
Police used drone to surveil thousands at Chch's Electric Ave festival
Police used a drone to surveil thousands of people attending the Electric Ave music festival in Christchurch earlier this year, 1News can reveal.
The drone operated as an 'eye in the sky', hovering at a fixed point a few hundred metres away from the festival.
A live feed was sent to police on the ground and – thanks to a powerful camera lens – officers were able to zoom in on the crowd, monitoring any potential criminal activity.
The public were not warned in advance. News of its use is only being revealed now through an Official Information Act (OIA) request, sent by 1News to police, seeking details of the deployment.
In response to the OIA request, police have released footage its officers recorded on the day, including several examples of revellers being apprehended by security and police. In one of the clips, security guards can be seen pinning a man to the ground, and throwing him out of the event.
ADVERTISEMENT
Further surveillance continued at night, with police using the thermal capabilities on the camera to track where people were.
Police have said it was primarily used to track potential disorder and assaults. However emails and documents obtained through the OIA show they were also keeping an eye on 'fence jumpers', as well as potential drug activity, with the drone team 'monitoring the sale and supply of controlled drugs'.
The deployment was carried out without a warrant, because one is not needed at large gatherings. Police instead relied on public filming rules.
It initially caused concern for the festival organiser, Callam Mitchell, who emailed police flagging that attendees had not been warned about the drone, the emails show.
Electric Ave festival organiser Callam Mitchell. (Source: 1News)
'We can't agree to it for privacy reasons, but we nonetheless respect and appreciate it will be happening,' he said.
'In future years we will need to make sure it is included in our terms and conditions prior to tickets going on sale.'
ADVERTISEMENT
However, Mitchell has since had a change of heart after seeing how the drone operated at the event, and described it as a 'great thing' in an interview with 1News.
'Don't view a drone in the sky as big brother watching,' he said.
'They're not there to pick on the end user having a good time and partying with their mates, they're there to make sure everyone's safe.'
That was echoed by inspector Darren Russell at Police National Headquarters, who described drones as a 'game changing' tool for police.
Police inspector Darren Russell. (Source: 1News)
'We don't do that in a secretive way, it's really clear where we're launching from and landing to, and certainly people will be aware that we are using them', he said.
Most of the time the drone was only streaming the video back to officers on the ground. Footage was only recorded and kept if police suspected an offence may be about to take place.
ADVERTISEMENT
'It's very hard for police to be everywhere, so it does enable our teams on the ground to be able to respond directly to anything that may be occurring,' Russell said.
'Likely to become more commonplace'
Emails obtained through the OIA indicate police are planning to expand their use of drones into even more scenarios – including protests.
An email sent by Sergeant Dave Robertson, of the Canterbury Alcohol Harm Reduction Unit, shows just how quickly police are adopting the tool.
'As the technology improves, and Police resources in that regard grow, it is likely to become more commonplace,' Sgt Robertson said in January.
'We are hopeful that the practical use of drones at events may lead to a reduction in the number of Police staff we need to roster/commit to large scale public events.'
Sgt Robertson also confirmed that drones can be used in several other settings, including 'protest activity, gang events, or outdoor concerts / festivals'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Two other examples of where drones were had been used in Canterbury were redacted under the OIA.
Police can also use drones to surveil people's property but this typically requires a specific warrant, known as a Surveillance Device Warrant.
However, they are regularly being used at short notice, and without a warrant, to help police in dangerous high-risk situations according to Inspector Russell.
He provided a demonstration of a smaller tactical drone being used inside a house, showing off its ability to fly in through a window and film under beds, inside closets and enter every room of the property.
This smaller tactical drone was primarily used to respond to high-risk offending, such as someone wielding a gun or in a hostage situation.
'The public seem to accept that and would expect us to use these tools where they are available to us, because it is about keeping them safe,' Inspector Russell said.
'We've got to be careful'
ADVERTISEMENT
The use of the drone at Electric Avenue didn't cause too much worry for citizen's rights expert Thomas Beagle, but concern is being raised about where the technology might go in future.
Beagle, of the New Zealand Council for Civil Liberties, believes 'the cat's out of the bag' to some extent on surveillance of this kind, as people are already used to security cameras.
New Zealand Council of Civil Liberties chairperson Thomas Beagle. (Source: 1News)
He said there wasn't a 'strong negative' about the drone filming from one fixed point at the festival in this way, and the rules police were following were reasonable.
But he felt it added to the feeling of 'being watched'.
