Western Sydney Beats the World Four Years in a Row for Community Impact
For an unprecedented fourth year in a row, Western Sydney University has emerged as the world's number one university for community impact awarded by the prestigious Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings. The University outranked 2,300 international universities in the evaluation process.
The University's deep-rooted commitment to improve lives and safeguard the planet through local and global initiatives is gaining huge recognition across markets. Spotlighting India's MARVI (Managing Aquifer Recharge and Sustaining Groundwater Use through Village-level Intervention) project – a collaboration between the University and its valued partners, the transformative community-led program has been commendable. The mission works on improving the security of irrigation water supplies and enhancing livelihood opportunities for rural communities. The project has reached over 3 lakh households in over 20,000 Indian villages across seven states in India.
The University is also actively involved in educating and training NGOs, government agencies, and Indian water professionals working directly on the ground, as part of our commitment to delivering world-class education and supporting the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
According to the Vice-Chancellor and President, Distinguished Professor George Williams AO, 'Our University is youthful, diverse, dynamic and entrepreneurial. We reflect our community locally and globally, and we are part of it. These rankings recognise the work we are doing together to take Western Sydney – and our wider global partnerships – to the next level. We can all be proud of this result. Our mission is to ensure our students are successful, our teaching and research have impact, and we are contributing to stronger communities.'
Highlighting the University's impactful work in India, Chancellor Professor Jennifer Westacott AC, said, 'By training local women as Bhujal Jaankars – ground water informed volunteers – and promoting female leadership in village cooperatives, MARVI is helping communities make informed choices about which crops to plant based on the availability of water. As one of our flagship community-led projects in the region, Western Sydney University is deeply invested in this project. We are also committed to delivering world-class education that aligns with India's skill needs.'
Sharing his perspective on this landmark achievement, Professor Williams says, 'Western Sydney University is showing the world the way. Universities around the world are being urged to return to their primary role as public sector organisations delivering public good. The Impact Rankings recognise that Western Sydney University is the world's best at delivering public good in the communities we serve. It's in our DNA.'
Western Sydney University works in partnership with communities in Western Sydney and globally including in India and its offshore locations in Indonesia and Vietnam to deliver on its commitment to the 17 United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The rankings assess what universities are doing to improve lives based on the SDGs and assess our research, teaching, campus operations, policies and community engagement and outreach. These include climate action, gender equality, ending poverty, providing affordable and clean energy, reducing inequality, industry innovation and producing sustainable cities and communities.
In addition to the overall world number one ranking, the University was highly ranked in the following categories:
4th in the world for SDG 15 Life on Land
7th in the world for SDG 5 Gender Equality
8th in the world for SDG 13 Climate Action and SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
9th in the world for SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals, SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation and SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
10th in the world for SDG 14 Life Below Water and SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
The Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings assess universities based on their contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, highlighting their real-world social and environmental impact. Unlike traditional rankings, they recognise institutions for driving positive change in areas like health, education, and climate action.
About Western Sydney University
Advertisement
Western Sydney University prides itself on challenging the traditional notion of what a university should be. We put students at the heart of everything we do. Embedded in the communities and region we serve, our university is fundamental to the economic, cultural and social life of Western Sydney – one of the fastest-growing, most economically important and most culturally-diverse regions within Australia. We have a network of sites and teaching campuses across Western Sydney and beyond. Western Sydney University has 50,000 students, 3,000 staff, and over 1300 International Indian students, and a strong cohort – both locally and globally – of more than 200,000 alumni.
The University has a long and proud history of increasing higher education participation and opening educational opportunities to students who have the drive, ambition and dedication to succeed, particularly for individuals from diverse and lower socio-economic backgrounds. At the forefront of education innovation, our programs are designed to help address Australia's current and future workforce needs, with our expanding short courses and micro credential offerings helping people rapidly upskill or reskill in their careers and stay competitive in a fast-changing workplace.
The University has been named number one in the world for its social, ecological and economic impact in the Times Higher Education (THE) University Impact Rankings four years in a row. We are globally focused, research led and committed to making a positive impact on the communities we engage with.
