Ohio Education Association president speaks out against bill that could close low-performing schools
The head of a statewide Ohio teachers union on Tuesday slammed a proposed bill that would automatically close low-performing Ohio public schools, saying it would harm students and communities, and force districts into counterproductive situations and decisions.
Ohio Education Association President Scott DiMauro testified against Ohio Senate Bill 127 Tuesday morning during the Ohio Senate Education Committee meeting. The bill would revise Ohio's public school closure law and require a poor performing school to either close or take remedial action.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'S.B. 127 proposes a heavy handed and overreaching state approach to local schools that receive low ratings on state report cards,' DiMauro said. 'The impact of the actions compelled by S.B. 127 would harm students and communities. The harsh measures required by the bill ignore mitigating factors, forcing districts to make counterproductive decisions that could harm well-functioning schools.'
Senate Education Committee Chair Andrew Brenner, R-Delaware, introduced the bill last month and no one has submitted supporter testimony for the bill yet. Five people submitted opponent testimony while the Buckeye Institute and the pro-charter-school Thomas B. Fordham Institute submitted interested party testimony.
S.B. 127 defines a poor performing school as a school (district-operated, community or STEM), serving grades four and older, that has performed in the bottom 5% among public schools based on its Performance Index Score for three consecutive years, and is in the bottom 10% based on its Value-Added Progress for three consecutive years.
A poor-performing school would have the option to close at the end of the school year or replace its principal and a majority of licensed staff. Another option is the school could get the help of an Ohio Department of Education and Workforce management organization, charter management organization, education service center, or an Ohio public or private university with experience in school improvement.
Ohio charter schools are automatically closed if they have three straight years of poor performance.
'Instead of offering significant support, S.B. 127 proposes significant punishments that will most likely destabilize schools where many great things are happening, even if those successes are not revealed on data printouts of standardized test scores,' DiMauro said. 'The barriers to learning caused by under-resourced schools and communities do not disappear when a state punishes a school district.
Greg R. Lawson, a research fellow at the Buckeye Institute, said the bill addresses chronic underperformance in public schools.
'Critics worry that closures may disrupt communities, but trapping students in the status quo cycle of underachieving schools is far more disruptive to students and their futures,' he said.
Thomas B. Fordham Institute's Vice President for Ohio Policy Chad Aldis said he would support the bill if a few tweaks were made including revising the growth measure to the Ohio report card one-star rating on Value Added Progress.
'This is a clearer and more stable indicator of inadequate growth, and it better reflects the state's own definition of 'low performance,' Aldis said. 'Combining this with a bottom 5% Performance Index score would ensure that only schools with sustained low achievement and weak student progress are flagged— exactly as intended.'
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Russia launches largest strike on Ukraine in weeks following Trump's call with Putin — as war's civilian death toll nears 13,000
WASHINGTON — Russian dictator Vladimir Putin ordered the largest drone strike on Ukraine in a month on Monday night — just as he hung up the phone with President Trump in a call discussing next steps for peace. As Trump celebrated his significant progress toward ending Russia's war on Ukraine in White House meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders on Monday, Moscow launched 270 drones and 10 missiles into the war-torn neighbor's territory. It came after at least 14 civilians were killed and more than 50 others were injured in a similar Russian strike ahead of the Monday meeting. Advertisement Among the dead was an entire family, including two children — ages one and 15 — their parents and grandmother, according to the Ukrainian government. They were at home in Kharkiv — roughly 15 miles from the Russian border — in the middle of the night when the fatal blast happened. 'An ordinary apartment block … families with small children, a children's playground, a residential compound,' neighbor Olena Yakusheva told Reuters on Monday while fighting back tears. 3 Ukrainian firefighters search for survivors in a damaged building after a Russian airstrike on Aug. 18, 2025. Anadolu via Getty Images Advertisement That assault added to the war's already horrifying death toll of nearly 13,000 civilians — including 569 children — since Russia invaded in February 2022, according to the Ukrainian Prosecutor General's Office data shared with The Post. Put in perspective, that's more than four times the civilian toll of the Sept. 11, 2011 attacks. 'Several children were killed,' Zelensky's top advisor Andriy Yermak told The Post on Monday. 'How is that possible if [Putin] sat and committed to Trump: 'Yes, I am ready for peace.'' 3 An elderly woman stands with her dog near a damaged brick wall in Kostiantynivka, Ukraine, after a Russian airstrike Monday night. Anadolu via Getty Images Advertisement '[Putin] is a liar — a professional liar,' he added. Trump has previously expressed frustration over Putin launching aerial attacks hours after promising the US president of his desire for peace, but he had not spoken out about the latest attack as of Tuesday afternoon. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit,'' he said in July, recounting a call earlier this summer. 'We get a lot of bulls–t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' he said another time. Advertisement Last month was the deadliest since Putin launched his full-scale war on Ukraine three and a half years ago. In July alone, 286 civilians were killed and another 1,388, according to official data. 3 Ukrainian firefighters search for survivors after a Russian air strike on a residential building after a Russian airstrike in Kostiantynivka, Ukraine on Aug. 19. 2025. Anadolu via Getty Images It was the second month in a row that Russia had reached an all-time high in the number of civilians killed during the course of its full-scale war. Also in July, Russia set a new record of 728 drones launched in a single night, blasting past its prior record of 337 set in March. While roughly 60% of the civilian deaths have occurred in communities near the front lines, the remaining 40% have happened far from the war's center, including in the capital city of Kyiv, according to a Monday United Nations report.
