
Elon Musk's X Sues New York Over Hate Speech Law, Citing Free Speech Rights
Elon Musk's social media platform X (formerly Twitter) has filed a lawsuit against the state of New York, aiming to block a recently passed law that mandates transparency around how platforms handle hate speech and other harmful content. The law, known as the Stop Hiding Hate Act, requires platforms to submit biannual reports outlining their definitions, moderation practices, and statistics related to hate speech, extremism, disinformation, harassment, and foreign political interference.
Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit argues that this requirement amounts to unconstitutional interference in X's editorial practices. According to a Reuters report, companies that fail to comply with the law may face penalties of up to $15,000 per violation per day.
X maintains that the law violates the First Amendment by compelling platforms to disclose 'highly sensitive and controversial speech' and by forcing editorial decisions about what to report. 'This is not a role that the government may play,' the platform stated in its legal filing. It further argues that determining the boundaries of acceptable speech is inherently subjective and a matter for private platforms, not government legislation.
The lawsuit draws parallels with a similar situation in California, where a comparable law was partially blocked by a federal appeals court in 2023. X and the state of California eventually reached a settlement in February 2024, allowing the platform to bypass the reporting requirements.
The New York legislation, which passed in December 2024, was authored by State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assemblymember Grace Lee. The lawmakers argue the law is not about censorship but about accountability. They insist it simply ensures that social media firms are transparent about how they manage harmful content on their platforms.
Responding to X's legal challenge, the lawmakers stated: 'Now more than ever... New Yorkers deserve to know what social media companies like X are doing (or not doing) to stop the spread of hatred and misinformation on their platforms.' They also called X a 'cesspool of hate speech' and criticized its historical lack of transparency regarding content moderation.
Since Elon Musk acquired X in 2022, the platform has significantly scaled back its content moderation efforts. It disbanded the Trust and Safety Council and reinstated several accounts that were previously banned. According to a report by The Associated Press, watchdogs and researchers have noted a marked increase in hate speech and extremist content on the platform since Musk's takeover.
Despite describing himself as a 'free speech absolutist,' Musk and X have also pursued legal action against researchers tracking the rise of harmful content. One such lawsuit against a nonprofit organization was dismissed by a federal judge in 2024.
The platform has also been criticized for targeting journalists and media outlets that have published critical coverage. According to The Guardian, X has suspended accounts and restricted links from platforms Musk disapproved of.
With its new lawsuit, X appears ready to replicate its California legal strategy in New York, signaling another high-profile clash between tech platforms and government regulation over content moderation and free expression.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Oracle cloud to add xAI's Grok 3 model to lineup for corporate customers
Oracle said on Tuesday that its cloud computing division is working with Elon Musk's artificial intelligence firm xAI to offer the startup's latest AI model to business customers. Grok 3 , as the model is called, first came out February and aimed to rival the latest offerings from DeepSeek and OpenAI. Musk made the model available to paying subscribers of his X social media platform, as well as through xAI itself. Oracle will now offer Grok 3 from its data centres to corporate users who want to use the model but need their data to remain under their existing security protections with Oracle, Karan Batta, senior vice president at Oracle Cloud Infrastructure , told Reuters on Monday. Oracle also offers models from Meta, French startup Mistral and Cohere on the service, part of its overall strategy of providing versions of popular models in a way that businesses can integrate into corporate software. "Our goal here is to make sure that we can provide a portfolio of models - we don't have our own," Batta said. "That's the current strategy. We are going to be the one that offers all of them."


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Iran hits back at Donald Trump in fiery tirade over White House meeting claim: ‘Warmonger clinging to relevance'
ran has firmly denied US President Donald Trump's assertion that officials from the Islamic Republic had suggested sending a delegation to the White House for negotiations. In a sharp rebuke, the Iranian Mission to the United Nations said Tehran would not negotiate 'under duress.' 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House,' the mission posted on X (formerly Twitter). Responding to Trump's remarks made earlier on Wednesday, the Iranian mission issued a strongly worded statement, rejecting both the premise and tone of the US President's comments. 'Iran does NOT negotiate under duress, shall NOT accept peace under duress, and certainly NOT with a has-been warmonger clinging to relevance,' the statement read. The mission also condemned Trump's threat to 'take out' Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, calling it 'cowardly.' 'The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat,' the Iranian statement continued. 'Iran shall respond to any threat with a counter-threat, and to any action with reciprocal measures.' Earlier in the day, President Trump told reporters at the White House that Iran was now eager to reopen nuclear negotiations and had even proposed a visit to Washington. 'They even suggested they would come to the White House. That is courageous and not easy for them to do,' Trump said. 'Why didn't they negotiate two weeks ago? They could have done fine… It is very sad to watch this.' Despite claiming Iran had reached out for talks, Trump added a note of skepticism about the timing. 'It is very late to be talking,' he said. 'There is a big difference between now and a week ago.' Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei directly responded to Trump's demand for 'unconditional surrender' in a televised speech on Wednesday, stating that Iran will not give in to pressure. 'The Islamic Republic will not surrender,' Khamenei declared. 'If the U.S. takes military action, it will undoubtedly cause irreparable consequences to them.' When asked by reporters whether he was planning a strike against Iran, Trump gave a characteristically ambiguous reply. 'You don't know that I'm going to even do it. You don't know; I may do it. I may not do it. Nobody knows what I'm going to do,' he said. 'Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate.'


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran parliament ‘burning' American flag, chanting ‘Death to America' amid Israel conflict? Truth behind video
A video showing Iranian parliament members chanting 'death to America' while burning the American flag surfaced on social media amid Tehran's conflict with Israel. In the clip, almost a dozen lawmakers can be seen lighting a paper US flag on the parliament floor. However, the video is old. The video, from 2018, shows Iranian lawmakers demonstrating against President Donald Trump's decision to pull out of the 2015 international nuclear deal. The MPs had staged a protest, chanting 'Death to America'. At the time, Iran's parliament speaker, Ali Larijani, said: 'If Europe and important countries like Russia and China fill this international vacuum (in the deal), perhaps there will be a way to continue. Otherwise, the Islamic Republic of Iran will bring them (US) to their senses with its nuclear actions.' Read More: Who will succeed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei if Israel takes him down? Here are top 5 contenders "They have to know that under such circumstances, Iran has no commitment to remain in the nuclear position it was in before." Re-sharing the video on social media, one person wrote: 'In Iranian Parliament, MPs burn the American flag while chanting 'Death to America,' and threaten to use a nuclear bomb against the American homeland. Iran is a BIGGER PROBLEM FOR US.' 'In #Iran Parliament, Mullah MPs burnt the #USA flag while chanting 'Death to America,' & also threaten to use a nuclear bomb against the American homeland,' a second one said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump said Wednesday he doesn't want to carry out a US strike on Iran but suggested he stands ready to act. The 78-year-old further warned Tehran about American troops joining Tel Aviv. 'I'm not looking to fight," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "But if it's a choice between fighting and having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do.' Read More: Whoopi Goldberg compares US to Iran in fiery clash with Alyssa Farah Griffin; 'They just keep hanging Black people' Trump earlier on Wednesday told reporters that it's not 'too late' for Iran to give up its nuclear program. 'I may do it, I may not do it,' Trump said of a potential U.S. strike in another exchange with reporters at the White House on Wednesday. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' 'Nothing is finished until it is finished,' he added, signaling a decision could soon. 'The next week is going to be very big — maybe less than a week."