Click here for Media Contact Details
Submit your press release
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with Business Wire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
I've spent a decade writing and editing greeting cards. I hate most 'thank you' notes — with one huge exception.
Although I've worked in the greeting-card industry for years, I hate most thank-you notes. I don't need thank-you notes for wedding or birthday gifts — they're often sent out of obligation. The thank-you cards that really matter come from the heart, and when they're not expected. I have a secret: I really hate thank-you notes. Now, for most people, that might not be the biggest deal. After all, the heyday of the greeting card has long since passed, and these days, plenty of folks don't send mail at all. However, those people also likely didn't spend a decade working in the greeting-card industry. There's a big difference between 'obligatory' thank-you cards and ones from the heart Throughout my career, I've edited and written cards for places like Hallmark, American Greetings, and Lovepop. One of the most useful things I learned was a term called "obligatory sending" — the idea that you're "required" to send certain cards if you don't want to seem rude. Most thank-you notes fall into this category, especially the sort that get sent en masse, such as after a graduation or wedding. Let's be clear: I'm not against gratitude, and I understand why my mom insisted I write thank-you notes as a kid. However, in my opinion, gifts should always be about sharing something with a person you care about — not the gratitude they show in return. Personally, I don't need a "thank you for the toaster" note after an event like a bridal shower. The hosts already invited me to share their big moment, usually throwing an elaborate party in the process. Consider my present a "thank you for including me," and let's just call it even. (Rinse and repeat this approach with any graduations, baby showers, birthday parties, or other big shindigs.) This doesn't mean I hate all thank-you cards, though. In fact, it's quite the opposite. To me, the ones that matter are the ones that you were never obligated to send. They're cards from my mentees at work, sharing the ways that they've grown thanks to my help. Or ones I've received during tough times that tell me how much I've helped someone in the past and remind me I have a support system, too. They're the thank-yous that are unexpected, but never unwanted — ones that come straight from the heart. One experience always reminds me of the power of genuine gratitude over obligatory politeness A few years ago, my mom was sick with terminal cancer. During chemo, she had trouble eating and drinking much of anything, and she had an intolerance for any cold or spicy foods. By that point, my mom was reluctant to go to most restaurants. She hated feeling like a "bother" to the staff, and too often, waiters would interpret her requests for ice-free drinks and spice-free foods as high-maintenance customer nitpicking. However, we found sanctuary when we visited a nearby Indian restaurant, Taj Palace. The welcoming staff took my mom's concerns seriously without making her feel singled out. When the owner learned that masala chai (a type of tea) was one thing my mom could almost always enjoy, he insisted we stop by whenever it would help — and he was always ready with a cup (or several). After my mom died, my family brought Taj Palace a card to let them know and, more importantly, to ensure they knew how much their kindness had meant to us. Five years later, the thank-you card from my family is still on the wall, prominently displayed next to the counter. Whenever I see it, it reminds me that even the smallest things, like a cup of tea, may have a huge impact — and that saying "thank you" really does matter, and sometimes a card is the best way to do so. I still hate most thank-you notes, and you won't find me writing the "obligatory" sort anytime soon. But for those who've made a real difference? Well, those are the cards that I'll always want to send.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
The 21-year-old male research assistant behind 'mankeeping' on what the current discourse gets wrong
Men are feeling called out. Women are feeling fed up. But Stanford undergrad Dylan Vergara is just following the data. Since the term "mankeeping' was introduced in a 2024 research paper by Stanford University sociologist Angelica Ferrara, it has landed squarely in the 2025 zeitgeist. Referring to the emotional labor that women often do for their male partners, the concept has since polarized the sexes, sparked TikTok debates and inspired comment-section screeds. Think: wives who are their husbands' best friends, romantic partners and therapists. After learning about mankeeping from social media or buzzy articles, many women have felt seen, vindicated — finally, a word to describe the hard-to-quantify exhaustion of being in a heterosexual relationship! Many men, on the other hand, felt that they were being unfairly accused of over-burdening their female counterparts — or that normal relationship behavior was being vilified (comments sections offer evidence). For academics like Ferrara and her research assistant, Dylan Vergara, it's a big deal for their study to become part of the cultural conversation. But