New York Post
39 minutes ago
- New York Post
Europe is not prepared to take up the defense of Ukraine
There are many more ways in which a peace process can fail than succeed. But for either to happen, it first needs to start. And that is often the most difficult step. But after his big summit in the White House, Donald Trump seems to have pulled off the unthinkable: A summit has been organized between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky which would kick-start peace negotiations. What did it take to get here? While a cease-fire will not be a precondition, the Europeans have been granted some of the assurances they wanted on security guarantees. Whether these can be enforced is an entirely different matter — but America's agreement, in principle, to help the Europeans meet their obligations does mark an important shift in this seemingly endless war. Since it is now unlikely that Trump will change his mind and revert to the Biden-era policy of unconditional, if hesitant, support for Ukraine, we are now left with two possible scenarios for how the war plays out. In the first, Ukraine and Russia will agree to a peace deal, and the US and Europe will try their best to make the post-war security arrangement work. It is our baseline scenario, but it will be hard to pull off since the question of land is a particularly difficult one. 4 President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the end of a joint press conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025. AFP via Getty Images The starting point of the talks would have to be the existing military situation — not Russia's or Ukraine's maximal demands — and would then need to be followed by detailed negotiations. In the second scenario, the peace talks will go ahead but fail. Trump will then blame Zelensky and actively disengage from supporting Ukraine. Beware of extrapolating yesterday's show of support: The smiles are deceptive. Trump wants to get out. Like the real estate developer he once was, who has first put a deposit down, Trump has invested political capital into a peace process and he is not going to back down. 4 Russian President Vladimir Putin listens to acting Head of the Komi Republic Rostislav Goldshtein during a meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2025. AP This scenario would be very bad for Ukraine and for Europe. America would withdraw — for real this time. The Europeans would be left having to support Ukraine and build a new security infrastructure without US support. This is not really a viable financial or military option for European leaders. After all, their engagement would have to be major. The Ukraine-Russia front line is, at the moment, about 745 miles — around the length of the Cold War-era inner German border. Nor does this include the rest of Ukraine's de jure border to the north and east with Russia, and with Belarus. There have been some comparisons with the situation in Korea — but the demilitarized zone there is barely 155 miles in length. 4 Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks during a joint press conference with the European Commission President in Brussels, on August 17, 2025. AFP via Getty Images Adequately securing such a large border on the Ukrainian side would take a huge amount of troops — one estimate suggests as many as 150,000 European soldiers. This is a far larger deployment than anyone has envisaged; Emmanuel Macron mentioned troop numbers in the thousands earlier in the year similar to the so-called trip-wire deployments in the Baltic States. And even if they wanted to, European leaders don't have the troops needed to provide genuine assurances to Kyiv. Johann Wadephul, the German foreign minister, recently admitted that Germany probably wouldn't have the capacity to send troops to Ukraine. And while the UK might be keen to voice its political commitment to the country, it's doubtful that it can meaningfully back this up. 4 President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025. AFP via Getty Images A RUSI piece last year indicated that Britain does not have enough equipment to sustain a proper three-brigade armored division. Even deploying a single brigade would use up 70%-80% of the British Army's total combat engineering capabilities. There are other challenges too. At this stage, the easiest way to blow a deal, by either side, would be to refuse concessions on land. The Russian claim for the entirety of the Donbas region, including the parts they don't occupy, is a maximalist one, from which Russia would have to retreat if the negotiations were to succeed. There are some commercial assets in the region of interest to Moscow — mines and industrial companies based in the Russian-occupied parts — but it has military significance for Ukraine. In any case, there is a long history of European regions being split. Karelia