother moved in with him after losing her investment. ADVERTISEMENT In Epworth, Georgia, retiree Carolyn Call will never see money she hoped would help augment her Social Security payments. She found out about Marshall though an uncle who lived in upstate New York. 'I'm just able to pay my bills and keep going," she said. "Nothing extravagant. No trips. Can't do anything hardly for the grandkids.'