alongside the hype come myths and misunderstandings. We examined the comments from men (and women) and spoke to Vergara, a 21-year-old (male) Stanford student getting his bachelor's in political science and his master's in sociology, simultaneously, about the meaning of mankeeping. The meaning Mankeeping, as Vergara and his mentor defined it, is an outgrowth of a much older term in sociology: kinkeeping. That term was coined in 1985 by Carolyn Rosenthal, whose research showed that women were far more likely to do the largely 'invisible' labor of household chores, child care and simply keeping the family together and in touch with one another. It's a familiar phenomenon that hasn't gone away and, some research suggests, only intensified with COVID and remote work. Mankeeping is the work of the same nature that women do, but in support specifically of their husbands or male partners, rather than the whole family. Specifically, it's about the way that men '[rely] on women as their predominant source of emotional support, creating undue labor on the part of women,' Vergara tells Yahoo. He and Ferrara have interviewed nearly 100 men from around the world, 'and we see that men far and wide, when naming their top five sources of social and emotional support, label their wives, girlfriends or partners as their number one,' he says. And perhaps more importantly, 'a lot of times men don't even have a top five,' he adds. So instead of having that one friend you call about your romantic woes, that other you text whenever your boss is being difficult and a sibling you vent about your parents to, for many straight men, those people are all the same person: their female partner. 'There often comes an inflection point when I'm interviewing a man when they realize, 'Oh, wait, this is a lot'' that they're asking their female partners to do, says Vergara. Myth #1: Mankeeping is just describing a normal relationship It's a sentiment Vergara reports that he hears repeated frequently. 'We are not saying you shouldn't go to your partner for emotional support. Of course you should,' he says. Instead, the problem of mankeeping arises when men only talk vulnerably with their female partners. 'Because men just tend not to have as many people they can go to for support, it's creating a burden on the women in their lives, specifically,' says Vergara. 'Obviously, communication is key to a healthy relationship. But it's also important to ensure that you're not creating some extra labor on the part of the woman.' And it's not just the mankeeping paper that indicates it's good to have multiple people you can talk to — or that men tend to go to their partner for support first. The Survey Center on American Life found that 85% of married men go to their spouse for personal support before talking to any friends or relatives, compared to 72% of married women. And while emotional connection and sharing are part of good relationships, research suggests that at a certain point emotional labor can exhaust people and put them at greater risk of mental and physical health problems. Conversely, people with more close friends are less at risk for depression, multiple diseases and death, from any cause. In other words, there's evidence to suggest that more friends would be good for men, and distributing the emotional support would be good for their female counterparts. Myth #2: Mankeeping is the result of personal failings It's easy to blame the individual men for leaning too heavily on their female partners, but the researchers think the root cause of mankeeping lies beyond their control. 'We too often view isolation as something that's an individual's fault,' says Vergara. 'But it's more of a structural issue.' Mankeeping, he and Ferrara argue, is a result of the much-talked-about male loneliness epidemic. Vergara points out that there used to be many men-only social spaces: barbershops, men's clubs, pubs, fraternities. 'Although we don't endorse patriarchal structures that exclude women, the degradation of those places has had a key detrimental effect on men's ability to seek out friendships with other men,' he says. What was once a bustling social infrastructure for men's friendships has all but disappeared. 'That's led to this female curation of male social and emotional well-being,' says Vergara. The point then is that men's loneliness isn't simply an isolated failing of each guy, nor even of the male species as a whole. Ferrara and Vergara's research — which started by tracing male friendship and social habits throughout history — suggests that it 'affects women and the entire infrastructure of men and women together,' says Vergara. And, other scholars have argued, while women certainly can (and arguably should) care about men's loneliness problem, that doesn't mean they are responsible for fixing it. Myth #3: Men who respect women never mankeep Vergara is a student of feminist literature (among other things), and describes himself as 'very fortunate' to have grown up with parents who each have their own close social circles. Though he did feel lonely when he first arrived at Stanford, Vergara considers himself highly social and has a robust circle of friends. But after he and his mentor published their paper, one of Vergara's male friends called him out: 'He said, 'You also do mankeeping!'' recalls Vergara. The friend pointed out that Vergara told details of his life to a female friend he'd only known for six months that he'd never shared with him, a friend of several years. 