split into Finnish and Russian parts after the Winter War of 1939-40, and parts of the old Prussia are now in Lithuania, Russia, Poland and Germany. Negotiations, though, will be fraught. But the big difficulty European leaders will face is how to deal with their war-crazed supporters back home. There has been a great deal of cheerleading and regime-change fanaticism in the European political and media space, with many recent headlines insisting that Russia must not be rewarded for its aggression. None of these authors, of course, has a military strategy for victory, because strategic thinking is not what educated Europeans do. They use the passive tense when they speak or write: Something must be done, they intone. Rarely, if ever, do they say: 'We will do this and are ready to make sacrifices to do so.' But we do know the rest of the world does not look at Russia the way Europe does. This Eurocentric perspective no longer dominates global discourse — except, of course, in Europe. It is clear that we are living in one of those dangerous moments in history where fate could flip either way. Yet for all his arrogance, at least Trump has a strategy, whereas; the Europeans do not. Reprinted with permission from unHerd.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Rep. Sarah McBride rips Democrats for not knowing how to combat anti-trans attacks: ‘Can't ignore these issues'
Rep. Sarah McBride, D-Del., criticized the Democratic Party's silence on Republican-led attacks on trans issues, arguing on Tuesday that the party needs to learn how to engage on the issue. 'I do think it was a problem that our party didn't explicitly respond to the anti-trans attacks. We can't ignore these issues. We can't just not respond and leave the narrative entirely to the Republicans,' McBride said when pressed by ex-DNC chair Jaime Harrison on his podcast. Discussing how Democrats should respond to Republicans on trans issues, the lawmaker specifically noted President Donald Trump's ad during the 2024 campaign that depicted former Vice President Kamala Harris as being for 'they/them' and the president as being 'for you.' McBride, a transgender lawmaker, said the party broadly should be focused on a 'diverse working class,' and should reject the idea of 'absolute purity politics.' 'I will say one of the reasons why, the sense that I have gotten from some Democrats as I talked to them, that you often see silence from Democrats in response to these attacks is because, to your point, they don't know how to respond, not because they don't know what they believe or how they feel, but because they feel like there is no way to respond in a way that doesn't result in everyone yelling at them,' McBride said during Harrison's podcast, 'At Our Table.' McBride said Democrats didn't need perfect terminology or to embrace the 'maximalist position' on trans issues, but suggested acknowledging concerns about transgender people participating in sports. Rep. Sarah McBride criticized the Democratic Party for staying silent on constant attacks from Republicans on trans issues. At Our Table with Jaime Harrison 'You can grapple with concerns around, for instance, trans people participating in sports, acknowledge that there are very real questions out there. But who is best able to answer those questions about how to balance respect and fairness in women's sports? It's not 435 members of Congress who know nothing about women's sports and even less about trans people. It's the individual athletic associations that understand their sports the best,' McBride said. The Democratic lawmaker said Republicans were trying to misdirect when they talk about trans people, accusing Trump of wanting to 'line the pockets' of corporations and wealthy people. 'And I think we have to be crystal clear about that while also pushing back against these attacks in ways that doesn't dismiss everyone with a question or a concern as a closed-minded bigot,' McBride said. On Jaime Harrison's podcast, McBride said, 'We can't ignore these issues,' and that the Democratic Party has to fight back against anti-trans attacks. Getty Images McBride said in June that the party might have overplayed its hand regarding trans issues. 'I think that's an accurate reflection of the overplaying of the hand in some ways — that we as a coalition went to Trans 201, Trans 301, when people were still at a very much Trans 101 stage,' McBride told The New York Times' Ezra Klein in an interview. The Delaware lawmaker said many of the cultural norms surrounding transgender people were likely premature for a lot of Americans. 'We became absolutist — not just on trans rights but across the progressive movement — and we forgot that in a democracy we have to grapple with where the public authentically is and actually engage with it. Part of this is fostered by social media,' McBride said.