'What I don't like about it is it's partly just increasing the idea that there's always cameras watching us, we're always being watched and tracked and monitored, and it's just another brick in that wall I guess, of that surveillance society,' he said.
The issue was not what police were doing with drones today, but what they would do in future, he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
'The problem is that a surveillance society comes on us step by step, it's not like we're just going to implement it one day and there it is,' he said.
It raised the question of what would happen if the Government changed and wanted to start 'suppressing things', he said – pointing out this had happened overseas.
"We've got to be careful about where we go, and we should be setting limits."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
8 hours ago
- 1News
Two charges against soldier accused of filming sex without consent dropped
Two of the charges against a soldier accused of taking sexual videos without consent have been dropped. Corporal Manu Smith was facing a Court Martial on three counts of making intimate visual recordings under the Armed Forces Discipline Act. In a Court Martial, a military panel made a decision on the accused's guilt or innocence. This morning, Justice Tom Gilbert, who was presiding over the court, advised the military panel that he had granted the defence's request to drop two of the charges. The judge said the two charges were dismissed for legal reasons because, in light of the evidence, he ruled that a properly directed panel could not reasonably convict on those charges. ADVERTISEMENT That afternoon, the accused Corporal Manu Smith gave evidence for the defence. Defence lawyer Timothy Leighton asked Corporal Smith why he had taken out his phone and started recording during sex with the complainant, and if the woman had known he was filming. Corporal Smith said he saw it as a way of expressing their intimacy and that she had seen that he was filming on his phone, and did nothing to indicate she wanted him to stop filming. He said the pair's relationship had been sexual from the start, and they both shared intimate sexual images with each other. Corporal Smith said the pair had talked about boundaries. "Yes, I expected the same respect from her that she did with me, in terms of sharing content with a third party or anybody outside. "...It was a circle of trust, it should have been. I don't want images of me shared with her girlfriends, nor would she want me to share intimate images of her." ADVERTISEMENT Where to get help for sexual violence. (Source: 1News) He said the pair had discussed filming sexual encounters, while discussing their sexual likes and dislikes, and he believed she was open to it. Corporal Smith said he believed he did have consent to record the sexual encounter which was the subject of the complaint, and he said if she had asked him to stop he would have. The prosecution's captain John Whitcombe asked Corporal Smith about the nature of his relationship with the complainant and whether she had reason to assume it was a exclusive relationship. Corporal Smith said the nature of their relationship was not discussed, but he saw it as non-exclusive and he believed she did too. Captain John Whitcombe challenged Corporal Smith's assertion that the woman had consented to the sex being filmed, asking if there was ever an express discussion about him filming on the day in question. Corporal Smith said they had talked about it in a light-hearted, jovial way. ADVERTISEMENT "There was no black and white, no written agreement," he told the court. The defence and prosecution will give their closing addresses this afternoon.

1News
14 hours ago
- 1News
Harvey Weinstein convicted of top charge in split verdict at #MeToo retrial
Former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein was convicted overnight of one of the top charges in his sex crimes retrial but acquitted of another, and jurors were as yet unable to reach a verdict on a third charge. The split verdict meted out a measure of vindication to his accusers and prosecutors — but also to Weinstein — after the landmark case was thrown into limbo. The partial verdict came after an extraordinary day in which the jury foreperson expressed dismay to the judge about how deliberations were going and Weinstein himself urged the judge to halt the trial, declaring: "It's just not fair." "My life is on the line, and you know what? It's not fair," the former Hollywood heavy-hitter declared after making an unusual request to address the court. "It's time, it's time, it's time, it's time to say this trial is over." He spoke before learning there was a verdict on any of the charges. ADVERTISEMENT Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News) This time, a majority-female jury convicted the former studio boss of forcibly subjecting one woman, Miriam Haley, to a criminal sex act in 2006. But jurors acquitted Weinstein of another criminal sex act charge. It related to Kaja Sokola, whose allegations of forcible oral sex date to 2006 but were added to the case last year. And jurors were to continue deliberating Friday on a charge that he raped another woman, Jessica Mann, in 2013. Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the first-degree criminal sex act offense. The jury in the Harvey Weinstein sexual misconduct case listens to a read back of testimony by a key witness at Manhattan criminal court in New York. (Source: Associated Press) Weinstein, 73, denies sexually assaulting or raping anyone. ADVERTISEMENT Jury deliberations had teetered Wednesday. The foreperson — who complained Tuesday that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges — signalled to Judge Curtis Farber that he wanted to talk. "He said words to the effect of 'I can't go back in there with the other jurors'," Farber explained later. The discussion was closed to the press and public, but Farber later said the foreperson had expressed that he didn't want to change his position — whatever it may be — and was being bullied. "He did indicate that at least one other juror made comments to the effect of 'I'll meet you outside one day,' and there's yelling and screaming," the judge said. Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala characterised the foreperson's concerns more severely, saying that the man had said he was concerned for his safety after his fellow panellist talked about meeting him outside and added, "you don't know me". "I don't think the court is protecting this juror. Period," Aidala said, going on to ask for a mistrial. Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo, however, said the foreperson hadn't seemed afraid or apprehensive, just "stubborn". ADVERTISEMENT "He said he'd made up his mind, he didn't want to change it, and people were pressuring him to change it. That's what jury deliberations involve," the prosecutor said. The episode was the latest sign of strain among the jurors. On Friday, one of them asked to be excused because he felt another member of the group was being treated unfairly. Weinstein's lawyers asked unsuccessfully for a mistrial then, and again after the foreperson expressed his concerns Monday. The jury kept deliberating and went through Tuesday without sending any more messages about interpersonal tensions. The seven female and five male jurors started their fifth day of deliberations Wednesday by re-hearing Mann's testimony that he raped her in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013. The group wrapped up Tuesday's deliberations by asking to revisit that testimony. Some jurors appeared to take fresh notes Wednesday, while others sat impassively as court stenographers read aloud the requested parts of Mann's days-long testimony. The jury had already reheard some of the passages last week. Weinstein, 73, an Oscar-winning producer and former Hollywood powerbroker maintains that he never sexually assaulted or raped anyone, and his lawyers portrayed his accusers as opportunists who accepted his advances because they wanted a leg up in the entertainment world. The Associated Press generally does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they agree to be named. Haley, Mann and Sokola have done so.

1News
14 hours ago
- 1News
Atlanta rapper Silentó gets 30 years in prison after killing his cousin
Silentó, the Atlanta rapper known for his hit song Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae), pleaded guilty but mentally ill to voluntary manslaughter and other charges in the 2021 shooting death of his 34-year-old cousin. The 27-year-old rapper, whose legal name is Ricky Lamar Hawk, was sentenced to 30 years in prison, DeKalb County District Attorney Sherry Boston said in a statement. Hawk also pleaded guilty to aggravated assault, possessing a gun while committing a crime and concealing the death of another. A murder charge was dropped as part of the plea agreement. DeKalb County police found Frederick Rooks III shot in the leg and face in the early morning hours of January 21, 2021 outside a home in a suburban area near Decatur. Police said the found 10 bullet casings near Rooks' body, and security video from a nearby home showed a white BMW SUV speeding away shortly after the gunshots. A family member of Rooks told police that Silentó had picked up Rooks in a white BMW SUV, and GPS data and other cameras put the vehicle at the site of the shooting. ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News) Silentó confessed about 10 days later after he was arrested, police said. Ballistics testing matched the bullet casings to a gun that Silentó had when he was arrested, authorities said. Rooks' brothers and sisters told DeKalb County Superior Court Judge Courtney L. Johnson before sentencing that Silentó should have gotten a longer sentence, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported. The rapper was a high school junior in suburban Atlanta in 2015 when he released Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae) and watched it skyrocket into a dance craze. Silentó made multiple other albums, but said in an interview with the medical talk show The Doctors in 2019 that he struggled with depression and had grown up in a family where he witnessed mental illness and violence. "I've been fighting demons my whole life, my whole life," he said in 2019. "Depression doesn't leave you when you become famous, it just adds more pressure," Silentó said then, urging others to get help. "And while everybody's looking at you, they're also judging you." "I don't know if I can truly be happy, I don't know if these demons will ever go away." ADVERTISEMENT Silentó had been struggling in the months before the arrest. His publicist, Chanel Hudson, has said he had tried to kill himself in 2020. In August 2020, Silentó was arrested in Santa Ana, California, on a domestic violence charge. The next day, the Los Angeles Police Department charged him with assault with a deadly weapon after witnesses said he entered a home where he didn't know anyone looking for his girlfriend and swung a hatchet at two people before he was disarmed. In October 2020, Silentó was arrested after police said they clocked him driving 230km/h on Interstate 85 in DeKalb County. Hudson said at the time of Silentó's arrest in the killing of Rooks that he had been "suffering immensely from a series of mental health illnesses".