'I was relying on my female friend to be that emotional support. I was being that guy,' says Vergara. The moment inspired Vergara to try to treat both his male and female friends better, by opening up more to the men in his life, and burdening the women less. How does he burden the women less? How does any man do it? There isn't a terribly specific prescription yet (though there are men's retreats, and lots of online support groups to sift through). But Vergara, personally, is trying to build a strong foundation. 'I'm trying to just watch myself for moments when I might be guilty of mankeeping,' he says. 'But the deeper strategy is to formulate and maintain close bonds with people other than your partner.' Vergara doesn't have a partner, but he's building the friend sector steadily and practicing being the first one to reach out to male friends in particular. 'I think that goes a long way to ensuring you have multiple pathways for emotional support, so you're not burdening one specific person. I think that's my path forward,' he says.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
I Went Through Sorority Recruitment, Here's Why I Wouldn't Survive Bama Rush
Between the rules, the heat and the dancing, I know I wouldn't last the week NEED TO KNOW A few years ago, I went through sorority recruitment After Bama Rush grew in popularity, so did the national attention on rush I'm grateful I went through the process before it turned into a content creation cycle "Rush" is the perfect word for sorority recruitment, because that's what it feels like: a rush of emotions, feelings, and exhaustion. I went through sorority recruitment my freshman year of college. It took place in the spring semester as outlined by the university, so students had a chance to feel settled before joining sororities. My college had 10 panhellenic chapters, and on the first day of recruitment, the possibilities of joining them felt endless. I've been watching Bama Rush with the same excitement, awe and bewilderment as others, but as someone who went through rush outside of the South, I don't think I would have survived it. At my school, sorority recruitment was a four-day process that took place in one of the local hotels. Instead of sororities being able to have on-campus houses, each one was designated a conference room, enshrined with life-sized Greek letters, the colors of the sorority, and enough tables and chairs for potential new members (PNMs) and already initiated sisters to talk. Similar to Bama Rush, you go through the process of meeting the sisters, and through a semi-mutual agreement, get invited back to certain sororities as time goes on. For those going through Bama Rush, the process starts months in advance. Some girls begin by obtaining a letter of recommendation from friends and family. Then they start planning their outfits, some of which can run the PNM up to $19K, as soon as possible. In the meantime, the already initiated sisters are memorizing choreography for viral TikToks and making sure their voices are loud enough to be carried down Greek row — a stark contrast to my recruitment cheers, which consisted of clapping and smiling at the same time, and nothing more complicated. When I went through recruitment, I picked out the outfits the morning of, did my usual makeup and touched up during the day. Without dating myself too much, the only social media that was accessible at the time was a combination of YikYak, Instagram, and Facebook. I didn't have to make outfit videos, get ready with me videos, or think about making content during the process. Even without all that, I still barely had the mental energy to set an alarm for the next day, let alone post a video debrief on how each day went. The physical and mental exhaustion tied to Bama Rush alone would be enough for me to likely drop out. During rush, ambulances are frequently stationed on campus due to the intense summer heat, which can often cause girls to pass out. The PNMs wait outside the houses in the August Alabama heat, in their carefully curated outfits and fresh faces of makeup. Aside from the blazing temperatures, rush is already a very physical process, as you have to talk for hours on end, actively listen, engage, and decide if you want to keep going. I don't think I have a setting spray good enough, or shoes comfortable enough to last the day. The process itself has gotten more elaborate over the years, with PNMs increasing their spend and already initiated sisters taking on more responsibilities in order to bolster themselves as a top house before the process even begins. What happens if you're in the sorority and can't dance? When you join the sorority, do you start learning the dances? All this to say, it feels like some of the key elements of why I joined a sorority get lost in the glitz and glamour of Bama Rush. Of course, joining the right sorority can determine your social life for the coming years, but there still should be a focus on the people behind the door, the philanthropies you want to be involved in, and the sisterhood bonds you're going to make that 'last a lifetime.' I'm grateful that my recruitment was before #RushTok. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
